Portland, Oregon
June 23, 2024
June 23, 2024
June 26, 2024
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 19
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
19
10.18260/1-2--46589
https://peer.asee.org/46589
54
Lucas Wiese is a PhD student in Computer and Information Technology at Purdue University. He studies AI ethics education and workforce development and works in the Research on Computing in Engineering and Technology Education lab (ROCkETEd) and the Governance and Responsible AI Lab (GRAIL).
Alejandra J. Magana, Ph.D., is the W.C. Furnas Professor in Enterprise Excellence in the Department of Computer and Information Technology and Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University.
Artificial intelligence’s (AI) widespread societal impact means that students of all disciplines will be working in roles adjacent to this new technology. As a result, they need to understand how to appropriately navigate and behave ethically in practice. The purpose of this paper is to introduce and detail a learning intervention intended to enhance the ethical behavior of future AI developers and engineers. The SIMDE conceptual framework was developed to offer a basis for understanding the pre-rational aspects of ethical decision-making as they are carried out into deliberate discourse in a social space amongst peers. To investigate the SIMDE framework, students were asked to solve a professional AI ethics problem in a dilemma-based seven-step learning activity. The qualitative results of this paper examine how constructs in the SIMDE conceptual framework were present in student responses, and what students learned from peer discourse that led them to either justify their gut-reaction decision or change their mind. We found that students are impacted by perspective-taking, they use reasoning to defend their position rather than seek and appraise truth, and moral self-reflection helps them learn more about themselves. Moreover, even when students learn new information and improve their reasoning, they are not inclined to change their minds from their initial intuitive judgment. This finding supports literature that suggests ‘reasoning’ can only go so far in the ethics curriculum if behavioral change is the goal. More interdisciplinary educational research is necessary to design an ethics curriculum that can appropriately prepare future AI professionals for the demands of industry.
Wiese, L. J., & Magana, A. J. (2024, June), Applied Ethics via Encouraging Intuitive Reflection and Deliberate Discourse Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46589
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015