need for environmental scientistsand engineers to integrate nature as a key component of solutions while developing innovativesolutions to complex environmental problems. The need to use nature in environmental problem-solving is epitomized by investment of $8 billion to restore the Kissimmee River in Florida to itsoriginal state after it was straightened to canal 30 years ago [9]. In another example, the City ofColorado Springs recently publicized its plans to spend $460 million over two decades in itsstormwater infrastructure, maintenance and education programs [10]. Evidences suggests thatecological intensification of agriculture, an integration of nature into environmental solutions,can help sustain agricultural production while minimizing
or “street race and gender,” the race and gender that society assigns to an individual inmundane, everyday societal interactions in describing participants as Black and non-Black andman and woman [9]. Three participants were Black; five were non-Black. Two participants weremen; six were women.Data Collection and AnalysisToward the end of the second year of the project (the first year was a planning year), weconducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with project team members who each servedon at least one of the six teams. We attempted to capture a variety of team member experiencesand perspectives, including those from practitioners outside of academia. The full interviewprotocol contained 19 questions. The four interview questions we
readouts for monitoring pivotal parameters crucial to plant health and maintenance, such assoil moisture, light intensity, and nutrient levels, epitomizing the project's innovative fusion ofbotanical expertise with contemporary engineering solutions.The fabrication of the Thurman Botanical Tapestry entailed meticulous strategic planning andprecise execution. Commencing with the selection of a spectrum of resilient and aestheticallypleasing Aroid plants, the project's structure was meticulously engineered to accommodate thevaried growth habits of these botanical specimens while seamlessly incorporating cutting-edgesensor technologies. These technological enablers played a pivotal role in real-time monitoringof critical environmental parameters
needed. This was to be used by the school's dive team for as longas possible. The team originally planned to use Arduino for cost savings, but ended up using aclick PLC for the increased robustness. This case study investigates if the team made the bestdecision.Once again, appropriate weights for each of the categories were determined, summing to 100: ● Expense - with a total budget of $5,000 expense was important, but did not need to be minimized, so it was weighted as 20. ● Availability - while this product does deal with safety and excessive downtime is not desired, the team successfully competed for decades without it, so availability is not critically important, as long as it is not likely a part would become
majors.This class has been taught for four years although the first two years were impacted by COVID.As a result, this class is just starting to reach steady-state in terms of its content. Futureassessment will consider the achievement of our student learning outcomes. In addition, forstudents who plan on an engineering major or minor, we will look at the impact of this class onretention in the program. For students who are outside of the engineering program, we willexplore how this class has affected their acquisition of engineering skills and an appreciation forthe importance of engineering.IntroductionUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is comprehensive university that does not have aschool of engineering, but our Department of Applied
paper, and can be used to identify appropriate inclusion and exclusioncriteria for future full systematic reviews [15].With engineering leadership as a relatively nascent field and engineering design’s obvious placewithin the actions of the engineering profession, the researchers planned to embark upon twoscoping literature reviews. One review was to explore what previous work has identified relativeto engineering leadership competencies and the second review would explore the previousresearch related to engineering design competencies. The resulting search found that a systematicliterature review had been recently completed for the engineering leadership domain [16], as isfurther described in the next paragraph. We decided to use this pre
blocks to be gathered and classified by the robot. C) Map of the final project line following the course.Labs and ActivitiesThis interface was used for all the labs in this course. The activities where this interface providedthe greatest benefit were those requiring continuous streaming of sensor data. For example, theSimultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) module went over the basics of that field andintroduced ultrasonic range sensors. Students were able to stream ultrasonic sensor data whilewalking about the classroom to see how this sensor could be used for obstacle avoidance. TheQuadrotor Control and Path Planning Module introduced the idea of simultaneous sensorimotorloops, allowing students to draw
andpromising trends in education is the “edutainment” concept, which combineseducational content with entertaining activities so, the participants learn while havingfun.The program proved its flexibility as it was adapted to various locations, number ofparticipants, and time intervals. The paper will present the continuation of the program,the new results, and the plans for future expansion of the program to reach a broaderrange of participants.IntroductionExtensive evidence supports the effectiveness of instructing engineering students inspatial visualization skills, leading to improved outcomes. Research, spanning from theearly 1990s onwards, has consistently shown that practicing and training in spatialvisualization enhances performance in
) Creating Innovative Sustainable Materials, 2) Digital Construction, 3) BIM and VDC, 4) Virtual Testing Lab, 5) Construction Education, and 6) Sustainability.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from the CoDr. Tulio Sulbaran, The University of Texas at San Antonio He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineer from Georgia Institute of Technology with concentration in Construction Management with a minor in Computer Engineering and strong statistical background. He
to teach concepts in assembly, robotics, density,manufacturing and path planning. Students interacted wearing a 3D HMD or headset and controllers fornavigating and picking up objects, etc. In figure 2, a student can be seen interacting with such a medium usinga Vive platform. Fig. 2. A student seen wearing a 3D Vive headset interacts with an immersive VLE.Researchers have reported that children with autism learn best using Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) [33,34]. In this learning approach, positive reinforcement, is considered the most effective method to teach anindividual a desired behavior [35, 36When participants perform desired learning behaviors, they are rewarded.When a child performs a desired action, it is
student in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. Her master’s research focuses on disability accommodations in engineering classrooms and will produce a research-backed facilitation for faculty to navigate relationships with their disabled students. She plans to complete her PhD research in biomedical acoustic applications. She has a B.S. in Integrated Engineering & Humanities from Lehigh University.Dr. Karina Ivette Vielma, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Karina I. Vielma is a first-generation college student who dreamed big. As the eldest of five children, Dr. Vielma became very resourceful, attributing her skills to growing up in poverty. Her parents had high expectations for
qualitative case study research design and identifies the successes andchallenges of institutionalizing a successful NSF-funded S-STEM recruitment and retentionprogram. Institutionalization of successful educational programs is a goal of many NSF-fundedprograms. Reflection and critique of the institutionalization of our program will provide criticalinsights for similar programs on planning their institutionalization and contribute to theunderstanding of the institutionalization process, timeline, and effort areas. Throughout a“COVID-interrupted” 7-year period, this NSF-funded S-STEM program implemented research-based student success and retention strategies to serve 90 students and provide scholarshipsupport to 42 students. As programmatic elements
as part of this project which included: Select the location they recommended where the drone system would be located Discuss the impact of the selected location on their aspect of the project Determine rules for their teams Develop design specifications for their part of the project Produce at least three different concepts Select their preferred concept with sufficient justification Conduct a preliminary literature search Present the initial design concept to the class Complete the FAA drone training certificate training Select which drone or power generation equipment to purchase List any special tools that might be needed Developing a testing plan with metrics and an
experiments are planned yet), students are evaluated by the feasibility oftheir project. This feasibility includes considering resources and equipment available andexplaining how their proposed idea will be completed safely in the laboratory.The next step in the completion of the class project is the submission of a group written proposalin which each team defines the problem to be solved, the relevance of the problem, theirproposed solution and approach, a summary of relevant theory and methods, their managementplan, a detail of supplies and equipment needed, and a draft of the calculations needed tocomplete the problem solution. Teams are also required to designate a safety officer for theirteam, this is the student responsible for all the safety
Paper ID #42852Leveraging Open Source Tools to Teach Quantum Computing Foundations:Bridging the Future Workforce Gap in the Quantum EraDr. Radana Dvorak, Saint Martin’s University Radana Dvorak Ph.D. has worked as a researcher, professor, dean, consultant, and program architect. Her Ph.D. in CS-AI and MSc-AI from the UK, and BA from the University of Michigan, have led her to the UK, US, and the Cayman Islands. Radana spent time in the software industry, headed a VC-funded company bringing her PhD work to market, served on government, university strategic planning committees, and international fellowships; she was one of the
these advising practices cater to the diverse needs of all students and promote an inclusive and equitable environment? 2. How are expectations communicated to faculty and students regarding graduate student advising? 3. Could you describe a particularly successful advising relationship within your department and what you think contributed to its success?RQ2: Current Departmental Adoption of Mentoring Tools 1. Can you tell us about any mentoring tools (e.g., Individual Development Plans, aligning expectations worksheets, mentoring compacts/agreements, etc.) currently in use in your department to support graduate student advising? 2. Are there formal or informal ways faculty share mentoring tools, resources, and best
instructional practices into their courses [1], they alsohighlight a deficiency in the success of such adoption [2], [3]. Barriers to adopting EBIPs includeinadequate preparation time, content coverage concerns, unsupportive colleagues or departmentalculture, limited professional development opportunities, negative student reactions, andmisalignment with instructor reward structures [4], [5]. Instructors commonly cite a lack of time,especially the initial commitment required to transition from traditional lecture-focused methods,as a key obstacle to instructional change [6], [7]. In order to turn daunting barriers into instructionalsuccesses, engineering faculty and teaching training centers need to be intentional in planning forEBIP implementation
investigationalways reveals that the builders violated the approved guidelines."They don’t always build according to the approved plan, especially when it is a three-story building. There are times residential buildings are converted to six- or seven-storyshopping complexes by unscrupulous builders," the former General Manager said.CorruptionCorruption is another major factor responsible for ceaseless building collapse incidences;like compromise, this also takes place at different stages of building and from differentplayers in the building construction process. Another building developer somehowjustified the compromise. He said that for the building developers to maximize profit, theysometimes take loans from banks in a bid to assist the landlord in
mindsetframework. This entrepreneurial mindset framework is summarized by the 3C’s, namelyCuriosity, Connections, and Creating value. By applying an entrepreneurial mindset, participantsidentify characteristics desired in their student chapter, officers, and members. Additionalworkshop prompts explore actions of student members and leaders and help participants developan action plan for the coming semester and year. The logistics and delivery of the workshop aredetailed in this contribution. In addition, surveying participants at both the beginning and end ofthe workshops found high engagement, i.e., significant evidence of brainstorming and goalsetting.Introduction and backgroundEngineers are known as problem solvers, who commonly work in teams. Teamwork
at 50, 75, and 100%, where theinterrupt routine method produce latency over time in operating the motor. This experimentprovided a consideration for how a student should measure motor position if they plan to operatefor a long duration of time.MAEP Lesson PlanThe MAEP facilitates a hands-on learning experience in an introductory mechatronics labcourse. Through a series of labs designed for each motor type, students gain familiarity with themotors' functionalities and applications, empowering them to select the most suitable motor for amechatronics system. A first lab focuses on the BDC motor, where students compare differentdrive modes to operate a motor. Next, they explore operating a RC servo motor with feedback.Finally, a lab operating a
detection Fueling efficiency Tank storage capacity Plan for failure Plan for Failure Storage of materials Storage of Materials Environmental testing Environmental testing Noise level Noise Level Social/ environmental Tank and piping maintenance and cleaning Tank and pipe materials
. Still, the option of running the program in ahybrid format remains open for subsequent iterations, especially to better reach students in othergeographic areas and as a mechanism for students requiring special accommodations. Onlinerollout of the program requires some advanced logistical planning, such as compiling andpackaging the supplies to send to the students. We would also like to point out that in the hybridversion, the online students miss out on the in-class interactions. The learning objectives ofteamwork and collaboration are not met in the online setting.The topics covered in the ChE-focused summer program include fluid flow, separations, energyconversion, mixing, and reactions. This work-in-progress paper focuses on
the first exam in the course. The initial interview was heldat the end of September through the beginning of October, 2023, soon after receiving a grade onthe first course exam. Students were asked whether they did better/worse on that exam than theythought they would, their reactions to their score, study strategies, and planned changes after thefirst exam. Sample interview questions included “How did you react when you saw your examscore?” and “How and when did you study for the exam?”. The same students were then asked toparticipate in a follow-up interview after receiving a grade on the second course exam and thiswas at the end of October through the beginning of November of the same semester. In additionto selectively asking the same set
other’s drafts in class 4) Students reflect on the peer review process, identifying revisions they plan to make due to comments they received and also anything they plan to change after being inspired by seeing a strength in another student’s draft.Based on instructor observations and student feedback, we can identify several reasons why thepeer review process has variable results for students. The major problem we have identified isthat students put different amounts of effort into reading and commenting on other students’drafts, which results in some students receiving very little or unhelpful feedback. Sometimes astudent will not submit a draft, which affects not only that student (i.e., they do not receivefeedback from peer
by thesummer of 2024. To ease the conversion efforts, a strategic plan was created for the summer of2023 to create a comprehensive picture of how much MATLAB was embedded in thecurriculum and to connect faculty with students who would work over the summer to make theconversions happen. A Python consultant was brought in for the summer and a team of 8undergraduate students were hired to span the diverse classes that required conversions.While adoption of Python was required for undergraduate courses, elective undergraduate andgraduate level courses are still free to use the language of their choice but all faculty were giventhe option of support to make the Python conversion if they so chose.During end of year course meetings conducted in May
, knowledge, or attitudes learned in onesituation to another learning situation [5]. While the concept and practice of transferring learninghave always been intrinsic to educational objectives, it was not until it was defined as an explicitgoal of education plans that it was formally named. Fundamentally, ToL asks students to applytheir learning to contexts different than where they originally learned them [3]. ToL is central inengineering education, given the complex nature of problems in engineering and the tailored,problem-specific solutions they demand. In engineering classrooms, learners must applyfoundational concepts creatively and flexibly in varied contexts [6]. ToL can be promotedthrough strategies like inquiry, problem-based, or project
undergraduate mentors who joined remotely.Building Sustainability in Year TwoThe GGEE team understood that a shift toward more sustainable practices and partnershipswould allow for the program to continue into another year and expand across the state. Whenplanning for the second year of GGEE summer programs, the following areas were identified tobuild out a preliminary sustainability plan: 1) methods to recruit interested schools and districts,2) increase program ownership by schools and districts, 3) engage cost-sharing partnerships, 4)recruit students to participate in programs, 5) research and program assessment, and 6) providingmultiple opportunities for students to return to the program. These six factors were chosenthrough a deconstruction of the
discussion with a question to the students, asking them how they arrived at theIOE building that day. The students volunteered answers about their mode of transportation, suchas taking the bus or driving with a parent. This initiating question prompted a conversation abouthow the vehicle operator knew how to get to the destination in the most efficient way possible.The discussion about the mode of transportation transitioned into a conversation aboutnavigation applications and their route-planning algorithms. The familiar topic of navigationapplications served as a starting point for curiosity about how the “best” route is selected.Students volunteered answers about the factors that the algorithm might consider when selectingthe best route, such as
unsuccessful and what you learned. 3) What is your plan to further address this difficulty? Include an explanation of why you believe your plan will help. Or, if you were successful in addressing this difficulty, discuss how you might use these approaches to address future difficulties.Students were asked to focus on a difficulty related to the course content in each of the sixreflections.At the end of the semester, instructors and TAs from each course were interviewed about theirexperience integrating reflection in their course. The interviews were semi-structured and weredesigned to elicit detailed information regarding the perceived usefulness of reflective practices,the strategies employed, the perceived impact on student learning
for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive, and