for accreditation as an architectural engineering program.Students must be design-capable in one area, application able in a second area and comprehendthe last two curriculum areas. In addition to having a curriculum to support all four areas, ABETaccredited architectural engineering program graduates should be able to “discuss… architecturaldesign and history” [7].Table 1: Summary of Accredited Programs Bach. Architectural Engineering programs; Degree Required # Required Degree Canada (CEAB), International (ABET), Options or of Co-op or # of Duration in USA (ABET
of specific roles within an industry. This context aids future career decisions.Specialist interviews equip someone exploring or pursuing an industry career with revelationsand advice for mapping out a rewarding professional journey ahead. The insights andconnections gained can prove invaluable for tuning one's career trajectory toward a fulfilling andsuccessful path.For many reasons, written reports and oral presentations are essential in the internshipexperience. These assignments help interns process and integrate what they learn from theirhands-on experiences at the internship site. They force interns to organize their thoughts, analyzewhat they have learned, and articulate the knowledge and skills they have developed. They allowinterns
. Moreover, a significant gapexists in systematically incorporating emerging research topics into foundationalengineering education courses. This gap is partly due to the challenges in aligningacademic content with rapidly evolving technological landscapes and the lack ofstructured approaches to integrate these advancements into the curriculum [3]. Asa result, students may graduate with a knowledge base that, while solid intraditional principles, lacks the immediacy and relevance of recent technologicalprogress. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing a methodical approachto bridge the gap between current research developments and engineeringeducation. Focusing on integrating green infrastructure for stormwatermanagement and
traditional written exams should be avoided. Team-based projects [7] are highly encouraged, especially those which are multi-disciplinary [8]. Many entering freshmen are unprepared for rigorous academic study; thus, the Intro course should address how to be successful in college [9]. Beyond academic preparedness, retention is improved by generating enthusiasm for engineering [10] and by fostering a sense of community amongst students [11].A popular idea at many universities is the integrated curriculum -- common objectives andassignments overlapped with non-engineering courses that students take at the same time as theirengineering courses. One school paired three engineering faculty with three English-composition
framework's impact relied on servicehours, outreach scales, and feedback collected during the summer camps.The analysis confirmed the framework's effectiveness in enhancing students'technical and soft skills, sustaining their interest in STEM, improving teamperformances, and fostering an inclusive community for collaboration. The LPSframework offers students flexibility in developing their skill sets and has beenproven to be sustainable, transformable, and scalable for integration into K-12thengineering curriculum and extracurricular programs.IntroductionRobotics has been identified as an interdisciplinary field encompassing electrical components,computer vision, mechanics, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence [1-5]. Innovation inrobotics
accreditation or reaccreditation visits hinge on the significance ofpresenting the necessary materials and corresponding data to support the Self-Study conciselyand clearly. PEVs will assess materials that adequately showcase the program's adherence torelevant criteria and policies. A significant portion of this information should be integrated intothe Self-Study Report. Supplementary evidence of program compliance may be shared withreviewers before and during their visit through an online storage platform [5].ABET’s glossary defines display materials as “textbooks, course syllabi; sample student workincluding assignment and exams, ranging in quality from excellent, average and poor, andassessment materials [6].” While the overall glossary term is
[its] parts,” and suggested that there was a lack of shared vision among faculty,leading to classroom efforts feeling siloed rather than a part of an integrated framework ofstudent development across the curriculum. Furthermore, there was a general sense ofhelplessness when it came to enhancing the curriculum, citing concerns that the curriculumalready felt too rigid and overloaded. Faculty recognized that representation and equity problemsexisted, in that different students entered the program with a wide range of experiences, skills,and knowledge. Diversity and inclusion efforts to help reduce these differentials were recognizedfor their value, although faculty felt they needed more guidance to improve effectiveness.Regarding the use of
beyond text comprehension, a domain forwhich ChatGPT is renowned. It aims to nurture future engineers to become critical thinkers, whoare proficient in applying acquired knowledge to execute complicated engineering tasks. However,there’s an apparent gap in understanding how ChatGPT can be effectively integrated intoeducational practices within this specialized area due to a lack of detailed insights into its abilitiesand limitations. This research seeks to fill this void by exploring and assessing ChatGPT’sreasoning abilities and limitations within the context of mechanical engineering. It examines thecapabilities and constraints of ChatGPT in engineering reasoning by analyzing two mechanicalexamples, which are drawn from machine design and
to both STEM instructors and natural scientists, weselected a framework that helped participants realize how to integrate high-quality researchpractices into all aspects of the research design process, in a way that is intuitive, equitable, andmapped to the intellectual curiosity of the researcher. The framework upon which projectactivities were built is the Qualifying Qualitative Research Quality (Q3) framework pioneered byWalther, et al. [20]. This framework presents qualitative research quality as an essential andcontext-sensitive consideration in every aspect of a study’s design, rather than as a series ofspecific strategies that can be added to a research design to increase quality [20, 21]. Theframework divides research quality into
-incomepeople and/or persons of color [2]. Considering equity as an integral dimension of infrastructureis becoming more common, particularly in transportation [3, 4] and water [5]. The current ASCECode of Ethics [6] implies that civil engineers should strive for equitable infrastructure. Forexample, under the society stakeholder, civil engineers should “acknowledge the community'sdiverse historical, social, and cultural needs and incorporate these considerations in their work.”The idea of equitable infrastructure also aligns with the new ABET civil engineering programcriteria (CEPC). Specifically, in November 2023 the Engineering Accreditation Commission(EAC) of ABET approved new civil engineering criteria that state: “The curriculum mustinclude: A
work gave us an opportunity to practice those skills outside ofassignments. The utilization of Android Studio and BLE were examples of skills learned outside of thestandard curriculum that the PBL opportunity gave us.RESULTS & DISCUSSIONIn testing our time prediction model, we cooked a chicken drumstick in an oven set to 350℉. Thethermocouple probe was placed in the center of the drumstick meat. Rather than an experiment, our testingphase more closely resembled an observational study, as we intended to evaluate TC++’s behavior in anentropic, natural environment where multiple uncontrolled factors influence the cooking of food. Weaimed to gauge the general usefulness and adaptability of our project despite the high degree ofrandomness
all stakeholders.Integrating social justice with engineering in the classroom is difficult, as most engineeringeducators do not possess the requisite social justice background. Some engineering facultymembers have successfully conducted this integration, whether for a thermodynamics [23] orcontrols [13, 24] course. It is incredibly challenging to attempt this integration within an entireengineering program [25].We propose an alternative integration. Rather than adding social justice directly into ourengineering courses, we rely on a social justice core curriculum to provide a thorough socialjustice foundation. Through this core curriculum, students learn how to critically analyze socialconditions. We then administer social justice case study
Engineering Network) award titled ”Educating the Whole Engineer” to integrate important competencies such as virtues, character, entrepreneurial mindset, and leadership across the Wake Forest Engineering curriculum. She has led Wake Forest Engineering with a focus on inclusive innovation and excellence, curricular and pedagogical innovation, and creative partnerships across the humanities, social sciences, industry, entrepreneurs, etc. in order to rethink and reimagine engineering education. All this has led to Wake Forest Engineering achieving unprecedented student diversity (42% women, 25% racial and ethnic minorities) and faculty diversity (50% women, 25% racial and ethnic diversity). Olga is an engineering education
disciplines.Dr. Blanca RinconAlok Pandey, College of Southern NevadaClaudia Mora Bornholdt, College of Southern NevadaVanessa W. Vongkulluksn Ph.D., University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dr. Vongkulluksn is an Assistant Professor in the Educational Psychology program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Her research examines student engagement as situated in specific learning contexts. She specializes in cognitive engagement in STEM learning, particularly in technology-integrated learning environments and for traditionally underserved students.Rachidi Salako, University of Nevada, Las VegasJohn William Howard, College of
also point out the variation among those who educate in engineering (tenured/tenure-trackfaculty, graduate students, and contingent/adjunct faculty), which is not always acknowledged.By not paying attention to such variation, the impact of work done in engineering educationresearch may be limited. In an effort to illuminate these variations, we report on research thatexplores some details of the educator experience. In this paper we ask: what does it look like tobe an educator working to adapt an existing curriculum for a new term, in our case a curriculumpreviously taught in Autumn 2021 and adapted for use in Winter 2022? Broadly, the curriculumwas a 10-week seminar titled Dear Design: Defining Your Ideal Design Signature where
anindividual student will decide his/her learning path and pace, which is different from thetraditional “instructor-centered” teaching in which an instructor controls the teaching flow andspeed 6,7 . The “robotics knowledge” should fill the gap between the current curriculum commonlytaught in the academic world and the requirements from local robotics companies.Interactive System for Personalized Learning (ISPeL) 8 has been implemented based on ourproposed learning framework. Feedback from over 100 students on ISPeL has been collected, andthe results of the user study show that our proposed framework is promising for enhancingundergraduate education. Students have found it more convenient to understand how topics areconnected and to review the
in Engineering Education, 2014. 22(2): p. 283-296.28. Caminero, A., et al. Obtaining university practical competences in engineering by means of virtualization and cloud computing technologies. in Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE). 2013. IEEE.29. Wang, Y., M. McCoey, and Q. Hu. Developing an undergraduate course curriculum for ethical hacking. in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. 2020.30. Al Kaabi, S., et al. Virtualization based ethical educational platform for hands-on lab activities on DoS attacks. in 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). 2016. IEEE.31. Willems
. DiFrancesca, C. Lee, and E. McIntyre. “Where Is the "E" in STEM for Young Children? Engineering Design Education in an Elementary Teacher Preparation Program.” Issues in Teacher Education 23(1), 2014.14. S.W. Thomas, S.W. Campbell, M.D. Subramanyam, C.R. Ellerbrock. “Contemporary STEM issues: Engineering training of pre-service teachers for middle school STEM curriculum development.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.15. L.J. Genalo, M. Gallagher, J. Golder. “An engineering linkage to K-12 teachers,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference F.C. Tseng and F.Y. Kuo. “A study of social participation and knowledge sharing in the teachers' online professional community of practice
pedagogical approaches to enhance teaching and learning outcomes. This sub-themeexists as many participants reported learning about strategies to implement methodology inmanners that do not come intuitively, to potentially surpass a lack of experience in the area.Example quotes are provided below: • “I learned what an implementation of "Arts" in an engineering technology setting can look like.” • “I learned how to frame the entrepreneurial mindset as a target in curriculum.” • “I have had limited experience in bioinspired design and STEAM, and was surprised at how well we were able to integrate the concepts into my course module.” Sub-Theme #2: Diversity of PerspectiveThe theme "Diversity of Perspective" refers to the
this section) notdirectly integrated within the Cornerstone system. This design was introduced during the COVIDpandemic and, due to success in employment under the remote course setting, it was decided tokeep this as a second design upon return to in-person instruction. Figure 2 in the appendix showsexamples of these two different Cornerstone systems.For the water filtration project, the two design challenges are: 1) housing for a turbidity (watercleanliness) sensor that is in-line with piping, and 2) a housing for an ultrasonic (distance) sensormounted above a tank of water to act as a “tank-level indicator”, providing real-time water levelmeasurements (Figure 3 in the appendix).Technical WritingTeams of students are required to document
engagement in social topicsmore than a traditional approach [20]. This outcome shows how new design methods can helpengineers build better products and systems. Similarly, they can also help engineers to buildpersonal confidence. A study at Lafayette College found through emphasizing morals in theengineering classroom, students were more confident in their abilities to develop solutions insocially complex situations [21]. In another study at Loyola University in Chicago, it was seenthat by including social justice topics across the engineering curriculum, retention rates ofminority engineering students increased [17]..Students who have been negatively affected orseen their community impacted by an engineering project, may feel left out and
7 Foreign language and international study 7 Engineering 6 Health professions 6 Communications and journalism 5Engineering students face competing priorities and challenges, such as curriculum rigor,compatibility, apathy, perception of the value of international education, and an emphasis inengineering education on practical work experience, that can hinder participation in study abroad[12], [13]. High impact practices in international education such as internships, co-ops, andtechnical research conducted abroad has been shown to have the most significant influence onenhancing global
ChatGPT, posing a potential threat to theequilibrium of academic integrity. The adaptive strategies employed by institutions in responseto GenAI are also discussed in this paper, and we have explored whether instructors restrictstudents’ access using sophisticated detection systems or simply advocate ethical and responsibleuse of GenAI. The potential consequences of these policies on students’ learning were alsoexplored with an emphasis on whether students feel unfairly disadvantaged when detectionsystems fail or if they perceive the need to rely on GenAI tools to maintain academiccompetitiveness.Keywords: Engineering education, generative AI (GenAI), adaptive strategies, undergraduateBackgroundEngineering education is an ever-changing field that
class. The quizzes must have simple questions, and when quizzes require more algebraic manipulation, the professor supports the student's task.The following scopes and limitations will be considered: Limitation: The comparative courses are courses in civil engineering structures in the Bachelor of Civil Engineering. Limitation: The proposed indicators for assessing the proposed teaching methodology used an internal teacher assessment named ECOA, which stands for its Spanish acronym, Student Opinion Survey. Limitation: Using the ECOA’s metric, it is understood that it is a mixed set of metrics that include course satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning outcomes achievement, curriculum relevance, engagement and
year.Fullan’s educational change theory was used to investigate the impact of STEAM education in 2public school districts as they aligned to new state STE curriculum frameworks. A mixedmethods, embedded case study approach was used to explore how sixteen (16) elementaryteachers and six (6) district leaders implemented revised STE curricula before and during thepandemic. This study investigated the research question “How does the presence of science,engineering and technology curricula and STEAM Labs, and in particular their absence duringCOVID-19, impact elementary education and the implementation of new science, technology andengineering (STE) curriculum frameworks?”. Study participants were invited betweenDecember 2021 – February 2022 to complete an
course sequence over the 2021-2022 and2022-2023 academic years to determine the effect of EM-focused instruction and first-yeardesign projects on EM growth. We analyzed responses in a pre/post manner within theseacademic years and holistically analyzed across academic years. We used the cross-year analysisto address the impact of curricular changes. Finally, we provide implications and pedagogicalapproaches that can support the development of an EM in the future.2. BackgroundThe Ohio State University (OSU) partnered with KEEN in 2017 and has since integrated EMLacross several courses in its engineering curriculum. This initiative first began with the redesignof the First Year Engineering Program (FYEP) standard course sequence. Alterations to
microplastics) [1], [2]. Particle science plays acrucial role in product quality, material transport and storage, manufacturing processes andadvancement of materials science [3]. For example, understanding particle behavior (i.e., dryflow, aggregation and agglomeration) at a mass scale is crucial to the safety and improvement ofstorage, transport and manufacturing processes [3].Despite calls since the 1990’s to increase the availability of a uniform particle sciencecurriculum, little progress has been made in integrating particle science into the currentengineering curriculum—resulting in a limited number of engineers trained in the field [1].Within the United States, particle science courses are sparse and lack uniformity within thematerials and
electrical and computer engineering from the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. He worked as an analog IC designer at Texas Instruments, Dallas, between 2011 and 2012. He was a Member of Technical Staff, IC Design at Maxim Integrated, San Diego, CA, between 2012 and 2016, and a Staff Engineer at Qualcomm, Tempe, AZ, between 2016 and 2019. In 2019, he joined the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Oklahoma State University, where he is currently an assistant professor and Jack H. Graham Endowed Fellow of Engineering. His research interests include power management IC design, hardware security, and energy-efficient computing. ©American Society for
processes as they work through a project and thereby see ways to improve theircreativity8. However, the infusion of open-ended design activities in the engineering curriculumhas been limited to “synthesis” exercises using known methodologies or exercises9. In thissituation, students mostly follow well-proven design techniques that were covered in thetextbooks or lectures rather than being challenged to think through a new process or create aunique solution. To have more and better distributed opportunities to develop their creativeproblem-solving skills as an integral part of their four-year college education, various pilotstudies have been conducted to reform the learning environment within regular courses to affectthe students’ creative problem
Paper ID #42361Unpacking Student Workload through Elicitation Techniques: Perspectivesfrom Engineering Faculty and StudentsDr. Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile Isabel Hilliger is Assistant Professor of Practice and Associate Director for Assessment and Evaluation at the Engineering Education Unit in Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile (PUC-Chile). Isabel received a BEng and PhD in Engineering Sciences from PUC-Chile, and an MA in Policy Organizations and Leadership Studies from Stanford Graduate School of Education.Prof. Marietta Castro, Universidad San Sebasti´an Marietta holds a