engineering [2], we wanted to evaluate just how much thisuniversities’ Makerspace impacts student identity development that in turn will influenceretention.Three undergraduate members of our research team searched through all the first and secondsemester interview transcripts looking for mentions of the Makerspace, also searching for avariety of university-specific nicknames for the areas associated with it. Then, we did a deeperlook searching for terms related to “making,” including “building,” “3D printing,” and“designing,” that implied students were using the Makerspace. After collecting all the quotes, wesorted them into five categories regarding the context of mention of the Makerspace: 1. Generic perspectives on the Makerspace student group
Engineering at the University of Memphis. He is also a member of the CAESAR DTL and DRONES Research Cluster. His research foci include signal processing, sensor system analysis and design (with a focus on infrared wavelengths), turbulence mitigation, light propagation, and incorporation of electrical engineering concepts to transportation issues such as intelligent transportation system development, freight logistics, pre-emptive malfunction detection, workforce development, and student retention. He serves as faculty advisor for the University of Memphis student chapters of National Society of Black Engineers and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Stefano Alessandro Blasoni, The University of
a. Met with AISC University Programs staff and faculty review panel i. Refine video ideas ii. Verify terminology for script iii. Feedback on jokes 5. Film videos a. Check sound and lighting before filming all scenes b. Practice lines to ensure accuracy of terminology and delivery c. Overcome scheduling and social distancing challenges due to COVID-19 pandemic d. Perform many retakes because most engineering student and faculty actors are not theater majors e. Develop system for labeling scenes and retakes to make editing easier 6. Edit videos a. Select the best takes of the videos b. Used iMovie to create
faculty representatives presented the benefits ofmentorship, mentorship goals, and best practices. Career center representatives shared availableresources, while the grant team provided an in-depth overview of the project's goals, objectives,and activities. The workshop concluded with the group brainstorming activities for the upcomingyear and planning research initiatives to inform and enrich the project.Professional Development LunchesStarting in winter quarter, the grant team initiated a weekly lunch for the students. Each week,the grant team planned a menu and divided the food responsibilities among each other. Thisinformal gathering provided faculty members an opportunity to connect with students whileaddressing homesickness through home
outcome or based on student perceptions.On a competition-based project, the project manager uses the work breakdown structure (WBS)to manage tasks [7]. This paper aimed to demonstrate how the WBS can be used to demonstrateachievement of ABET student outcomes individually for each team member.This case study's objective was to provide a framework to individually assess the achievement ofthe ABET student outcomes for each member of a competition team. This research studyinvestigated the implementation of two ASCE Student Design Competitions: the AISC StudentSteel Bridge Competition and the ASCE Concrete Canoe Competition, as culminating capstonedesign projects. The authors assessed best practices from other programs outlined above in theirsuccess
MR module focusing on the design and operation of hydraulicgrippers has been developed, leveraging MR functionalities for integration into fluid powercourses. A research study has been executed within a fluid power course to assess the impact ofMR on students' spatial skills and engineering learning outcomes. The MR module,encompassing a 10-minute tutorial session and a 20-minute simulation lab, was administered to102 students enrolled in the course. The Revised PSVT:R assessment tool, provided by PurdueUniversity, was employed to evaluate improvements in students' spatial skills. Also, self-reflection surveys were designed and completed by 90 students to analyze improvements inunderstanding and assess attitudes toward MR technology. The
programming education context, where ‘antipatterns’—recurring coding mistakes that arecounterproductive to good software design—are identified, named, and categorized. This not onlyfacilitates a shared vocabulary between instructors and students but also allows for the developmentof critiquing systems that can provide specific, actionable feedback on these antipatterns.The project builds upon the insights from pedagogical research that highlights the critical role ofimmediate feedback in the learning process. Studies by Shute (2008) and Narciss (2008) under-score the value of formative feedback in fostering deep learning and mastery of complex skills,such as programming. This body of work advocates for educational interventions that are respon-sive
challenges: education, awareness, appreciation, accessibility,interpretation, application, and logistics. Participant responses highlight five reasons technicalstandards education is important: safety/best practice, practical application, expectations of theprofession, employment and business, and foundation/career development.IntroductionThe development, use, and education of technical standards have blossomed in the past fewdecades. While these documents bring great order and structure to the engineering field andbeyond, major challenges persist for users, educators, and students.In general, technical standards are agreed-upon procedures, tests, and protocols established in awritten format through consensus among a group of interested and expert
of Alabama ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Innovation-Themed National Science Foundation S-STEM Grant ProgramTo enhance the competitiveness of the United States on a global scale through the provision ofSTEM graduates equipped with innovative skills, students must be educated in innovationmethodologies. With the support of a grant from the National Science Foundation's Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program (S-STEM), researchers at the University ofArkansas are focused on augmenting the number of STEM graduates who possess both trainingand experience in innovation. The program, Closing America’s Innovation Gap throughCollaboration
towards specific tasks. Importantly, custom instructions, user uploadedfiles, and inputs given to custom GPT instances are not used to train the underlying foundationmodels, GPT-4 in this case. Building custom GPTs is still new and there is much to learn aboutcreating instances of GPT4 designed to assist with specific tasks. Due to their ability to optimizeon a narrow task, custom GPTs were determined to be the best option for this project. Thecustom GPT was designed specifically to extract citations from MET capstone project reports viaimages of their bibliographies. Screenshots of the bibliographies were saved as local image filesand uploaded to the custom GPT one at a time to extract and build the citation information.While this worked well
studied ina variety of fields [5], bringing together a wide range of perspectives from scholars across variousdisciplines to examine the challenges and opportunities for diversifying STEM fields [6], [7]. Inparticular, Shivers-McNair et al. [8] implemented a community-driven framework for supportingtechnology innovation with marginalized communities and explored how a community-basedmentorship can guide innovative technology design through intersectional technofeministperspectives. It is increasingly noted that diverse and inclusive scientific teams can amplifyinnovation, productivity, and impact [3], [4]. Despite these increases, STEM women faculty arestill underrepresented [1], [2], and they often advance slower than male faculty into
that the skills in both fields overlap. A good artist and a goodengineer need to have confidence in their abilities in creative problem solving. Structuring thecamp with a theme of art allows students more opportunities to feel like they belong in the field. The sculpture area at WSU provided hands-on practices in three-dimensional art includingsculpture and jewelry/small metals as part of our contribution to the camp. Most often theworkshops applied the welding skills students learned from the engineering lessons to createexperimental sculptural forms in metal with an emphasis on being playful, creative and havingfun. However, the most notable project with the strongest impact and depth in learningprofessional art and design issues was
(provided by NSF and an industry partner) to produce graduates with intrapreneurshipcompetencies. A total of 68 scholars in four cohorts were admitted to TIP. Scholars, hiringmanagers, and mentors were surveyed on topics to reveal the efficacy of the program. Bothqualitative and quantitative data were collected. This paper presents data on the growth inintrapreneurship competencies for each of the cohorts of students, data on mentoring practicesthat were integral to the TIP experience, as well as student and mentor perception data on thebenefits of the program.introductionThis paper examines the outcomes of a National Science Foundation sponsored Scholarships inSTEM (S-STEM) program. This S-STEM program (TIP) was designed to produceintrapreneurial
Paper ID #42184Lessons Learned: Summer Book Club to Promote Reflection among EngineeringFaculty on Mental Health of StudentsLuis Delgado Jr., Penn State University Luis R. Delgado Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Pennsylvania State University. He has a bachelor of science in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at El Paso and earned a master of science degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Public Policy from Penn State. Along with his role as a Ph.D., he is also a graduate research assistant at the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn
Comfort with Ambiguity aimed to build community and a sense ofpsychological safety in the course through mindfulness and was conducted by our teachingassistant based on her own work [31].The Impact Gap Canvas Workshop [19] guides students through a structured exercise that helpsstudents to gather knowledge on the current understanding of the problem, solutions that havebeen tried, and to work through the current gaps.The Workshop on Interview Skills introduced best practice for conducting expert interviews aswell as ethical considerations.The 5Rs Workshop helps students to elucidate the Roles, Relationships, Rules, Resources andResults of their system and to create a summative map [19]. This map is used in a Peer Feedbacksession.The Team Check-in
Paper ID #41867Building Collapse: Tackling the Construction Quality Gap in NigeriaMr. Muritala Hassan Ayinla Mr., University of Central Missouri Muritala Ayinla is a second-year graduate student at the University of Central Missouri. He is pursuing a master’s degree in technology management. He is a seasoned storyteller, researcher, communication scholar, writer, content creator, and award-winning journalist. While practicing journalism, Muritala has embarked on an array of investigative reporting and human interest stories, especially the recurrent incidences of building collapses in Nigeria. He won the Nigerian
betweenengineering education researchers and machine learning researchers, we can work together at theintersection of machine learning and discipline-based education research. During the qualitativecoding process, we shared multiple perspectives on how students could discuss differentconcepts so that we could work towards making a more diverse codebook. When evaluating thecodes generated by machine learning analysis alongside the results from manual coding, wediscussed how to best work towards a better coding process to help train algorithms.LimitationsThis study did not factor in the differences between instructors and their context or instructionalmoves. For example, some instructors may emphasize the importance of written responsesdifferently, impacting
participant’s design outcomes [10][11]. Further still, many papersaddress different ideation methods and their efficacy [12] [13]. However, all previouslyreferenced papers follow participants who all have similar engineering and problem-solvingexperience. This paper not only addresses the different ideation methods but also compares theoutcomes between student and practicing engineers. By understanding the importance of learningdifferent ideation methods and detailing how to use them effectively, this paper describes how tooptimize problem-solving to best demonstrate the competencies that employers are seeking. This paper and associated research is for a Senior Honors Project within the engineeringdiscipline. The inspiration behind this project
students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a 2016 National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical
in addition to the financial assistance totruly support students during their transitions. The high-impact practices designed forEMPOWER to influence each of Schlossberg’s transition factors include: ● A month-long summer preparatory program to prepare students in both technical and professional skills for internship applications. EMPOWER Scholars at the two community college partners are encouraged to enroll. The summer program implemented was highlighted by Truong et al. in [20]. ● A multi-year research and mentoring program that introduces students to research experience with faculty in Engineering departments at UCSD. The students are encouraged to explore graduate studies in the BS/MS, MS, or PhD program
driver was employed toregulate two DC motors. In [6], a sun-tracking system was designed by using an AtMega 328pmicrocontroller, an array of photo resistive sensors, a double H-Bridge driver, and two gearedmotors. In [7], a sun-tracker system was developed by utilizing an Arduino UNOmicrocontroller. The control program activated the servo motor in the direction of the maximumsunlight intensity detected by a pair of light dependent resistor (LDR) sensors. In [8], a sun-tracking system was designed by using a deep recurrent neural network with long-term short-term units. The prediction algorithm could predict the best solar path for each day of the yearbased on location. In [9], a dual-axis sun-tracking system was designed by using a fusion
their interest in pursuing aSTEM-related discipline in their future. Data was collected from multiple STEM summer campsduring 2017-2023 (except for 2020 & 2021). The summer camps were intended to exposestudents to STEM. The data collected is used in a qualitative and quantitative analysis todetermine if self-efficacy is related to and has any impact on students’ interest in STEM.Program DescriptionStudents and teachers coming from multiple school districts in (state in the mountain westregion) were invited to attend a week-long summer engineering camp. The camps took place inthe summers of 2017, 2018 and 2019. Another similar camp was scheduled for summer 2020 butwas cancelled due to the Covid pandemic.The camps were designed to increase
expectations set forth by ABET.IntroductionThe landscape of undergraduate engineering management programs in the United States hasexperienced an evolution captured by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology's(ABET) recognition of the need for traditional engineering disciplines alongside a morecomprehensive discipline that integrates leadership, communication, and teamworkcompetencies as seen in (Figure 1. Engineering Managers manufacture fiscal and enterprisevalue in creating, designing, and implementing technical projects, products, or system solutions[1]. The West Point Engineering Management (EM) Program embodies this approach. It ishoused in the Department of Systems Engineering at the United States Military Academy(USMA) as one of
engineering faculty’s lack offamiliarity with non-ABET professional skills, like entrepreneurial mindset and cultural agility,the difficulty of making changes in technical classes, and the limitations in assessing professionalskills. The researcher aims for the recommendations derived from this pilot study to raiseawareness of professional skill development within engineering curricula, fostering collaborationwith industry, and stimulating further research into enhancing the engineering curriculum with afocus on these essential skills.IntroductionTo succeed in the 21st-century workplace, engineering graduates need more than technical skillsor risk losing their jobs to automation [1, 2]. Professional skills complement a technicaleducation and are part
Foundation under grantnumber 2130326. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthese materials are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] P.M. Yanik, C.W. Ferguson, A. Ritenour, W. Cagle, and S. Rowe. “Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship (FLiTE): Program Goals and First-Year Activities.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013.[2] M.H. Davis, J.A. Hall, and P.S. Mayer, P.S. “Developing a New Measure of Entrepreneurial Mindset: Reliability, Validity, and Implications for Practitioners.” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 2015.[3
-STEM Award (#2030665) which hastaken this into consideration by developing regular family gatherings designed to includescholars’ families in supporting their students’ degree completion.Summer bridge programs are often cited as one of the best practices for increasing first yearstudent retention and thus we are not surprised with the change in identities that we found inscholars upon completion of Engineering Ahead. Not only did all scholars self-report a change inidentity from that of a high school student to a college student, but they also all identified asengineering college students following the summer bridge program. This change in identityseemed to develop from a combination of the opportunities they had to engage in
community.IntroductionEngineering Technology programs, including both two year and four year tracks, continue togrow. Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers [3] published that there were14,312 degrees awarded in the year 2019 alone. These degrees come from 111 institutions thatgrant Engineering Technology degrees [3]. Despite the considerable number of degrees awardedin Engineering Technology disciplines, there is little research conducted on the experiences ofEngineering Technology students.Like Engineering Science degree earners, Engineering Technology students may test forprofessional engineering licensure in 35 states. Although the procedures in testing for a licensemay vary, Engineering Technology graduates may pursue careers as professional engineers
modelingenvironment designed specifically to have a “low threshold” to make it easy for novices to startmodeling, while still having a “high ceiling” of what is possible [32]. To start, students canengage in inquiry through modifying small amounts of code in existing models. This can eitherbe a form of open-ended “tinkering” with the code to explore what happens, or more directedmodifications to model a new phenomenon [33]. There have been many successful examples ofhigh school and college students learning to use NetLogo and successfully building incisivemodels in subjects such as biology [34] and MSE [35], [36].Prior research has shown increased student understanding of core concepts in MSE through theuse of computational models [36] as well as in related
protocols for educational action-research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/146978741773561427. Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2013). Toward a model of transfer as sense-making. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 184-207. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2013.80755628. Nokes, T. J., & Belenky, D. M. (2011). Incorporating Motivation into a Theoretical Framework for Knowledge Transfer. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 109–135. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00004-129. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.30. Braun, C., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023