student acknowledged their positivemindset in relation to their CliftonStrength of Harmony, stating, “I’ve started to focus on just trying my best and being happy with any outcome. I realize now that my strength of harmony has a lot to play in the fact that I am being more realistic and not worrying about all the little steps” (14, R2, Fall).Another student displayed an avoidant mindset in their first reflection, stating how theirDeliberative CliftonStrength has “helped [them] to assess and avoid certain risks, like badenvironments in life” and how they can “plan ahead in [their] personal life more...by assessingpotential risks” (11, R1, Spring). This student then recognized the comfort they gain fromlooking at their
studentshave both the basic knowledge and sufficient time to work on them, with feedback integratedhalfway through each checkpoint. The checkpoints are summarized in Table 1 and are describedas below:Checkpoint 1: Project Proposal: This checkpoint requires students to brainstorm through theirproject ideas, identify the main modules, better understand the functionality and operationsinvolved with each module, design some mock-ups of the main web pages and develop a plan oftheir overall project.Checkpoint 2: Front-end Design: This checkpoint requires students to design at least 3 main Checkpoint Purpose Submission Expectation Technical Skills
Figure 1, blended learning environments arecharacterized by a thoughtful combination of in-person andonline learning activities, allowing for a seamless integrationof technology into the learning process. This intentionaldesign includes the development of learning materials,instructional strategies, and assessments that align with boththe face-to-face and online components. In contrast,emergency remote teaching, as experienced during theCOVID-19 pandemic, differs from carefully planned blendedlearning environments because it often involves a reactiveresponse to unforeseen circumstances, leading to a temporaryreliance on online tools and platforms without thecomprehensive planning and instructional design associated Figure 1
. Each sketch should be accompanied by a brief written description and credit to the artist/creator. Your report should demonstrate contributions from all group members.3: Compare A typed mini-report with a description of the process used to select the best possibleDesigns and solutions among the multiple presented. Your selected designs will be used during milestoneMake 5, so the report should also include detailed documentation of your plan for parameterDecisions testing. You must also describe the planned construction process in words.4: Hand Deliver hand drawn dimensioned sketches of your team’s alpha designs that will be used inDrawings parameter testing. The hand drawings
HEI contexts is the one previously published as Work-in-process19.Methodology The SLR methodology used for this study considers the same used previously19, whichwas developed by Tranfield and colleagues in 20031. This methodology considers three differentstages with multiple phases on each. First, planning the review, where the main goal is toidentify the need for a review, the respective preparation, and the development of the reviewprotocol. The second stage of conducting a review considers the identification of research,selection of studies, their quality assessment, data extraction, and progress monitoring, to endwith the data synthesis. Finally, the third stage considers the report and recommendations, andgetting evidence into
. Thereare five well documented stages of team development (forming-storming-norming-performing-adjourning) as illustrated in Figure 1 per Tuckman [35] who indicated these phases are allnecessary and inevitable in order for a team to grow, face up to challenges, tackle problems, findsolutions, plan work, and deliver results. Over time team effectiveness increases as the team beginsto norm. We have found that integrated (where different roles are specialized but the members ofthe team interact in planned and controlled ways), diverse, and complementary teams (where teammembers are not just integrated but also complement each other) [36] are the most effective andcan achieve the performing stage more quickly. Many sources discuss the typical roles
. This approach seeks to equipfuture construction engineers with the practical skills necessary for success in their careers and tomeet the industry's demands effectively.IntroductionEducation plays a pivotal role in teaching planning. A well-structured teaching method not onlyfacilitates knowledge transfer but also encourages students to challenge their preconceptions andmotivates them to learn [1]. When it comes to engineering education, there are unique peculiaritiesdue to the specific competencies required in this field. Engineering education is characterized bya distinct design in most curriculums [2]. The aim is to cultivate interdisciplinary-minded andhighly talented practitioners possessing innovative thinking and problem-solving
DevelopmentGoals. In 2015, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution for 2030 that included SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDGs). These SDGs have prompted changes to the engineering field to solvethese broad issues by increasing the capabilities and capacity of engineering through theinvolvement of young, student populations. It also prompts a change in engineering education tofocus more on sustainability in the curriculum [18].One final solution is the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Strategic Plan. The NSF hassupported multiple engineering education programs, such as Engineering Research Centers(ERCs) as well as the Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU). The main goal of theseprograms is to support research opportunities for students in
develop an app formobile devices such as iPhones, iPads and Android devices, for instance. In those situations, andin future online development, we would allow users to establish an account to log in to the system,and the bot would “remember” the conversation with the user, and be better prepared to give morespecific information. We are also planning on developing training functionality to teach users someof the basics of “prompt engineering” to better engage with the bot.After identifying into the four major groups, the user then can ask questions at a prompt. Our initialbeta version had limited information covering 4 of the largest engineering departments on campus,but we have now expanded it to cover nearly 50 academic departments. We further
engineering practices, primarily focusing on team-basedactivities to promote professional engineering communication, along with helping students createa qualification plan to develop their undergraduate and professional goals in engineering. TheTRUE Capstone projects focus on preparing students for professional engineering problems byincorporating industry partners into the project decision process in order to identify real-worldproblems and solutions for the Capstone teams.In accordance with the RED ideology, a group of students, mentored by an engineeringeducation researcher, decided to apply Participatory Action Research (PAR) to study the role ofnew changes in the department. In this paper, we present the investigation led by one of
students enjoyed and highly valued their experience. Teachers were supportiveand recommended expanding the program to other schools.We adapted a college-level lab experience to make it more accessible to high school students andenhanced the campus tour to provide them with a holistic view of university life. We have foundthat the key takeaway from this initiative is the ease and success of the endeavor. Our programrepresents a new contribution to pre-college engineering education by providing high schoolstudents with hands-on exposure to engineering concepts and a glimpse into life as collegestudents. Our future plans include making this an annual event, expanding it to other schools andstudent communities, and improving non-lab activities to
skills.The PRA-TTSI team will primarily collaborate with four local high schools. Additionally, theprogram will be promoted through regional robot competitions and the Annual Science Fair heldin the County. The PRA-TTSI team aims to enroll ten students into the program during the 3rdyear of the grant period. Furthermore, the recruitment efforts of the PRA-TTSI program willspecifically target women, low-income individuals, and traditionally underrepresentedminorities, as outlined in the detailed plan provided in Table 6.Project TimelineThe departments of admissions, financial aid, academic support services, as well as theengineering and technology department will collaborate to ensure compliance with the NSF-ATErequirements for the program. The
and Human Resources (EHR) and the Division of Human Resource Development (HRD)called for increased accessibility to and diversity of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) fields and STEM education to include marginalized and underrepresented people1. In the NSF2022-2026 Strategic Plan, Strategic Goal 1 aims to broaden the participation of the "Missing Millions" orunder-served, underrepresented, and marginalized populations to fully participate in STEM2. Furthermore,the Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering (CEOSE) is charged by the UnitedStates Congress to advise NSF to increase the full participation of women, historically underrepresentedracial and ethnic populations, and neurodiverse individuals
: whatperceptions and attitudes related to AI usage contribute to PSTs‘ consideration of it as aneducational tool? Implications are provided in the ensuing discussion.Qualitative FindingsFirst, we analyzed the 26 empirical studies to better understand PSTs’ perceptions of AIintegration into STEM education. This qualitative analysis focused on identifying PSTs’perceptions, experiences, and challenges in considering adopting and implementing AI withinSTEM lesson plans. The results revealed several unique themes that are summarized below.Opportunities and Concerns in AI-integrated STEM educationThe first theme that emerged was the collective agreement among PSTs for more proactive useof AI tools in teaching methodologies. According to Kannan (2022), for
seminars provided them with new information about career fieldsor topics in their career or helped them learn about something they knew nothing about.Comments across the years about these seminars included: ● “Helped clarify my plans for the future.” ● “It was really helpful to see professors who went through similar struggles and took time to get into their field. They gave advice that meant a lot as well.” ● “They introduced interesting new concepts that are beneficial to my career.” ● “Being able to create connections with people outside of my major. In the pumpkin demo, we were able to interact with our presenter and learn some cool stuff at the same time.” Students who indicated that the various seminars were useful
understanding of threads and sockets, by utilizing resources such astutorials and articles. Make sure to revisit the project specifications multiple times, understanding the overarchingstructure and then processing the individual components involved. You could draft a development plan includingevery major step. Start with establishing communication between Manager and the Workers via sockets. Then, buildupon this facility while keeping in mind the need for infrastructure to work on your other tasks seamlessly. Masteringmodularity and sticking to good design principles like SOLID and DRY could enable you to successfully earmark thefault tolerance feature for the last phase of your project. Start the project in the exact order that components havebeen
electrical power is critical. For an Instrumentation Control Systems EngineeringTechnology (ICET) Program at Louisiana Tech University, hands-on projects are consistentlythreaded throughout the curriculum resulting in graduates who can design, plan, research, evaluate,test and implement electrical and electromechanical systems that span multiple engineeringdisciplines.To push the curriculum and its graduates forward, ICET faculty members are empowered tocontinuously develop and improve activities and projects for core courses. In Spring of 2022, asystems-level project was integrated into the sophomore-level Applied Thermodynamics course.A thermoelectric cooling system (TeCS) was developed in-house to allow students to experienceand measure
development of new STEM majors, particularly in emerging fields such asengineering, computer science, and information technology, emerges as imperative for fosteringSTEM growth at Keiser University. Addressing these challenges head-on is paramount tocultivating a more inclusive and supportive environment that empowers all students to pursue andpersist in STEM disciplines.As it is clear from tables 3 and 4, the major drawback are the retention and graduation rates forboth STEM and non-STEM majors. . In order to address the issue, a comprehensive mentoringplan will be the developed in the coming year.The proposed mentoring plan utilizes the mentors (a) To serve in an academic support role inwhich they will provide one-to-one or very small group
. In addition to the baseline survey results, we will present example lesson plans,worksheets, class assessments, and an example physical model to illustrate how abstraction willbe used in the classroom. Future directions for this project will also be discussed.Introduction and literature reviewThis paper describes a work-in-progress that examines the potential for explicitly teachingproblem abstraction in statics classes to improve students’ self-efficacy and future-orientedmotivation. The paper presents a brief overview of the backgrounds and motivation and thendescribes progress made in course development, instrument development, and baseline data fromtraditional statics classes.Sophomore level engineering science courses, e.g. statics and
of complexity. Jonassen definedproblem solving as “a goal-directed sequence of cognitive operations” essential for everydaysituations [1-3]. In engineering courses, problem solving is a multi-step process in whichstudents need to understand the problem, determine which equations and principles are necessaryto solve the problem, devise a plan to solve the problem, execute the plan, and verify that thesolution is correct. Depending on the complexity of the problem, a problem can have one ormultiple solutions. Story problems, also known as word problems, are the most common form ofproblem solving in formal education [2, 3]. Story problems contain a quantitative problemembedded in a narrative or story.Metacognition refers to the processes used
quality and usefulness, including howISPeL compared to other forms of instructional delivery, particularly PowerPoint. The survey alsoincluded open-ended items for students to make improvement recommendations.For the second survey, we collected student feedback from a two-week mini-course embeddedwithin a one-semester course on special topics in engineering, in which robotics topics weredelivered via ISPeL 21 . The survey for the mini-courses was designed to gather student feedbackon their course experiences in general 22 and its effect on their interest and motivation in roboticsand future career plans. Because the study is inspired by Self-Determination Theory 20 , weadapted course evaluation items that have been used in previous studies with a
that it has prompted analysis of its effectiveness. Strawderman et al. noted that theS-STEM program didn’t seem to attract students who were not already planning to attend theinstitution, but it did shift their interest in majors [9]. When evaluating why students who wereoffered the scholarship were not recruited, Jones et al. noted that some students were offeredmore money by other institutions or didn’t have the institution as a first choice [12].2.3 S-STEM Program at WVU Tech: OverviewIn March of 2021, WVU Tech was awarded a Track 1 S-STEM project. The project targets low-income Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and Computer Science and InformationSystems (CSIS) students. The overarching goal of WVU Tech’s S-STEM Track 1 project
studies should be done to compare students’ performanceduring several semesters with and without the use of GAI tools, particularly isolating differentcourse assessment components where the student’s performance metrics were most influenced byGAI use. Also, as ethical concerns surrounding GAI persist, future studies should delve deeperinto the issues of AI-assisted plagiarism, algorithmic bias, transparency, equity, data privacy, andsecurity in engineering education learning and instruction.References[1] “What is Instructional Design? | ATD.” Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.td.org/talent-development-glossary-terms/what-is-instructional-design[2] “MagicSchool.ai - AI for teachers - lesson planning and more!” Accessed
motivated low scores for other items related to group dynamics (e.g., opportunitiesfor social activities, organized group activities/field trips). This was supported by feedback froma participant in Year 1 to an open-ended question asking what they would change about theprogram. This participant noted: • "I wished there were more organized team building activities. It was honestly pathetic how easily we got mad at each other for different views or beliefs and then let that divide the group."To improve the group dynamics of the Year 2 cohort, additional team-building activities wereadded prior to traveling to Brno and further social/cultural activities were planned for the time inthe Czech Republic. Pre-Travel: In Year 1, it
its purpose and value is crucial. Thus, establishing how badges serve as a solution to an instructional or curricular problem must be communicated to faculty and students from the beginning of the implementation process. Additionally, the FSBPI suggests that demonstrating to faculty and students how badges can be shared externally may foster a broader understanding of their value. Finally, to guarantee the success, sustainability, and potential scalability of the badge architecture, the FSBPI recommends designing and incorporating a comprehensive evaluation and a revision plan. This plan must include instructors and teaching assistants (TA) continuous training to ensure grading consistency
can bring to a project 13. I appreciate the value that individuals with different strengths bring to a team 14. I recognize that people with different backgrounds from my own might have better ideas than I do 15. I am willing to learn from others who have different areas of expertise 16. I recognize the importance of other fields even if I don’t know much about them 17. I am willing to update my plans in response to new information Factor 3: Interest (In) 18. I tend to get involved in a variety of activities 19. I enjoy being involved in a variety of activities 20. I participate in a wide range of hobbies Factor 4: Altruism (Al) 21. The idea of tackling society’s biggest problems does not motivate me (reverse
(Student Learning Outcomes) using abachelor's and master's ACCE accredited Construction Management program based in the NewEngland region. However, the authors had to exclude the ABET evaluation due to time constraintsand a lack of data from the selected university. They plan to include it as a future expansion of thisresearch, with collaborative opportunities from other universities.The goal of the paper is to create a framework for XR (extended reality) that can be utilized byeducators in AEC (architecture, engineering, and construction) institutions to implement XR-basedactivities. These activities can assist in evaluating the student learning outcomes (SLOs) necessaryfor ACCE accreditation. The XR-SLO framework will provide educators with a
historical example, create or selectlearning objectives and design exercises to help students identify inequities created byinfrastructure, understand the historical context of that infrastructure, and plan for solutions thataddress the remediation of infrastructure inequities. As the framework is being developed, theauthors are testing its effectiveness and adaptability by creating lessons based on case studies.The framework as well as the lessons created will be available through the CIT-E Canvas page toall interested instructors.IntroductionThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E, pronounced “city”) is acommunity of practice (CoP) for those interested in supporting and improving the scholarship ofinfrastructure education
transfer students.The study found that transfer students receiving formal information literacy instruction weresignificantly more confident conducting research. It is important to note that while transferstudents did not mind being singled out as a group, they preferred to learn about the library in asmall group setting, rather than in a classroom setting. Further, the results indicated thatinformation literacy instruction did not impact the students’ sense of belonging at their newschool or connectedness.The existing literature conveys there is a need for information literacy instruction for transferstudents. However, the next logical planning point is determining who in the library would beresponsible for this population. Some libraries will
need for environmental scientistsand engineers to integrate nature as a key component of solutions while developing innovativesolutions to complex environmental problems. The need to use nature in environmental problem-solving is epitomized by investment of $8 billion to restore the Kissimmee River in Florida to itsoriginal state after it was straightened to canal 30 years ago [9]. In another example, the City ofColorado Springs recently publicized its plans to spend $460 million over two decades in itsstormwater infrastructure, maintenance and education programs [10]. Evidences suggests thatecological intensification of agriculture, an integration of nature into environmental solutions,can help sustain agricultural production while minimizing