reviews are a type of literature review that takes a systematic approach to search,review, and synthesis of information on a defined topic. A well-designed review will achieve“exhaustive and comprehensive searching”[1] for relevant evidence while minimizing selectionbias. As the volume of scientific publications has surged exponentially over the past severaldecades [2], with a recent study showing that the number of publications in the Physical andTechnical Sciences doubles every 11.9 years [3], the need for systematic reviews to collate andsynthesize all this research has become critical. The general field of engineering has seen the risein published research review papers that many other fields have seen recently [4-6]. Conversely,performing
confidence.1. IntroductionChoosing a major is a pivotal decision in a student's academic journey, setting the course fortheir future career and professional development [1], [2], [3], [4]. Engineering is a cornerstone ofmodern society, driving innovation, solving complex problems, and improving the quality of lifefor people around the globe. As a field of study covering a broad range of disciplines, includingmechanical, electrical, civil, and computer engineering, engineering offers diverse career pathsand opportunities. However, the decision to pursue a major in engineering is not one to be takenlightly, given its rigorous curriculum and the demands of the profession. As a result,understanding engineering as a major is paramount, not only for
assess the creative climate of graduate-levelengineering education and account for academia’s complex interpersonal relationships andorganizational structures. Results demonstrate that many of the creative climate dimensions areabsent from research group and classroom environments in graduate-level engineering education.This paper is one of the first to explore engineering graduate students’ perceptions of creativitywithin their academic and research environments and offers implications for how graduate-levelengineering education can better foster creativity.1. Introduction and Review of Relevant LiteratureEngineering is a creative act. At its core, the profession of engineering is focused on developingcreative and novel solutions to complex
, time management, conflicts between members of a teamand intensity of building tasks and fabrication. Overall, design-build as an instructional deliverymode has shown to present merit in conveying construction fundamental knowledge, however,challenges with time and group size seem to impact the overall efficiency of the model.Keywords: Design-build, Instructional Delivery Method, Construction Education, StudentPerceptionIntroductionConstruction education has undergone significant evolution in recent years, responding to theever-changing needs of the construction industry [1], [2], [3]. To adapt to this change,universities and construction programs have developed different approaches in their courseworkand curricula, moving away from traditional
interviewed faculty members,ensuring a diverse sample for interviews and facilitating a standardized comparison with facultyresponses. Gender and racial diversity were maximized in the student sample to ensure that theperspectives and voices of minoritized students were captured, as inclusive teaching is vital for alllearners and can be especially impactful for students who are not from a dominant background.Qualitative interviews were conducted to explore beliefs, practices, and perceptions surroundinginclusive teaching. The interviews were based on the following questions: 1. What lessons, actions, or activities have you provided/been provided to foster inclusivity in the engineering environment? 2. What are some characteristics of an
constructionstudent sleep patterns and their expected sleep patterns in their professional careers.BackgroundSleep-related issues including sleepiness, sleep deprivation, and irregular sleep time are among thechallenges that students at the college level are overwhelmingly dealing with during their studiesas 50% report daytime sleepiness and 70% do not gain sufficient sleep time [1]. Jalan, Priya, andG. R [2] explored sleep awareness among college students and concluded that the majority ofcollege students are suffering from sleep deprivation. Xu et al. [3] explored the effect of physicalexercise on sleep quality and the mediating effect of smartphone use behavior among Chinesecollege students which they conducted a cross-sectional study design with 5,075
) have emerged as a pivotal component in highereducation, significantly benefiting students, faculty, and universities alike [1], [2], [3]. Theseprograms offer a unique combination of hands-on research experience and mentorship,enhancing students' learning and career trajectories [4]. A notable initiative in this regard is theResearch Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) funded by the National Science Foundation(NSF) [5] which highlights the importance of such programs in science, engineering, andmathematics [6]. These REUs consist of ten or so undergraduates who work in the researchprograms of the REU host universities across the United States [7].One of the primary benefits of URPs is their influence on students' decisions to pursue
studentsexplored multiple elements of the design process and had the opportunity to discover their idealdesign signature. During the delivery of the seminar, the education team wrote weekly reflectionsto capture their adaptation experiences. Using qualitative methods, we analyzed the educationteam’s structured reflections. The thematic analysis resulted in three emergent themes: 1) Ithought this would be easier, 2) acting on values, and 3) teaching as an educational journey. Wediscuss these themes in light of positioning theory and the norms that early career instructorsmay find themselves working within.IntroductionStephanie Cutler and Alexandra Coso Strong (2023) bring awareness to the lack of discussionabout faculty as people in engineering education
engineering identity development,contributing to our understanding of this important, complex, and dynamic process.IntroductionSeveral factors have been shown to influence an engineering student’s ability to recognize andidentify themselves as an engineer, including personal academic achievement, experience in theengineering field, acceptance of family legacies, or a combination of other factors [1], [2], [3].As an engineering student experiences and accepts these factors, they can better envision andrealize their potential as an engineer. However, due to their diverse backgrounds and priorknowledge, we know that students have differing definitions of what it means to be a ‘successfulengineer’ [4], [5]. While some students base their definitions on
University of Applied Sciences Alexander Strutzenberger is currently studying Automotive Engineering at Joanneum University of Applied Sciences. Prior to his studies he visited a secondary school with a focus on natural sciences. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Swarm Behavior: An Undergraduate Project in Physics and Computer ProgrammingGünter Bischof 1, Konrad Dobetsberger 1, Markus Ensbacher 1, Christian J. Steinmann 1, 2, andAlexander Strutzenberger 11 Joanneum University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Automotive Engineering, Graz, Austria2 HM&S IT Consulting, Graz, AustriaAbstract – Collective motion, epitomized by the fascinating spectacle
research to describe mental health. The researchmethods employed in these publications, populations that were under study in each article, and thenumber of publications written by a collaboration between STEM and Mental health experts.Next, we will report on the findings in each of these categories.Temporal trends in mental-health-related publications. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution ofthese publications across the years. It shows a small but steady increase in the number ofpublications each year prior to the COVID-19 global pandemic. Figure 1 further shows thatpublication rates surged dramatically during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating anincreased interest within the research community concerning the mental health of
first-year engineering graduate students’ initial goals were when entering theirgraduate programs and how those goals may have evolved over the course of their first year. Inthis longitudinal qualitative study, we interviewed the participants four times throughout the courseof their first academic year: (1) during the first semester, (2) between the first and secondsemesters, (3) after the second semester, and (4) at the end of the first summer of graduate school.Using thematic trajectory analysis, we determined what students’ goals were at the start of gradschool and how they may have changed. Findings indicate that students’ goal extensions fluctuatedthroughout the year and ultimately became more short-term by the end of the first year
significantly weighed by students. Institutions can use these discoveriesto know what information to present to students and which program design considerations seemto matter to students as they seek to build interest in a specific study abroad program.IntroductionIt is valuable for engineering programs to help their students develop global engineeringcompetencies before they enter increasingly international workplaces [1], [2], [3]. One way thatengineering programs encourage global engineering competency is through study abroadprograms. Studying abroad helps students develop their global attitudes and perspectives andapply their global competencies in an authentic context [4], [5]. Studying abroad can have highbarriers to entry, with factors such as
, Morgan State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring the Impact of Exposing Command Line Programming to Early CS Majors (An HBCU Case Study)AbstractLearning to program is an essential part of developing computational skills amongst computerscience (CS) majors. Yet, CS majors can encounter programming as a barrier and in many casesleave the field altogether. The learning process that CS majors encounter while developing theirprogramming skills is multifaceted. They are expected to: 1) grasp necessary programmingconcepts, paradigms, and data structures, 2) become adept with employing the appropriate syntaxand semantics for a given programming language used for code
study sheets and underscores the complexity of theirimpact on student learning. The implications of the findings for future research are alsodiscussed.IntroductionThe evaluation of students' understanding of engineering course concepts through closed-book,time-limited examinations has faced criticism, with concerns raised about its efficacy inpromoting a deep understanding of critical concepts [1]. Critics argue that this approach oftenleads to memorization without fostering genuine comprehension [2]. In response, some suggestalternative examination formats, such as permitting the use of study sheets during examination.These study sheets, also known as study guides or cheat sheets, serve as concise summaries ofcrucial course concepts, offering
these identities, whetherpersonal and social, engineering, or ethical, on the establishment of public policy as a careerpathway for engineers. In this theory paper, we aim to explore (1) what theoretical constructs aremost prevalent among several theories for each form of identity development (personal andsocial, engineering, and ethical), and (2) whether these various identities have the potential to beleveraged in the establishment of a policy career pathway. We review the existing literature onthe identity of engineers (including personal and social, engineering, and ethical) and considerthe relation between these identities and public policy as a career for engineers. To complementthe literature review, we provide examples from interviews
the landscape of engineering academia, the underrepresentation of Latinx/Hispanic professorsis a significant challenge, as highlighted by the ASEE report, "Engineering by the Numbers,"which revealed that only 3.6% of faculty appointments in engineering are held byLatinx/Hispanic individuals [1]. While many programs emphasize increasing the Latinx/Hispanicpipeline into engineering doctoral programs and academic careers, there remains a distinct gap inaddressing the unique challenges and experiences faced by Latinx/Hispanic faculty members.Several factors contribute to the underrepresentation of Latinx/Hispanic professors inengineering academia. These include systemic barriers, such as lack of access to educationalresources, cultural biases
support for establishing collaborative efforts, underscores the necessity for a multi-faceted doctoral training approach to support doctoral students more effectively.We believe that the insights reported here will help in designing support systems that willempower faculty to contribute to the training of doctoral workforce for the benefit of society atlarge. It will also inform curriculum development and help prepare students better for a widerrange of career paths.1. IntroductionPhD training holds a crucial role in higher education within STEM disciplines, traditionallyfocusing on enhancing doctoral students' academic skills, including in-depth research on ascientific question or engineering problem, communication of newly generated knowledge
emergingtechnologies in shaping the future of engineering education.IntroductionThe advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has revolutionized various sectors,including shipping and manufacturing, management and hiring practices, economics and financemarkets, art and creative endeavors, and education [1]-[4]. Generative AI's intrusion intoacademic practices, particularly homework completion, is a subject that has garnered recentattention [5] and controversy [6]. Artificial Intelligence has disrupted traditional pedagogicalmethods, offering students tools that make problem-solving and homework completion moreefficient [7]. Other AI tools, such as automated grading, plagiarism detectors, and intelligenttutoring systems, have provided needed support
Birmingham, UK in 1978, and Masters and Ph.D. degrees in Applied Sciences/Electrical Engineering from the University of Delaware. He joined Villanova University in 1984 and has been faculty member there ever since. He has served as the Chair of the Middle Atlantic Section of ASEE, Zone 1 Chair, and has organized and hosted three regional ASEE conferences at Villanova University. Dr. Singh has published papers regularly at the ASEE Annual Conference and currently serves Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee of the IEEE Education Society on Diversity and Inclusion. In 2022, Dr. Singh was recognized with the IFEES Duncan Fraser Award for Excellence in Engineering Education.Dr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan Lord is
individuals, whowere either organizers or participants, augmented with end-of-program feedback, we provide a rich description ofthe program's planning, activities, and impact. Specifically, our study draws from engineering education research,bridging the gap between research and practice to answer three research questions related to the program: (1) Howdid the program design enable a more effective understanding of interdisciplinary problem-sets? (2) How didparticipants experience the interdisciplinary work of the program? (3) Did the program affect participants' impact oninterdisciplinary problem-sets after the program? Our findings highlight the benefits of interdisciplinary, holistic,and hands-on approaches to AI education and provide insights for
approaches they used. For instance, the instructors faced aninteraction barrier—sources of resistance to initiating a student-instructor interaction, such as alack of instructor self-confidence or student reticence. We illustrate challenges instructors facedand their approaches to resolve them through reflective episodes from the instructors. Ouraudience is twofold: Education researchers will find new lines of investigation for future work onstudios, while early instructors will learn how to get started with teaching in studios.IntroductionStudio instruction is a useful active learning alternative to passive approaches, such as purelecture. Drawing on a tradition from architecture and the fine arts [1], studio instructionde-emphasizes the instructor
Paper ID #41900Beyond Exhibits: Exploring Bio-Inspired Education Robots in Museums forSTEM EnrichmentDr. Lydia Ross, Arizona State University Lydia Ross (she/her) is an assistant professor for the Division of Educational Leadership in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. Her research broadly centers on issues of equity, access, and inclusion in K-12 and post-secondary education, focusing on STEM. Specifically, she aims to understand 1) how students access educational systems and opportunities, 2) student experiences within educational systems, and 3) fostering professional development (PD
the fact that most high school teachers are not engineers and struggle with teaching studentsabout complex engineering concepts or the engineering design process. To address this, wedeveloped and implemented an engineering design challenge for high schoolers to 1) enhancestudent awareness of engineering applications and careers with emphasis on biological systems,2) train students on the engineering design process, 3) challenge students to solve a current problemrelated to human health, 4) instruct students on how to collect and analyze data, and 5) givestudents experience in presenting their findings. The design challenge itself had teams of 3-4 highschool students design, build, and test a system capable of trapping and isolating
Wilcoxon test confirms that the PBL methodologysignificantly improves participants' sense of belonging (interactions) and self-efficacy whenengaging in projects situated in real-world scenarios. Collaborative activities that involve roleassignments and active problem-solving in authentic contexts are particularly effective inenhancing these sociocognitive factors.Keywords: Construction Engineering, Self-efficacy, Sense of belonging, Problem-basedlearning, Real-world scenariosIntroductionThe construction real estate sector, a pivotal contributor to Chile's Gross Domestic Product(GDP), accounts for a significant 7% of the total GDP. It encompasses about 60% of theinvestment and ranks sixth among national employers [1]. This industry, playing a vital
humanities and social sciences have increasingly used quantitative textualanalysis to gain a high-level understanding of language and themes in texts. These studies aredesigned to investigate a corpus, or collections of words from selected texts, and usemathematical principles to look for high level connections and concepts not always apparentthrough individual reads [1], [2]. By moving beyond the standard literature review, the authorscan examine the content of published material to explore themes and future research directions tounderstand belonging in STEM libraries. This methodology allowed the authors the opportunityto examine details in language and trends in texts in a corpus in a novel way that would besignificantly more difficult and time
users have changing needs that require the library to evolve. The library works tomeet these needs and continues to create spaces that give a sense of welcoming and belonging.Decisions related to changing the library space need to be carefully thought-out to ensure theviability of the library and relevancy to the library user.There are three broad steps to decision making: pre-work, observation, and implementing [1],[2]. Pre-work involves identifying areas of concern and opportunities. Observation is thegeneration of data, finding relationships between problems and the source, and increasingunderstanding around the issues or area for growth. Finally, implementing is the decision basedoff the observations to implement a solution to resolve the
Results:Preliminary results suggest that this innovative integration of AI-driven Generative Design inBuilding Information Modeling (GD-BIM) with advanced Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) simulations carries significant implications for student health in the context ofcollaborative learning. This pioneering workflow not only promises to influence but alsoexpedites the design of interior layouts conducive to collaborative learning, thereby enhancingthe overall health and learning experience for students.Data support:Figure 1 The heavily utilized discussion-based classroom and the building blueprint from theuniversity archive.We measured the room interior, including the location of the table and chairs, window size andlocation, window AC sizes and locations
International Experiences on the Development of Students’ Entrepreneurial MindsetAbstractInternational experiences, including collaborative online international learning (COIL)experiences that naturally increase accessibility, are of interest to many undergraduate students.These experiences provide educators a unique opportunity to develop a student's entrepreneurialmindset (EM). Additionally, hands-on experiences aligned with the National Academy ofEngineering’s (NAE) grand challenge themes (Sustainability, Security, Health, and Joy ofLiving) support connections between the experience, disciplinary knowledge, multiculturalawareness, and EM. Through this Work-in-Progress (WiP) study, we seek to answer: 1) How dointernational
to manage stormwater and create green spaces. Aneglected green roof on the Shiley School of Engineering building was used as a service learningopportunity and to build community. This student-led green roof rehabilitation effort over thelast 2 years has included plant selection, weeding, and planting on the roof. Plants wereevaluated each year for growth and drought tolerance, and a survey was given to studentvolunteers to evaluate the experience. During Year 1, three plots were planted with thyme, stonecrop, and a sedum mix to determine which plants did best. All of the thyme died, and the sedummix partially died off in the center. The stone crop survived and grew. Based on the results fromYear 1, the thyme plot was replanted with stone