second instructor of the course will also be involvedin the content analysis process to ensure reliability.References[1] M. L. V. Blerkom, "Class Attendance in Undergraduate Courses," The Journal of Psychology, vol. 126, no. 5, pp. 487-494, 1992.[2] P. Friedman, F. Rodriguez and J. McComb, "Why students do and do not attend classes: Myths and realities," College Teaching, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 124-133, 2001.[3] N. Fjortoft, "Students' motivations for class attendance," American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 107-112, 2005.[4] S. Moore, C. Armstrong and J. Pearson, "Lecture absenteeism among students in higher education: A valuable route to understanding student motivation," Journal of Higher Education
-CollegeRelationship, and Alumni Support,” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, vol. 10, no. 3,pp. 21–44, May 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/j050v10n03_02.[3] S. Gaier, “Alumni Satisfaction with Their Undergraduate Academic Experience and theImpact on Alumni Giving and Participation,” International Journal of Educational Advancement,vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 279–288, Aug. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ijea.2140220.[4] Hoyt, J. E., & Winn, B. A. (2004, Spring). Understanding retention and college studentbodies: Differences between drop-outs, stop-outs, opt-outs, and transfer-outs. NASPA Journal,41(3), 395-417[5] Melguizo, T., Kienzl, G. S., & Alfonso, M. (2011). Comparing the educational attainment ofcommunity college transfer students
changing the grade scale, reducing the amount of material, or having theinstitution provide academic support to the students when unrealistic expectations of prior knowledge areput on the student. Looking at ways policies and practices can be changed in the classroom or throughoutthe institution allows for the potential success of more students, particularly those who are marginalized,pursuing computing.VI. References[1] J. Ma and S. Baum, “Trends in Community Colleges: Enrollment, Prices, Student Debt, and Completion,” College Board Research, Research Breif, 2015. [Online]. Available: www.luminafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/trends-in-community-colleges.pdf[2] R. D. Cox, “Complicating Conditions: Obstacles and
a framework assessing Maker programs’ impact oncareers. Our primary activity addresses the immediate need to understand the types of metricsmost appropriate to measure career impacts of Makerspace experiences. From these results weplan to develop and calibrate the tool(s) needed to apply the metrics framework for Activity 2.In Activity 2, we will build on the framework to implement a set of tools that stakeholders canapply generally across design and fabrication studies to assess the relationship betweenmakerspace experiences and career readiness.In this Work In Progress paper, we lay the foundation for the activities of our project, and shareout some preliminary observations based on initial interviews with our target populations
. 2020.[4] ABET. “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2024-2025.”https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2024-2025/ (accessed January 18, 2024)[5] M. Kotche, A.E. Felder, K. Wilkens and S. Stirling, "Perspectives on Bioengineering ClinicalImmersion: History, Innovation, and Impact," Annals of Biomedical Engineering, April 2020.[6] J. Goldberg, "Preparing Students for Medical Device Innovation: Notes from BME-IDEA2018," IEEE Pulse, vol. 10, pp. 32-35, Jan. 2019.[7] W.H. Guilford, M. Kotche, R.H. Schmedlen, “A Survey of Clinical Immersion Experiences inBiomedical Engineering,” Biomedical Engineering Education, pp. 1-10, Apr 2023.[8] V. Braun, V. Clarke, “Using thematic
Engineering Education at Purdue University. He keeps a balanced life connecting with nature, staying mentally, physically, spiritually, and socially active, constantly learning and reflecting, and challenging himself to improve. He is interested in learning/teaching collectively, engineering philosophy, and social and environmental justice. His purpose is to help people freely and fully develop in a sustainable world.Mr. Leonardo Pollettini Marcos, Purdue University Leonardo Pollettini Marcos is a 3rd-year PhD student at Purdue University’s engineering education program. He completed a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Materials Engineering at the Federal University of S˜ao Carlos, Brazil. His research interests are in
balanced strategy for success. While it may be evident to develop short-termtechnological solutions, it is equally crucial to incorporate long-term structural and functional solutions intothe planning process. This holistic approach ensures a more robust and sustainable outcome for the project[2].Based on Gibson et al.'s analysis of data from Anderson Consulting (1993) [1], the goal developmentrepresents a small part of the total lifetime cost of a system (less than 1% in a typical software system), yet"it results in a critical commitment of recourses." When the first 8% of the project budget is spent, 80% ofthe cost of the project/system is determined.Competitiveness in professional practice requires engineers to participate in and accomplish
Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 2021, pp. 1–14.[17] D. S. Dunn and E. E. Andrews, ‘Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists’ cultural competence using disability language’, Am. Psychol., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 255–264, 2015 [Online]. Available: 10.1037/a0038636.[18] W. Gaver, ‘What should we expect from research through design?’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp. 937–946 [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2207676.2208538.[19] J. A. Turns, ‘What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy for Doctoral Education’, in
2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #2322, 2011.[6] Hamilton, S., “Peer Review: Modeling Civil Engineering Practice, Another Way to ImproveLearning,” Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.[7] Bachnak, R., Maldonado, S., “A Flipped Classroom Experience: Approach and LessonsLearned,” Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #8725, 2014.[8] Brown, J., Click, P., “Collaborative Learning About the Meaning of Professionalism,”Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3661, 2001.[9] Haller, C., Gallagher, V., Felder, R. “Dynamics of Peer Interactions in CooperativeLearning,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2630, 1999.[10] Siddique, Z., Akasheh, F., Okudan, G., “Enhancing Peer-Learning
depend on the flow type. The current problem is transient, incompressible, laminar, and isothermal flow whose physics is governed by Eq. (1) and (2). Also the fluid properties (density and viscosity), initial conditions (the initial velocity field of a fluid domain), and boundary conditions need to be prescribed. The boundary conditions used for the current problem are given in Fig. 4. The velocity of 2.8 × 10−4 m/s at the inlet and zero velocity at the cylinder surface were assigned. The slip condition was used at the top and bottom of the domain and zero stress was assigned to the outflow. Figure 4: Boundary conditions• Step 4. Discretize the governing equations to obtain solutions. In FEM, the governing
contributing to their mastery?," Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, vol. 35, 2022.[2] L. Riebe, A. Girardi, and C. Whitsed, "A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education," Small Group Research, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 619-664, 2016.[3] A. Planas-Lladó, L. Feliu, F. Castro, R. M. Fraguell, G. Arbat, J. Pujol, J. J. Suñol, and P. Daunis-i-Estadella, "Using peer assessment to evaluate teamwork from a multidisciplinary perspective," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 14-30, 2018.[4] D. Weaver, and A. Esposto, "Peer assessment as a method of improving student engagement," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 805-816, Nov. 2012.[5] J. S. Kane
medicine: determinants of students’ engagement and persistence,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, vol. 6, no. 2, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1355. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2024].[6] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palinscsar, “Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning,” Education Psychology, vol. 26, pp. 369-398, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2024].[7] J. S. Krajcik and P. C. Blumenfeld, “Project-based learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, R. K. Sawyer, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University
). Impact of COVID-19 on Sense of Belonging: Experiences of engineering students, faculty and staff at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Journal of Engineering Education, 112 (2), pp. 488-520. http://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20512Fletcher, T. L., & Strong, A. C., & Jefferson, J. P., & Moten, J., & Park, S. E., & Adams, D. J. (2021, July), Exploring the Excellence of HBCU Scientists and Engineers: The Development of an Alumni Success Instrument Linking Undergraduate Experiences to Graduate Pathways Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37152Freeman Jr, S., & Palmer, R. (2020). Exploring
://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9781780523873/B9781780523873-s003.xml[12] International Network of WAC Programs (INWAC). (2014) Statement of WAC principles and practices - the WAC clearinghouse. [Online]. Available: https://wac.colostate.edu/principles/[13] P. Anderson, C. M. Anson, R. M. Gonyea, and C. Paine, “The contributions of writing to learning and development: Results from a large-scale multi-institutional study,” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 199–235, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24890033[14] J. Yoritomo, N. Turnipseed, S. L. Cooper, C. Elliott, J. Gallagher, J. Popovics, P. Prior, and J. Zilles, “Examining engineering writing instruction at a large research university
. Cherng, B. Q. Li, and N. Natarajan, "Development of a Mechatronics Course for SeniorMechanical Engineering Students," in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26,2013[2] H. Vasquez and A. A. Fuentes, "Integration of Sensors and Low-Cost Microcontrollers intothe Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Design Sequence," in 120th ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, June 23-26, 2013[3] M. Barger and R. Gilbert, "New Mechatronics Education Initiatives in 2-year Programs," in2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Palace Convention Center, Salt Lake City, UT,June 24-27, 2018[4] S. A. Yost and D. D. Maggio, "The Mechatronics Road Show: Building on Success inMechatronics Curriculum Development," in 2004 American Society for
addition, an initial assessment indicates that students had better understand of microelectronicdevices and applications when they are learning them through visual representation methods.References[1] ABET homepage; https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2018-2019/[2] Charyton, C., Jagacinski, R. J., Merrill, J. A., Clifton, W., & DeDios, S. (2011). Assessing creativity specific to engineering with the revised creative engineering design assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 778-799.[3] Dewulf, S. & Baillie, C. (1999). CASE: How to foster creativity. London, UK: Department for Education and Employment.[4] Kazerounian, K., & Foley, S. (2007
] T. Buckmiller, R. Peters, and J. Kruse, “Questioning Points and Percentages: Standards- Based Grading (SBG) in Higher Education,” Coll. Teach., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 151–157, 2017, doi: 10.1080/87567555.2017.1302919.[5] M. E. Selbach-Allen, S. J. Greenwald, A. E. Ksir, and J. E. Thomley, “Raising the Bar with Standards-Based Grading,” PRIMUS, vol. 30, no. 8–10, pp. 1110–1126, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2019.1695237.[6] M. Knight and R. Cooper, “Taking on a New Grading System: The Interconnected Effects of Standards-Based Grading on Teaching, Learning, Assessment, and Student Behavior,” NASSP Bull., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 65–92, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0192636519826709.[7] M. C. Lovett, M. W
complexities of LP modeling successfully. In conclusion, integrating mathematicalconcepts with applied examples can serve as a crucial bridge, linking theoretical understanding topractical application. This approach fosters a deeper comprehension of the subject matter,benefiting students across engineering disciplines. Through delving into the intricacies ofengineering education, it becomes evident that a holistic approach, encompassing factors such aseffective learning strategies, cognitive skills development, and practical application, is essentialfor nurturing well-rounded and successful engineering students.References[1] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, and K. Edstrom, “Rethinkingengineering education,” CDIO Approach, vol
creativity and innovation ineducation." Journal of education and learning, 2017, pp. 201-208.[2] S. A. Kalaian and R. M. Kasim, “Effectiveness of various innovative learning methods inhealth science classrooms: a meta-analysis,” Adv in Health Sci Education, 2017 pp. 1151–1167.[3] Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &Wenderoth, M. P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 2014, pp. 8410-8415.[4] Johnson, David W., and Roger T. Johnson. "Cooperative learning: The foundation for activelearning." Active learning—Beyond the future, 2018, pp. 59-71.[5] Lin, Galvin Sim Siang, et al. "Innovative
faculty, students,and university services.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumber 2028005 within the SSTEM program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.ReferencesAljohani, O. (2016). A Comprehensive Review of the Major Studies and Theoretical Models ofStudent Retention in Higher Education. Higher Education Studies, 6(2). Canadian Center ofScience and Education.Bean, J., & Metzner, B. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Non-traditional Undergraduate StudentAttrition. Review of educational research, 55(4), 485-540.http://dx.doi.org
Paper ID #44482Work in Progress: Stigma of Mental Health Conditions and its Relationshipto Conditions’ Knowledge and Resource Awareness among Engineering StudentsMatilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on developing cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts
. BibliographyLagoudas, M., Yoon, S. Y., Boehm, R., & Asbell, S. (2020, July). Impact of an I-corps site program on engineering students at a large southwestern university: Year 3. In Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.Lagoudas, M., Yoon, S. Y., & Boehm, R. (2019, July). The Implementation and Assessment of an I-Corps Site at a Southwestern University: Lessons Learned. In Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education.Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.Denzin, N. K. (2007). Triangulation. The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology.Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985
intrinsic value was found to be a mediating factor and predictor of this behavior.Specifically within the field of engineering, Hasbun et al. 's [3] study on motivating doctoral studentssupports that the end of coursework marks a critical point in students’ motivation towards degreecompletion.Recent studies have explored engineering graduate students' motivation through different theories andframeworks, including Identity Based Motivation (IBM), Future Time Perspective (FTP),Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT), Graduate Engineering Identity (GEI), and Graduate attrition decision(GrAD) [5], [6], [7], ,[8]. Findings from these studies have shown that graduate engineering identity is akey contributor to graduate student motivation and persistence
developed by Cabrera and Cabrera [39] because their framework helpsdevelop a mental model needed to practice systems thinking [36]. Further, their framework haspreviously been used in educational contexts and is universally applicable to individuals withvarying disciplinary backgrounds [36]. Cabrera and Cabrera [39] defined systems thinking as afour-part cognitive skill consisting of tenets like making distinctions (D), organizing the system(S) into parts and wholes, recognizing relationships (R) between parts and wholes of the system,and taking multiple perspectives (P). Taken together, this four-part skill helps develop a holisticapproach to designing a solution to a problem.In the context of threat modeling, the systems thinking approach
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Table 1. Truth Table of a Full AdderA 4-bit parallel subtractor can be devised using four full adders, as depicted in the diagram below.This configuration executes the subtraction operation based on the principle that adding theminuend and the complement of the subtrahend yields the same result as subtraction.To subtract A from B, we derive the 2’s complement of B by taking the 1’s complement and
volume, center ofmass, and moment of inertia to a reference file. Such a comparison is similar to the CertifiedSOLIDWORKS Associate in Mechanical Design exam [7], where students generateSOLIDWORKS files and input a geometric property, such as mass or center of mass, todetermine if their drawing is correct. Bojcetic et al.’s method allows for more refined gradingcriteria, grading features, and sketches in addition to the basic geometry [8]. Overall, thedeveloped automated grading systems speed up the grading time for faculty, allowing for morehomework. Still, they do not provide quick feedback, allowing students to learn by correctingtheir mistakes. Having rapid feedback was the motivation for developing an email-based gradingsystem.Program
andsocial identity development is Turner et al.’s [14] Self-Categorization Theory. This theoryexplicitly notes that, depending on a situation’s relative value to a person, one or both identitytypes will influence the person’s behavior. This is also the reigning difference between Tajfel’s[14] Social Identity Theory and Turner’s [18] Self-Categorization Theory; where the former“suggests a continuum of interpersonal versus intergroup behavior,” the latter “pronounces thatboth—social and personal identity processes—may be at work simultaneously” [15]. Self-Categorization notes that personal identity is the self-descriptions pertaining to one’s personalattributes and social identity is the self-descriptions pertaining to one’s membership of a