participants' experiences duringthegroupclubsessions. Whenaskedabouttheirexperienceduringthebookclubsessions,allparticipantsreportedbeinginagroupof faculty who had the same goal of improving their teaching as the most important aspect of the book club experience. In this sense, the book club served as a faculty learning community, motivating participants to continueengaginginthesessionsandhelpingthemtoreflectcriticallyontheirteaching.Oneexampleofthisis stated in Participant #1’s answer when asked about the most valuable aspect of the book club: Itwasaverygood
reported no difference between the pre- and post-test survey, a0 was given for that question. If a student reported a negative difference between the pre- andpost-test survey, a -1 was given for that question. The tallies were added up and a positive sumcorresponded to a positive progression, a sum of 0 corresponded to no progression, a negativesum corresponded to a negative progression. More formally: s = student c = construct Q(c, s)ij = numerically scaled Likert response matrix for each student and construct n(c) = number of questions in a constructFor each student in a construct, a score is calculated through Eq. 1 as: n
]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531255.pdf[2] V. Y. T. Liu, “The Road Less Traveled: Degree Completion and Labor Market Impact of Reverse Transfer on Non-High-Achieving Students,” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2021, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2021.0006.[3] L. Anderson, “Reverse Transfer: The Path Less Traveled,” May 2015. https://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/01/18/77/11877.pdf (accessed Oct. 08, 2023).[4] National Center for Education Statistics, “National Center for Education Statistics,” nces.ed.gov, Jul. 27, 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.aspid=900[5] S. Devilbiss, “DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska –Lincoln: The Transition
application.IV. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. This research is part of the research “Building Bridges into Engineering andComputer Science” that is approved by the City Colleges of Chicago District IRB protocolIRB2018007.The researchers would also like to acknowledge Ahmed Sozzer, Dominika Panek, Zhiyi Zhu fortheir contributions.REFERENCES[1] G. Crisp and I. Cruz, “Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007,” Research in Higher
describes an NSF (National Science Foundation) S-STEM-funded scholarshipprogram, representing a collaborative five-year grant project among three prominent universitiesin the Southeast region of the United States. Its primary objective is to support dedicated scholarsin graduating and finding a professional pathway. Each institution recruited a cohort of 15-20scholars annually for three years. The project offers scholarships and provides curricular and co-curricular support to academically talented but financially challenged students in the computingdisciplines, including Computer Science, Computer Engineering, Cybersecurity, and InformationTechnology majors, starting from their junior years. The program aims to impact 150 scholars,most of whom are
Undergraduate Research Experience Intensity on Measures of Student Success," Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 23, no. 1, 04/04 2023, doi: 10.14434/josotl.v23i1.32675.[2] S. Russell, M. Hancock, and J. McCullough, "Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experience," Science, vol. 316, pp. 548-549, 2007.[3] R. S. Hathaway, B. A. Nagda, and S. R. Gregerman, "The Relationship of Undergraduate Research to Graduate and Professional Education Pursuit: An Empirical Study," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 43, pp. 614-631, 2002.[4] B. A. Nagda, S. R. Gregerman, J. Jonides, W. von Hippel, and J. S. Lerner, "Undergraduate student-faculty partnerships affect student retention," The
the block disrupts the beam sensor at theramp's lower end. The accelerometer considers the ramp's direction as the x-axis and calculatesthe average acceleration experienced during the time it took the block to pass between the twoinfrared motion sensors. Finally, the screen displays the acceleration in meters per secondsquared (m/s²). Additionally, the serial monitor logs all the acceleration readings captured duringthe block's descent, along with corresponding timestamps.The development of this apparatus was part of a clinic project. It required various skills,including: Manufacturing skills: 3D CAD modeling, woodworking, fastening, precise measurements, basic electronics, Arduino programming and 3D printing. Project
Subjects: A S.Sudarman, S. Sugeng, and H. Hairullah, "Development of interactive infographic learningmultimedia on study methodology study course of Economic Education Program ofMulawarman University," JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran), 25(2), 2019, pp.51-64.https://doi.org/10.17977/um047v25i12018p051[7] H. G. Hassan, "Designing Infographics to Support Teaching Complex Science Subjects: A S.Doukianou, D. Daylamani-Zad, and K. O'Loingsigh, "Implementing an augmented reality andanimated infographics application for presentations: effect on audience engagement and efficacyof communication," Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(20), 2021, pp.30969-30991.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-021-10963-4[8] H. G. Hassan, "Designing
review,” in 2021 International Conference on innovation and Intelligence for informatics, computing, and technologies (3ICT), pp. 403–410, IEEE, 2021. [5] I. A. Mastan, D. I. Sensuse, R. R. Suryono, and K. Kautsarina, “Evaluation of distance learning system (e-learning): a systematic literature review,” Jurnal Teknoinfo, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2022. [6] E. Mousavinasab, N. Zarifsanaiey, S. R. Niakan Kalhori, M. Rakhshan, L. Keikha, and M. Ghazi Saeedi, “Intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 142–163, 2021. [7] T.-d. Kim, M.-y. Yang, J. Bae, B.-a. Min, I. Lee, and J. Kim, “Escape from infinite freedom
. 1–9.[20] B. Crandall, G. A. Klein, and R. R. Hoffman, Working Minds: A Practitioner’s Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis. The MIT Press, 07 2006.[21] J. J. J. Scott D. Johnson, Jeff W. Flesher and A. Ferej, “Enhancing Electrical Troubleshooting Skills in a Computer-Coached Practice Environment,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 3, no. 3, 1993, publisher: Routledge pages = 199–214,.[22] T. Axton, D. Doverspike, S. Park, and G. Barrett, “A model of the information-processing and cognitive ability requirements for mechanical troubleshooting,” International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 245–266, 1997.[23] A. Schaafstal et al., “Cognitive task analysis and innovation of training: The case of
.References[1] ABET Accreditation Criteria https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ Accessed January 20, 2024[2] National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) https://www.nspe.org/ Accessed April 22, 2024[3] IEEE Code of Ethics https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html Accessed April 22, 2024[4] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzelski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social responsibility: A Conflict Minerals Module for an Electrical Circuits course,” Proceedings of the 2018 WEEF-GEDC Conference, Albuquerque, NM, November 2018. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8629755[5] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzelski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social
at https://midfieldr.github.io/2023-midfield-institute/agenda.html [Accessed February 7, 2024].[4] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, M. K. Orr, R. A. Long, C. E. Brawner, and J. Roy, “Sustaining and scaling the impact of the MIDFIELD project at the American Society for Engineering Education (Year 1),” 2023 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, MD, June 2023. https://peer.asee.org/43112[5] R. A. Long, R. A. Layton, M. K. Orr, S. M. Lord, and M. W. Ohland, “A primer on working with longitudinal student unit records,” 2023 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, MD, June 2023. https://peer.asee.org/44629[6] S. M
technical, relating to the stream content, technology in general, technicalemployment, or general encouragement and suggestions from viewers. Some streams had mixedsocial and technical interactions where streamers might go off-topic due to a chat message orbuilt-in social time.RQ2 Knowledge Transfer Knowledge transfer in streams occurs most generally through thethink-aloud nature of streamers who, at a high level, talk through what they are working on orplan to work on during stream. In most streams, a viewer may pose a question to the streamerseeking information about what they are working on or something entirely different, but stilltechnology related. In S3’s stream, a viewer asks why the streamer works on a particular project,S3 responds:7 “I
Office of Global Inclusion,Diversity, and Strategic Innovation who have contributed to and co-facilitated training contentand the Office of Inclusive Excellence for their support of our team.References[1] T. Filz and R. A. R. Gurung, "Student Perceptions of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants," vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 48-51, 2013. 7[2] A. Baumann, S. M. Gillespie, and N. Sanchez, "Adding the Extra 5 Percent: Undergraduate TA's Creating Value in the Classroom," in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[3] L. Mohandas, N. Mentzer, A. Jaiswal, and S. Farrington, "Effectiveness of Undergraduate Teaching Assistants
practice,” Engl. Specif. Purp., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 425– 445, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2004.01.002.[2] Eun Gyong Kim and A. Shin, “Seeking an Effective Program to Improve Communication Skills of Non-English-Speaking Graduate Engineering Students: The Case of a Korean Engineering School,” IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 41–55, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TPC.2014.2310784.[3] Y.-R. Tsai, C.-S. Ouyang, and Y. Chang, “Identifying Engineering Students’ English Sentence Reading Comprehension Errors: Applying a Data Mining Technique,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 62–84, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0735633115605591.[4] L. R. Cox and K. G. Lough, “The importance of writing skill to the engineering students
research on diverse andmultifaceted interventions within engineering education. The next stage of the research includes a comprehensive qualitative analysis of thedata obtained in the PRAs, for further triangulation of the quantitative data with thequalitative data. Ultimately, we hope that this research can contribute to the formation ofwell-rounded engineers, not only technically competent, but also deeply committed to theethical and social dimensions of their work.References[1] S. E. Schulenberg, R. R. Hutzell, C. Nassif, and J. M. Rogina, “Logotherapy for clinical practice,” Psychotherapy, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 447–463, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1037/a0014331.[2] V. E. Frankl, Man’s search for meaning. 1946.[3] G. I. Chan, “Sentido de vida
andchallenges.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. 2325523 and 2325525 .ReferencesBolton, C. S., Miskioğlu, E., Martin, K. M., Aaron, C., & Carberry, A. (2021). Practicing Engineers' Definition of Their Expertise: Emergent Themes and Frequency by Gender Identity and Role Change into Management. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference & Exposition, https://peer.asee.org/37591Bolton, C. S. (2022). What Makes an Expert? Characterizing Perceptions of Expertise and Intuition Among Early-Career Engineers [Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Bucknell University]. Lewisburg, PA.Bolton, C. S., Miskioğlu, E., Martin, K. M., Aaron, C., & Carberry, A. (2021). Practicing Engineers' Definition of Their
generate anawareness among faculty of the power they possess and the impact of their work, not only inresearch settings, but in the classroom, too.References[1] S. Ambrose and M. Norman, “Preparing engineering faculty as educators.,” Natl. Acad. Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, p. 25, 2006.[2] S. Baum and M. McPherson, “Improving teaching: Strengthening the college learning experience,” Daedalus, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 5–13, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1162/daed_e_01757.[3] D. M. Riley, V. Henry, and L. C. Leighton, “What makes faculty adopt or resist change in engineering education?,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, p. 23.1367.1-23.1367.20. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
completion of a full cross-case analysis of all sixcase-studies which include primary (elementary) and secondary education contexts.AcknowledgementsWe are deeply grateful to our case-study coaches and students for sharing their time andexperience with us.References[1] For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST), "FIRST annual impact report: More than robots," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://firstinspiresst01.blob.core.windows.net/annual-report/annual-report/first-fy22-annual- impact-report.pdf[2] S. Evripidou, K. Georgiou, L. Doitsidis, A. A. Amanatiadis, Z. Zinonos, and S. A. Chatzichristofis, "Educational robotics: Platforms, competitions and expected learning outcomes," IEEE Access, vol
with faculty across the United States.” o “I appreciated hearing their stories and learning from them.” o “Seeing other peoples' curriculum work was constructive and helped provide ideas for future projects in various implementation styles.” Summary of ThemesDue to space limitations, only one theme is fully shared. The other themes (and sub-themes) aresummarized in Figure 3. Figure 3. Summary of Themes and Sub-ThemesLessons LearnedThere are three key lessons learned.First, of the six tools, faculty participants found three tools particularly helpful. • Peer Feedback Tuning Protocol (https://www.sotlaccelerator.com/s/Tool-2-Peer-Feedback- Tuning-Protocol.pdf): Participants commented on the
international students for diverse career paths help to make their academic journey morerewarding. To thrive, one must embrace these multifaceted transformative experiences with anopen mind, a willingness to learn, and resilience that will enrich the academic experience andprepare them for future success beyond the classroom. Finally, after creating a welcomingclassroom environment, if faculty members desire to enhance international students' experienceand their ability to thrive, there must be intentional relationship building to help the studentsbecome more comfortable asking for help when needed.LimitationsThis study utilized a limited sample size in a non-randomized survey; hence, the findings maynot be generalized.References 1. S. K. Gardner
Leadership, “Engineering Leadership Certificate Student Handbook,” Rice University, 2014.[5] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, 2001.[6] L. J. Zachary, The Mentee’s Guide: Making Mentoring Work for You. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[7] D. Allen, Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress-Free Productivity, revised ed. New York, NY: Penguin Books, 2015.[8] K. Klenke, Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group, 2008.[9] S. R. Komives, J. E. Owen, S. D. Longerbeam, F. C. Mainella, and L. Osteen, “Developing a leadership identity: a grounded theory
help them form theirpersonal narratives as they prepare for interviews and careers after graduation, and as generalengagement grows, students will gain self-awareness of their professional skills and be able tobetter communicate them to employers.References[1] J. H. Callewaert, J. M. Millunchick, C. S. E. Woodcock, K. C. Jiang, and S. Edington, “Developing a Framework for Experiential Learning,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/developing-a-framework-for-experiential-learning[2] J. H. Callewaert, J. M. Millunchick, C. S. E. Jamison, and K. C. Jiang, “Assessing and Communicating Professional Competency Development
Conference on SoftwareEngineering Advances, EDUCAUSE, Association for Advancement of Computing in Education, InternationalSociety for Technology in Education, Society for Design and Process Science, American Society forEngineering Education, Human Computer Interaction International Conference, and International Academy,Research, and Industry Association) in USA, Canada, England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugaland Romania. Her work was also presented by co-authors at conferences in Brazil, Taiwan and S. Korea.Among Dr. Marghitu’s honors and awards are the following: 2011 AccessComputing Capacity BuildingAward, the 2012 Auburn University Access award, the 2012 Society for Design and Process ScienceOutstanding Achievement Award, the 2013
utilized to tackle thisever-growing issue due to its ability learn and classify complex data. AI can be described as twomain subfields: machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). ML leverages labeled data tobuild models for predicting labels on unlabeled data. DL relies on extensive unlabeled datasets touncover underlying patterns within the dataset. On the other hand, knowledge-based modelingand simulation (M&S) techniques utilize known models to generate data for the analysis of newand existing designs. M&S works well for simple systems but becomes increasingly difficult formore complex systems. The difficulty comes from the uncertainties associated with each addedvariable being modeled. To bridge the gap between AI and M&S, the
are using an approach that blends undergraduateresearch, interdepartmental collaborations, and a focus on experiential learning. We arecollaborating with the university Green Fund and the Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S)department to recycle materials, reach the campus community, and understand the environmentaland economic impacts of the study. The manuscript describes a summary of the projectdevelopment, a detail of project goals and current advances, and a summary of our researchobjectives as we integrate the practice of sustainability into the chemical engineering program.Motivation and Research QuestionThe Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin has investedefforts and resources in the renovation
as an Analogy for CollegeThere are parallels between a student’s college experience and football, such as: Lows and highs – The lows might be season(s) long or might last only part of the game. Team work – Many of the CE students received coursework help from other students and general support from friends and family.Pervasive sports analogies may be annoying, but perhaps students absorb these models [25]. Iaspire to having my students view me as a coach rather than a ref (enforcing rules) or theopposing team (putting up roadblocks to prevent students from reaching their goal of success inthe course or earning their degree). Faculty should remember that our students may be facing anarray of challenges (personal health challenges
/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00835.x.[3] J. E. Mitchell, A. Nyamapfene, K. Roach, and E. Tilley, “Faculty wide curriculum reform: The integrated engineering programme,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 48–66, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1593324.[4] S. D. Sheppard, “Design as cornerstone and capstone,” Mechanical Engineering, p. 44, 1999.[5] Y.-L. Han, K. Cook, G. Mason, and T. R. Shuman, “Enhance engineering design education in the middle years with authentic engineering problems,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 140, no. 12, p. 122001, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4040880.[6] G. Charosky, L. Hassi, K. Papageorgiou, and R. Bragós, “Developing innovation competences in engineering students: a comparison of two approaches
a blueprint for formative assessment of conceptualunderstanding in aerospace engineering middle-year courses. Therefore, future work includessimilar analysis of other flight dynamics topics (linearization, and longitudinal and lateral-directional dynamics) as well as a comparison of student and instructor mental models. Byfocusing on understanding the development of the students’ conceptual models of atmosphericflight mechanics topics, it is possible to design courses that are better suited to developing robustunderstanding.References[1] R. A. Streveler, S. Brown, G. L. Herman, and D. Montfort, “Conceptual change and misconceptions in engineering education: Curriculum, measurement, and theory-focused approaches,” in Cambridge Handbook