theinformation gathering section and ends with result documentation in the result analysis anddocumentation section. According to [12], this framework has been used by other researchers buta further research work was done to develop a proposed framework for soft skill application inlinear programming using PBL activity sequence. The author stated that, the PBL activitysequence proposes a feedback loop that allows the students to learn as they work using a setmetric and rubric to assess each work stage. LP integration with PBL is grounded in the desire toafford students with authentic and real-world solving experiences that helps to bridge traditionalpractice knowledge providing a systematic approach for modeling and solving decision makingproblems [12
. This paper describes the authors’approach to teaching two hybrid software project courses which make use of flipped classroommodels that rely on active learning and the use of authentic assessment practices (e.g., reflectivewriting and peer assessment).Active LearningEngineering educators regard experiential learning as the best way to train the next generation ofengineers [4]. It is reasonable to believe that the soft skills practiced in active learningclassrooms can improve the capabilities software engineering students and better prepare themfor their capstone projects [5]. Active learning is “embodied in a learning environment where theteachers and students are actively engaged with the content through discussions, problem-solving
scientific research abilities, which are critical for their respective future careers.Engineering education is no exception to this academic requirement [1]. The employability ofengineering students today depends on more than just using their technical abilities; in order toeven secure part-time employment and progress in their careers, they also require complementaryprofessional abilities or soft skills [2], [3], [4]. These professional skills include the capacity forinitiative, teamwork, communication, planning and organization, and commercial acumen [5], [6],[7]. Professionals believe that communication skills are one of the most important skills requiredfor employability [8].Writing and more specifically academic writing and communication is an
. 2. Create generalized lesson plans for methods in recovery, separation, and purification of bioproducts, and a certificate in industrial cleaning, sanitization, and sterilization. 3. Develop a series of soft-skills and career readiness modules in conjunction with the Niswonger Foundation and BioBuilder. 4. Implement lessons and develop modules suited to non-traditional and non-matriculating students. 5. Prototype modules suitable for integration into a four-year degree in bioengineering or biomanufacturing. 6. Implement a nexus between our educational programs, the ETSU Research Corporation, and local and prospective industry. 7. Identify the effectiveness of the proposed scope of work on student learning
students they serve; They developleadership skills, learn about counseling and educational theories, and reflect on their valuableexperiences [3], [7].Learning objectives for the course include: • Articulate different definitions and related sub-themes that could comprise peer advising, peer mentoring, interpersonal communication, and leadership soft skills. • Evaluate the current level of development in soft skills and develop a plan for future reflection, evaluation, and adjustment to said skills. • Demonstrate effectiveness in your role and build confidence in providing advising assistance. • Demonstrate familiarity with resources and opportunities in the College of Engineering and the greater campus and
what needs to be done to keep thoseitems flowing through the organization. It’s technical, because I have to know what I’m dealingwith and what the part can do, but it’s also about people. I have to be able to work and interfacewith others to move the assemblies along. I have to be able to keep track of the different contactsthat I’ve made along the way. I am still polishing the soft skills from Rising Scholars.” Rising Scholar Gamma (Engineering Technologist) “The summer before I graduated, I managed to land an internship with the Vulcraft divisionof Nucor, here in Indiana. I had a good round of interviews and managed to make it to the finalpart of the process with three companies. I picked
Engineering Criteria, as well as various other accreditation models [2]. When reshapingcontemporary engineering education, several elements deserve attention. These decisions areinfluenced by evolving industry needs and societal context. Interdisciplinary learning, integratingfields like data science and entrepreneurship, is crucial for holistic problem–solving. Soft skills suchas communication, teamwork, and leadership are essential for effective collaboration [3].Notably, the emphasis on the evaluation of students' engagement and performance through moderntechnological means, including the analysis of facial expressions, signifies a substantial evolution inengineering education. This transformation constitutes the fifth major paradigm shift within
). Shortsummaries of the ‘growth’ and ‘sentiment’ Likert scores used in the prompt are: - Growth: The student indicated or demonstrated growth in their ability to work in a team, in technical skills, or in soft skills. They overcame a challenge or tough experience. They learned about themselves and/or the world around them. They are better prepared for their future career. If the comment does not indicate or demonstrate growth (or lack thereof), please select 3.0. - Sentiment: The student comment indicated or demonstrated a positive or negative sentiment towards the course, the instructor, the project, or the team. Constructive feedback is neutral (3.0); you are assessing the student comment sentiment, not
accompany its advancementand deployment. While some students feel equipped to handle these challenges, the majority feelunprepared to manage these complex situations in their professional work. Additionally, studentsreported that the ethical concerns involved in the development and application of technologieslike AI is often not included in curricula or is viewed as “soft skills” that are not as important as“technical” knowledge. Although some students we interviewed shared the sense of apathytoward these topics that they see from their engineering program, most were eager to receivemore training in AI ethics. These results underscore the pressing need for engineering educationprograms, including graduate programs, to integrate comprehensive ethics
most perceived growth was "speaking clearlyand coherently during oral presentations," and the lowest was "coding/programming." Table1 lists all average perceived growth scores for each skill. Interestingly, learning technical skillssuch as coding was the top-trending theme for what skills UG students hoped to gain from theproject, followed by project understanding and professional and soft skill enhancement.However, coding/programming scored the lowest in perceived growth, suggesting a demand anda need to implement more opportunities for UG students to engage with technical developmentskills, specifically in coding. However, coding is a difficult skill to learn for students, especiallyfor UG students who have not yet developed the skills
Learning hasalso been shown to improve students’ confidence, school engagement, and mental health(Greenberg et al., 2017). Additionally, students tend to benefit long-term and are better preparedfor higher education, more successful in their careers, and more engaged citizens (Greenberg etal., 2017). Tumaini students appear to reap many of these benefits: they felt that they were a partof a supportive community and that they learned a lot about themselves such as how to controltheir emotions, how to be comfortable with themselves, and how to express themselves. Since itis very important that students fully complete their industrial attachments to maximize theirbenefits from the program, the fact that students possess these soft skills speaks
engineering education," EnvironmentTechnology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, vol.3, p. 253, 2019, doi: 10.17770/etr2019vol3.4118. [11] G. Gidion and R. O. Buchal, "Fostering teamwork skills using collaboration software in engineering design education," Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2013, doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4845. [12] J. Schleiss, M. Bieber, A. Manukjan, L. Kellner, and S. Stober, "An Interdisciplinary Competence Profile for AI in Engineering," 2022, doi: 10.5821/conference- 9788412322262.1288. [13] S. Nicola, C. Pinto, and J. Mendonca, "The role of education on the acquisition of 21st century soft skills by
the students on AI Literacy so they can analyze and interpret the syntheticallygenerated outputs.The course “Introduction to the Engineering Experience” is a required course offered every Fallsemester to all first-year engineering students at our university. The course is grounded on theapproach of Raymond Landis, who coined the term World Class Engineering Student (WCES)[10]. The approach focuses on development of soft skills including collaboration, reflection, peerreview, and time management; skills which are increasingly recognized as an important part ofstudent development and success in engineering education, and essential in the development of aWCES [11]. In the Fall of 2023 semester, the AI literacy module was added and delivered
, tangential soft skill) Reports assessed for Reports excluded as not related to at least empathy eligibility: 56 one of the three constructs of empathy: 7 Article excluded as relating only to STEM education generally:1 Studies included in review: 48Figure 2: PRISMA showing the identification, screening, and selection process for thissystematic review.Analysis After reading the 48 articles, our research team identified three emerging themes:Empathy in Teaching and Learning, the Role of Empathy in Engineering, and Empathy inEngineering Design. When determining the category
analysis was performedafterward for homework, either individually or in groups according to the students’ preference.Related Literature Compared to the hundreds of works available on the use of digital games inundergraduate education, less than 30 can be found studying analog or board games [2]. Ofthose, only a few deal with complex STEM topics, including one examining a game aboutfossilization and another with a game about public health biology. Results in these studies havebeen overall positive, particularly in the development of soft skills such as communication orteamwork. Some studies, such as that of Clark et al., examined the effectiveness of game design, notjust game play, in improving students’ learning outcomes as well as
engineers," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, no. 8, pp. 1367-1370, 2000.[2] L. Small, K. Shacklock, and T. Marchant, "Employability: a contemporary review for higher education stakeholders," Journal of Vocational Education & Training, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 148-166, 2018.[3] R. J. Marandi, B. K. Smith, R. F. Burch, and S. C. Vick, "Engineering soft skills vs. engineering entrepreneurial skills," The International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 988-998, 2019.[4] H. Jang, "Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, pp. 284-301, 2016.[5] L. Ballesteros-Sanchez, I. Ortiz-Marcos, and R. Rodriguez-Rivero
fornumber writing and the handling of significant figures, alongside comprehensive treatment ofunit conversions and dimensional analysis. Additionally, the course teaches practical Excel skills,including techniques such as data sorting, filtering, and basic statistical computation, as well asthe creation of charts and graphs.Furthermore, students are introduced to logical functions for data analysis, and are equipped withthe tools of goal seek and solver for the analysis of linear optimization challenges.Complementary to these technical competencies, the course also addresses a suite of soft skills,including an introduction to artificial intelligence and navigation of library resources withemphasis on academic integrity, plagiarism avoidance
students and maintaining enrollment. SI programs are not unique to theUniversity of South Alabama and other universities, but the adaptations made during SIprograms and training during the unprecedented COVID period are of quiet value. and Theunderstanding of factors and their impact on retention and academic unit costs can be applied toother similarly sized state institutions.Background At the University of South Alabama, the chosen student instructors delivering SI areindividuals who have previously taken the course, demonstrated great academic performance,and possess exceptional soft skills. Great academic achievement is indicated by the achievementof an “A” (90-100) in the course, and typically, a faculty member identifies these
skilldevelopment. We appreciate the participation of industry partners towards optimizing theeducational experience, including professional preparedness of bioengineering undergraduatestudents and the engagement in continuous program improvement.References[1] Hadgraft, R.G., & A. Kolmos (2020). ”Emerging learning environments in engineering education”, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 25:1, 3-16, DOI: 10.1080/22054952.2020.1713522[2] Hirudayaraj, M., Baker, R., Baker, F., & M. Eastman (2021). “Soft skills for entry-level engineers: What employers want”, Education Sciences, 11, 641-675. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100641[3] Kolmos, A., & J. E. Holgaard (2019). “Employability in Engineering Education: Are
UTAs aware of non-technicalteaching aspects and the dynamics of the classroom environment. The course covers fundamentalaspects such as FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) basics, Cybersecurity, andKognito, a practice-based digital learning tool to improve mental health and well-being ineducational settings [11]. Emphasizing the importance of soft skills, the training equips UTAswith social abilities for interacting effectively with students and recognizing potential challengesstudents may face. This is crucial given that UTAs often engage with students in their age group.Professors are actively involved in preparing UTAs, holding weekly meetings to ensure readinessfor leading lab sessions, and imparting skills to manage the
empowering women inengineering/technology: A case of success at Northen Kentucky University (NKU) andCincinnati State Technical and Community College (CSTCC)”, Proceedings of the 2020 IEMSConference, 26, 88-97, December 2022.[3] D. Che, D. Clark, D. Shaw, G. James. (2012). “Lessons Learned from Starting an SAE BajaProgram in a Small Liberal Arts College”. ASEE, June 2012.[4] P. C. Wang et al., “Robotics Mentorship as a Cross-Disciplinary Platform to FosterEngineering Soft Skills”, ASEE, June 2023.[5] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/deepracer/latest/developerguide/deepracer-console-train-evaluate-models.html#deepracer-train-models-define-reward-function[6] https://blog.deepracing.io/2023/03/01/join-the-aws-deepracer-league-2023/#more-1361[7] https
and Employers, 2023. [Online]. Available: naceweb.org[5] C. Stewart, A. Wall, and S. Marciniec, “Mixed Signals: Do College Graduates Have the Soft Skills That Employers Want?,” Compet. Forum, vol. 14, pp. 276–281, Jan. 2016.[6] S. Eisner, “Grave New World? Workplace Skills for Today’s College Graduates,” Am. J. Bus. Educ., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 27–50, 2010.[7] C. S. E. Woodcock, J. Callewaert, and J. Millunchick, “Synthesizing definitions of professional competencies linked to experiential learning in engineering education: a literature review,” J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 123–146, 2021.[8] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of Learning and Development Second Edition. 2015.
. Bothemployers and students acknowledge that communication skill is the most important quality inconstruction. However, the results demonstrated a gap in perceptions of the hard skills betweenemployers and students. Prior work experience and solid construction core skills and knowledgeare both ranked in the least 5 important qualities by employers, but they are ranked relatively highby students (ranked number 7 and 6, respectively). This discrepancy suggests a misalignmentbetween what students perceive as important for their professional development and the actualindustry expectations. In traditional engineering education, soft skills such as presentation,interpersonal skills, and time management are often overlooked. However, these abilities
programming courses and increased satisfaction and enjoyment whenprogramming [13].Though some instructors worry about equal distribution of work, research has found thatindividual performance on exams is similar when using pair or solo programming [13].Additionally, students might immediately push back against pair programming because theymust practice soft skills that might not be typically associated with programming [14]. However,if instructors continue to use pair programming in their courses, students will manage thetransition from solitary work to pair work, and they will benefit from it.Active Learning Shifting Textbooks and Asynchronous LearningStudents had very limited access to information when textbooks first became an educational tool,so
: 10.1111/j.1949- 8594.1992.tb12159.x.[26] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Random thoughts: Hard assessment of soft skills,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 63–64, 2010.[27] T. Y. Pang, A. Kootsookos, K. Fox, and E. Pirogova, “Does an assessment rubric provide a better learning experience for undergraduates in developing transferable skills?,” J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2022.[28] D. D. Stevens and A. J. Levi, Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA, USA.: Stylus Publishing, 2013.[29] R. Bailey, Z. Szabo, and D. Sabers, “Assessing student learning about engineering design in project-based courses
Engineering Students: A Two-StepFramework’, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2023, 2023, pp. 81668254 Andrews, J., and Higson, H.: ‘Graduate Employability, ‘Soft Skills’ Versus ‘Hard’Business Knowledge: A European Study’, Higher Education in Europe, 2008, 33, (4), pp. 411-4225 Warsame, A.F.: ‘The Gap Between Engineering Education and PostgraduatePreparedness’. Ed.D., Walden University, 20176 Sheppard, S.D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W.M.: ‘Educating Engineers:Designing for the Future of the Field. Book Highlights’, Carnegie Foundation for theAdvancement of Teaching, 20087 Burt, B.A., Carpenter, D.D., Holsapple, M.A., and Finelli, C.J.: ‘Out-of-classroomexperiences: Bridging the disconnect between the
Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) stresses the significance of incorporating criticalthinking instruction, along with other general engineering expertise (e.g., soft skills) inengineering curriculum through their published student outcomes (Claris and Riley, Email: mshokrolahshirazi@marian.edu2012). Since the connection between CT and problem-solving in engineering is a recurringtheme in the literature, teaching and learning critical thinking should equip differentlevels of problems with varied features that involve appropriate hypotheses, methodsfor experiments, and structuring open design problems (Ahern, Dominguez, McNally,O’Sullivan, and Pedrosa, 2019). On the other hand, the challenging level of the problems is another key
largely accomplished. Figure 3: Race/Ethnicity of Post Survey Respondents (N=29) SA Agree Neutral SD Disagree N/ALearned from industry leaders about tech topics 64% 32% 4% 0% 0% 0%Gained technical skills from workshops 36% 32% 12% 0% 12% 8%Gained soft skills from workshops 40% 44% 8% 0% 4% 4%Learned about grad. school paths 36% 32% 4% 0% 4% 24%Learned about job opportunities 48% 36% 4% 0% 4% 8%Networked w/ leaders and peers in field 60% 32% 4
this study have implications forimproving engineering education and future laboratory development.Keywords: Engineering education, undergraduate students, laboratory use,perspectives, attitudesIntroductionThis study delves into the diverse perspectives of engineering students regarding thethree types of laboratories, recognizing the background and significance of laboratoryexperiences in engineering education. In a hands-on lab, both the instructor andstudents operate the machine directly in the laboratory (Ma & Nickerson, 2006).Additionally, hands-on laboratories can provide an engaging session for students todemonstrate their content and soft skills (Yeter et al., 2023). Furthermore, involvingdirect machinery operation within a physical
in soft skills by working in aninterdisciplinary team.AcknowledgementsThis project was supported by USDA NIFA funding, award number 2019-38422-30259. Wewould like to acknowledge Evelyn Martinez and Misael Calderon for the germination graphincluded in this document. We would also like to acknowledge all the previous SUSTAINstudents whose work is photographed in this paper. The external evaluation of the grant programwas conducted by Integrated Learning Innovations, Inc.References[1] Bogoslowski, S., Geng, F., Gao, Z., Rajabzadeh, A.R., Srinivasan, S., “Integrated Thinking -A Cross-Disciplinary Project-Based Engineering Education” in Auer, M.E., Centea, D. (eds)Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0. ICBL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems