University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Dr. Joseph Francis Mirabelli, University of Michigan Joseph Mirabelli is a postdoctoral fellow in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan Ann Arbor who researches engineering education. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches
uncertain future that lies ahead. Evidence suggests thatproficiency in innovation, critical thinking, complex problem-solving, and effectivecommunication positions students for success in sustainable engineering careers [2-4]. However,a prevalent culture of risk aversion among students stifles exploration into unchartedtechnological territories, thereby limiting their comprehensive academic growth [5].In response to these challenges, this paper presents an evaluative study of an inventive, multi-disciplinary, project-based course known as "Innovation Through Making." This course isdesigned to blend the foundational Engineering Sciences (ES) curriculum with anEntrepreneurial Mindset, thereby endowing students with critical knowledge and
diversity. He started his engineering education research endeavor through an NSF RIGEE grant in 2014. The promising findings of this research and the encouraging feedback of the student community motivated him to pursue this line of research in his NSF CAREER award in 2017. Since then, he has built a coalition within the university to expand this work through multiple NSF-funded research grants including IUSE/PFE: RED titled ”Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Because of the importance of neurodiversity at all levels of education, he expanded his work to graduate STEM education through an NSF IGE grant. In addition, he recently received his Mid-CAREER award through
work of practicing engineers, as well as the preparation of professionals for their future careers. Dr. Korte is an Associate Professor of Human and Organizational Learning at The George Washington University where he combines his practical experiences of work in education, business, and industry with his research and teaching in professional education, professional practice, and the social foundations of work. He has published on topics ranging from organizational socialization (onboarding), workplace learning, organization studies, social science, and philosophy. He also works on a variety of topics supporting his students’ work on decision-making, the meaning of work, and social connectedness in school and the
’ success, including the challengesassociated with adapting to a new campus environment and the potential loss of academic creditsduring the transfer process. Conversely, alternative studies indicate that transfer students whoeffectively integrate into their new educational environment, receive appropriate support, andpossess well-defined academic and career objectives can achieve similar, if not superior, levels ofretention and academic success in comparison to traditional students.Peer mentoring presents an invaluable opportunity for first-year engineering students to establisha meaningful connection with experienced upperclassmen who can provide guidance onnavigating the challenges associated with coursework and the adjustments encountered
research projects focused on institutional environments and STEM identity development are sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Kapor Center. In recent years, she was selected as an Early Career Awardee and Faculty Fellow with the American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education (AAHHE) and a NASPA Emerging Faculty Leader. She also received the Barbara Townsend Early Career Scholar Award by the Council for the Study of Community Colleges (CSCC) and gave the distinguished ASHE-CAHEP Barbara Townsend Lecture. To learn more about her current projects, visit http://sarahlrodriguez.com/Paul Charles Bigby, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Paul C. Bigby is a graduate student at
Paper ID #43066The Future of Learning: Harnessing Generative AI for Enhanced EngineeringTechnology EducationMr. Jody Lee Alberd, Austin Peay State University Mr. Jody Lee Alberd is an Assistant Professor with the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University (APSU) from where he earned his Master of Science in Engineering Technology. Mr. Alberd’s industrial career as a Manufacturing Engineer included working with several renowned companies such as Trane Technologies and Electrolux North America. Prior to that, he served in the United States Navy during a 20-year career that included service during
, if women do notparticipate in engineering across various fields, their perspectives on design solutions are absent[3]. This is significant, considering that a diverse team can better understand and represent end-users' needs in problem-solving [1].Differences in gender socialization, linked to environmental factors such as family values, socialexpectations, and representation in traditional and digital media, among others, are identified asone of the reasons for gender biases among individuals. Therefore, family and education arecrucial in career choice [2]. Efforts from academia and industry are essential to promote a changein the volume of female participation in these fields [1]. This challenge should be viewed as asocietal one involving
that meet Quality Matters (QM) standards. She was the faculty advisor to student research teams, where two teams made the final round of the AACC Community College Innovation Challenge (CCIC) in 2016 and 2017. Dr. Delahanty has developed and conducted STEM focused outreach initiatives to community groups and in K-12 schools with a higher percentage of underrepresented and underserved students. Prior to her teaching career, Dr. Delahanty was an electrical engineer at General Electric Company in both military and commercial satellite communications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Gender-Based Comparison of Creative Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Perceptions of
research question, “What are the industry perspectiveson assessed strengths and challenges related to professional and engineering design skills ofbioengineering seniors?”Building on prior coursework, the senior design capstone experience provides students with theopportunity to apply concepts and develop important skills necessary for transition to theirprofessional careers. In the bioengineering undergraduate programs at the University ofCalifornia San Diego, the senior design experience culminates with an event calledBioengineering Day (BE-Day), in which senior students present posters on their design project.Students have the unique opportunity to interact one-on-one with industrial professionals todiscuss their projects. After visiting with
students in engineering education programs buttressour point [8]–[10]. These studies suggest that international engineering education graduatestudents complain about not being heard or understood, and lack a sense of belonging as theynavigate the limited opportunities available to them by virtue of their international studentstatuses. Responding to a call to genuinely support international engineering students’ well-beingand career development and counteract their othered experiences [10], this work aims to compareand contrast the experiences of initiating and sustaining two student-led international ethnicengineering education scholarly communities for Chinese and African groups. In this paper, weoperationalize international ethnic groups as
, therefore, recognizes the value and existingcontributions of engineering instructional faculty and seeks to provide the support structures thatacknowledge their desire to build their leadership capacity towards educational change.Drawing upon prior work exploring EIFs [5], [6], [7], our EIF case study research [8], [9], andexisting educational development scholarship, a professional development program wasdesigned, which included a group coaching component. The AMPLIFY Institute encompassed atwo-day, on-site “kick-off” workshop, virtual coaching sessions, and a virtual celebratory event.These activities brought together thirty-six EIF participants from thirteen HSIs across the UnitedStates, from different disciplines, and levels of their careers
groups. This observation is consistent with national trends showing underrepresentation ofLatina/o populations in STEM disciplines.[1], [2] With this motivating background, a study hasbeen undertaken to explore the social, cultural, educational, and institutional factors affectingmatriculation of undergraduate Latina engineering students into graduate engineering programsand/or industry careers. A research team was formed with four members (co-authors of thispaper) from diverse backgrounds but a common commitment toward an asset-based approachthat avoids marginalizing individuals in the research design process and by selecting respectivemethods.[3] Results of these team discussions and decisions sought balance between variousphilosophical
disaster social impact and equity in their education.Despite the importance of incorporating community resilience and equity concepts into thecurriculum, it is not a trivial task due to the concepts’ complexity. These concepts are definedbased on other complex subjects, such as multi-criteria decision-making, systems analysis, riskanalysis, and socioeconomic disaster impact analysis. It is one of the reasons why these conceptsare often taught in more advanced graduate-level courses, if at all, instead of undergraduatecourses. However, introducing these concepts early on is crucial, since the vast majority ofpracticing structural engineers start their careers after their undergraduate program. To addressthese issues, we adopt an active learning
currently the director of the Cultural Competence in Computing (3C) Fellows program and the NSF-funded Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). She also serves as senior personnel for the NSF-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female faculty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019
How supportive has your faculty mentor been about your academic goals? Level of support Q6 How supportive has your faculty mentor been about your life goals? Q7 How easy has it been to discuss ideas about elective options with your faculty mentor? Q8 How easy has it been to discuss ideas about career options with your faculty mentor? Comfort level in Q9 How easy has it been to discuss ideas about internship options with your faculty mentor? academic topics discussion Q10 How easy has it been to discuss ideas about research options with your faculty mentor? Q11 How helpful has your faculty mentor been in balancing your class
Paper ID #41416Community College Undergraduate Research using a Student-Driven andStudent-Centered ApproachDr. Elizabeth A Adams P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Elizabeth Adams is an Assistant Professor at Cal Poly in San Luis Obispo, California. She a civil engineer with a background in infrastructure design and management, and project management. Her consulting experience spanned eight years and included extensive work with the US military in Japan, Korea, and Hawaii. In 2008 Elizabeth shifted the focus of her career to education and academia, later receiving her Ph.D. in Civil Engineering
expect that there is more value added in additional upperdivision electives than adding the CS0 course into our respective programs.4.1 Instructor 1 Re�lection I began working at Loyola in January 2018 and continued until the end of June 2021. I was incharge of teaching coursework and overseeing programs in the continuing studies school. Therewas a BA Information Technology which was an applied CS degree as well as a CS certi�icate. Thestudent population at this continuing studies school is primarily adult learners looking to completecollege as well as those seeking career change and upskilling. My experiences running a non-pro�ittraining program for underserved individuals prior to starting my position at Loyola had taught methat those
conducted in a single junior-level course for environmentalengineering students. The innovation self-efficacy of participants was measured using a surveythat included items from the Very Brief Innovation Self-Efficacy scale (ISE.6), the InnovationInterests scale (INI), and the Career Goals: Innovative Work scale (IW). The drawings wereanalyzed for Artistic Effort (AE) and Creative Work (CW) by engineering and art evaluators,respectively. The ISE survey results were compared with the AE and CW scores and thecorrelations with travel, gender, and multilingualism on creativity attributes were explored. Astrong correlation between CW scores and AE scores was observed. A negative correlationbetween CW and ISE.6 was found. The CW scores were significantly
scienceconcepts in both didactic and experiential settings. Students appreciate the need to successfullycommunicate with data and be effective data storytellers but will often feel frustrated that datastorytelling skills are not “real data science.” An analysis of LinkedIn profiles indicates that over60% of graduated learners secured new employment in data careers since starting the program.To build on this success, further curriculum development should more explicitly connectfundamental data science concepts and broader concepts such as creative problem-solving anddata storytelling.KeywordsGraduate education, data analytics, distance learning, life-long learning, adult learning1. IntroductionWe are living in an era where the Volume, Velocity, Veracity
andopportunities faced by graduate students and higher education institutions in navigatinginterdisciplinary research and teaching landscapes. Key themes include but are not limited to: thecultivation of a community-oriented team culture to enhance scientific team cohesion andproductivity e.g., [5]; the importance of academic motivation and teamwork diversity ininterdisciplinary context [6]; the mechanisms that facilitate team science e.g., [7], and theperspectives of graduate students and early career academics on interdisciplinary research e.g.,[8]. These studies collectively underscore the complexity of interdisciplinary endeavors, andhighlight the need for supportive institutional structures, the development of interdisciplinarycommunication and
a scale we designed to quantify the successful developmentof target EML skills, had no consistent pattern based on race, but that female students reported asignificantly lower score compared to male students. We additionally developed a panel ofquestions gauging the extent to which certain groups of students were motivated by theirdemographics (e.g., gender, race, etc.) and individual economic benefits of BMEG (e.g., high-paying jobs, career preparation, etc.). Female students were also more likely to report that theywere motivated by their demographics and had significantly lower self-efficacy scores comparedto male students. While race had no impact on the final EML score, HRM groups were moremotivated by their demographics and were
generation of engineers to be ethical, human-centric, collaborative, communicative, and transdisciplinary. As a graduate student she has advised international interactive qualifying projects (IQP) and a senior capstone design project (MQP). As she pursues a career in academia, Tess strives to combine her interests in medical robotics and engineering education.Dr. Ceren Yilmaz Akkaya, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Yilmaz Akkaya is a postdoctoral researcher in Nanoenergy Group under the Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). She holds BS degrees in Chemistry and Molecular Biology and Genetics from Bogazici University. She completed her Master’s and PhD Degrees
many challenges. For instance, arocket project involves the collaboration of aerospace, mechanical, chemical, electrical, andcomputer engineering disciplines. As a result, students from diverse backgrounds and withdistinct career aspirations must collaborate to overcome the obstacles. This diversity fosters ateam-based and interdisciplinary learning approach that provides students with invaluable insightand skills beyond those learned in a typical classroom setting [7].Program PhilosophyAt Make to Innovate, we advocate for a practical learning experience emphasizing a hands-onapproach. Our students are motivated to tackle problems head-on and create innovative solutionsthat can be tested in real-world scenarios. Clear objectives are set for
critical challenges society faces. In the ever-advancing engineeringindustry, how would our Materials Engineering education system adequately prepare ourstudents with the essential knowledge and skills necessary to adapt and excel in their career?What are the learning outcomes that are required to support such excellence?To design these learning outcomes in our curriculum, gathering and analysing relevantstakeholders’ input is crucial. This paper presents our endeavour in partnering thestakeholders (students, educators/faculty, alumni and employers) to understand the gaps andneeds of Materials Engineering education. Consultations with the stakeholders were designedto rally around three main focus areas namely (i) to evaluate the existing
times during the term: Goal Setting, Student Involvement Fair, Mid-terms, End of Semester 2. Faculty Interview: each student selects a faculty member in area of interest to interview and present to the class 3. Advising Portfolio: review core curriculum and create a list of potential courses for the next term 4. Career Exploration and Alumni Field of Interest Interview: complete a career/interests inventory and conduct a group interview with an alumni who works in a field of potential interest 5. My Improvement/Implementation Plan: review and reflect on the first semester, explore two possible majors and two possible career area of interests and lay out future plan for improvement and explorationWith
society 2. The ease or difficulty of being an ethical aerospace engineer 3. Technical determinism and aerospace career pathways 4. Macroethics discussions within aerospace coursework 5. The ability of faculty to facilitate conversations on the macroethics of aerospaceThese five factors provide a new basis upon which we will generate additional survey items inthe future. Through this process, we will develop a survey that can effectively measure students’beliefs and experiences in regards to the macroethical implications of the field of aerospaceengineering.IntroductionThe impact of aerospace systems on society is regularly featured as part of the global news cycle.Recent topics have included protests against aerospace companies
/hybrid delivery to increase student learning intoday’s enhanced learning environment. Virginia Tech is designated by the National ScienceFoundation as a minority serving institution.Starting in Fall 2023, 13 activities were introduced to improve the Signals and Systems course inthe Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. The 13 initiatives introducedare: (1) Tracking attendance for assigned points starting on the first day of class; (2) mapping eachexam problem and each quiz question to the corresponding course Learning Objective(s) [3]; (3)introducing a series of mini-Guest Speakers to talk with the students about how they use theconcepts of signals and systems in their careers and jobs; (4) introducing Prize Day with a
understand the student perception of the course andhow it has changed over time. To this end, we strive to answer the following research questions: • Research Question 1: How does student sentiment change between the new course design vs the old course design. Where we define sentiment as students perceiving this class as a positive or negative experience in their undergraduate academic career. • Research Question 2: Is there a difference in self-reported student growth between the new course design vs. the old course design. One of the main learning goals of senior projects is for students to overcome a hard problem, or to experience a design failure but learn from the failure. We classify this as
involved in programs 31.4 33.0 37.5 39.4 37.8 40.5 45.9 49.2 to clean up the environment Working to correct social 44.9 NA NA NA 63.5 NA NA NA inequalitiesNA = not asked on the survey in that yearWithin engineering, there is evidence that females are particularly interested in sustainabilitytopics. Klotz et al. [18] found that female engineering students were significantly more interestedthan male engineering students in work in their careers related to disease, poverty anddistribution of resources, and opportunities for women and minorities; female engineeringstudents had lower interests in energy. Verdin et al. [19] found that community college