Asee peer logo

An Experience Report on Reducing Barriers by Removing Prerequisites for a CS 1 Introductory Programming Course

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

July 12, 2024

Conference Session

Innovating Inclusivity: Rethinking Access and Empowerment in STEM Education

Tagged Divisions

Equity and Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY)

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46552

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Udayan Das Saint Mary's College of California Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-3666

visit author page

Udayan Das is an associate professor and program director in computer science. Dr. Das’s main area of research is Technical Language Processing (TLP). Current NLP approaches and LLMs are inadequate to dealing with the complexity of technical text that needs to be reasoned on in such a manner that the accuracy of the automated reading can be relied upon and the cross-referentiality of technical documentation can be captured. His current research is focused on developing higher reliability Technical Language Models (TLMs) which are essentially knowledge-graph backed LLMs that can
pinpoint where information was drawn from within a complex information environment. He also works toward improving CS education, broadening participation in computing, and incorporating ethics into CS education.

visit author page

author page

Christopher Isaac Fulton

Download Paper |

Abstract

An Experience Report on Reducing Barriers by Removing Prerequisites for a CS 1 Introductory Programming Course

By: Dr. Udayan Das, Saint Mary's College of California and Chris Fulton, Loyola University Chicago

Abstract Even though many CS programs continue to evolve in considering what is required for students to begin a program, a majority of programs continue to have math or CS0 prerequisites to begin taking a CS1 programming course. This experience report discusses the impact of removing the math prerequisite at an R2 university (Loyola University Chicago) and a liberal arts college (Saint Mary's College of California). Our experience shows that the removal of prerequisites, making the course readily available for those interested in pursuing CS, did not affect student performance negatively but allowed a wider body of students to begin taking the program sooner. Having minimal prerequisites has beneficial effects in terms of diversifying the CS student body as well as enabling students to begin CS coursework early, often in the first semester, potentially impacting persistence, but also enabling students to decide, early, if CS is right for them. Programs should evaluate what prior knowledge is required to be successful in a CS program. The high success rate of students of various backgrounds taking CS certificates and pursuing graduate school also shows that aggressive prerequisites may be functioning as barriers to entering CS programs. If we are serious about supporting diversity, we need to acknowledge the wide disparity in high school education nationwide and that prerequisites are perhaps functioning as a needless barrier. Where the CS0 course doesn’t count towards a degree, or there isn’t space for that requirement in the program, it is also worth considering whether the CS0 prerequisite is necessary.

This paper will discuss the results of an analysis of 50 CS programs in the US representing a wide cross section of type and size of institution. These programs included many top CS programs as well as academic institutions of various types, including Carnegie Classified R1 and R2 universities, private and state universities, liberal arts colleges, as well as community colleges. 30% of CS1 courses at surveyed programs have no prerequisites to start the course. (Note that no prerequisites in this context includes high school completion or GED.) Of the CS1 courses that have prerequisites the breakdown is as follows. calculus or precalculus is a requirement in 24%. Another 12% require calculus or precalculus as a corequisite. Other math such as college algebra or mathematical reasoning account for 12%. CS 0 is an accepted prerequisite for the CS1 course in 30% of institutions. Note that the numbers do not add up to 100 because the listed requirements sometimes overlap.

We consider a CS 1 course to include the following topic areas guided by ACM Curriculum 2013 and 2023 beta: Variables Data types Console I/O Expressions Branching and selection Loops Functions File I/O Modules and libraries Objects Recursion

The paper will include detailed instructor reflections from 2 instructor-program-directors as well as a detailed discussion regarding implications and incorporation of the approach in other institutions, which includes more reliance on active learning and project-based learning as well as strong student supports.

The removal of prerequisites has significant benefits in terms of allowing a wider variety of students to take the CS 1 course earlier in their programs. The rationale of requiring students to take calculus prior to taking a CS 1 course should be reconsidered. Not only is there no dependence of a standard CS 1 programming course on calculus, but this requirement can also function as discouragement and a delay in students interested in taking the CS 1 programming course. Towards broadening participation in computing and supporting students from a wide variety of backgrounds, bringing differing prior experience a big step would be making it easier for students to begin programming as soon as possible.

Das, U., & Fulton, C. I. (2024, June), An Experience Report on Reducing Barriers by Removing Prerequisites for a CS 1 Introductory Programming Course Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/46552

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015