. 198.0 References1. K. Otto and K. Wood, "Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product design," ed: Prentice-Hall, 2001.2. L. Sass and R. Oxman, "Materializing design: the implications of rapid prototyping in digital design," Design Studies, vol. 27, pp. 325-355, 2006.3. M. Schrage, "The culture (s) of prototyping," Design Management Journal (Former Series), vol. 4, pp. 55-65, 1993.4. R. Moe, D. D. Jensen, and K. L. Wood, "Prototype partitioning based on requirement flexibility," in ASME-IDETC, 2004, pp. 65-77.5. B. A. Camburn, B. U. Dunlap, V. K. Viswanathan, J. S. Linsey, D. D. Jensen, R. H. Crawford, et al., "Connecting Design Problem Characteristics to Prototyping Choices to Form a Prototyping Strategy
7 17 300 30 G 2 3 6 20 210 4 1 S 10 200 Targets/Waypoints 5
in SoTL.References[1] A. M. Lucietto, and L. A. Russell, “STEM Educators: How They Teach,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, no. Summer 2018, 2018.[2] C. R. Thomas, “Personality in Engineering Technology,” Journal of Engineering Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 16-20, Fall2014, 2014.[3] E. R. Kahu, and K. Nelson, “Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success,” Higher education research & development, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 58-71, 2018.[4] R. M. Felder, and R. Brent, “Understanding student differences,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 57-72, 2005.[5] J. A. Gasiewski, M. K. Eagan, G. A. Garcia, S. Hurtado
concern Assessment Assess action taken to improve learning None; Change/ Change in/confirmation of one’s thinking (about Vague; Confirmation learning strategy or learning concern) as a result Sufficiently Goals Description of clear goal Detailed; Planning Steps Articulate action(s) to be taken Justification Explain/Justifies choices made to move forward OR Planning- Transfer Description of application of learning strategy/ Transfer skill/content to futureVI. ResultsThe levels of students’ engagement
methods to address the students’ diverse learningstyles.Our research team is currently working on developing shared MR environments to allow formore comprehensive collaborative experiences among students. So, as future work, our teamaims to refine the MR module and upgrade it from single-user to multi-user operation, allowingfor synchronized shared experiences and conducting another research study.References[1] B. Jaeger and A. Upadhyay, “Understanding barriers to circular economy: cases from the manufacturing industry,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 729–745, 2020.[2] S. Helper, T. Krueger, and H. Wial, “Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters? A Policy Framework,” SSRN Electron. J., Feb. 2012, doi
, leadership, teamwork, innovation, and civic andpublic engagement. The survey aimed to understand students’ “attitudes towards professionalskills is to predict their intention to master those skills during college and enact them aftergraduation” [13, p. 1430]. This recent work is focused on helping universities develop curriculathat incorporate professional skill development within technical courses and seems particularlyuseful for engineering educators. Another option might be using the Miville-GuzmanUniversality-Diversity Scale—Short form (MGUDS-S) to determine their openness to andappreciation of cultural diversity [14].Students should be taught creativity theories and methodologies in engineering design courses toincrease creativity in
. Vitak et al. critique the IRB process for applying strict requirements forlow-risk research [18]. While our study was low-risk, we successfully underwent the IRBprocess and received approval exempt from full board review. However, we found that twocommunity colleges would not recognize our qualifying IRB. Each college's IRB requested thatthe research study go through their college’s IRB qualification before allowing their faculty toreceive the recruitment message. In one instance, coauthor 1 asked to forward the recruitmentmessage from coauthor 2's initial postings and was told to submit the survey to coauthor 1's IRBbefore doing so. In the second instance, after someone had forwarded our survey invitation totheir colleagues, a community
approaches to enhancing programs and curricula.In this context, we argue that it is particularly important to conduct comparative internationalresearch to better understand how conceptualizations of interdisciplinary education are not onlydiscipline-dependent but also culturally and institutionally contingent. Such a comparative studycan help inform curricular design to foster students' understanding of global competence. As afirst step in such efforts, we used reflexive thematic analysis within a comparative case study[11], [30], [31] to identify interdisciplinary graduate students’ conceptualizations ofinterdisciplinary education at two universities, one in Finland and one the U.S. The researchquestion(s) associated with this work are the
periods are the focus of this work. A visualization of thismodel is presented below in Figure 1. Figure 1: Conrad et al.’s (2006, p. 257) Model of Undergraduate SocializationStrayhorn [23] argues that feelings of belonging are a fundamental human need that are alsosufficient to drive behavior. Individuals that feel cared for, supported, and that they matter tothose around them in a given environment subsequently feel that they belong in thatenvironment. Belonging takes on heightened importance during uncertain or stressful periods oftime, and in contexts where an individual feels like an outsider. For most traditional prospectivestudents, the college application process is stressful and takes place during late adolescence: acritical period
traditional linear regression and thus necessitatesa regression method that accounts for clustering within a sample. ICC values can range from 0 to1, with higher values indicating stronger intergroup correlations and indicating the need forHierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) methods. While the interpretation of ICC depends on thecontext of the study and the research question being addressed, ICC values greater than 0.1generally indicate that there is a significant amount of clustering in the data and that HLM maybe appropriate [40]. It is also important to note that the interpretation of ICC values should bedone in conjunction with other information about the study, such as the sample size andcharacteristics, the instrument(s) used, and the research
HSGPAranges.Continuing from the insights provided by the KDE analysis, we further examine the variability inprogram complexity among universities. This part of the exploratory data analysis focuses on howthe structural aspects of university curricula influence student enrollment decisions. As highlightedin Figure 3, the distribution of program complexity varies notably between different institutions,such as University ’1’ and University ’3’. This variability is not merely incidental but indica-tive of these institutions’ diverse academic cultures and curricular frameworks. The KDE plot forUniversity ’1’, with a multi-peaked distribution, suggests a curriculum that offers a wide array ofprograms ranging from less to more complex. In contrast, University ’3’s
”, Perspectives on PsychologicalScience, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 164–180, 2006.[13] Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., and London, B., “Effects of role model exposure on STEM andnon-STEM student engagement”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 410–427, 2016. 17[14] Soltovets, E., Chigisheva, O., and Dmitrova, A., “The Role of Mentoring in Digital LiteracyDevelopment of Doctoral Students at British Universities”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 4, em1839, 2020.[15] Wilson, Z. S., Holmes, L., Degravelles, K., Sylvain, M. R., Batiste, L., Johnson, M.,McGuire, S. Y., Pang, S. S., and Warner, I. M., “Hierarchical mentoring: A transformativestrategy for
Swapana Subbarao Jerpoth, Rowan University Swapana S. Jerpoth received her B.Tech degree in Chemical Engineering from Priyadarshini Institute of Engineering and Technology, India in 2017, and her M.Tech degree in Petrochemical Engineering from Laxminarayan Institute of Technology, India in 2019. SMr. David Anthony Theuma, Rowan University I am a recent chemical engineering graduate of Rowan University looking for employment in the chemical manufacturing, project engineering, or engineering consulting industries. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #43351Sean Curtis, Rowan
design and manufacturing. He is also currently serves as a board member for Indiana TSA as the Competitive Events Coordinator.Ms. Wonki Lee, Purdue University Wonki Lee is pursuing a PhD in Curriculum and Instructionˆa C™s Literacy and Language program at Purdue University. She received her B.A and M.S in Korean Language Education from Seoul National University, South Korea. She served culturally and linguistical ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing design thinking mindset: Using factor analysis to reexamine instrument validityAbstractThis method paper analyzes validity evidence of the Design Thinking Mindset Questionnaire andextends the
. Bovtruk, I. Slipukhina, S. Mieniailov, P. Chernega, and N. Kurylenko, "Development of an electronic multimedia interactive textbook for physics study at technical universities," 16th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications, October 2020.[5] K.M. Kecskemety, K.A. Parris, "Exploring the impact of a Matlab programming interactive e-textbook in a first-year engineering course," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2019.[6] Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2016). Investigating learner attitudes toward e-books as learning tools: based on the activity theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 625-643.[7] R. McFall, H. Dershem, and D
’ work for term project:Team A2 chose the Tesla Model S body for their design. They modeled the body and chassis andperformed a drop test in SolidWorks to show how the vehicle chassis will react to a collision asshown in figures 1 and 2. The impact velocity was set at 130 m/s to show the extremes that thechassis would undergo while hitting a vehicle or obstruction head on at high speeds. Theyperformed the simulation for front, side and rear impacts.They also performed an aerodynamics study with speed that was set was 40 mph as a baselineand results are shown in figure 3.For integrating AI, the team chose Obstacle Avoidance and Automated Parking. Then, the teamreferenced MathWorks’ Obstacle Avoidance Using Adaptive Model Predictive Control
-traditional students, and broadening participation in engineering education. He received his B.S. in electrical engineering from Tuskegee University, an M.S in journalism from the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, an M.S. in physics from Fisk University, an M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Central Florida and an M.Ed. in educational leadership from Texas Christian University.Dr. Bruk T Berhane, Florida International University Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelorˆa C™s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland in 2003. He then completed a masterˆa C™s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a PhDr. Stephen Secules
anddevelopment. Prentice-Hall.[2] Letina, A. (2015). Application of Traditional and Alternative Assessment in Science andSocial Studies Teaching. Croatian Journal Educational / Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I[3] Chrysochoou M, Zaghi AE, Syharat CM (2022) Reframing neurodiversity in engineeringeducation. Front. Educ. 7:995865. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.995865[4] Armstrong, T. (2012). First, Discover Their Strengths. Educational Leadership, 70(2), 10.[5] Daniels, S., & Freeman, M. (2018). Gifted dyslexics: MIND-strengths, visual thinking, andcreativity. In S. B. Kaufman (Ed.), Twice exceptional: Supporting and educating bright andcreative students with learning difficulties, Oxford University Press (pp. 266-277).[6] von Károlyi, C. (2001). Visual–spatial
Education, A New Technology for Learning, information Science Reference, pp. 1–30, 2012.7. A. Eguchi, “Theories and Practices Behind Educational Robotics for All,” pp. 677–715, 2022.8. K. Berns, T. Braun, C. Hillenbrand, and T. Luksch, “Developing Climbing Robots for Education,” Computer Science, Education, Engineering, 2005.9. M. Sanders, “TEM, STEM Education, and STEMmania,” Technology Teacher, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 20-26, 2009.10. T. Moore, M. Stohlmann, H. Wang, K. Tank, A. Glancy, and G. Roehrig, “Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education,” in Engineering in Pre-College Settings, S. Purzer, J. Strobel, and M. Cardella, Eds. West Lafayette: Purdue University, 2014, pp. 35-60.11. R. W. Bybee, The
thechanging design. Finally, they note that providing students with contextual information beyond medicalneeds supported innovation. This suggests that teaching students to be socially aware of their role andwork as engineers beyond technical efficacy is important in developing their empathic design ability.Thus, Kong et al.’s [12] work provides specific instructional activities designed to teach students how toactively incorporate empathic tendencies into their design process.Eliciting Empathy Through Personal ReflectionWhile the instructional methods previously discussed are embedded in elements of traditional BMEcurriculums (design, teamwork, and ethics), Lunn et al. [13] and Morgan et al. [14] describe a standaloneBME course based on story-driven
faculty can see themselves utilizing the audio narrative toolsand how to reach faculty outside of the realm of equity and inclusion research.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under AwardNumbers EEC 2114241 and 2114242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. Secules, C. McCall, M. B. Kali, and G. Van Dyke, "Audio for Inclusion: Broadening Participation in Engineering through Audio Dissemination of Marginalized Students' Narratives," ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Proc., Jun. 2023. doi: 10.18260/1-2--42647.[2] C. R
or 2-factor solution. Both solutions were explored using a CFA.Model-data fit, item factor loadings, and interfactor correlations were evaluated to determine thebest factor solution.Results of COI ItemsA 2-factor solution was first explored (see Table 1 below that also includes the data in 2021 whenthe items were in a set order). Six items significantly loaded onto Factor 1 (Inclusion) with fiveitems significantly loading onto Factor 2 (Culture) using the threshold of 0.45. “I feel that I fit inwith ’s workplace culture” had the highest loading on Factor 1 with a loadingof 0.966. The interpretation for this item on Factor 1 is – when all other items are held constant, if“I understand ’s workplace culture” increased by one unit, we expect
V, 500 mV, oscilloscope differential inputs 200 mV, 100 mV, (1MΩ, ±25V, 50 mV, 20 mV, differential, 14- 10 mV bit, 100MS/s, 30MHz+ bandwidth - with the Analog Discovery BNC Adapter Board) Oscilloscope 200 ms to 5 μs. NA NA 100 kSPS Time Base DC outputs ± 15 V, +5V 0…+5V, 0…-5V Two 5 V (200 mA) Max Power 500 700 mA
-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects.” Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12635[3] J. Pleasants and J. K. Olson, “What is engineering? Elaborating the nature of engineering for K‐12 education,” Sci. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 145–166, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21483.[4] C. Cunningham, “Engineering Is Elementary,” The Bridge, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 11–17, Sep. 2009.[5] A. Rusmann and S. Ejsing-Duun, “When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2063–2091, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09692
dynamic and participatory learningenvironment. This optimized the efficiency of the learning process and enriched the overalleducational journey by providing a balance between theoretical knowledge and practicalapplication.References[1] C. Saviz and K. Schulz, (2003, June), Learning Design In Lab Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2--12134.[2] P. C. Wankat,, and P. S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering. McGraw-Hill, NY, 1993.[3] Bloom, B. S., M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. MacKay, NY, 1956.[4] “Kahoot!,” (Accessed 2024). Available: https://kahoot.com/.[5
Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.[7] K. D. Tanner, “Structure Matters: Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 322–331, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115.[8] A. Kezar, S. Gehrke, and S. Bernstein-Sierra, “Designing for Success in STEM Communities of Practice: Philosophy and Personal Interactions,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 217–244, 2017, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2017.0002.[9] R. H. Thaler and C. R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.[10] J. H. Tomkin, S. O
from Dynamics of MachinesFigure 1a represents a problem from dynamics of machines course in a form suitable for in-person exams. The problem shows a four-bar mechanism with given dimensions, and the angularvelocity of the crank. The solution includes drawing a scaled position diagram and a scaledvelocity polygon. For the four-bar linkage, assume that ω2 = 4 rad/s cw. Write the appropriate vector equations and solve them using vector polygons determining, when θ4 = 53o: A (a) θ2, θ2 (b) vC, ω3, ω4. 2 B 3 C
. 2, pp. 379–387, 1999.[3] H. Rodriguez-Simmonds, J. Ortega-Alvarez, S. Atiq, and S. Hoffmann, “Identifying sources of information that students use in deciding which engi-neering major to pursue Identifying sources of information that first year engineering students use in deciding which engineering major to pursue,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.877.1-26.877.16.[4] S. Zahorian and S. A. Zahorian, “Factors that Influence Engineering Freshman to Choose Their Engineering Major Factors that Influence Engineering Freshman in Choosing Their Major,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013, pp. 23.589.1-23.589.13.[5] B. M. Argrow and B. Louie, “Introduction to
The steady magnetic field Magnetic forces, materials, and inductance (S parameter) Time-varying fields and Maxwell’s equationsIn response to the challenge of maintaining continuity between the electromagnetics course andits related prerequisite mathematics courses, LeTourneau University ECE department decided tomove the electromagnetics course from the senior to the junior year, advancing it by one yearstarting from the Fall of 2023. By running the course in a setting where both juniors and seniorstake it together, the authors have a unique opportunity to compare their achievements andanalyze any correlations between their performance