—instead ofas a final step once results have been obtained and analyzed”, RT is more effective for use bypolicymakers and communities.[3], [8] The third finding (2.3) is that “effective community-level translation methods place an emphasis on using a variety of interactive and participatorystrategies aimed at soliciting, valuing, and engaging with community.” [8] These could go fromauthentic participatory action research (PAR) strategies in the planning of research, tocommunity-owned workshops, to k-12 education modules to inform local teachers and studentsof the effects of research, to name a few. [15] Based on our experiences, the fourth finding (2.4)is that while RT-committed researchers might suffer from lack of trust from communities asresult
gradedassessments. This requires approval by curriculum and department leadership as it affects gradedassessments. The intent is to reduce student workload by incorporating PLTL with existingassessments vice requiring additional assignments. The authors plan to scale this work beyondthe three previously identified courses.ConclusionThe results so far have been encouraging and show the peer support intervention has positiveeffects on student grades. The course averages indicate that students involved with PLTLactivities have higher course averages an indicator of academic success that has potential to leadto persistence in engineering pathways compared to those students not involved with PLTLactivities. This preliminary data appears to support the overall
providebest practices or action plans to reduce CO2 emissions. However, this area has limited research to provideeasy and robust approaches to analyzing carbon footprint and drive research and experimentation design.Note that research and educational activity in higher education differs from industrial settings in that theprocess usually operates at the most efficient point to maximize profits. In higher education,teaching/research activities aim to understand specific processes or fulfill the identified learning outcomes,so operation conditions are often varied and can be less economical. Teaching laboratories are essential for higher education, providing students with hands-onexperience and practical application of theoretical knowledge
managementfor online learners are highly encouraged for REACH students to address these concerns. Theworkshops are provided at no cost to CGCC students on the platform:www.college2success.com and include: “Online Courses: Staying Motivated & Disciplined”, “10Tips For Success In Your Online Course”, “Study Tips & Note-Taking Strategies”. Aftercompleting one of the workshops, the students are invited to fill out an action plan that includes4 points of reflection: Overcome challenges, Establish a schedule, Know your instructor, andBreak large tasks into smaller chunks. In the next semesters, a question will be added to thesurvey to assess the impact of taking those workshops on the academic integration scores. This preliminary study includes only
in the regular TA-led recitation sessions, which underscores the intervention’s main achievement, to help students pass the course who might otherwise fail. In addition, this illustrates that the PLSG method helps all students, including transfer students, pass the course at higher rates. The inclusion of other factors pertaining to students’ starting course competency could potentially further elucidate these results. The research team plans to include demographic data and examine how transfer status is affected by study group participation in later studies. Ongoing and Future Work Ongoing work for the project includes investigating how the PLSGs affect students compared to the traditional TA-led
Illinois State University, teaching in the Sustainable and Renewable Energy program. Dr. Jo also leads the Sustainable Energy Consortium at the university. Dr. Jo is an honors graduate of Purdue University, where he earned a B.S. in Building Construction Management. He earned his M.S. in Urban Planning from Columbia University, where he investigated critical environmental justice issues in New York City. His 2010 Ph.D. from Arizona State University was the nation’s first in sustainability. His research, which has been widely published, focuses on renewable energy systems and sustainable building strategies to reduce the negative impacts of urbanization.Allison Antink-Meyer, Illinois State University Allison
San Diego County Office of Education andwith the San Diego Science Project to create a series of lesson plans centered on the webapplications, incorporating playful activities that explore how everyday objects create sound. Thecurrent version of the curriculum can be accessed for free through this team’s websitewww.listeningtowaves.com.All these activities have been carried out in an iterative manner: evaluating how children interactwith the curriculum and applications and how teachers respond to the training. This paperexamines how teachers' attitudes toward the teaching of waves change as they participate in theprofessional development.2. MethodsTwenty-four science teachers from 19 schools across 10 districts in California participated in
fromhttp://depts.washington.edu/cerse/research/current-research/.Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity, and Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology(2018). Creating Shared Vision: A Tip Sheet from REvolutionizing Engineering and ComputerScience Departments (RED) Participatory Action Research. Retrieved fromhttp://depts.washington.edu/cerse/research/current-research/.Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity, and Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology(2022). Planning for Leadership Change: A Tip Sheet from REvolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) Participatory Action Research. Retrieved fromhttp://depts.washington.edu/cerse/research/current-research/Vuori, J. (2018) Understanding academic leadership using the four-frame model
additional data collection of pre-transfer andpost-transfer surveys and interviews with pre-transfer students and two-year college faculty,staff, and administrators. Following the collection of that data, all data collected during thisproject will be mixed to create greater understanding of the assets that assets, factors, andstrategies that enable access to engineering transfer pathways and the ways in which these itemsvary across student demographics, locations, institutions, or intention to transfer. Beginning inYear 3, with this information, and data from other studies conducted in this CAREER grant, theresearchers plan to develop an interactive, digital Engineering Transfer Student Dashboard,based on constructs identified by transfer student
. Additionally, an extensiveFOI analysis of multiple data sources (both qualitative and quantitative) can help provide adeeper understanding of the intervention.RecommendationsRecommendations for higher education practitioners and researchers engaged in fidelity ofimplementation activities are provided below: • Develop clear guidelines, such as a rubric outlining key components of the professional development framework or intervention. These guidelines can support practitioners and researchers to ensure a shared understanding of the intended implementation structure and process [1],[8]. • Examine how professional development activities (planning, teaching, and reflection) advance particular components of
(1994) usability inspection methods, usability testing will be done throughfocus groups to explore participants’ perceptions of the user interface design, identify designproblems, and uncover areas to improve the user interface and user experience in Ecampus andhybrid courses (RQ1). A heuristics evaluation [16, 17] of the user interface will be conducted toensure that usability principles are followed to provide a user interface with inclusivity andaccessibility (RQ2). A Likert scale will be adapted from Bandura’s (1989) MultidimensionalScales of Perceived Self-Efficacy [18] to explore participants' self-regulatory efficacy (RQ3).Planned InterventionThe proposed study will combine elements of both exploratory and quasi-experimental
use standard statistical tests (using mean comparisons, chisquare, and regression, etc.) abiding by the standards for statistical significance. For qualitativedata, we will use axial coding and thematic analysis.SedimentSketch softwareSedimentSketch will be a web-based software application that will allow instructors to createcustomized virtual lab classes with a personalized experience and automated feedback tostudents. No coding experience is needed for instructors to tailor these classes to use with theirteaching plan. The active learning software SedimentSketch will facilitate student mastery ofsediment identification and description; and provide a unique interactive environment for studentsto practice and improve their sedimentology
addition tothese questions, we have recently added an investigation into the conceptual understanding ofengineering material when practicing with OEMPs. This new research question has beenmotivated by student survey results and instructor feedback. Future plans include developing afaculty development workshop that will explain how to design an OEMP, why they are beneficialto students’ education and development as an engineer, and how to implement them in theclassroom. The goal of this workshop will be to encourage professors to use open-endedproblems in engineering science courses and give their students an opportunity to practiceengineering judgment. With this, we can begin to understand all of the ways in which studentsdevelop as engineers from
evaluations contribute to academic integrity? - Better planning - Clear homework deadlines Greater organization and responsibility - Unanounced evaluations - Need for constant review - Continuous class attendance Development of new study techniques - More study frequency - Opportunity to clarify doubts Reduction in copy rate - Study frequency - Different types of evaluationsGreater organization and responsibilityEnhancing organization and
: equitable use;flexibility in use; simple and intuitive use; availability of information; tolerance for error; lowphysical effort; size and space for approach and use; and aesthetic and minimalist design [8].Biodesign is a method of training future health technology innovators that was founded at StanfordUniversity [9]. This approach engages medicine, engineering, and business in a curriculum thatchallenges participants to identify (needs finding and screening), invent (concept generation andscreening), and implement (strategy development and business planning) [10]. A recentlydeveloped diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ) toolkit for the Biodesign process providescurriculum developers and instructors with information on diverse team
Ethics Awareness and Professional EthicsStandards for New Engineering Talents" and the series of lectures on "Engineering Ethics"courses regularly held by various science and engineering colleges mainly include topics suchas the relationship between engineering and ethics, risks in engineering, safety andresponsibility, engineering value, interests and justice. Dalian University of Technology has also successfully held the 8th National Cyber EthicsSymposium and the 3rd Academic Symposium on Science, Technology, and Engineering Ethicsin China. It has exchanged ethical governance systems with scholars from universities acrossthe country, implemented the Philosophy and Social Science Prosperity Plan, and built aplatform for strengthening
activities online, number of assignment and/or quiz submission, total time spent on theLMS, etc. For instance, the study by Kizilcec et al. (2013) [19] used the students’ interactionpatterns on their course LMS data to predict their engagement in the course. Additionally, studentLMS interaction data was used to predict their retention in online courses [20].With that background knowledge, it is evident that teaching online courses requires significantlymore planning, more effort and time investment compared to in-person face-to-face courses. Wewould like to acknowledge that we are not looking down upon teaching courses in-person andneither are we hinting at it is easy to teach in-person face-to-face courses. Additionally, we alsoacknowledge that
to accommodate different learning styles. The quiz tool facilitates rapid evaluationof student performance, enabling instructors to work with students more efficiently. The methodwas implemented in one group and evaluated based on students’ feedback, demonstrating itsefficacy in both regular lab classes and self-learning sessions. Future plans include implementingthe method in different courses to further evaluate its effectiveness.REFERENCES[1] M. Ainley, “Connecting with Learning: Motivation, Affect and Cognition in Interest Processes.” Educational psychology review 18.4 (2006): 391–405. Web.[2] A. Elkhatatt, S. Al‑Muhtaseb, “Hybrid online‑flipped learning pedagogy for teaching laboratory courses to mitigate the pandemic COVID‑19
transformation projects and use of learning analytics have been conducted at largeresearch institutions, the findings from this project will contribute to the knowledge inengineering education change in the context of a public, regional, primarily undergraduateinstitution in the Midwest. This work-in-progress paper describes the grounding, planning, andimplementation of these strategies to build capacity for change as well as shares the challengesencountered, strategies used, and lessons learned.Learning Analytics Dashboard Development and InitiationTo date, a total of individual 17 faculty members have been involved one or both facultycommunities (Data Tools Co-Design FC, Inquiry in STEM Success FC) since the start of theproject (Spring 2021-Spring
exploratory study by Mena and Schmitz delves into views of mentoring from theperspective of the graduate student mentor in a CURE [3]. In this study, one particular mentordescribed his role as purely “organizational and trying to set out a plan of action” [3, p. 5]. Indescribing the benefits gained from this experience, one other mentor said that they developedskills involving “trying to manage everyone’s time and experience levels” [3, p. 5]. Anotheracknowledgment further said that the mentor usually had to make sure that they knew more thanthe undergraduate in order to help them with their work.From the undergraduate research perspective, a mentored research experience will have thefollowing steps. Firstly, an undergraduate researcher should
figure, students from the No-COIL group said that they are uncertain that this experience willaffect their career plans. Students from the No-COIL and COIL+ groups said it has moderatelyimpacted their career choices. Most students were open to working internationally or with peopleof other cultures. Students from all three courses said these experiences will highly influence theircareer choices. Additionally, the students' responses encompassed skills gained from theseexperiences that they plan to utilize in their future careers. Students from the No-COIL and COIL+groups talked about confidence, adaptability, and communication skills while discussing theirfuture career aspirations. 9 8
engineering work can potentially influence career choices inteenagers. The First-Year Seminar at Campbell University approaches helping studentsunderstand engineering with a ‘something for everyone’ approach that examines engineeringfrom many perspectives and asks students to identify and build on whichever set of perspectivesconnects best to their interests and career plans. To this end, a set of activities examining beautyand elegance in engineering was created to focus on creative and aesthetic aspects ofengineering, and other positive impacts of engineering related to experiences of beauty.While not typically considered a core first-year topic [2], exploring the concepts of beauty andelegance with first-year engineers broadens and enhances their
encountered in producing the design, and detail how they overcame the challenges. It ismade clear to the student with the Mechanical Engineer role that they do not actually have tobuild the device, but are responsible for ensuring the build happens, and documenting thechallenges and roadblocks the team encounters. Among the 64 teams I have taught over the lasteight years, I have yet to have a team that did not encounter challenges, and had to modify theoriginal plan the Project Manager proposed. It is important that students learn to expectchallenges and persevere to find solutions. Students are graded on the following criteria: • Resources (Was a comprehensive parts list developed…6 pts) • Cost estimate (Was an updated cost estimate developed
qualitative deflected shapes and shearand bending moment diagrams. Students implement analysis procedures through computerprogramming using Python and commercial structural analysis software SAP2000. Students useSAIL app to help make and confirm predictions and make observations over time that improveintuition.Research QuestionsThe research question of focus for this paper is: (1) How does SCPS affect student ability tosense and predict CBE (Construction and Building Engineering) problem solutions? Theassessment plan includes establishing baseline data of student understanding and comparing itover time to student scores on homework and final exams. We used items from conceptinventories (Force Concept Inventory [6] and Statics Concept Inventory [7, 8
ASEE 2024 At least student orgs are able to continue with culturally specific events, but now they’re not getting that collaboration and financial support from our offices. I think they’re going to be stressed out trying to plan these events all by themselves, at least if they want to do it at a high-quality level.Given the celebrations mentioned as exempt from termination are specific cultural celebrations,time will tell if the bias towards more established celebrations like those will stand or if they toowill be disallowed. It is likely that clear standards will only develop as state governments move toenforce their laws and institutions either face repercussions for being too lax in their restructuringor continue
Paper ID #43842Integration of Augmented Reality (AR) in Construction Management (CM)Education: Bibliometric Literature ReviewAbigael Olatoyosi Oluniyi Abigael Oluniyi is a PhD student in the Education Equity and Transformation program with a focus on Construction Management. She works as a Graduate Teaching Assistant for the Plan Reading and Quantity Survey course in the Department of Construction Management at Colorado State University. Abigael’s research focuses on Augmented Reality, Pedagogical Practices and Student Learning Outcomes.Dr. Svetlana Olbina, Colorado State University Dr. Svetlana Olbina is an Associate
career prospects and make enough money to supportherself in a better lifestyle.” With extensive experience in the service industry as a hairstylist,she planned to develop technical skills to help “people who are not tech savvy in a morepersonable non-geeky manner.” Although an early benefit of our STIR dialogs was in getting Ethrough the technical learning so she could leverage her social strengths in a more lucrativecareer trajectory, the subsequent work and career self-efficacy outcomes are more relevant to thispaper. In particular, the following SocioTechnical Learning example shows how E improvedwork and career self-efficacy through reflective problem-solving.Early in her apprenticeship, E’s primary concern was establishing a routine. When
copy of SLAMS go to: https://github.com/jkw104/SLAMS git@github.com:jkw104/SLAMS.git gh repo clone jkw104/SLAMSThe authors have found the problem library to be helpful as the problems are readily availablefor any class. Creating an assessment now involves simply selecting the type and number ofproblems rather than searching through old Word documents.Conclusions and Future PlansFuture enhancements are planned in two phases. The short-term goal is to develop a template formultiple-choice questions. The long-term goal is to enable generating problems with uniquevalues for each student, promoting collaborative learning and reducing plagiarism. The uniquevalues would encourage students to understand the concepts rather than simply
task is encapsulated by ABET Criterion 5 which states that an effective team includes“members [who] together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” (2023). For the most part, this education inpractice consists of combining students into groups and letting them explore teamwork dynamicsthrough self-determination (i.e., figuring it out as they go). This sort of situational, experientialeducation mimics to some extent what happens in the engineering workplace, where individualswith unique skill sets are tasked with working together to achieve a common goal. However, theoutcomes of this educational approach can be highly variable, resulting in students who have
. Oursection is called “Socially Engaged Design of Nuclear Energy Technologies.” In its first offeringin Fall 2023, the course had 38 students. Students from any engineering major can take thiscourse, meaning that some were nuclear-interested but many were planning to major in otherdisciplines. As is typical of many schools right now, we had a significant number of studentsinterested in computer science and engineering. But a wide range of engineering fields wererepresented in our course.All Introduction to Engineering courses in the College of Engineering are design-build-testcourses, as is ours. The project with which students in our course are tasked is the design of ahypothetical fusion energy facility in collaboration with community members from