].The codes mostly fell under one of two main categories: positive comments and negative comments.Table 2 below provides a list of the codes that fell under each category, as well as an example commentfor each one. Table 2: Different Categories of Student Responses with Examples for Each One EXAMPLE POSITIVE COMMENTS About teammate's work, work “He was very good about getting the most out of everyone. Very ethic, and/or personality committed to creating a good product for every assignment.” “I feel that the work has been evenly and fairly distributed across About entire team's work
communication and collaboration in disaster situations[1]. d. Case Studies and Guest Speakers: Use case studies and invite guest speakers from diaspora communities who have been involved in disaster response and recovery efforts. Their experiences can provide valuable insights[15]. e. International and Transnational Perspective: Consider the global and transnational nature of diaspora communities. Explore how diaspora networks can facilitate international aid and assistance during disasters.3. Ethical Considerations and Social Responsibility: a. Ethical Dilemmas: Discuss ethical dilemmas that engineers may face when dealing with disaster resilience and diaspora influence. Emphasize the importance of balancing technical solutions with
some studies found substantial mental health challenges for CSt, rates ofanxiety and depression in CSt did not vary significantly by ethnicity. [26] Similarly, for CSt ingraduate school, there was not a significant difference in motivation, satisfaction, or stress basedon gender. [27] 4.4 Assets of Caregiving StudentsThe studies included in this review catalogue many assets that CSt bring to their educationalexperiences. First, their presence encourages a caregiving ethic in schools. [28] This ethic may berelated to how the experience of caregiving impacts their priorities and goals: one study showedthat educational aspirations changed after becoming a parent as students (in this case, Latinamothers) preferred work that allowed them to help
academia, as postdoctoral fellows, and as facultymembers at universities [6], [14]. Thus, training as well as personal mentoring experiencesshape the ways graduate students come to approach their mentoring practice [6].Other studies have noted some key challenges associated with graduate student mentoring [8],[15]. For one, graduate students struggle to balance the time commitments necessary for astructured training program with coursework and other academic program requirements. Further,we must consider the ethical concerns and risks associated with graduate students mentoringundergraduates due to the power differential that arises from the differences in their levels ofdevelopment and life experience. Despite these concerns, however, most
engineering. We are aware of our limita�ons and blind spots. Through our collabora�vedialogue and reflec�on, we remain open to challenging our assump�ons and biases. We strive toembrace our differences and are commited to conduc�ng research that is conscien�ous and relevant.Ethical Considera�onsEfforts were made to iden�fy and mi�gate publica�on bias by systema�cally searching mul�pledatabases and sources, including unpublished studies and grey literature. The review aimed to include adiverse range of studies, regardless of their outcomes, to minimize the impact of selec�ve repor�ng onthe overall findings. Transparency in repor�ng all relevant data, regardless of sta�s�cal significance, wasa guiding principle. Ethical considera�ons were not sta�c but
standard that I'm held up to at school which causes me to produce, I think, a better work ethic or just a stronger work ethic, that will prepare me for biology, a topic that I know, or a major, which I know and is known to be a little bit more strenuous.And: I've just heard people say it. I've just heard people say that it's strenuous just as I've heard other people at my school say that certain courses, which I'm taking right now, are strenuous. Just with the information that I have right now, I believe that I'm getting well prepared, but I'm not sure which levels of strenuous they both stand on. However, there's only so much I could do right now to prepare myself in terms of work ethic for that course. I
https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/83120. Publisher: Institute for Higher Education Policy.[12] Sally Gunz and Marianne M. Jennings. University legal counsel: The role and its challenges. Notre Dame JL Ethics & Pub. Pol’y, 33:177, 2019. URL https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/getp df.cgi?handle = hein.journals/ndlep33section = 9. P ublisher : HeinOnline.[13] Sandra Coswatte Mohr and Kaye Shelton. Best practices framework for online faculty professional development: A Delphi study. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 2017. URL https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183780/.
research instrumentThis study aimed to gain insight into the factors influencing students' decisions to pursuegraduate studies in engineering. We conducted a survey in the Faculty of Engineering at aresearch-based university in Ontario, Canada. The survey sought correlations between students'intersectional identity factors and family background, their perceptions of the Faculty ofEngineering’s resources and support systems, their lived experiences of discrimination,inclusion, equity, and equality, and their decisions to (re)consider graduate degrees. The surveywas created and administered through REDCap, a secure online platform designed for creatingand managing databases and surveys on the web. Ethics approval had been sought from andgranted by
, industryvisits, cooperative projects, creative activities, exploration of societal and ethical implications ofengineering, and so forth. Because a significant challenge faced by SBP participants is a sense ofdeep scrutiny from faculty, [85] it may be particularly helpful to integrate opportunities forpositive, low-stress interactions into math-intensive SBPs. Research RecommendationsThis study confirms the findings of a previous review of SBPs, which found that, given howcommon SBPs are, there is relatively little research on their outcomes. [3, 4] Further, the findingsof this review match those of Lee et al., [86] who found that most published reports related toSBPs are more akin to experience or evaluation reports than to formal research studies, and
about demonstrating engineering interest throughwatching YouTube videos to learn more about engineering topics and desires to improve theirproblem solving and communication skills, which they identified as important for doing well inengineering.Performance/ CompetenceIn order to talk about counselors’ assessed performance/ competence, it is first important todiscuss the skills they identified as important for being successful engineers. When asked what itmeans to be an engineer, participants gave both technical and non-technical characteristics. Onthe technical side, this meant analyzing and solving problems, developing solutions, andapplying base knowledge to the real world. Non-technical characteristics were bravery,communication, ethics
-conscious admissions as well as similar state laws affected the recruitment and retention ofminoritized engineering students at public universities in one state?, we engaged in a qualitativestudy using deductive coding techniques [13] described below.This study was covered under a broader ethics review from Northeastern University’s IRB for theEngineering PLUS Alliance. As a token of appreciation, we issued a $50 USD gift card forparticipants who completed the interview. The interviews were conducted in late 2023.3.1 Participant SelectionWe contacted prospective participants based on their position within a public university orcommunity college in a state where legislation prohibiting or limiting DEI offices and support haspassed. We found
professional journey includes extensive experience in K-12 support services and fostering collaborative partnerships across sectors. Liliana is based out of Houston, and currently serves as a board member within the University of Houston Hispanic Alumni Network and on the City of Seabrook Ethics Review Committee.Dr. Kimberly D Douglas P.E., Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Over 25 years of experience as an engineering educator and administrator developing and funding programs for increasing the persistence and degree completion rates of STEM students. Particular expertise in creating mutually beneficial partnerships and proAndrea D. Beattie, Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc. Andrea D. Beattie