Asee peer logo

Beyond "How's it going?": A Collaborative Autoethnographic Study by Early Instructors in a First-Year Engineering Studio Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

July 12, 2024

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 8: Peers as Mentors & Instructors

Tagged Division

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46645

Request a correction

Paper Authors

author page

Esme Eleanor Abbot Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

author page

Berwin Lan Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

biography

Luke Raus Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

visit author page

Luke Raus is studying Engineering with a concentration in Robotics at Olin College of Engineering.

visit author page

author page

Bill Fan Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

biography

Zachary del Rosario Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-1692

visit author page

Zachary del Rosario is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Applied Statistics at Olin College. He studies how people react to uncertainty. In particular, he is interested in how technical people (scientists, engineers) make decisions with numbers. There are examples in the historical record where decisions ignored uncertainty and the results led to catastrophic failure. Prof. del Rosario's research goals are to understand how technical people experience uncertainty, and use that understanding to help them make better decisions.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

In this complete research paper, we study student-instructor communication in an engineering studio course. Studio pedagogy is an increasingly popular active learning technique. This tradition of pedagogy deemphasizes faculty lecture and emphasizes student-directed project work. However, studio pedagogy draws heavily on instructor-initiated communication for effective instruction. A limited body of research suggests that such communication is challenging, and we posit that early instructors experience additional, as-of-yet unidentified challenges. To better understand these communication issues, a team of four undergraduate course assistants and one faculty member conducted a collaborative autoethnographic study of instructors learning to teach in a first-year studio course. We identified the challenges the (student) instructors faced and the approaches they used. For instance, the instructors faced an interaction barrier—sources of resistance to initiating a student-instructor interaction, such as a lack of instructor self-confidence or student reticence. We illustrate challenges instructors faced and their approaches to resolve them through reflective episodes from the instructors. Our audience is twofold: Education researchers will find new lines of investigation for future work on studios, while early instructors will learn how to get started with teaching in studios.

Abbot, E. E., & Lan, B., & Raus, L., & Fan, B., & del Rosario, Z. (2024, June), Beyond "How's it going?": A Collaborative Autoethnographic Study by Early Instructors in a First-Year Engineering Studio Course Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/46645

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015