Technical Educators Board of Directors and currently serves on the Texoma Workforce Board of Directors. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Effect of organizational changes on student retention and engagementAbstractEngineering and computer science disciplines remain substantially under-represented inHispanic, African American and women students. Relative to the population demographicsreflecting approximately 50% women, 60% white non Hispanic/Latinx, 13% African American,19% Hispanic and 1.3% Native American, engineering demographics reflect under-representation. While recent trends reflect significant gains, women remain under-represented inengineering. Based on the ASEE EDMS system, in
appearance whereby the closer an individual is to thecenter of the wheel, the more privilege they are likely to have [17].Reid guided the graduate student mentors through an AWoP reflection exercise after the 2023SIRI session concluded. Students had to choose the identities that resonated with them the mostand then reflect on whether their life experiences aligned with the categories described.Students then had to consider alignments with people with identities different from their ownand those indicated in the AWoP. We asked the students to reflect on the exercise andcomment on how the Academic Wheel of Privilege can help graduate students engage withundergraduates as mentors.Several researchers have used the AWoP as a tool – to determine
engineering reviewed the survey andprovided feedback on survey questions regarding their relevance, wording, and inclusion. Inaddition, we piloted the survey, and over 50 students from the researched university respondedand provided feedback on the pilot version. The final survey was administered in February andMarch 2023. It was distributed to all students at the Faculty of Engineering through theUndergraduate and Graduate Dean's offices, students' affinity groups, the CommunicationOffice, the Faculty social media and newsletter, and informal students' social media channels.For this study, we only worked with independent variables reflecting students’ demographicfactors, examining how these factors could have influenced their decision-making
' critical thinking and problem-solving skills.In project-based activities, participants experimented with materials to examine their light-reflective properties. This material testing informed the design of daylighting systems for modelhouses, allowing students to directly apply the EDP. Through this hands-on approach, studentssynthesized their theoretical learning with tangible engineering tasks, and embodied the role ofengineers in solving contemporary challenges.Tools and InstrumentsQuantitative InstrumentsFor the quantitative analysis, we administered structured pre- and post-intervention surveys toevaluate changes in students' self-efficacy, STEM identity, and engineering knowledge. Thesesurveys, which featured a series of items on a 5-point
engineering students through community building (Evaluation) AbstractOver the past twelve years, the ESTEEM program, funded by the NSF S-STEM, at University ofCalifornia Santa Barbara (UCSB) has supported 161 low-income undergraduate students inengineering. This paper emphasizes the students’ changing needs and what they foundsupportive over time with a special focus on the shifting needs for community building before,during, and after COVID-19 pandemic remote learning. Without additional support, low-incomeengineering students, who often reflect additional intersecting minoritized identities and are morelikely to be the first in their family to attend college, leave the field at
, andalso a component involving the ways the actual work done influences students’ perception oftheir preparation. § RQ1: How does participation in environmental engineering and science experiences outside of the classroom contribute to the ways students construct early career trajectories? § RQ2: How does participation in environmental engineering and science experiences outside of traditional classrooms influence students’ perception of their preparation to construct and participate in professional judgment processes?BackgroundOverview of the STEMcx Environmental Justice ExperienceThis data analyzed in this research reflects the experiences of one intern in the STEMcxEnvironmental Justice Internship. STEMcx is an
not inclusive to people of color, and overt racial incidents. Garcia et al. (2020)revised the model to shift away from a deficit perspective, recognizing the diverse forms ofcultural wealth these minoritized students bring to higher education. The model also emphasizesthe importance of higher education institutions in fostering an inclusive environment thatembraces and amplifies these unique racial and ethnic perspectives.For this study, this framework allowed us to elicit through interviews and explore throughthematic analysis how RDI-supported URM students reflected on various aspects of theirindividual development and their perceptions about the value of the RDI workshop. This studyaims to broaden the applicability of the existing model
learn. For example, according to the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate, a well-structured program should be purposeful (i.e., programmatic requirements and elements should be aligned with specific goals). It should also be created by a process of iterative individual and collective reflection, transparent (i.e., collectively understood by the faculty and graduate students), and accessible (i.e., elements can be evaluated in terms of their contribution in achieving the purposes of the program) (Golde et al., 2006).● A cascading mentorship model works well, in which members of research groups receive mentorship from more senior members and provide it to more junior members (Feldon et al., 2019).● Institutional
be attributed to the fact that GradTrack’s main focus and mission is the preparation ofstudents for graduate school, particularly with their applications. This theme also emergedfrequently in student reflections as one of the most helpful aspects of the program. One studentreflecting on this said: “I also found all of the resources, examples, and a timeline of when to accomplish certaingraduate school application tasks to be rewarding and allowed me to prepare my applications as best as I could have.”Another student remarked: “I found completing my application documents and getting them reviewed to be the most valuable part about my GradTrack mentorship experience.”Further, within the
understanding of these students’ experiences. Todate, the research team has recruited and conducted Zoom interviews with 22 undergraduateengineering students from over 11 universities. The interviews consist of three major parts: 1)Students’ identity and impact on lives, 2) Engineering-related experiences, and 3) Reflection andGiving Back to the community. The details of the bigger project are described elsewhere [17]. 4We adopted narrative and discourse analysis techniques [18], [19] to construct narratives fromthe transcribed interviews. Constructed narratives centered around the final question of ourinterview protocol (i.e., “If you could tell
navigating the complex processof selecting the right institution for their pre-college students. Finally, the third module,"Preparing for College Visits" equipped parents with valuable information and strategies to makethe most out of college exploration trips.The strategic selection of pilot locations for Equipando Padres Academy was influenced byseveral factors, including the imperative to ensure geographic diversity and align with theinterests of our primary funder, RTX. With the grant funding originating from RTX, thelocations chosen—Hialeah, FL; Tucson, AZ; and Ponce, PR—were identified as opportune sitesthat not only reflected high Hispanic/Latinx population concentrations but also catered to theinterests of our funding partner. This approach
to each data set. As this is a work-in-progress, some subsections are placeholdersin reflection of ongoing study. Furthermore, in this paper, we provide high level summaries of keyconclusions from inspection of these data sets. Further data assimilation is ongoing work.1.1 Institutional CultureInstitutional culture in higher education is a vehicle for implementing organizational andinstitutional change [2]. The culture of an institution of higher education is shaped by numerousfactors, including demographic, economic, and political factors, as well as internal factors such asits history, and the processes that allow the institution to function [3]. Part of those processesinvolve things that can be assessed via survey, such as the Harvard
about the value and necessity of affirmative action and diversity, equity, and inclusion(DEI) initiatives, with the abundance of opportunities and vacancies in construction management,increasing interest and participation by members of historically marginalized racial/ethnicminority communities may be an effective way to partially address the growing demands of theindustry.It has been suggested that the phrase “historically marginalized communities” better conveys thefact that underrepresentation of racial/ethnic minorities usually doesn’t reflect a lack of interest oreffort, but instead a lack of opportunity. [2] In the field of construction management, African-Americans compromise only 4.8% of the construction managers in the U.S. in 2023 [1
challengeexternal and internal beliefs about racism, sexism, and classism [27][37]. Another studyexploring belonging in STEM and intersections of race and gender found students experiencedan increase in sense of belonging if they had relationships with faculty and peers in their major,confidence and interest in a major, and a strong science identity [28]. Additionally, women andstudents of color who decided to leave their STEM majors experienced a lack of relationshipswithin their department and low levels of science identity. Marginalized students in STEM alsoconsistently report an increase in belonging when their identities are reflected in their peers,faculty, and mentors [28][34][33].It is crucial students’ sense of belonging is a focus for engineering
scholars of color. Thequestions were carefully worded, asked in a specific order, and included probing questions toseek clarification and meaning. After the completion of each interview, the web conferencingplatform rendered a transcription. All recordings were permanently deleted once transcriptionswere reviewed and cleaned for errors and identifying information.Reflexivity and Positionality. Throughout the study, the research team practiced individual andcollective reflexivity (Patton, 2015) by reflecting on, setting aside, and discussing experiences,values, and beliefs related to the way in which university postdoctoral affairs offices can bettersupport engineering postdoctoral scholars of color both personally and professionally.Reflexivity is
ouruniversity being a second choice, so maybe we might be getting bumped up to a first choice with[changes to legislation] happening the way they’re happening.”We grouped responses from participants into the following subcategories: increase in usage ofstandardized testing; decrease in sense of belonging among students from minoritized groups;decrease in awareness of support for applying; and decrease in enrollment of students fromminoritized groups. We also add some further reflection on admissions.4.1.1 Increase in Requiring Standardized TestingParticipants mentioned several ways that their institutions attempt to lower obstacles to applyingfor admission, such as removing application fees and moving towards test-optional applications.However, Jean’s
, Alegra Eroy-Reveles5 American Society for Engineering Education National Conference 2024 Author NoteThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2113355. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Josephl L. Henry,Department of Sociology, University of California Irvine, Email: Josephlh@uci.edu1 PhD Candidate in Sociology at the University of California Irvine2 PhD Student in Mathematics and Science Education at the University of
might be reflected in the underrepresentation of students with disabilities in thescholar community. Between 11% and 15% of U.S. college students identify themselves asstudents with disabilities [7] [8] and about only 4% of these students with disabilities haveenrolled in engineering majors [8]. As of 2015, while the 33% of the U.S. population held atleast a bachelor’s degree, only 14% of the population with disabilities had reached this level ofhigher education [9]. Furthermore, just 1% of students with disabilities have received a PhDdegree in 2017 [10]. These statistics provide a glance of the disadvantaged position that studentswith disabilities hold, as compared to the general population in the U.S. Given the historicallyexclusionary
influence thatcontribute to the funds of knowledge. Thus, combining them can provide a better understandingof how underrepresented groups (e.g., MSFW students) convert or exchange their funds ofknowledge and social capital to navigate STEM spaces.As stated above, FofK concentrates on students’ families, lived experiences, and communityresources, all of which are impacted by social capital [22], [23], [24]. For example, Stanton-Salazarand Dornbusch [25] mentioned that social capital and FofK are essential for minoritized students’academic success. Their findings showed significant results on how the accumulation andacquisition of social capital are tied to social class, which is also reflected in students’ performanceand access or lack of funds of
internships because they believe companies “preferto hire students who have completed their entire degree program at a single institution." There isno proof that being a transfer student will put them at any statistical disadvantage in the job orinternship market as a student who finished their whole degree at one university. These issues re-veal deeper insights outside of registering for classes and choosing a major. They reflect a lack offlexibility and support for non-traditional students who juggle employment and education, as wellas misconceptions that can negatively influence students’ perceptions and decisions.5 Conclusion and future workRising costs at 4-year universities are bringing a shift in acquiring a bachelor’s degree by attendinga
amongstudents that it is critical to consider social equity in the planning and implementation ofinfrastructure resilience as well as that access to transportation is crucial for overall resilienceduring and after disasters for a community. Figure 3. Boxplots presenting students’ rating on statements related to equitable infrastructure resilience (1 = None at all, 2 = Slightly, 3 = Moderately, 4 = Greatly, 5 = Significantly)Furthermore, the study utilized boxplots to reflect students’ responses related to their interest inworking toward systemic change as shown in Figure 4. The survey included 8 statements: S1.Motivation to contribute to systemic change within the field of civil and constructionengineering; S2. Belief of civil and construction
-boarding activities, researchexperience, mentor experience, program interactions, and reflect on the gains from programparticipation. This study did not include survey data on participants perceptions of the programdue to the limited number of participant responses. Based on the focus groups conducted,participants reported that this experience was highly valued and significantly increased theirmotivation for pursuing future research and careers. Participants also reported that the programallowed them to develop and refine their professional and research skills, enabling them to applyconcepts learned during their undergraduate studies to their research projects. Additionally,participants described faculty mentors as supportive, understanding, and
statistics, but on the retention/graduation rates of those who meet one or more ofthese criteria. This study highlights the importance of institutional data for nontraditionalstudents in engineering and represents new work in advancing a more holistic understanding ofthese individuals.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNumbers #REDACTED. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] K. C. Aquino and S. BuShell, “Device usage and accessible technology needs for post- traditional students in the e-learning environment,” The
program. Students participating in the summerresearch abroad program expressed a positive and enriching experience. They took pride inlearning about diverse cultures and languages. The program enhanced their confidence andresearch skills, providing valuable insights into applying classroom knowledge in a lab setting.This encompassed the practical application of skills (presentation skills, knowledge of software),the transformation of academic concepts into concrete research projects, and an enhancedunderstanding and confidence in navigating the research process. Some students aspired to workand live abroad, viewing their developed technical, linguistic, and social skills as valuable assetsin their STEM career paths. Students reflected that their
representative of engineerseverywhere. Nevertheless, their insights are essential in understanding our institutional context,and can guide examination of other settings.Finally, all knowledge produced herein is inevitably affected by the positionalities of theresearchers, beginning with asking a question and continuing throughout the research process.Examination of the merits of this work should be done in understanding and interpretation ofthose positionalities.AcknowledgementsAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Theresearch team would like to thank the College of Engineering at New Mexico State
positive feelings, stored knowledge, and stored values. We’reencouraged that the number of subscribers of our UDL nuggets increases over time, and theydo respond to the knowledge sharing and advertisement which suggest emerging personalinterest. As to the dramatic drop in open-rate in December through January is likely due to theincreased demand upon instructor’s attention at the end and beginning of semesters. We areeager to see what open rates we will see with a much larger audience after our Januaryincrease in subscribers. We will also be watching if the open-rate reflects the fluctuatingdemands on instructors’ time throughout the year.It has been reported previously that the lack of time and lack of awareness were among the topbarriers for
who are studying engineeringis needed. Future work might include comparative assessments of the perceptions, experiences,and outcomes of CSt who are studying engineering with those in other areas of study, whichwould lay a foundation for developing interventions needed to support CSt in engineering.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under award #2119930. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] Khan, K. S.; Kunz, R.; Kleijnen, J.; Antes, G. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2003, 96, 118–121
general, a broader research base on SBPs is likely to be useful inmeeting program goals.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under award #2119930. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] What Works Clearinghouse Summer Bridge Programs. 2016; https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=WWCIRPS661, Publisher: National Center for Education Statistics. [2] Yoder, B. L. Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students. American Society for Engineering Education. 2012
lecture series program Q7. How did the [component] Mean 3.875 3.333 affect your sense of belonging in the research group? Std. dev. 0.696 0.471PALS surveyThe Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) survey is demonstrated in the literature toaccurately predict the motivation and persistence among students that engage in researchexperiences [15 ,11][19 ,18]. This instrument can assess the perceptions of student’s goals,which include orientations that are classified as mastery (or task), performance-approach, andperformance-avoidance. The revised scales were used in this study to reflect the adaptation of thePALS survey to measure goal