and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Missouri Rolla. Dr. Ertekin has also been a Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE), awarded by the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) since 2001, and a Certified Quality Engineer (CQE) awarded by the American Society for Quality (ASQ) since 2004. In addition to positions in the automotive industry, Dr. Ertekin has held faculty positions at Western Kentucky University and Trine University. In 2010, he joined Drexel University’s College of Engineering as an associate clinical professor. He has been instrumental in course development and the assessment and improvement of the Engineering Technology (ET) curriculum, including integrated laboratories
diligently.2.4. Standardized and iterative formative assessmentsIn this category, alternative grading approaches are applied for formative assessments orassessment for learning [13] through standardized and iterative feedback. In the literature,standardization approaches include specifications grading [14] and standards-based grading [2],which, in our view, involve an explicit mapping between learning outcomes and assessmentresults. Such standardization has also been commented on as an essential element forcompetency-based education [25]. Generally, the literature has reported positive learning effectsin various course contexts such as mathematics [26], [27], chemistry laboratory courses [28], andsoftware projects [29]. Standardization can also
within Penn State system.It should be noted that both MATH 140 and PHYS 211 are foundational courses (“gateways”) formany science and engineering majors at the Penn State University and important prerequisitesfor later work in many STEM disciplines. MATH 140 (4 contact hours) is an important buildingblock in the education of any professional who uses quantitative analysis and includes standardintroductory topics in differential calculus, integral calculus and their applications. PHYS 211 (5contact hours) is a calculus-based introduction to classical mechanics, and laboratory exercisesare an integral part of this course. PHYS 211 covers the following topics: kinematics, dynamics,laws of conservation, and their applications. Moreover, both MATH
) for a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering at UC San Diego. Courses that incorporate the chemical process project are shown in bold. Laboratory and capstone courses where students also work in teams are italicized. A) A 3-year upper division chemical engineering course schedule is typically followed by students admitted freshman or sophomore year. B) A 2-year course schedule is typically followed by transfer students admitted junior year. A) Fall quarter Winter quarter Spring quarter Sophomore Material and Energy Chemical Reaction Thermodynamics Year
considerations are embedded and influence the technicalsolutions. Researchers have been exploring the intersection of these four approaches, intentionalinterventions, unique classroom contexts, and student outcome data to better understand howthese interventions work to support student learning in technical communication and morebroadly their sociotechnical development.The use of student perception data to better understand pedagogical interventions for technicalcommunication learning outcomes has been explored before in contexts such as freshman yearwriting courses [7], design courses [7] and laboratories [8] connecting theoretical lectures tohands-on practice. However, the context provided within this study aligns itself more withpractices and norms
intervenes and uses it as an opportunity toreiterate the educational motivation for being in the class. Students must revise their script forinstructor approval before the email is sent. Despite best efforts, it is difficult to ensure thatstudents do not prematurely approach potential need-knowers.Lesson 4: Preparing for the interview through laboratory practice. One laboratory section isdedicated to introducing and practicing interview methods that promote respectful interactions,such as the master-apprentice model for contextual inquiry, the consent to record process,reminding interviewees that they can stop the interview at any time, etc. We intersperse activitieswith reflections regarding the effectiveness and experiences of both student
limited to additional examples, practice quizzes, anddetailed homework solutions. All responses associated with Topic 1 were subsequently assignedto a theme of “problem solving”. Topic 4 referred to student concerns about sufficient TAassistance in explaining and completing laboratories and other experiential or active learningactivities; this topic was placed into a theme labelled “experiential learning.” Both Topic 2 andTopic 3 indicated students' preferences for increased interaction with TAs, including extendedoffice hours, online (Zoom) meetings, email correspondence, and other forms of question-and-answer engagement. These codes were combined under a single theme of “TA-studentinteractions”. These three themes are all an essential aspect of
Colombia, working with undergraduate and graduate students. My doctoral research focused on electronic devices for recording and stimulation of Obstructive Sleep Apnea, obtaining a Cum Laude distinction and experience in neuromodulation. I am currently a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas at Austin working on the development of portable focused ultrasound neurostimulation technologies in the laboratory of Dr. Huiliang Wang, an expert in optogenetics and sonogenetics.Prof. Huiliang Wang, University of Texas at Austin Huiliang (Evan) Wang is an Assistant professor at the Biomedical Engineering department at the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin). His research is on neuro-engineering technologies
Paper ID #42406Extra Credit Analysis of Undergraduate Engineering StudentsTushar Ojha, University of New Mexico Tushar Ojha is a graduate (PhD) student in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico (UNM). His work is focused on researching and developing data-driven methods for analyzing and predicting outcomes in the higher education space. He works as a Data Scientist for the Institute of Design & Innovation (IDI), UNM.Don Hush, University of New Mexico Dr. Hush has worked as a technical staff member at Sandia National Laboratories, a tenure-track professor in the ECE
anundergraduate Engineering Leadership class at Texas A&M University. This technology alreadyshows the potential to dramatically change the trajectory of careers; many fear the elimination of jobs.At the same time, others believe that GenAI will create entire new fields of employment andopportunity. Meanwhile, parallel concerns are detrimental effects on cybersecurity and privacy. Aportion of our course content covers the broad topic of data innovations, including GenAI. The lecturethat includes this topic provides connection to servant leadership. Our guiding principle is to practicemastery of this technology in ways that enhance humanity and promote transparency. A keyassignment includes prompts for associated laboratory teams to grapple with
laboratory under Professor Mircea Teodorescu. He has previously served as the president for both robotics club Slugbotics and the student organization the Sustainability Lab; now, Eliot serves as Electrical Systems Lead for FSAE team Formula Slug and as Secretary to the UC Santa Cruz Engineers Without Borders chapter. Above all, Eliot strives to solve problems and build the technical skills of himself and his peers.Mr. Qingyuan Cao, University of California, Santa Cruz Qingyuan Cao is a 3rd year Robotics Engineering undergraduate at UC Santa Cruz. He currently serves as the president of the UCSC Rocket Team, which competes in the NASA Student Launch Competition. He has participated with the experiential learning
COVID, we will elaborate more on how these commonalities wereembedded into the REM program design.Timeline of the PartnershipThere was a lot of adapting from the first pilot of the REM program in 2019 to its present form in2023 (see Figure 1). The original pilot in 2019 had only 3 REM students and 3 REM teachers. Figure 1: A timeline of the CISTAR – NSBE SEEK partnership.After the successful pilot in summer of 2019, the next year had COVID shutting down all in-person summer programs. NSBE SEEK was able to pivot to virtual programs in 2020. Withuniversity laboratories closed and having predominantly experimental research projects, it tooklonger for CISTAR to pivot and offer the program virtually. Thus, in the summer of 2020
Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2010.[9] Chien, Yu-Hung, Chia-Yu Liu, Shaio-Chung Chan, and Yu-Shan Chang, "Engineering Design Learning for High school and College First-year Students in a STEM Battlebot Design Project," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2023.[10] Tenenbaum, Laura S., Margery K. Anderson, Swati B. Ramadorai, and Debra L. Yourick., "High school students' experience with near-peer mentorship and laboratory-based learning: In their own words," Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, vol. 18, 2017.[11] Price, M., Kallam, M., & Love, J., "The learning styles of Native American students and implications for classroom practice," In Eighth Native American
Mexico where he became professor and Provost & EVP for academic affairs between 2011 and 2018. Since 2018, he is the Executive Vice President for Research at Georgia Tech & professor of ECE. Professor Abdallah conducts research and teaches courses in the general area of systems theory with focus on control and communications systems. His research has been funded by national funding agencies, national laboratories, and by various companies. He has also been active in designing and implementing various international graduate programs with Latin American and European countries. He was a co-founder in 1990 of the ISTEC consortium, which currently includes more than 150 universities in the US, Spain, and Latin
Paper ID #42682EmPOWERing a Sustainable Energy Future through Interconnected Curricularand Co-Curricular PedagogiesProf. Jeffrey M. Bielicki, The Ohio State University Dr. Bielicki is the Program Director and Principal Investigator of the OSU EmPOWERment Program on convergent graduate training for a sustainable energy future. He is also research lead for Sustainable Energy for the OSU Sustainability Institute and he runs the Energy Sustainability Research Laboratory where he and his students research issues in which energy and environmental systems and policy interact, specifically on topics related to carbon management
and readings, and students gain hands-onexperience in structured laboratory exercises. The laboratory exercises provide experience withmixture design and material testing that will become critical when the project begins. Thelectures include specialized content regarding the rheology of cementitious materials and thefundamentals of 3D printing as students begin to work on the project. The timeline for theexperimentation and subsequent deliverables under this project is organized as follows:(i)Experimental Mixture Development and Test Development Report Submission: Thebrief, memorandum report detailing the experimental process and test development for themortar mixture is submitted two weeks after the project is initiated. The report composes
programs that involved students in the on-going activities of the institution andacquainted them with older professionals, who could potentially serve as mentors, wereincorporated into the sequense of recommended activities [11], [17]. Since today’s collegestudents are deeply motivated by large scale problems and environmental issues [18], significanteffort was expended in helping them to select broad, diverse faculty-directed projects orientedtoward the Grand Challenges for their initial research team experiences, where possible [19]. Asrising sophomores, the RS students participated in the Louis Stokes Alliance of MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) program [20], becoming team members within an experimental laboratory,directly participating in the
Paper ID #42410Credit-Hour Analysis of Undergraduate Students Using Sequence DataTushar Ojha, University of New Mexico Tushar Ojha is a graduate (PhD) student in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of New Mexico (UNM). His work is focused on researching and developing data driven methods that are tailored to analyzing/predicting outcomes in the higher education space. He works as a Data Scientist for the Institute of Design & Innovation (IDI), UNM.Don Hush, University of New Mexico Dr. Hush has worked as a technical staff member at Sandia National Laboratories, a tenure-track
, in 1985, 1986 and 1989, respectively. He was with MIT Lincoln Laboratory from June 1989 to July 1994, as a member of technical staff. During the academic year 1993-94, he was a visiting lecturer at MIT and an adjunct professor at Northeastern University. From August 1994 to July 1998, he was with the ECE Dept., University of Wisconsin, Madison. He was with Boston University from August 1996 to June 2001. He is currently a Distinguished Professor with the Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department, UC San Diego. His current research interests are 3D video processing, machine learning with applications in health monitoring/analysis and 3D modelling. He is the coauthor (with Prof. Gilbert Strang) of a
assignments. There will be more data collection for future course offeringsof non-design courses including Process Control, System Dynamics and Control, EnergyConversion and Experimental Measurements Laboratory. Moreover, incremental changes in thecourse assignments, including incorporation of micro-assignments related to EML outcomes, andrevision of instructions and resources for digital communication, along with assessment tools willbe made based on student feedback and faculty input after each semester. This study along withother future studies can be carried out to focus on exploration of other EML outcomes such ascreating value.7. AcknowledgementsThis content was created through the author’s work with the Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork
offer results of and discussion on twosurveys from the Fall 2023 course on student perceptions about networking. All this is intended toassist faculty and students as preparation for fulfillment and success in whatever they undertake, bothduring and after college.Background on Engineering Leadership CourseEnrollment in our engineering leadership course typically runs over 80 students per semester. Thecourse includes two credit hours of lecture and one for laboratory. We aspire to help students grow inskills for emotional maturation, collaboration, and team and organizational leadership. Our frameworkis the remarkable similarity of engineering and leadership skills [4]. When we appreciate the pertinentcharacteristics of people as individuals and
authority figures visiting campuses and creatingnarratives based on conversations. By the mid-20th century, as business practices that focused onquality and efficiency gained social and economic dominance in the U.S. and statistical analysisbecame the preferred methods of evaluation, these new, competition- and ranking-orientedapproaches fit with the increased enrollment in U.S. colleges and universities (Wilbers &Brankovic, 2023). Additionally, particularly in STEM education and research, a realization thatadvances in technology, science, and engineering were crucial to national Cold War effortsrequired schools to constantly be evaluated to receive federal funding for more sophisticated andexpensive laboratories (Apple, 2019; Seeley, 1999
research groups [7]. The interactions of thesetwo factors (e.g., advisors and peers) play a crucial role in a student's performance in researchenvironments [7]. Graduate students are often engaged in faculty-led laboratories (or research groups) andcollaborative teams as students develop both their teaching and research skills [7, 16, 17].Depending on the size of the research group, faculty advisors' roles and interactions might vary(e.g., large-size, mid-size, or sub-size) [7]. Crede and Borrego found that there were substantialdifferences in the perceived roles and interactions between faculty and graduate students acrossdifferent sized labs [7]. In particular, large-sized groups appeared to be run more like smallbusinesses (i.e
Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of industries from the petroleum and natural gas industry to brewing and newspaper industries. Dr. Ayala has provided service to professional organizations such as ASME. Since 2008 he has been a member of the Committee of Spanish Translation of ASME Codes and the ASME Subcommittee on Piping and Pipelines in Spanish. Under both memberships, the following Codes have been translated: ASME B31.3, ASME
means to study andwork as a civil engineer.The syllabus states “Through a series of hands-on laboratory experiments, students will developworking knowledge in the use and application of modern engineering tools and techniques requiredfor engineering practice.” The syllabus is admittedly too vague and was partially adapted from aprevious version of a first-year engineering course. The authors will revise the course objectivesfor future versions of the course to be more in line with the three goals listed above.Design of CourseTo meet the three course goals described above, we used the following simple approach to designthe course modules: 1) identify a subdiscipline of civil engineering, 2) identify a physical conceptthat is relevant to that
exchanged between researchers, although they have notbeen easily searchable or available to the public until the early days of the internet.First established at Los Alamos National Laboratory in 1991, the pioneering arXiv repositoryenabled the sharing of high-energy physics preprints [13]. This open access platform is nowhoused at Cornell University. arXiv paved the way for the proliferation of other preprintrepositories across disciplines over the subsequent three decades, such as bioRxiv and medRxiv[14].These repositories are excellent at featuring recently-posted articles but lack optimization forsearching with specific syntax and facet limiting, which engineering librarians are accustomed todoing.In the last five years, traditional subscription
recent graduates and current students in theMechanical Engineering (ME), Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET), Manufacturing SystemsEngineering (MSE), and Master of Science in Systems Engineering (MSSE) programs. Beginning in May2023, the teams commenced work on the project. A laboratory / project space was established in theNoorda Building on the WSU main campus where the CHRD development team began development ofthe enhanced instrumentation and control suite as well as various design and functional upgrades to therocket motor hardware. The materials development team worked in conjunction with the engineeringand technical staff at MARS, located approximately 10 miles from the WSU main campus, to produce therequired test articles. Multiple
peer-to-peer interaction on average compared to the SpringSemesters. When considering other variables that influenced this phenomenon in the data, it wasfound that more lab classes were offered in the Fall than in the Spring. Since most lab activitiesin the civil engineering department are executed in groups, there is naturally more opportunityfor peer-to-peer interaction to be embedded in the course syllabi. This is consistent with thecommentary of Fiesel and Rosa on the objective of laboratory activities in undergraduateengineering education, specifically, to “work effectively in teams, including [a] structure [for]individual and joint accountability; assign roles, responsibilities, and tasks; monitor progress;meet deadlines; and integrate
laboratory with equipment to handle.” [interviewee 2] Moreover, PBL proves to be an efficient methodology when there is a reduction in thescope of the course or limited time for the development of skills and competencies. In suchscenarios, students take on the responsibility of selecting the necessary information to address theproblem at hand. This approach allows students to establish a foundational understanding anddelve into topics of greater interest or relevance, transitioning from a macro to a microperspective. As articulated by respondent 5: “Accomplish a reduction in scope without losing a connection with reality and the student’s needs.” [interviewee 5] PBL