, No. 2219589. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] A. C. Graesser, P. Chipman, B. C. Haynes, and A. Olney, “Autotutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 612–618, 2005. [Online]. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/te/te48.html#GraesserCHO05[2] J. A. Kulik and J. D. Fletcher, “Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 42–78, 2016.[3] K.-I. Malatesta, P. Wiemer-Hastings, and J. Robertson, “Beyond the short answer
Outcomes from a Pilot Medical Innovations Course with Nursing, Engineering, and Biology Undergraduate Students,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 4, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40594-017-0095-y.[5] D. Melian, J. L. Saorin, J. De la Torre-Cantero, and V. Lopez-Chao, “Analysis of the Factorial Structure of Graphic Creativity of Engineering Students through Digital Manufacturing Techniques*,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 4, p. 9, 2020.[6] M. E. Andrews, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 24, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.[7] E. C. Hilton, K. G. Talley, S. F. Smith, R. L. Nagel, and J. S. Linsey, “Report on
, 2, 3) values as per equation (2) and sends the calculated 𝑦𝑦𝑖𝑖 and(previous) 𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖 values to the respective Arduinos #i. The Arduinos use these values to calculate 𝑒𝑒𝑖𝑖and 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 as per equation (3) and send the new 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 values back to the Raspberry Pi (as indicated inFigure 6). Once all these 𝑢𝑢𝑖𝑖 values are received, the Raspberry Pi calculates new 𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖 values as perequation (4). Then, in order to meet the 0.02 (s) sampling time interval, the Raspberry Piintentionally executes an idle (compensation) time. 9 Figure 5. Flow chart of the program on Raspberry PiFigure 6 illustrates the flowchart for the Arduino controllers #i (𝑖𝑖
education," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, 2009.[2] E. W. Johnson and S. G. DeMaris, "Developing an International Engineering Experience for Undergraduate Students at a Small Institution," Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 2, 2007.[3] M. H. Salisbury, P. D. Umbach, M. B. Paulsen, and E. T. Pascarella, "Going Global: Understanding the Choice Process of the Intent to Study Abroad," Research in Higher Education, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 119-143, 2009.[4] G. M. Warnick, M. S. Call, and R. Davies, "Understanding engineering and technology student perceptions: Barriers to study abroad participation," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference
similar to the one discussed in this paper. Acknowledgment of Support & Disclaimer This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2215770. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References [1] NGSS Lead States. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies
critiques causes excessive cognitive load for students. WebTA users view a traffic light system to portray the severity of antipattern(s) found within a stu- dent’s program. A ‘Green’ light means no antipatterns and/or a good pattern was found within the code. A ‘Yellow’ light means a non- critical antipattern or error was found. A ‘Red’ light
(TALE). IEEE, 2015, pp. 72–76. [7] K. W. Van Treuren, “Applying active learning to an introductory aeronautics class,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018. [8] C. R. Compeau, A. Talley, and P. Q. Tran, “Active learning in electrical engineering: Measuring the difference,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [9] F. Portela, “A new and interactive teaching approach with gamification for motivating students in computer science classrooms,” in First International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2020). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum f¨ur Informatik, 2020.[10] G. S. Tewolde, “Effective active learning tools for an embedded systems course,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education
involved conducting a comprehensive analysis of the overall system. Cruse et al.provide a detailed overview of the course topics, with project days and activities denoted [4].Survey And Data CollectionResearchers implemented a self-efficacy survey in the course structure to gain insights into theproject's impact on student self-efficacy. The instrument used to measure self-efficacy was anadapted from of the survey validated and discussed in Mamaril et al.'s Journal of EngineeringEducation paper entitled, "Measuring Undergraduate Students' Engineering Self-Efficacy: AValidation Study [8]." In this validation study, a self-efficacy instrument was identified to measureengineering efficacy in four areas: general engineering (Gen) and three engineering
, L. Landherr, D. Silverstein, S. Thiel, B. Vaughen and T. Vogel, "Process Safety Across the Curriculum," in AIChE Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL, 2023.[2] L. P. Ford, K. D. Dahm, D. Crowl, C. Barr, J. Brennan, T. Carter, L. Landherr, D. Silverstein, S. Thiel, B. Vaughen and T. Vogel, "The 2023 Timepoint in the Development of Process Safety Education," Chemical Engineering Education.[3] M. S. Mannan and D. K. Startz, "Process Safety Curriculum in US Universities," Centerline, vol. 10, no. 1, 2006.[4] P. B. Hasan, "Process Safety Curriculum Survey," Centerline, vol. 16, no. 2, 2012.[5] J. A. Shaeiwitz and S. Abubakr, "Hazards Associated with Chemical, Physical, and/or Biological Processes in the ChE Curriculum," in AIChE
of Higher Education of the School of Engineering and Sciences, and her current role is Academic Services Director. Vianney belongs to the executive committee of the Matilda Latin American Chair for Women in Engineering and belongs to the mentoring and research groups. She belongs to the LACCEI executive board. She is a founding member of Ingenia Women in Engineering and Sciences participating in the linkage, mentoring and dissemination committees. Vianney is a founding member of the OWSD Mexico´s Chapter. She is an IEEE, WIE (Women in Engineering) and IEEE-HKN member. Vianney is a CB Coach certified by the Conscious Business Center. She belongs to the National System of Researchers (SNI). Her research lines
, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence studentˆa C™s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term succes ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Replicating the Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem – differences in outcomes across studentsIntroductionWith the ongoing transition to the knowledge-based, mobile economy, cities in the United Statesrecognize the importance of a STEM-literate workforce. In the depopulated, legacy industrialareas in the Midwest, cities fight to attract and retain an educated
. The GameThe method by which this paper teaches SOP minimization is a game with which students competeto capture the maximum number of true minterms. Upon capture by either player, a true minterm’ssquare or cell is highlighted with the player’s corresponding color. Once all true minterms arecaptured by either Player One or Player Two, the game is over and the player with a greater numberof true minterms covered wins. The player(s) can also capture true minterms occupied by the otherplayer to both reduce their opponents score and increase their own. However, if a player capturesa false minterm through any one of their moves via an incorrect Sum-of-Products, then the playerforfeits the game. As such, the game encourages students to naturally
Paper ID #42835Use of Virtual Reality to Improve Learning Experience on a Lean ManufacturingCourseDr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez, Tecnologico de Monterrey Dr. Gibr´an Sayeg-S´anchez is professor – consultant in the Science Department in Tecnologico de Monterrey, Puebla campus. He studied a PhD in Financial Science in EGADE Business School (2016), a MSc in Industrial Engineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2011), and a BEng in Industrial and Systems Engineering in Tecnologico de Monterrey (2006). Dr. Sayeg-S´anchez has more than 11 years of experience in teaching statistics, mathematics, and operations research; and more
completed more variety of StaticViewproblems, more specific CAD models used as well as the timing on when they are introduced toyield more meaningful results.References[1] Steif, P. S., & Dollar, A. (2004, January). Reinventing engineering statics to address theconceptual difficulties of students. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress andExposition (Vol. 47233, pp. 47-52).[2] Wingate, K. A., Ferri, A. A., & Feigh, K. M. (2018, June). The impact of the physics, statics,and mechanics sequence on student retention and performance in mechanical engineering. In2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[3] Steif, P. S., & Dollar, A. (2005). Reinventing the teaching of statics. International Journal ofEngineering Education
Education, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/34764[3] R. Fry, B. Kennedy, and C. Funk, “STEM Jobs See Uneven Progress in Increasing Gender, Racial and Ethnic Diversity: Higher Education Pipeline Suggests Long Path Ahead for Increasing Diversity, Especially in Fields Like Computing and Engineering,” Pew Research Center, Apr. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp- content/uploads/sites/16/2021/03/PS_2021.04.01_diversity-in-STEM_REPORT.pdf[4] A. Peng, J. Menold, and S. R. Miller, “Nature Versus Nurture: the Influence of Classroom Creative Climate on Risk-Taking Preferences of Engineering Students,” in Volume 4: 20th International Conference on Design Education (DEC
● Reread or rewrite notes or class material ● Perform note recall by recalling sections of notes and concepts as a form of review ● Summarize chapter, section of notes or textbook Understand ● Using flashcards or quizzes to test your understanding of key theories or concepts ● Explaining a problem or concepts to a classmate(s) (in a study session, at office hours, in class, Piazza, discussion board, etc.) ● Solving practice problems with guidance and support from notes and examples Apply ● Represent a concept or problem in a different form (graphically, equation, diagrams, explanation, verbally
Conservation. NJ,USA: Noyes Data Corporation, 1979.[17] G.F. Froment, K. B. Bischof, and J. de Wilde, Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, 3rded. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.[18] A. Araújo and S. Skogestad, “Control structure design for the ammonia synthesis process,”Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2920-2932, Dec. 2008, doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.03.001.[19] R. Sinnott and G. Towler, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice, andEconomics of Plant and Process Design, 6th ed. Elsevier, 2020, doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-01555-0.Appendix A1. Chemical Process Project Description and Background. Plant for Productionof Ammonia: Haber-Bosch ProcessIntroduction and History:One of the most critical nutrients for
engineering students through community building (Evaluation) AbstractOver the past twelve years, the ESTEEM program, funded by the NSF S-STEM, at University ofCalifornia Santa Barbara (UCSB) has supported 161 low-income undergraduate students inengineering. This paper emphasizes the students’ changing needs and what they foundsupportive over time with a special focus on the shifting needs for community building before,during, and after COVID-19 pandemic remote learning. Without additional support, low-incomeengineering students, who often reflect additional intersecting minoritized identities and are morelikely to be the first in their family to attend college, leave the field at
innovations both within our course and across our curriculum. Any futuredevelopments should generate solutions while looking through the lens of student experience,with a goal to better prepare students to be technically excellent, iterative, collaborative,empathetic, and confident engineers.References1. Santana S. Instrumentation for Evaluating Design-learning and Instruction Within Courses and Across Programs. In: 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. 2021.2. Sanchez A, Blake LP, Chen D, Jones M, Mao S, Mendelson L, et al. Building Better Engineers: Critical Reflection as a High Impact Practice in Design Learning. In: 2022 ASEE Annual Conference \& Exposition. 2022.3. McNair TB, Bensimon EM, Malcom-Piqueux
events are accessible to students with vision and V. PARTICIPANT T ECHNICAL S UPPORThearing impairments, ensuring everyone has the opportunity Participants at the FAU Hack-a-Thon have access to essen-to participate. tial productivity tools including Slack, GitHub, WebEx, and This diversity enriches the event by bringing together a Canvas (an educational LMS), which facilitate collaborationwide range of perspectives, which enhances creativity and and project
and the ToyotaUSA Education Foundation to the National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity. The programdescribed in this paper was funded by the National Science Foundation. Early collaborators andcontributors to variations of the rubric include Tegwin Pulley, Audrey Selden, Mimi Lufkin, JuliaThompson, and Michelle Brown. Special thanks to our CISTEME365 participants for theirsupport in realizing the potential of this resource.References 1. Gazibara, S. (2013). “Head, Heart and Hands Learning”-A challenge for contemporary education. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 4(1), 71-82. 2. Piaget, J. (1964). Cognitive Development in Children Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186
, 1991, p. 138. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355.[14] D. Hamman-Fisher and V. McGhie, “Towards decoloniality of the education training and development third-year curriculum: Employing situated learning characteristics to facilitate authentic learning,” Cogent Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 2237301, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2237301.[15] K. M. Bursic and C. J. Atman, “Information Gathering: A Critical Step for Quality in the Design Process,” Qual. Manag. J., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 60–75, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1080/10686967.1998.11919148.[16] M. Basadur, G. B. Graen, and S. G. Green, “Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding and solving in an industrial research organization,” Organ
materials science, the neuroscience of learning, humanitarian engineering, and undergraduate research involvement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Implementing Entrepreneurial Minded Learning in a First-Year Seminar CourseEntrepreneurially minded learning (EML) was implemented in a first-year seminar course at ateaching-focused public institution in the Southeast United States. Entrepreneurial mindset (EM)is characterized by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN)’s 3Cs, which arecuriosity, connections, and creating value. To assist the first-year students with the developmentof EM, a 7-week long project was developed and incorporated into the course
2024 02/06/24]; Available from: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/.8. Lawrence, L., et al. Human-Centered Design Taxonomy: Case Study Application with Novice, Multidisciplinary Designers. in 15th Annual International Conference of the Learning Sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences. 2020. Bochum, Germany.9. Brown, T., Design thinking. Harvard business review, 2008. 86(6): p. 84.10. Zhang, T. and H. Dong, Human-centred design: An emergent conceptual model. 2008.11. Tucker, T., Pagano, A., & Shehab, S. , Merging Human-Centered Design with engineering design: Synthesizing a Human-Centered Engineering
, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 964–982, Nov. 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812465006. [2] E. Daphne, M. L. William, P. R. Steve, and W. J. Adrian, “CVE technology development based an real world application and user needs,” In Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000), pp. 12-20, Nov. 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/enabl.2000.883698.[3] S. Deb, D. W. Carruth, R. Sween, L. Strawderman, and T. M. Garrison, “Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 65, pp. 449–460, Nov. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.007.[4] X. Li, W. Yi, H.-L
review of commitment and implementation of sustainable developmentin higher education: results from a worldwide survey,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 108,pp. 1–18, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048.[3] T. B. Ramos, S. Caeiro, B. van Hoof, R. Lozano, D. Huisingh, and K. Ceulemans,“Experiences from the implementation of sustainable development in higher educationinstitutions: Environmental Management for Sustainable Universities,” Journal of CleanerProduction, vol. 106, pp. 3–10, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.110.[4] H. Shapira, A. Ketchie, and M. Nehe, “The integration of Design Thinking and StrategicSustainable Development,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 140, pp. 277–287, Jan. 2017,doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro
deficiencies. Future studies may investigate theeffectiveness of teaching interventions which focuses on other domains of the ATMI survey suchas enjoyment of introductory programming, motivation, and value of programming. 8References 1. Carberry, A. R., & McKenna, A. F. (2014). Exploring student conceptions of modeling and modeling uses in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 77-91. 2. Wiedenbeck, S., Labelle, D., & Kain, V. N. (2004, April). Factors affecting course outcomes in introductory programming. In PPIG (p. 11). 3. Guzdial, M., & Soloway, E. (2002). Teaching the
be helpful if themap was able to be shown within the tool rather than having to open a separate application. Thisfeedback will be provided to the the automated scoring tool development team to see if there areadditional elements that can be added to improve the user experience.References 1. “The Network,” KEEN - About. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/about.aspx. 2. N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed‐Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering Students and Entrepreneurship Education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes*,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 3. Kern Family Foundation, The, “Engineering Unleashed,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/, 2021, (accessed January 2021). 4. K
• Fluid flowrate: 2 m/s • Bulk flowrate: 0.026 m^3/s • Flow regime: Turbulent Leak • Berm containment: • Berm containment: detection and Length: 30m Length: 15m containment Width: 30m Width: 10m High: 5m High: 5m Material: PVC polymer-based Material: PVC polymer-based geomembrane geomembrane • Automatic Gauge tank system • Automatic Gauge tank system with Veeder-Root
residues or etching with flow control to achieve precise etch profiles and uniform etchrates.REFERENCES [1] E. Petruzzelli, “Editorial: Concerning Trends for Chemical Engineers,” Chemical Engineering Progress, 2022. [2] R. R. Rhinehart, “Tracking trends in undergraduate enrollment,” Chem. Eng. Prog., vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 97–99, 2008. [3] K. E. Wolff, C. Dorfling, and G. Akdogan, “Shifting disciplinary perspectives and perceptions of chemical engineering work in the 21st century,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 24, pp. 43–51, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2018.06.005. [4] A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman, and S. I. Safferman, “Understanding K-12 engineering outreach