University. His specializations include qualitative methods, post-secondary transitions, and academic writing.Dr. John Carrell, Texas Tech University John Carrell is Assistant Professor of Engineering at the Texas Tech University Honors College. He received his doctorate in industrial engineering from Texas Tech University and his research focuses on enriching engineering education through the humanities.Michael Scott Laver, Rochester Institute of Technology Michael Laver received his bachelor’s degree from Purdue University, West Lafayette in 1996 in both history and psychology, and his Masters and PhD in East Asian Languages and Civilization from the University of Pennsylvania in 2006. He is currently a professor in the
colonialism can be perpetuatedthrough engineering.To address this gap, I designed course lectures and shared resources that could speak to howpower dynamics and systems of oppression impact engineering design. A critical considerationfor me was the belief that discussions around topics such as race, gender, class, etc. should not berelegated to one week focused on “equity.” I was worried that relegating all equity- and justice-related content to one week would devalue it in the minds of students and perpetuate the idea thatall the other content in the course was neutral or apolitical. My course had two full weeksdedicated especially to gender and colonialism in the course. In addition, most of the other weeksincluded concepts, ideas, and examples
event a success. Many havecontinued to create additional opportunities for education, public dialogue, and impact in their respectiveenvironments. Considering these indications that the program was a success, this study’s research objectives aremeant to draw from that collective experience and provide insight for engineering educators designing similar skill-sharing events between engineers and students and professionals from other disciplines, especially those stemmingfrom a specific need to take a multi-sectoral approach. With that in mind, this study of that program, as well asreflections on this interdisciplinary collaboration and measures of the program’s impacts, was a valuable opportunityto examine our research questions and derive
solve theproblem—as the designer proceeds in the design process. Andrews connected design failures toPiaget’s “perturbations” in the environment that encourage students to get curious and learn [4,9]. Another way to consider how design failure may inspire learning is to compare it to howanomalous data may do the same in science education. As Chinn and Malhotra found in fourseparate experiments, “upper elementary school children are fair minded in their observations ofdata about empirical regularities in science, and they are willing and able to change their beliefsin response to their observations” (p. 342) [10].Squarely in the engineering education space, Crismond [11, 12] and Crismond and Adams [2]assert the importance of diagnostic
Paper ID #41604Remote Learning: A Means to Advance Educational Equity in Isolated orRural RegionsMr. Marcelo Caplan, Columbia College Marcelo Caplan - Associate Professor, Department of Science and Mathematics, Columbia College Chicago. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Remote Learning: A Means to Advance Educational Equity in Isolated or Rural Regions (Evaluation ofProgram/Curriculum) 1. AbstractA significant disparity exists in the quality of education between urban and rural areas in Latin America.While urban centers and towns benefit from well-equipped schools staffed by qualified educators
Paper ID #43089Corsi-Rosenthal Box Learning Module: How Can We Make Clean Air Accessiblefor Schools? (Resource Exchange)Aaron Richardson, University of Connecticut Aaron Richardson studies and teaches with a focus on social and racial justice, accessibility, and creating relevant curriculum that will make use of students’ lived experiences and knowledge to help them bring their own personal meaning to their education and into the classroom. Aaron Richardson’s interest in the Corsi-Rosenthal Learning Module project revolved around accessible, relevant science and engineering education for students by using phenomena that
answer two general short-answer questions followed by aquestionnaire containing specific items where you will rank the frequency and importance of variouscommunication modes and skills.In a few sentences, please give your initial responses to the following questions (no need to spendsignificant time, it can be whatever comes to mind first): 1) What communication skills do new engineering graduates need to improve? 2) What are the top one or two ways new engineering graduates can improve their communication skills? Communications WRITTEN How often used Daily Weekly Monthly
we have toreach people on a deeper intellectual, emotional, and moral level. . . A candid sharing ofperspectives on race—grounded in facts. . .leads to greater awareness and action” (p. xviii).Throughout The Conversation, Livingston offers research findings and imaginative analogies thatare relevant to the discourse on diversity in engineering. In a similar vein, Jonathan Haidt in TheRighteous Mind: Why Good People Divided by Politics and Religion (2013) presents a socialintuitionist model of persuasion that explicates the underlying processes by which socialinteraction “sometimes leads people to change their minds” (p. 55). Together with rhetoricaltheory, social psychology provides us with available resources for persuasion that could be
Paper ID #42788Investigating Student Experiences of Inclusion and Exclusion to Guide MakerspaceDevelopmentDr. Aubrey Wigner, Colorado School of Mines Aubrey Wigner is an assistant professor at the Colorado School of Mines where he teaches engineering design, entrepreneurship, and systems design.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Colorado School of Mines Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor and Division Director of Engineering, Design, & Society at Colorado School of Mines.Catherine Chase Corry, Colorado School of MinesJulianne Stevens, Colorado School of Mines ©American Society for Engineering Education
engineering majors and others persistthrough completing the degree [3].Numerous studies have proved the link between a strong sense of engineering identity andsuccess in the field [4]. This ties directly into retention rates as students who see their ownvalidity in engineering disciplines are more likely to stay in undergraduate engineering programs[9]. With this in mind, some universities have tried to increase retention rates by creating spacesfor students to do what we’ve termed, “make.” Dougherty’s [5] universally accepted definitionof “making” encompasses traditional trades like woodworking, sewing, and soldering with moremodern activities including coding, 3D-printing, and laser cutting [6]. Our definition of“making” is similar, but
.” Lastly, the code Meeting need of customer / criteriacontains 6.8% of the responses and include examples such as: “producing a product or servicewithin a client’s parameters” and “identifying a thorough list of needs and requirements anddesigning with those in mind.”Questions 2 and 3 asked about challenging and straightforward aspects of engineering design.Because of the similarities in the responses, the same coding framework was used for bothquestions. Question 2 asked students to identify what they deemed up to two aspects of engineeringdesign that they found challenging. The responses were much more distributed among the variousthematic codes than question 1, with the top choices all being under 20%. The highest percentageof responses, 18.2
/tej2022221121.[10] J. L. Hess, J. Beever, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman, “Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20249.[11] P. Murphy, “Teaching applied ethics to the righteous mind,” J. Moral Educ., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 413–428, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/03057240.2014.963036.[12] E. L. Black, F. G. Burton, and J. K. Cieslewicz, “Improving Ethics: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Include Moral Disengagement,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 945–978, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04896-z.[13] J. Haidt, “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social
variables (i.e., gender, race, ethnicity, academic major, etc.).As shown in Table 5, the result of Pearson Chi-square test revealed that engineering students hada higher likelihood of experiencing changes in epistemic dimension as compared to the non-engineering students, pointing towards the possibility of a meaningful relationship betweenstudent majors and the likelihood of changes in habits of mind dimensions.Table 5. Cross Tabulation Analysis between Students’ Academic Majors and Habits of Mind’sEpistemic Dimension Frequency Change in Epistemic Dimension Engineering (n=10) Non-Engineering (n=8) Yes 5 (2.8) 0 (2.2) No
Conference Proceedings.[3] ASME, 1995, “Integrating the product Realization Process (PRP) into the Undergraduate Curriculum,” (a curriculum development project of the ASME Council on Education, ASME, December 1995.[4] Brancaccio-Taras, L., Mawn, M. V., Premo, J., & Ramachandran, R. (2021). Teaching in a Time of Crisis: Editorial Perspectives on Adjusting STEM Education to the “New Normal” during the COVID-19 Pandemic.[5] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.[6] C. Chaplin, ‘Creativity in Engineering Design – The Educational Function,” The Education and Training of Charted Engineers for the 21st
Provost. She is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and enjoys teaching thermo/fluids/energy and design related courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The ICE Faculty Development Program (Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset) – Then and NowAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper describes the creation and evolution of a faculty developmentprogram known as “Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset” (ICE) that has beenoffered for more than ten years. The program began when entrepreneurially minded learning(EML) was in its infancy and has undergone continual improvement as a deeper understandingof what is required for effective EML has continued to
validation, financial knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy, and social support[1], [3], [4]. The research questions are designed with TSC in mind and to support achievementof the purposes of the project. The research questions guiding this grant are: RQ1: What are assets, factors, and strategies that enable access for two- year college students to engineering transfer pathways? RQ2: Do assets, factors, and strategies vary in magnitude and/or presence across student demographics, locations, institutions, or intention to transfer? RQ3: How does use of digital learning tools and resources impact transfer outcomes for pre-transfer engineering students? RQ4: To what extent can transfer outcomes be
Across Academic Disciplines. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 2016. 30(1): p. 23-41.2. Jensen, K.J. and K.J. Cross, Engineering stress culture: Relationships among mental health, engineering identity, and sense of inclusion. Journal of Engineering Education, 2021. 110(2): p. 371-392.3. Whitwer, M., S. Wilson, and J. Hammer. Engineering Student Mental Health and Help Seeking: Analysis of National Data from the Healthy Minds Study. in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2023. IEEE.4. Hargis, L.E., C.J. Wright, M.E. Miller, E.E. Usher, J.H. Hammer, and S.A. Wilson. Relationship Between Mental Health Distress and Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Engineering Students. in American Society
understand and assess engineering students’ motivation entrepreneurially minded learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Validating the Use of Epistemic Network Analysis to Describe the Nature of Learning in Practice-Based Learning SettingsIntroductionPreparing engineering students to thrive in the workplace post-graduation has been a longwithstanding challenge and discussion topic in engineering education spaces. To provide studentswith authentic engineering experiences, there have been shifts in engineering educationcurricular approaches, such as problem-based, case-based, and project-based approaches – whichhave had various success rates at increasing transfer, learning, and
framework is designed to be completed as part of a mentorship or curricularprogrammatic activity. As such, while students work to complete the framework, they alsoengage in a mentoring relationship with a faculty member. The mentoring relationship isdesigned to allow each student to receive guidance on both professional and technical skills andrelated activities while reflecting with a mentor who can provide additional perspective.This paper focuses on the professional skills within the framework, which are divided into thefollowing components: teamwork, communication, engineering habits of mind, solutions andimpact, professional ethics, lifelong learning, leadership, and diversity, equity, and inclusion(DEI). Importantly, the current work extends
Paper ID #43651Teaching Effective Communication for TeamworkDr. Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University Joanna Tsenn is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her B.S. from the University of Texas at Austin and her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. She coordinates the mechanical engineering senior capstone design program and teaches senior design lectures and studios. Her research interests include engineering education with an emphasis on capstone design and teamwork.Jonathan Weaver-Rosen, Texas A&M University
workremains to stabilize and grow this nascent effort into a mature and robust program. Areas ofimmediate focus include program accreditation, faculty hires, research efforts, partnerships, andstudent awareness.Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Gaining ABET accreditation for theprogram is, of course, a key emphasis item for UAF. As is the case for any new program, we mustgraduate at least 1 student from the program prior to applying for accreditation. UAF is workingdiligently to ensure this process is as quick and efficient as possible. The new aerospace program hasbeen built from existing UAF programs (all accredited) with the specific ABET aerospace engineeringaccreditation standards in mind from the beginning, and UAF’s
Paper ID #41607Teaching Social Justice in Infrastructure: A Community of Practice Frameworkfor the use of Case StudiesDr. Claudia Mara Dias Wilson, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Dr. Claudia Mara Dias Wilson is an Associate Professor in civil engineering at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (New Mexico Tech). She earned her B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Florida State University. Although she specialized in earthquake mitigation and the development of control algorithms for semi-active dampers to reduce seismic vibrations on buildings, her research interests are broad and include topics
first-year engineering coursesmight also provide new pathways for transforming curricula aimed at educating the 21st-centuryengineer [14].Mental Health and Wellbeing (MHW) has been attributed to student success in higher education.While engineering undergraduates and their faculty agree on the need for improveddissemination of information, students desire a broader scope, including information relating tocourses and hands-on experiences [15]. Mindfulness training can support the development ofintrapersonal and interpersonal competencies that transfer directly into supporting students'engineering education experience as well as their personal lives [16].Inclusion and a sense of belonging matter as well. Creating learning communities for
more effectively [8][9]. Notably, learning tocommunicate effectively (oral and written) requires correct sentence structure, which is lackingskill and requires assistance.Recognizing the root problem of engineering students' technical writing as inappropriate use ofsentence structure in English, this paper focuses on creating means to allow students to conveytheir thoughts using correct sentence structure. Prior literature suggests that complete sentenceseffectively allow an individual to communicate with another because complete sentencesenhance the strength and meaning of the ideas in the writer's mind [10].We hypothesize that this model will assist students in classifying written sentences asdeclarative, interrogative, imperative
Paper ID #41547Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Accelerator Program: Overview,Results, and Lessons LearnedDr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include entrepreneurially minded learning, energy education, interdisciplinary education, and faculty professional development.Dr. Katey Shirey, EduKatey As the founder of eduKatey, Dr. Katey Shirey supports science and math educators worldwide to bridge their content areas and bring engineering design and creativity to their students. Dr. Shirey earned her BA in physics, BA
Paper ID #43457The Paint Bucket Model of Dis/ability in STEM Higher Education: Axioms1-3Dr. D. C. Beardmore, University of Colorado Boulder D. C. Beardmore earned their Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. They are currently the Engineering GoldShirt Program Manager for the Broadening Opportunities through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) center at the University of Colorado Boulder. Their current and historical positionality statements can be found at dcbeardmore.com.Dr. Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder
Paper ID #42092GIFTS: Improved Team Skill Development through a Semester-Long TeamworkReportDr. Melissa M. Simonik, State University of New York at Binghamton Melissa received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Union College (Schenectady, NY) in 2014 and her M.Eng. degree in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University (Ithaca, NY) in 2015. Melissa started at Binghamton University in 2015 as a Mechanical Engineering doctoral student. She served as a teaching assistant (TA) for Watson Capstone Projects for two years. She continued as a TA for the Engineering Design Division in 2017 where she taught both Introduction to
toward better practice.The three-year FLC followed the three-part structure of the Colorado Equity Toolkit [14], whichis a freely available collection of curated resources to support inclusive teaching at all levelsfrom primary through postsecondary education. During 2021/22, the first year of the FLC,ENNTICE emphasized self-inquiry, reflection, and mindfulness [15]. During 2022/23, thesecond year of the FLC, ENNTICE emphasized inclusive course design [16]. Here we reportselected results from 2023/24, the third year of the FLC, when ENNTICE emphasized buildingcommunity. These results have been selected to answer the research question: To what degreedoes faculty participation in an FLC impact engineering college culture?MethodsFor the purpose of
environmental conditions and skin types [20]. In this study, we used such advancements to improvethe efficacy and accuracy of rPPG technologies in non-invasive stress monitoring. Furthermore, as a response to detected high stress, there are several practices suitable for engineering students tobring stress under control as shown in table II. Techniques like Mindfulness Meditation, which focuses awareness onthe present moment, and Progressive Muscle Relaxation, involving the progressive tensing and releasing of musclegroups, have been shown to effectively reduce stress [21]. Diaphragmatic Breathing, characterized by deep, slowbreaths from the diaphragm, activates the parasympathetic nervous system, promoting relaxation [22]. CognitiveBehavioral
Paper ID #43263Promoting Persistence: Providing Support for HBCU Students from Low-IncomeBackgroundsDr. Brittany Boyd, American Institutes for ResearchDr. Jing Yan, Tennessee State University Dr. Yan is currently the Research Associate Professor and Director of Grant Services of College of Engineering at Tennessee State University. She got her Ph.D. from Jackson State University in 2018. Her expertise is in engineering education, underrepresented student’s development in STEM education, data analysis using SPSS and discourse analysis, artificial intelligence, and human-computer interaction. Dr. Yan is the author or co