-identification[2] M. Kotche, “Clinical Immersion Internship Introduces Students to Needs Assessment,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/clinical-immersion-internship-introduces- students-to-needs-assessment[3] M. Ong, J. M. Smith, and L. T. Ko, “Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 206–245, 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21417.[4] K. C. Thiem and N. Dasgupta, “From Precollege to Career: Barriers Facing Historically Marginalized Students and Evidence-Based Solutions,” Soc. Issues Policy Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 212
Paper ID #42757Understanding and Enhancing Student Engagement: Measuring Resources,Self-Assessment and Constructive Engagement In 1st-Year Engineering CoursesNavid Yaghoubisharif, Oregon State UniversityDr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and Associate School Head in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award inDr. Natasha Mallette P.E., Oregon State University Dr. Natasha Mallette is a licensed professional engineer with expertise in
Paper ID #42158Unveiling the Crisis: Decoding the Working Conditions of Doctoral EngineeringStudents and the Call for Decent WorkMr. Rafael De Leon, The Ohio State University A current PhD student in engineering education at The Ohio State University, Rafael De Leon has spent much of his academic and professional career researching and analyzing energy technologies. He spent some time working at the National Energy Technology Lab (NETL) becoming familiar with how policy is influenced by engineers. His current research interests include graduate student working conditions and policy. He enjoys spending time with family and
their degree. Theproblem is compounded when there is a lack of realization that these students have manyresponsibilities outside of schoolwork (Tyson, 2012).Yet, these students still enroll in college and universities for multiple reasons. A study found thattypical non-traditional students expect to utilize college for career preparation and were lesslikely to be focused on the social scene (Forbus, Newbold, & Mehta, 2011). Another study citeda personal desire to complete what they started, being a role model for their children, and thefinancial incentives to improve their economic situation (Bohl, Haak, & Shrestha, 2017).Providing a meaningful undergraduate experience to non-traditional students will go a long waytowards enhancing
mechanisms to better support student learning and improve theoverall nature of computing courses. As a result of this, computation has been integrated intonumerous first-year engineering courses to expose students to introductory computing activitiesto improve student learning early in their post K-12 career. Introductory programming coursessuch as these first-year engineering courses have been a significant context to study as thechallenges associated with novice programmers have been a focus of scholarly work withincomputing education research both for the students themselves and the instructors [2,3].The challenges students face in introductory programming has been a focus for computingeducation and engineering education researchers investigating
designed to support their educational experiences). This research showsthat CSt face three main challenges: time constraints, lack of knowledge of available resources,and lack of availability of affordable child care. Assets of CSt include their increased motivation,organizational skills, and patience; these assets may be responsible for the higher GPAs that CSthave relative to their peers.As outlined above, none of the studies included in this review focused specifically on engineeringstudents. One study, which involved students from a variety of areas of study, consisted of 23%engineering students; [32] another study involved students studying the built environment [13] (aninterdisciplinary field appropriate for students considering careers in
M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development.Dr. Kim-Doang Nguyen, Florida Institute of Technology Dr. Kim-Doang Nguyen is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering education research, data science, machine learning, robotics, and dynamical systems. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024How Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate
research experience includes examination of implicit bias in the classroom and application of VR technologies to improve student engagement. Darby hopes to pursue a career in STEM education and educational research.Dr. Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University Kaitlin Mallouk is an Associate Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Experiential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Effect of Ego Network Structure on Self-efficacy in Engineering StudentsAbstractEngineering
if only offered in isolation from regular engineering content. ● To maximize reach and integration of change efforts, prioritize core and required courses ● Scaffold learning across all stages of degree, not just in first year courses, design courses, or capstones ● Engage industry partners in curricular and co-curricular activities to demonstrate the relevance to careers ● Incorporate sustainability skills, as well as professional and leadership skills such as critical thinking, communication, and teamwork. ● Faculty mentorship or a community of practice support is ideal for sustained faculty engagement and curricular change and to foster deeper understanding ● Share ideas, lessons learned and curriculum
to past students who participatedin a senior-year fluid mechanics course during spring semesters spanning 2019-2022 and wereengaged in a semester-long multidisciplinary service-learning project. The objective was toassess their current perception of the impact of the assignment, after several years have passedand they have moved into their professional careers (long-term impact). We also examined howthe opinions of all participants as a group may have evolved from when they were students tonow as working professionals. We compared their recent group responses with reflections theycompleted during the course (short-term impact). Class Setting The Fluid Mechanics course, part of a midsize university's Mechanical
recommend appropriate adjustments such aspre-training to enhance learners’ prior knowledge for effective learning of the course materialat hand. As VR laboratories can serve as a form of pre-training for physical laboratories,these findings reveal the need for improved scaffolding and varied forms of elementinteractivity based on topic complexity in designing effective learning environments.Sasidharan and Kareem [35] reported that learners’ perceptions of usefulness are majorlyinfluenced by the relevance of course concepts to their future careers independent ofperceived content difficulty. We observed related results in our data, as learners in our studyexpressed positive perceptions on the beneficial role i.e., utility value of laboratory
’ educational careers [5], it behooves programs to take advantage of the data available tothem in order to better understand the unique backgrounds and needs of students as they navigatethrough the curricula.Accordingly, engineering education researchers have identified many factors that predictengineering students’ academic success [6]–[8]. To build power and generalizability, someanalyses have aggregated data across multiple engineering programs and institutions, such asresearch using the MIDFIELD database [9]. While these generalized insights have valuablecontributions for the engineering community and its subdisciplines, there is also value incontextualizing analyses within specific programs, since departmental culture, studentcomposition, and many
transdisciplinary,holistic, and problem-solving abilities [18]. Research indicates that incorporatingdesign thinking into engineering education yields several positive outcomes, includingenhanced creativity, sustainability, and career readiness[19]. Furthermore, it has beenshown to improve students' leadership, algorithmic, entrepreneurial, and criticalthinking skills, fostering a culture of design and creativity [20]. Graham’s studyshows [21] design thinking enhances empathy, entrepreneurship, emergingtechnologies, material science, collaboration, and a human-centric focus.Traditionally, engineering education has heavily focused on critical thinking withintechnical realms, nurturing students' proficiency in managing tasks [22]. In contrast,design thinking
Paper ID #44090Board 85: Work in Progress: Asset-Driven Equitable Partnerships (ADEP inPractice)Dr. Kenneth A Connor, Inclusive Engineering Consortium & Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Kenneth Connor is Program Officer at the Inclusive Engineering Consortium (IEC), whose mission is to enable MSI ECE programs to produce more and better prepared graduates from groups that have been historically underrepresented in ECE careers. He is also an emeritus professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer, and Systems Engineering (ECSE) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) where he taught courses on electromagnetics
roles played by employer policies and organizations such as the AGC. By emphasizing the industry's proactive measures, it seeks to inspire and attract young individuals to consider fulfilling careers in construction, contributing to a sustainable and thriving future for the sector. B. The significance of students thinking about professions in the construction business is emphasized in this essay. It will look at the main issue facing the construction industry, which is a lack of competent labor, how the sector has tried to meet the needs of the newest generation, and what possible reforms have been suggested for the future. It explores the ways in which employer policies impact the career decisions
through the continuingprofessional education of university teaching staff.In short, thinking about the way of teaching has been the product of research andexperiences that show the need to focus on training to scale up or improve student retentionpractices and inter-and transdisciplinary views of the specificity of a field in relation towhat surrounds it.We have varied antecedents in Latin America that show that in recent times, engineeringhas had little growth because these careers are perceived as very long and difficult, addingto the fact that the initial years have become more difficult for those who join these careers[21]. Therefore, thinking about teaching would give us the possibility of providing areflective look at the practice that
looking for technically skilled professionals andindividuals with strong leadership abilities. Leadership in engineering is the ability to guide,motivate, and influence a team of professionals toward achieving goals and objectives. TheEngineering School of a University in Chile needs to understand the self-perceived skills of itsstudents, especially those in the final years of their engineering programs. This will help thefaculty prepare future professionals for team management, decision-making, and otheressential skills required in their careers. The School can align their graduation standards withthe career profiles of the students to ensure they are well-equipped to succeed in theirprofession.Numerous studies have suggested that there is a
engineering education, pp. 1–17, 2010 Available at: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076158.pdf.[2] K. Mattern, J. Radunzel, and P. Westrick. “Development of STEM Readiness Benchmarks to Assist Educational and Career Decision Making.” ACT Research Report Series, 2015 (3). ACT, Inc., 2014[3] A. Sithole, E. T. Chiyaka, P. McCarthy, D.M. Mupinga, B.K. Bucklein, and J. Kibirige. “Student Attraction, Persistence and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges”. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), pp.46-59, 2017[4] E. R. Kurban, and A. F. Cabrera. “Building readiness and intention towards STEM fields of study: using HSLS: 09 and SEM to examine this complex process
, after which theauxiliary material gets elbowed out to address new technical developments, external pressures,and so forth. We are, however, conscientious about both the reason to spread this work out andthe how to sustain it.For the former, as faculty who advise all the students in our programs—with each of whom wemeet no less than three times each year (no less than once per quarter, typically two or threetimes) just for advising—we are familiar with many students’ tendency to identify what theyconsider throw-away courses. These are required courses that many students do not perceive asessential to their career. And because we cannot teach our major courses more than once peryear, it is sometimes justifiable for a student to leave these
and Obafemi Awolowo University. With passion to communicate research findings and gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has attended several in-persons and virtual conferences and workshop, and at some of them, made presentation on findings on air pollution, waste water reuse, and heavy metal contamination.Dr. Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University Dr. Oludare Owolabi, a professional engineer in Maryland, joined the Morgan State University faculty in 2010. He is the assistant director of the Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research (CATIER) at Morgan State Universit ©American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #42056Examining the Opportunities and Challenges of Using Artificial Intelligencefor Engineering Technical Writing CoursesDr. Susan J Ely, University of Southern Indiana Dr. Ely began her academic career at the community college level, after having worked as an engineer in areas of manufacturing, distribution, logistics and supply chain. She is the Director of Technology Programs and Assistant Professor in Manufacturing at the University of Southern Indiana. Research includes student retention and engagement, mentoring and support of women in engineering and lean applications in non-manufacturing environments.Dr
Instruction in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. She received her PhD in 2005 in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from Vanderbilt University. Her research interests are computer animation, undergraduate computer science and engineering education, and broadening participation in computing. Throughout her career, Dr. Wang has been actively involved in the important mission of recruiting and mentoring women in computer science and engineering. She serves as the faculty advisor of Women in Computer Science and Engineering student organization since 2013. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Peer-led Learning for a Hardware
-year anniversary retrospective survey to former students in2019 to inquire about the value of the course for their academic and professional careers. Now,we are embarking on a project to formally evaluate the course content and its direct impact oncurrent students, particularly their leadership skills with regards to DEI in engineering, to informour next course redesign process. As part of the long-term goals for our project, we want toevaluate the impact the redesigned course has on students’ leadership development, both in theirremaining academic careers and their future professional careers.This work-in-progress practice paper presents the preliminary results of the first phase of ourcurrent project. In this first phase, we evaluate the
equitabledevelopments in the AEC industry. Literature has highlighted the low participation ofmarginalized communities in civil and construction industries as well as in the academic sector[16]. Furthermore, very few studies focused on improving the competencies of Hispanic andother historically marginalized students in AEC including communication and presentation skillsand other professional skills, while other studies assessed their preferences for sustainability andrelevant career choices [17]–[19]. In order to support the skilled labor shortage in the AECindustry as well as to preserve the economic success of the US, marginalized professionals mustbe involved in infrastructure construction projects. Moreover, awareness of equitableinfrastructure resilience
Paper ID #41317Board 126: Work in Progress: Investigating Faculty Development Experiencesin the Context of a Teaching-focused Book ClubMarcus Melo de Lyra, The Ohio State University Marcus is a second-year Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education Department (EED) at The Ohio State University. His research interests include teaching faculty development and early-career faculty experiences. Before joining the EESD program, Marcus earned his BS in Civil Engineering at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte and his MS in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Federal University of Campina Grande in Brazil.Dr
iteration of our HCD-based camp. Givenour preliminary results [3], we iterated the camp’s design and performed a second round of datacollection to better understand the impact of our activities on students’ learning outcomes. Duringthe first iteration, we noticed a positive impact on students’ interest in pursuing an engineeringcareer, their awareness of what engineers do in an engineering career, and their awareness of therole of HCD in engineering.Our previous work [3] primarily addressed the implications of the introduction of HCD onengineering design pedagogies. In this paper, we examine the reciprocal influence of traditionalengineering contexts on HCD. This paper seeks to answer the following research questions: RQ 1: What is the impact
faculty members. This relationship extends to both the mentoring andproject development aspects of the program. Personalized mentoring sessions delve intocurriculum planning, postgraduate education pathways, and career opportunities, providingtailored guidance to each student.Living Learning Community (LLC): As first-year students, INNOV scholars reside in an LLCsituated in the HC residence hall. This arrangement immerses students in an environmentoptimized for academic endeavors and offers direct access to HC programs. Additionally, itenables natural cohort bonding and integration into the Honors College's vibrant academic andsocial ecosystem.Honors College (HC) Programs: Students demonstrating exemplary academic performance (GPAof 3.5 or higher
(Tsui, 2007). Flynn(2016) found that Black STEM students have a higher probability of not continuing their education inSTEM compared to their White counterparts. Underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, such asBlack, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American, and Indigenous communities, face unique challenges inaccessing and succeeding in STEM education and careers. Structural barriers, lack of resources,limited role models, and systemic racism contribute to lower representation and retention rates forSTEM SUCCESS AT AN HSI COMMUNITY COLLEGE 7these groups in STEM fields (Corbett & Hill, 2015). Overcoming these challenges requires concertedefforts to provide equitable opportunities
participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair for the Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business
Review of Higher Education, vol. 22, pp. 55-72, 1998.[5] A. B. Diekman, E. R. Brown, A. M. Johnston, and E. K. Clark, "Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers," Psychol. Sci., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1051-1057, 2010.[6] E. Clark, E. Brown, A. Johnston, and A. Diekman, "Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of STEM careers," 2017.[7] E. S. Weisgram and R. S. Bigler, "Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls' attitudes toward and interest in science," Psychol. Women Q., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 262-269, 2007.[8] R. H. Wade, "Feeling Different: An examination of