: 𝑺𝒓𝒆𝒇 = 𝝅𝒓𝟐𝑩𝑻 + 𝒘𝑨𝑩 𝒍𝑨𝑩 𝐬𝐢𝐧 (𝜽°) Eq. 2Using OpenFOAM, we wrote a script that iterates through each rocket model and simulates thedrag coefficients and forces at varying airbrake deflection angles. These values will then be storedin a lookup table, which the algorithm will reference during flight. The cluster drastically decreasedthe time since multiple simulations were run simultaneously on different nodes. Figure 5 illustratesthe velocity values on a 60° airbrake deflection model at 205 m/sec (671 ft/s or 457.5 mph). Figure 5: Paraview Post-Processing of Model with 60° Deflection of the Airbrakes (m/s)My team manufactured most of the rocket’s structures, such as the lower airframe, fins
,” IEEE Glob. Eng. Educ. Conf. EDUCON,vol. 2018-April, pp. 364–368, 2018.[2] J. L. Docktor and J. P. Mestre, “Synthesis of discipline-based education research inphysics,” Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. - Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–58, 2014.[3] B. Bridgeman, “A Comparison of Quantitative Questions in Open-Ended and Multiple-Choice Formats Author ( s ): Brent Bridgeman Published by : National Council on Measurementin Education Stable URL : http://www.jstor.com/stable/1435138 REFERENCES Linkedreferences are av,” vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 253–271, 1992.[4] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, “A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometricanalysis,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 363–371, 2005.[5] G. L. Gray, F. Costanzo, D. Evans, P
of the Statics Modeling Kit developed by S. Ardakani and Ellis [11]. It wasdesigned to resemble a model of the equilibrium of a rigid body in 3D. It is very simple and easyto set up yet maintains sufficient stability to remain stable throughout the students’ completion ofthe activity. The labeled points A, B, C, and D, shown in Figure 1, are needed when studentscreate force vectors to solve the problem, which will be outlined in the following sections. Thevertical beam is placed at the origin (0,0) on the table by a ball and socket joint. Surrounding itare three pulleys, A, B, and C, with coordinates of (-3, 1, 2.5), (1, -3, 3.5), and (3, 2, 3.5),respectively. Strings are fastened to the top of the beam and rested over the three pulleys
collaboration inengineering education reform.References[1] C. Woolard, C. Kirkland, K. Plymesser, A. Phillips, Lauchnor, E., O. Stein, W. Schell, S. Gallagher, M. Miley, P. Gannon, E. Austin, K. Intemann. “Developing an Integrated Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, July 2022.[2] S. Gallagher, A. Phillips, E. Lauchnor, A. Hohner, O.R. Stein, C.R. Woolard, C.M. Kirkland, and K. Plymesser, “Implementing Integrated Project-Based Learning Outcomes in a 21st Century Environmental Engineering Curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, June 2023.[3] E.K. Talley and R.B. Hull
should also ease apprehension thatstudents have with interacting with the professor outside of class times.Lastly, the faculty are looking at methods for students to provide feedback on their projectsduring the semester, whether this is through discussion boards, sticky notes, or surveys. Thiswould help provide students with different mechanisms to reach out for help during the projectand during the semester.References[1] J. E. Mills and D. Treagust, "Engineering Education: is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?," Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 3, no. ISSN 1324-5821, 2003.[2] K. H. Tseng, C. C. Chang, S. J. Lou and W. P. Chen, "Attitudes towards science, technology, engineeirng and mathematics (STEM) in
4.221 0.701 Traditional S 23 189 3.889 0.835 4.268 0.853 3.949 0.753 4.060 0.828 Pilot F 22 84 3.889 0.851 4.433 0.666 3.964 0.649 4.247 0.623 Pilot S 23 44 4.030 0.715 4.530 0.539 4.150 0.566 4.385 0.592There are no significant differences in mean Recognition change between Traditional and Pilotsequences from Sep 2022 to May 2023 (F=1.5358, df1=1, df2=185.9, p=0.2168), and post-hoccomparisons revealed no significant Recognition change within either course sequence(Traditional p-value = 0.5551; Pilot p-value = 0.2785) (Figure 1). Similar results were found forPerformance/Competence (F=1.5911, df1=1, df2=213.2, p=0.2085) with insignificant
AnnualConference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. https://peer.asee.org/42457[3] Andrade, N., & Smela, E., & Nguyen, V., & Bigio, D., & Egyen-Davis, A., & Nganjo,D. (2022, August), Environmentally and Socially Responsible Engineering - AssessingStudent Empowerment Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41569[4] S. Hoffmann, I. Hua, E. Blatchley, and L. Nies, "Integrating sustainability into coursesacross the engineering curriculum: a faculty workshop model," in ASEE Ann. Conf.Expo, Louisville, KY, Jun 20-23 2010, pp. AC 2010-1802, 15.773.1, doi:DOI:10.18260/1-2--16732. https://peer.asee.org/16732[5] A. L. Welker, V. Smith, S. Shrestha, and K. M. Sample-Lord
asrepresenting the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Department of the Air Forceor the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprintsfor Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation hereinReferences[1] A. Bagiati, A. F. Salazar G´omez, J. Radovan, K. Kennedy, and C. Breazeal, “Learning journeys for scalable ai education: an mit-usaf collaboration,” in Towards a new future in engineering education, new scenarios that european alliances of tech universities open up. Universitat Polit`ecnica de Catalunya, 2022, pp. 1529–1537.[2] X. Du, S. Alghowinem, M. Taylor, K. Darling, and C. Breazeal, “Innovating ai leadership education,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference
, 2024. https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/electronic-designer-jobs/?currentJobId=37350063015. Choi, C. 2008. A microcontroller applications course and freescale’s microcontroller student learning kit. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA, June 22-25.6. Farook, O., C. Sekhar, and E. Bouktache. 2008. Embedded System Design with Microchip’s 16F88 Microcontroller. In Proceedings of 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 22 - 25.7. Hsiung, S., Ritz, J., and Eiland, J. 2008. Design and develop a cost effective microcontroller training system for distance learning engineering students. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering
. 2217640 through a wider initiative and acenter for transforming graduate engineering education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusionsor recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCESArtiles, M. S., Knight, D. B., & Matusovich, H. M. (2023). Doctoral advisor selection processes in science, math, and engineering programs in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 1-16.Boyce, A. S. (2021). Strategies for mentoring and advising evaluation graduate students of color. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 35(3), 350-362.Bryson, T., Kowalske, M., Wilkins-Yel, K., & Housh, K. (2023). The
-year instructors could apply more specific instructions orintervention to ensure student projects are completed on time.References[1] A. C. Edmondson and I. M. Nembhard, "Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits," Journal of product innovation management, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 123- 138, 2009.[2] R. R. Reilly, G. S. Lynn, and Z. H. Aronson, "The role of personality in new product development team performance," Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 39- 58, 2002.[3] N. Sivasubramaniam, S. J. Liebowitz, and C. L. Lackman, "Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta‐analytic review," Journal of Product Innovation
,” Educational Administration and Supervision, vol. 13, pp. 399–406, 1927.[3] S. A. Basow and J. L. Martin, “Bias in Student Evaluations,” in M. E. Kite (Ed.), Effective Evaluation of Teaching: A Guide for Faculty and Administrators, pp. 40–49, Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 2012.[4] W. J. McKeachie, “Student Ratings: The Validity of Use,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1218–1225, Nov. 1997. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1218.[5] A. G. Greenwald and G. M. Gillmore, “Grading Leniency Is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings,” American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1209–1217, Nov.1997. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.52.11.1209.[6] J. Esarey and N. Valdes, “Unbiased, Reliable, and Valid Student Evaluations Can Still
, economic, environmental, and societal contexts Unsatisfactory (1) Developing (2) Satisfactory (3) Exemplary (4) (4.1) Identify Student is not able Student can identify Student can identify Student can identify ethical dilemma(s) to identify ethical basic and obvious major ethical issues several and complex or issue(s) within issues (dilemmas) ethical issues (dilemmas) in a issues (dilemmas) in an engineering in cases in a given (dilemmas) in a given scenario and a given scenario and context. scenario. given scenario but clearly
., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuringemotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.[2] Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development.Psychology Press.[3] Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.[4] Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.[5] Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development.Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127
Validity of a Team Processes Survey Measure,” Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 399–431, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1094428119840801.[3] M. A. Marks, “A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes,” 2001.[4] A. R. Rajabzadeh, J. Long, G. Saini, and M. Zeadin, “Engineering Student Experiences of Group Work,” Educ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 5, p. 288, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/educsci12050288.[5] L. A. DeChurch and J. R. Mesmer-Magnus, “The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 32–53, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1037/a0017328.[6] R. Lingard and S. Barkataki, “Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science,” in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Rapid
://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3680004[11] C. R. Jackson, "Validating and Adapting the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for STEM Courses at an HBCU," AERA Open, vol. 4, no. 4, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418809346[12] H. Bayoumy and S. Alsayed, "Investigating relationship of perceived learning engagement, motivation, and academic performance among nursing students: a multisite study," Advances in Medical Education and Practice, vol. 12, pp. 351-369, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s272745[13] S. Hamid and V. Singaram, "Motivated strategies for learning and their association with academic performance of a diverse group of 1st-year medical
discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices.Lauren Christopher, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Dr. Lauren Christopher attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she received her S. B. and S. M. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1982, specializing in digital signal processing and chip design. She worked at RCAˆa C™s David SaChristine Krull, Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisEric W Adams, Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisShahrzad Ghadiri, Indiana University - Purdue University IndianapolisRichard Vernal Sullivan, Indiana University-Purdue University
, a series of meetings werearranged, including a detailed presentation of our course objectives during the preparatory visit.Subsequent virtual meetings were held to discuss logistics and the future vision for ourcollaboration, which includes the establishment of an annual "Abu Dhabi Global EngineeringSummit." To secure financial support, the author submitted an application for funding through the"Advantage Abu Dhabi Application Form," [5] which was evaluated and approved by the AbuDhabi Convention and Exhibition Bureau, a part of the Abu Dhabi Department of Culture andTourism.This preparatory trip also facilitated encounters with industry leaders, including the CEO & HeadDubai Campus & Director of S P Jain School of Global Management
. (2020). Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.asce.org/-/media/asce-images-and-files/career-and- growth/ethics/documents/asce-code-ethics.pdf, on February 3, 2024.[13] Lingard, R., & Barkataki, S. (2011, October). Teaching teamwork in engineering and computer science. In 2011 Frontiers in education conference (FIE) (pp. F1C-1). IEEE.[14] Welsh, E. T., & Slack, M. E. (2023). A tale of two team formation methods: Innovative ways to form student teams. Journal of Education for Business, 98(2), 77-83.[15] Ivorra-Martinez, J., Gomez-Caturla, J., Moreno, V., Garcia-Garcia, D., & Quiles-Carrillo, L. (2023). SIMULATION OF A WORK ENVIRONMENT AS A LEARNING METHODOLOGY IN THE INDUSTRIAL DESIGN AND PRODUCT
, “Adapting Scrum Project Management to ECE Courses,”presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Oct.10, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/32395[6] R. B. Bass, B. Pejcinovic, and J. Grant, “Applying Scrum project management in ECE curriculum,” in2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2016, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757568.[7] S. Reynolds, A. Caldwell, T. Procko, and O. Ochoa, “Scrum in the Classroom: An ImplementationGuide,” in 2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2023, pp. 01–08. doi:10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343213.[8] M. W. Ohland et al., “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Developmentof a Behaviorally Anchored
Professor Quirrell cannot. You should create a random document foryour own and demonstrate this scenario.This lab task assumes that a confidential document is encrypted by Hermione Granger, whosecontent is only viewable by Harry Potter and Ron Weasley. In other words, only Harry and Roncan decrypt and read the document, while Professor Quirrell cannot. Students should demonstratethis scenario with two deliverables: 1. Let’s say you are Hermione Granger. Please provide command lines that encrypt the doc- ument. Also, please include the screenshot(s) to demonstrate that the document has been encrypted successfully. 2. Please provide command lines that show Harry Potter and Ron Weasley can decrypt the ciphertext. Also, provide the
analyze how they differ from one another, pending more survey respondents.References[1] Personal Communication between K. Mallouk and S. Chin. January 24, 2024.[2] A. M. Ogilvie and D. B. Knight, “Post-transfer Transition Experiences for Engineering Transfer Students,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, p. 152102511882050, Jan. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025118820501.[3] N. L. Smith, J. R. Grohs, & E. M. Van Aken, (2021). "Comparison of transfer shock and graduation rates across engineering transfer student populations," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111. 10.1002/jee.20434.[4] M. J. Gray, S. A. Gunarathne, N. N. Nguyen, and E. E. Shortlidge, “Thriving
. statistical analysis report. nces 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics, 2013. [4] S. Chockkalingam, R. Yu, and Z. A. Pardos. Which one’s more work? predicting effective credit hours between courses. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, LAK21, page 599–605, New York, NY, USA, 2021. Association for Computing Machinery. Retreived from https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448204. [5] CollegeTransfer.Net. What are degree requirements? Retrieved from https://www.collegetransfer.net/AskCT/What-are-Degree-Requirements. [6] Complete College America. Time Is the Enemy: The Surprising Truth about Why Today’s College Students Aren’t Graduating... and What Needs to Change, 2011. Retrieved
appendices) 4. Workshop: Workshops are scheduled as sessions of either 2 or 4 hours in length and will be held on the Sunday of the conference. Workshops provide attendees an opportunity to learn about a topic in depth and ways to apply the knowledge to their own settings. ASEE 2024 ANNUAL CONFERENCE FIRST-YEAR PROGRAMS DIVISION CALL FOR PAPERSIt is expected that the author(s) of a submission will support the Division by reviewing both abstracts andmanuscripts submitted for the Annual ConferenceGUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSIONAbstracts for Paper Proposals - Deadline – November 1, 2023.Due to the competitiveness of publication in the First-Year Programs Division, the quality of a submitted
engineering students identify as influences on their decisions of where to study abroad?Theoretical FrameworkMazzarol and Soutar [8] designed their push-pull model of study abroad choice to characterizewhy students make the decisions they do when it comes to enrolling abroad as an internationalstudent. The pull factors make a destination attractive to a student, which is influenced by thehost country, sending country, and the student themself [8]. The initial definition of thisframework came from a survey of over 2,000 international students in the 1990’s to learn howdifferent factors were weighed in their decisions to enroll abroad. They examined each step ofthe process; from deciding to study overseas, to personal and financial costs, to
effort in this regard.2.2 the OIPI initiative’s practice detailThe OIPI stands for Open platform, Individualized pathways, Project-based learning, andInductive tutoring. The OIPI initiative was launched by one of China’s elite universities(S University afterwards) in 2019, seeking to broaden the participation of higherengineering education in China, especially in the field of electronic design[13]. Toachieve this, it aims to, on the one hand, widen the accessibility of students enrolled innon-elite universities to high-quality educational opportunities; on the other hand, supportthese students’ self-forming agency to acquire desired academic success, which means totape out in this initiative.1Open platform consists of ‘open in’, ‘open resources
are eager toanalyze the preliminary results for the continuous improvement of the project. It is noted that PIswere able to have three scholars accepted for participating in the AAAS S-STEM ScholarsMeeting that was held on September 14-16, 2023, in Washington, DC. In the following, some ofthe activities implemented in this project along with the lessons learned are described:Recruitment. PIs examined different recruitment strategies and learned important lessons:• The full-time enrollment requirement was changed to a minimum of 8 credit hours per semester to allow students more flexibility as most of them already have other work and familial responsivities.• The minimum number of credit hours to transfer at the time of application was
and contribute to the credibility of our future findings. By continuing ourongoing study, we hope to gain a better understanding of patterns between students’ identity andtheir engagement within capstone design and improve student’s experiences within capstonedesign courses.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (Awards No.2138019 and No. 2138106). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.
. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.[4] L. Prendergast and E. Etkina, "Review of a First-Year Engineering Design Course," in ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[5] A. W. Johnson and J. E. Swenson, "Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore-Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[6] J. E. S. Swenson, A. W. Johnson, T. G. Chambers and L. Hirshfield, "Exhibiting Productive Beginnings of Engineering Judgment during Open-Ended Modeling Problems in an Introductory Mechanics of Materials Course," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019.[7] R.V. Vitali, N. Ramo, M. Bel, E. Treadway, A