a result, there have been many studies on this topic – how to effectively assess individuals onteams. In broad terms, instructors must decide on one of two general approaches. On oneextreme, once a team is assigned, instructors can let each team plan and manage the process forcompleting the project, meaning it is acceptable however the team decides to get the projectdone. Typically, this approach leads to every individual on a team getting the same score. Thisapproach is easiest for the instructor since it really doesn’t matter what an individual contributes.All that matters is that the project was completed. However, this approach can create a lot ofstress for the team, especially if they have different objectives. One student might be
Paper ID #43975Bridging Theory and Application: A Project in System Dynamics CourseDr. Bo Yu, Utah Valley University Bo Yu is an associate professor in mechanical engineering at the Utah Valley University. His teaching interests are in the area of system dynamics, vibrations, and controls. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Bridging Theory and Application: A Project in System Dynamics Course Bo Yu Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering Utah Valley University, Orem, Utah, 84058, USA
Paper ID #42961Board 138: Promoting Sustainable Innovation: Mechatronics and CollaborativeStudent Projects with Campus Sustainability CentersDr. Jheng-Wun Su, Slippery Rock University Dr. Jheng-Wun Su is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Slippery Rock University. Prior to joining the faculty at Slippery Rock University, Dr. Su earned his PhD in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from the University of Missouri. Dr. Su’s research interests are in the areas of mechatronics, 3D/4D printing, and soft robotics.Cameron Casey Constantine, Slippery Rock University Cameron Constantine is currently
Paper ID #41752A Framework for CAD Design Projects: Combining Scaffolded Milestones,Design Review, and ReflectionDr. Jamie Szwalek, The University of Illinois at Chicago Jamie Szwalek is currently a Clinical Associate Professor at University of Illinois at Chicago in Mechanical Engineering and has over ten years of teaching experience.Christopher Carducci, The University of Illinois at Chicago ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Framework for CAD Design Projects: Combining Scaffolded Milestones, Design Review, and ReflectionAbstractThis paper provides a framework
planning committee.Bennington J Willardson, Utah Valley UniversityJanis P Raje, Janis Raje is a free-lance technical writer for higher education programs. She received her B.A. from Brigham Young University and her M.A. from University of Maine in English. She has a particular interest in STEM programs at the baccalaureate and pre- baccalaureate levels. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing STEM Degree Completion: A Framework for the Work in Progress Civil and Mechanical Engineering (CAM) Scholarship ProjectAbstractThis paper presents the practical framework for implementing the Civil and MechanicalEngineering (CAM) Scholarship project, funded by a recently received grant
is an undergraduate student in the Mechanical Engineering program at Utah Valley University.Brett Swain, Utah Valley University Brett Swain is an undergraduate student in the Mechanical Engineering program at Utah Valley University.Sarah Dayley, Utah Valley University Sarah Dayley is an undergraduate student in the Mechanical Engineering program at Utah Valley University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Project-based learning via creation and testing of a silicone venous valve modelAbstractProject-based learning is an important tool in undergraduate engineering education, providingopportunities for students to deepen their understanding
Paper ID #42965Reflections of Undergraduate Engineering Students Completing a Cross-DisciplinaryRobotics Project with Preservice Teachers and Fifth Graders in an ElectromechanicalSystems CourseDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Associate Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons.)Dr. Jennifer Jill Kidd, Old Dominion University Dr. Jennifer Kidd is a Master Lecturer in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Old
Paper ID #43267A Comparative Study on the Role of Bloom’s Taxonomy-based Assignmentsand Project-based Learning on Student Performance in an UndergraduateFluid Mechanics CourseDr. Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Texas A&M University Dr. Arkasama Bandyopadhyay is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University (TAMU). She previously earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Mathematics from Oklahoma State University and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. Her research interests span the areas of distributed energy
Zampaloni, University of Wisconsin, Platteville ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Entrepreneurial Minded Learning in a Core Junior-Level Mechanical Vibrations CourseAbstractThis paper describes the implementation of a project that incorporated prototyping and theentrepreneurial mindset into a core, junior-level Mechanical Vibrations course in the mechanicalengineering curriculum. The course underwent an update that included the modification of ahands-on prototyping project integrating aspects of the entrepreneurial mindset into the projectrequirements starting Summer 2021. The project required that all aspects were verified usingtraditional theoretical relationships, were
) how the engineering design process is enacted in the course and(2) how fabricating physical artifacts relates to course learning outcomes in design and analysis.In this work, we conduct an extensive review of undergraduate mechanical engineering curriculaacross several institutions to understand students’ design and analysis backgrounds prior totaking upper-division mechanical design courses. We also develop two survey instrumentsfocused on project-based learning within mechanical design courses. The first survey focuses onhow the design process is enacted by students during their projects. The second survey examineshow students make fabrication decisions to support their project work.A pilot study using both instruments was performed with
actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests include dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, artificial intelligent in manufacturing, and engineering education.Yusuf Eid, Wentworth Institute of Technology Yusuf Eid received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from Wentworth Institute of Technology. Throughout his time at Wentworth, he studied various subjects focusing on stress and strain analysis as well as simulation-based design. Yusuf also participated in various internships throughout his time at Wentworth, including project management and manufacturing roles
student-generated soft robotics modules to impact the learning andinterest in soft robotics of both the students designing the modules and the students participatingin the modules once they are developed. Our project leverages a course structure called‘engineering clinics’, which are modified versions of capstone design experiences. Within clinics,third and fourth-year students engage in team-based projects with faculty or industry mentors. Theten students in our clinic were split into three teams and tasked with 1) surveying existing softrobotics designs and applications, 2) creating a soft robot prototype, and 3) designing a learningactivity around their prototype. At the end of the semester, student module designers were askedto self-report
mbiswas@uttyler.edu 1 psundaravadivel@uttyler.edu2, and aadityakhanal@uttyler.edu3,AbstractEngineering professionals are expected to conduct various methods of communication when theyenter the workforce. Video presentations are emerging as a preferred mode of communication formarketing and employment processes. However, such communication is uncommon for project-based learning (PBL) assignments in engineering education. Engineering professionals areexpected to bring some level of entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML) skills to solve social orcultural problems with responses rather than solutions. Moreover, the latest industry trend showsthe incorporation of video presentations to showcase and pitch entrepreneurial endeavors.However, such
Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of industries from the petroleum and natural gas industry to brewing and newspaper industries. Dr. Ayala has provided service to professional organizations such as ASME. Since 2008 he has been a member of the Committee of Spanish Translation of ASME Codes and the ASME Subcommittee on Piping and Pipelines in Spanish. Under both memberships, the following Codes have been translated: ASME B31.3, ASME
Students in an Introductory Mechanical Engineering Course toSucceed in StaticsAbstractThis research explores scaffolding strategies employed at Washington State UniversityVancouver to support first-year students in succeeding in an introductory mechanicalengineering course, with a particular focus on their subsequent performance in Statics. As inmany undergraduate engineering programs student retention has been a concern, especially in thelower division of the mechanical engineering program. In the past two years the introductorymechanical engineering course has been redesigned to prepare students for the rest of theirengineering curriculum by incorporating several design projects, involving senior students andfaculty as mentors, and giving
course was developed based onthe seven different process categories of AM. There are three parts to this course: (a) introductionto seven different AM process categories (b) generative design for AM, and (c) design-manufacturing-testing project. Early in the semester, students were introduced to materialextrusion AM and the generative design module of Fusion 360 CAD software. In parallel to theregular in-class meeting for seven different AM processes, students were tasked with self-pacedgenerative design for AM-based course modules. In the mid-semester, a comprehensive guidelineand rubric of design, manufacturing, and testing (DMT) based projects was provided to thestudents. Due to the availability of low-cost material extrusion 3D printers
methods to aid his teaching. He attained a PhD and an MEng in Mechanical Engineering at Imperial College London. Fabian has also spent time working as a field engineer in Algeria, Abu Dhabi and Aberdeen, and as a strategy consultant in London.Idris Kevin MohammedKate IppolitoMarc Masen ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design Week: A simulated exerciseAbstract“Design Week” is an assessed group-based project in the Department of MechanicalEngineering at Imperial College London. It is designed to enable second year students toexperience the entire design process in one week, and apply fundamental knowledge gainedfrom the first year and a half of their undergraduate (UG
, Madison B.S., Mechanical Engineering University of Wisconsin - Madison, Dec 2023Theodore Zheng Hong Lee, University of Wisconsin, Madison Theodore Zheng Hong Lee is a graduate in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin Madison. He is currently a Project Engineer in Alkar Rapidpak.Corinn Sievwright, University of Wisconsin, Madison ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Design and Development of a Pneumatic Breadboard and “Sandbox” for Students in Mechanical Engineering Capstone DesignIntroduction Many students entering senior design have never taken a fluid power course or workedwith pneumatic circuits in any way. Most have only taken an introductory
difficulty dealing with ambiguity anduncertainty when they are faced with real-world machine design problems [2]. Anotherexperience-based skill required by engineers is to move forward amidst ambiguity anduncertainty. Liu and Brown also suggest that including active and project-based learning has thepotential to develop this experience-based skills in undergraduate students. Monterrubio andSirinterlikci implement this active learning approach into the curriculum of a Machine Designcourse by including a semester-long laboratory in which students design and construct aninjection-mold [3]. The authors found increased student engagement and high achievement ofexperience-based outcomes such as effective use of industrial and manufacturing tools such
determine the best method of analysis and likely failure location(s). Whenfaced with more open-ended structural analysis problems, students frequently make incorrectassumptions about two-force members, action-reaction pairs, and internal loads that can lead toinappropriate or inaccurate analyses.Problem- and Project-Based Learning in StaticsPrior studies in undergraduate engineering education have introduced problem- and project-based learning (PBL) experiences for Statics courses that involve design challenges [1-8].Collectively, this body of research provides valuable exemplars about how PBL learningopportunities can advance students’ engineering knowledge and skills, yet there remain twosubstantial limitations. First, the prototyping component
different undergraduate research projects. He then moved on to Michigan State University and took a position as a teaching specialist concentrating on undergraduate classroom instruction. Scott finally settled at York College of Pennsylvania. He has been at York College for over ten years and feels as if he has found a place where the focus on teaching and students aligns well with his background and interests.Dr. Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Stephen Wilkerson (swilkerson@ycp.edu) received his PhD from Johns Hopkins University in 1990 in Mechanical Engineering. His Thesis and initial work was on underwater explosion bubble dynamics and ship and submarine whipping. After graduation he took
that meets twice a week. There is one 50-minute session and one 110-minute session. The shorter session is used to introduce important concepts through a traditional lecture session, and the longer session is used for the laboratory portion of the course.• The course consists of 6 laboratory sessions, a midterm project, and a final project.• Homework assignments are used to reinforce lecture and laboratory topics.Grading Policy:Homework 30%Laboratories 30%Midterm Project 20%Final Project 20%Pick and Place MechanismThe course is based on a recently developed pick and place mechanism [6] that is shown inFigures 1 and 2. The mechanism is a one degree of freedom (i.e., one motor as
earlier, allowing students to focus on‘understanding’ the content rather than just ‘knowing’ the content [8]. The difference being thatlecture based teaching tends to focus on theory and strict processes, limiting students to findingone particular ‘right’ answer. Active learning methods, such as flipped-classrooms,think-pair-share activities, and case study reflections, push students to defy their normalcognitive boundaries of what engineering “is” [9, 10]. This education method can ease the oftenfrustrating transition that seniors experience during capstone design courses where students areexpected to translate isolated concepts learned in classrooms to suddenly very technicallycomplex projects [11]. The frustration that students experience
Paper ID #43071Sustainability-focused Digital Case Studies: Enhancing Engineering EducationDeepika Ganesh, University of Michigan Deepika is a second year Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, School for the Environment and Sustainability. She specializes in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and is curious about informal education spaces, especially outdoor and digital spaces, and their role in contextual learning environments. Her most recent projects include program evaluation for the Next-Gen Scholars program aimed at first generation and underrepresented masters students in her department, and studying
the best!" "No! PLCs (Programmable LogicControllers) are always the best option." "Well, actually, from my experience, NI (NationalInstruments) equipment works best." The reality is that almost any project can likely be"completed" by any of these platforms. As with all things in engineering, there are tradeoffs, andwe should teach students to seek an optimal solution. What that optimal solution is, whatmetrics should be considered, and how they are weighted depends on the application at hand.The point of this work is not to advocate that one is clearly the best but rather that it isnecessary for engineers and educators to introduce engineering students to multiple platformsand help them navigate how to select a platform for a given
, leading to loss of manufacturing competencies; or(3) a generational shift in incoming students’ prior experiences such that a familiarity withhands-on construction and basic tools cannot be assumed [2, 3]. As a result, mechanicalengineering undergraduate programs provide inadequate opportunities for students to develop themachining competencies that they may need in industry [4-6].The engineering education literature contains a variety of machining exercises for mechanicalengineering students. The MIT Stirling Engine Project [2], developed over 20 years ago andadapted by others [7], was designed to provide middle years students with experience in manualmill, lathe, and CNC mill operations, as well as stock hardware, fits, and tolerances
: What Engineering Students Can Learn from Them?AbstractAncient engineers were envisioning all sorts of machines including mechanically programmedones and building them. This study presents recent efforts of the author and his fellow faculty inemploying ancient machines in the engineering and other curricula. A variety of means wereemployed including an honors thesis, an extra credit project in an engineering course as well asan internal project that replaced the internship requirement for a Robert Morris University(RMU) student: i) A double-degree mechanical and manufacturing engineering student studiedthe innerworkings of the Antikythera mechanism to replicate its operation in a powered LEGOsystem for her
courses. Carroll et al. [6]highlight the integration of the ESEMA in a first-year civil engineering curriculum. The studyunderscores how the ESEMA survey reveals significant enhancements in entrepreneurial attitudesamong students, particularly in ideation and help-seeking behaviors. Jackson et al. [7] examinedEM development in engineering students over four semesters using ESEMA. Significant growthin Empathy, Help Seeking, Interest, and Open Mindedness was observed. These findings highlightthe importance of curricular interventions for EM enhancement, urging further research for acomprehensive understanding of EM development in engineering programs.Administered both before and after project implementation, the ESEMA survey consists of 34items
properties of synthetic oils. This was the first demonstration of the work ever done in this field and resulted in broad environmental and cost benefits, especially in energy storage and heat transfer applications. She has more than three years of experience teaching thermofluidic, mechanical design, and solid and structure courses and supervising senior capstone projects collaborating with industries such as Saint-Gobain, Klein Tools, and Parker. She also has served in leadership roles at the Society of Women Engineers and STEM advisory task force to represent diversity and inclusion and improve student success and retention for underrepresented students.” ©American Society for Engineering
purpose of keeping a record of course activities and providing resources to support studentlearning [7]. Past research has shown that syllabi, when properly analyzed, can be used to drawconclusions about the contents of a course and an instructor’s teaching methods [8]. The methodof analysis used in this project implements a Course Change Typology that has been developedas a part of a larger study and re-evaluated using feedback from two previous conferenceworkshops [9], [10]. In one study, the Course Change Typology was previously used to drawconclusions about ABET learning outcomes in engineering courses through course syllabi [11].The purpose of the current study was to use syllabi to track changes in engineering coursesacross five semesters