] J. Lönngren, T. Adawi, and M. Svanström, “Scaffolding strategies in a rubric-based intervention to promote engineering students’ ability to address wicked problems,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 196–221, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2017.1404010.[7] D. Kilgore, A. Jocuns, K. Yasuhara, and C. J. Atman, “From beginning to end: How engineering students think and talk about sustainability across the life cycle,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 305–313, 2010.[8] T. Mirza, J. Dennison, N. Fila, and S. Purzer, “The sustainability decisions of first-year engineering students,” presented at the IL/IN Sectional Conference, American
in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations,” Science, vol. 366, no. 6464, pp. 447–453, 2019.[8] P. N. Venkit, M. Srinath, and S. Wilson, “A study of implicit bias in pretrained language models against people with disabilities,” in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2022, pp. 1324–1332.[9] N. Vigdor, “Apple card investigated after gender discrimination complaints,” The New York Times, vol. 10, 2019.[10] A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, “Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 327–338, 2008.[11] L. C. Gundersen, “Scientific integrity and ethical considerations for the research data life cycle
Walton-Macaulay, Saint Martin’s University With degrees in both Bachelor of Science and Master of Science from the University of Arkansas, and a doctoral degree from the University of Kentucky, Dr. Corrie Walton-Macaulay is a Geotechnical Engineering Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering department at St. Martin’s University, where he has been part of the faculty since 2019. Dr. Walton-Macaulay has extensive experience in the geotechnical and materials industry prior to becoming an academician and is a licensed professional engineer. Dr. Walton-Macaulay’s has a passion to teach, to educate upcoming civil engineers in best practices and for them to look to alternative ways and new technology that will improve on
straightforward, andfiltering options offered the advantage of accessing disaggregated data of interest. However,without a data dictionary and consultation with representatives from the institutions' data offices,navigating these datasets could prove more challenging.Table 1: Institution 1 Enrollment Data 2023-24 2022-23 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 Fall 1 320 322 318 291 271 232 2 2679 2645 2628 2530 2388 2168 3 11.94 12.17 12.10 11.50 11.35 10.70 Spring 1 324 315 296 248
70 90 115 130 150 Licensed & Copyright 2019 Mitchell R. Hammer, Ph.D. 97 Figure 1: Intercultural Development Continuum and IDI ScoresQuantitative Data AnalysisIDI datasets of student that completed the HE minor were selected from a broader IDI dataset.Quantitative analysis was conducted to detect changes intercultural competence, specificallyevaluating if shifts from orientations within Monocultural Mindset to Intercultural Mindsetutilizing the Intercultural Development Inventory IDI scores that were generated via the
careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?,” Gend. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 369–386, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1080/09540250500145072.[8] R. Van Veelen, B. Derks, and M. D. Endedijk, “Double Trouble: How Being Outnumbered and Negatively Stereotyped Threatens Career Outcomes of Women in STEM,” Front. Psychol., vol. 10, p. 150, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00150.[9] W. C. Lee and H. M. Matusovich, “A Model of Co-Curricular Support for Undergraduate Engineering Students: Model of Co-Curricular Support,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 406–430, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1002/jee.20123.[10] D. Bilimoria and L. Xiangfen, “Effective practices to increase women’s participation, advancement and leadership in US
Pi, and Phi Kappa Phi honor societies. He is a life member of SHPE and SACNAS, and Senior Member of IEEE. He is a member of ASEE, and AGU.Michelle Klein, Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. Heads Assoc.Prof. Truong Nguyen, University of California, San Diego Truong Nguyen is a Distinguished Professor at UCSD. His current research interests are video processing and machine learning algorithms with applications in health monitoring/diagnosis and 3D modeling. He received the IEEE Signal Processing Paper AwardProf. Petru Andrei, Florida A&M University; Florida State University Dr. Petru Andrei is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Florida A&M University and Florida Stat
ofChange: Combining Social Inclusion in the Professional Development of Electrical andComputer Engineering Students,” Systemic Practice & Action Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 237–245, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11213-010-9183-3.[3] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2021 - 2022,” Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2024. [Online]. Available:https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/[4] M. Cote and A. Branzan Albu, “Teaching socio-cultural impacts of technology in advancedtechnical courses: a case study,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 5, pp.688–701, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1551329.[5
, 2019.[8] E. A. Adams and M. B. Burgoyne, "Integrating Humanitarian Engineering Design Projects to Increase Retention of Underrepresented Minority Students and to Achieve Interpersonal Skill- Related Learning Outcomes," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[9] K. C. Mittag and S. Taylor, "Activities for Students: As the Ball Rolls: A Quadratic Investigation Using Multiple Representations," The Mathematics Teacher, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 62-68, 2009.[10] B. E. Peterson, P. Averbeck and L. Baker, "Sine curves and spaghetti," The Mathematics Teacher, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 564-566, 1998.[11] S. A. Johnson and A. Thomas, "Exchange: Using Squishy Circut Technology in the Classroom," in 2011 ASEE Ammia
College, College ofEngineering Leadership Council, Provost’s office, and ASEE community) in an inclusivemanner. Feedback to implemented changes and plans for change were constantly sought. Thecoordinators have been kept abreast of the philosophical and pedagogical tensions that exist in anon-discipline-specific course, and have been able to make balanced, compromised decisions.As discussed above, the three-year redesign period was necessary and helpful in iterating on thecourse, as the coordinators were able to improve the course continuously in an agile andmanageable fashion. In addition to the redesign elements that were planned for each year, theteam identified additional opportunities for improvement through annual instructor meetings
disadvantage backgrounds and underrepresented populations. He is a board member of the Inclusive Engineering Consortium and is actively engaged in initiatives that promote diversity equity and inclusion in engineering education. He has held faculty research-internship positions with Air Force Research Laboratories, and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Furthermore, he is a member of the Eta Kappa Nu, Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi, and Phi Kappa Phi honor societies. He is a life member of SHPE and SACNAS, and Senior Member of IEEE. He is a member of ASEE, and AGU.Dr. Barry J. Sullivan, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department Heads Assn Barry J. Sullivan is Director of Program Development for the Inclusive Engineering Consortium
Completion Project,” Council of Graduate Schools, 2008. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://legacy.cgsnet.org/phd-completion-and-attrition-analysis-baseline-demographic-data- phd-completion-project-0[20] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013, pp. 67–84. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4.[21] E. Cech and H. Sherick, “Depoliticization as a Mechanism of Gender Inequality among Engineering Faculty,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
. Her research has been published in several premier journals, including the Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Higher Education, and Race, Ethnicity, and Education. She is a contributing author to several books published by Oxford University Press and University of California Press. She served as President for the Korean American Educational Researchers Association, including President in 2013-2014, and Chair of the KAERA Board of Directors in 2019-2020.Dr. Jerry Lynn Dahlberg Jr, University of Tennessee, Space Institute Jerry Dahlberg is the Director of Research at the University of Tennessee Space Institute. Prior to joining UTSI, he was an Assistant Teaching Professor and Senior Design Committee Chair
received Best Paper Awards at the American Society Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2020. Dr. Liu earned his B.S. in Applied Physics from Caltech and S.M. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT, under an MIT-SUTD fellowship and NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Educational Simulation for Understanding Atomic Force Microscopy Image ArtifactsAbstractThe atomic force microscope (AFM) is a fundamental imaging tool used to visualize minutefeatures, often on the scale of fractions of a nanometer. This is achieved by scanning a tip overa surface and monitoring the motions of the tip in response to forces between the tip
students and practitioners are addressing global inequality and the SDGs in career pathways, especially now, when activists are calling for the development sector to implement decolonized and anti-racist structures. Emma graduated from the California Polytechnic with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 2019 and an M.S. in Irrigation Engineering in 2020.Prof. Amy Javernick-Will, University of Colorado Boulder Amy Javernick-Will is a Professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder in the Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering Department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 avigating Transformational Resistance: Exploring Humanitarian Engineering N Students
, pp. 14–29, 2023.[4] E. O. McGee, P. K. Botchway, D. E. Naphan-Kingery, A. J. Brockman, S. Houston, and D. T. White, “Racism camouflaged as impostorism and the impact on Black STEM doctoral students,” Race Ethn. Educ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 487–507, 2021, doi: 10.1080/13613324.2021.1924137.[5] M. L. Miles, A. J. Brockman, and D. E. Naphan-Kingery, “Invalidated identities: The disconfirming effects of racial microaggressions on Black doctoral students in STEM,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1608–1631, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1002/TEA.21646.[6] M. Bahnson et al., “Students’ experiences of discrimination in engineering doctoral education,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Aug. 2022, pp. 1–13.[7] D. R. Jones
, “Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114.[5] T. Boyd and D. Mitchell, “Black Male Persistence in Spite of Facing Stereotypes in College: A Phenomenological Exploration,” TQR, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3124.[6] K. C. Margot and T. Kettler, “Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 2, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2.[7] B. Smith et al., “Faculty Characteristics that Influence Student
. Cooney, L. Russell, and E. Schott, “Engineering Technology Undergraduate Students a Survey of Demographics and Mentoring,” in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[35] A. M. Lucietto, and L. A. Russell, “STEM Educators: What They Believe,” Journal of STEM Educators, no. Summer 2018, 2018.[36] J. Y. Yoon, and M. R. Riley, “Grand Challenges for Biological Engineering,” Journal of Biological Engineering, 2009.[37] L. G. Huettel, M. Gustafson, J. C. Nadeau, D. E. Schaad, M. M. Barger, and L. Linnenbrink‐Garcia, “A Grand Challenge-Based Framework for Contextual Learning in Engineering: Impact on Student Outcomes and Motivation.”[38] K. Larsen, and J. Gärdebo, “Retooling Engineering for Social Justice
variousinterests related to them” [12]. A more concise description of DT was introduced by Luka (2019) as “ asystematic approach to problem-solving that involves the human perspective” [13]. Human CenteredDesign (HCD) has been used either hand-in-hand with DT [14] or used synonymously [15]. Empathizing,the first stage of DT, is considered the core of HCD [14], this highlights the focus on the human elementin the process of designing or solving a problem. Define is the second stage in DT, it is characterized byworking towards defining the problem at hand. Ideation is the third stage in DT, which can be defined asan iterative process to achieve a final design that addresses the user’s needs [16]. While having the capacity to work in cross-functional
Paper ID #41880Focus group analysis of engineering Collaborative Online International Learning(COIL+) compared to short-term study abroad programsJoshua E. Katz, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Joshua E. Katz is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, DELTA program, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where his research centers on collaborative learning in engineering education and other STEM disciplines. He obtained his B.S. in Technology and Engineering Education in 2019 and his M.S. in STEM Education and Leadership in 2021, both from Illinois State University
, broadening student participation in engineering, faculty preparedness in cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, and faculty experiences in teaching online courses. He has published papers at several engineering education research conferences and journals. Particularly, his work is published in the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education (ICTIEE), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Computer Applications in Engineering Education (CAEE), International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE), Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (JEET), and IEEE Transactions on Education. He is also serving as a reviewer for a number of conferences and journals
Rico Mayag¨uez Campus and is a licensed mathematics teacher by the Department of Education in Puerto Rico. Kevin is currently a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education as well as a M.S. student in the School of Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. His interests currently lie in cultural identity, engineering culture, acculturation, transnational migration, decolonization, belonging, and inclusion of occupational migrants from the U.S. territories who are looking to pursue engineering degrees and work in the mainland U.S.Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh Anne-Ketura Elie earned a BS degree in 2019 in psychology from the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. She is
in engineering education. a review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 13, pp. 909–922, 2019. [2] Iowa State University Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (CELT), “226 active learning techniques.,” March 2017. [3] A. M. Oliveira, “Simple ways so facilitate active learning in hands-on electrical engineering technology courses,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 26–1372, 2015. [4] A. Mouallem, M. Horowitz, and S. Sheppard, “The care methodology: a new lens for introductory ECE course assessment based on student challenging and rewarding experiences,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
achievement,and social and psychological well-being (Gopalan & Brady, 2019), across diverse educationallevels and disciplines. Particularly in STEM higher education where certain demographic groups,such as historically underrepresented racial or ethnic minorities, are more likely to experiencefeelings of isolation or unwelcome (Stayhorn, 2023), researchers have increasingly focused on theconcept of sense of belonging, as evidenced by a growing body of literature.Scoping Review A scoping review is a form of synthesis research designed to systematically mapthe existing literature within a specific field (Levac et al., 2010; Daudt et al., 2013). A scopingreview is the preferred methodology for exploring newly emerging evidence, particularly
the Gaps: Engineering Education and Practice. Proceedings of the 2010 AaeE Conference, Sydneyhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/228399518_Mind_the_Gaps_Engineering_Education_a nd_Practice15. Edward, N.S. and Middleton, J.C.R. (2001) Occupational Socialization—A New Model of the Engineer’s Formation. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Oslo, 6-10 August 2001.16. Cristina Fabretto, 2019, Building professional communication skills inside and outside formal educational contexts: the challenges and opportunities of engineering co-op placements.Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Associationhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/33876844817. Boeing Company. 2009. Desired Attributes of an
,” ABET.[3] Bodnar, C. A., Jadeja, S., and Barrella, E., 2020, “Creating a Master Entrepreneurial Mindset Concept Map,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education.[4] Jackson, A., Barrella, E., Bodnar, C. A., Carnasciali, M. I., Cruz, J., Dillon, H. E., Kecskemety, K. M., and miskioglu, Elif, 2021, “Refining an Entrepreneurial Mindset Master Concept Map through Multi-Institutional Collaboration,” 9th Research in Engineering Education Symposium and 32nd Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (REES AAEE 2021).[5] Martine, M. M., Mahoney, L. X., Sunbury, C. M., Schneider, J. A., Hixson, C., and Bodnar, C. A., 2019, “Concept Maps as an
Division and ASEE Projects Board. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Evaluating the Impact of a Summer Engineering Program Using the National StudentClearinghouseIntroductionSTEM education, encompassing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, is crucialfor elementary and secondary students. It plays a pivotal role in cultivating vital skills likecritical thinking, teamwork, and creativity, preparing students for the demands of a competitive21st-century society. This holistic educational approach equips students with the essentialknowledge and abilities needed to navigate future global challenges.The pursuit of a STEM degree offers students, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds