efficacy of women in engineering camps” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/2346[2] S. Weiss-Lopez, M. Frye, and O. Jones, “Overview of the megaGEMS AEOP Summer 2021 Research Apprenticeship Camp”, Proceedings of the 129th American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 26 - 29, 2022 https://peer.asee.org/overview-of-the-megagems-aeop-summer-2021- research-apprenticeship-camp[3] S. R. Burke, and A. (n.d.). Science & Engineering Indicators. NSF. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20211[4] R. Rincon, (Ed.). (2023, December). “A case study engineering leadership: Exploring
. [6] C. E. Vargas-Ord´on˜ ez and M. M. Hynes, “Engineering design and social justice: A systematized literature review,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, (Virtual On line), ASEE Conferences, June 2020. https://peer.asee.org/34551. [7] C. Schimpf and J. Swenson, “Reimagining faculty, student and community interactions in capstone: A synthesis of liberative pedagogies, citizen engineering and human-centered design,” in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–5, 2022. [8] C. T. Schimpf, J. E. S. Swenson, and C. Burris, “Addressing engineers and stakeholders social and institutional power in an human-centered design capstone course,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
, California, USA.Prof. Dominic J. Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College Dom Dal Bello is Professor of Engineering at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a California community college between UC Santa Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Program), and Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In ASEE, he is chair of the Two-Year College Division, and Vice-Chair/Community Colleges of the Pacific Southwest Section. He received the Outstanding Teaching Award for the ASEE/PSW Section in 2022. ©American Society for
anengineer at Melissa and Doug®, they had to synthesize and communicate technical informationto their supervisors. Contrived background documents and/or data sets were provided as part ofthe assignment. Weekly assignments were structured as 30% critique and 70% generatingcontent and were designed to take 2-3 hours per week.Table 1: Course learning objectives and associated communications skills for TechnicalCommunications. The week(s) in which skills were covered are also shown. Course Learning Objective Communications Skills Week(s) • Compare and contrast common norms for technical communication, including audience, style
the Engineering Academies grew in student volume and inlocations as word spread organically throughout the state of Texas. Beginning © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024with only 92 students starting at two locations to 543 students starting as ofFall 2023’s cohort, at 9 locations. 600 543 500 417 400 420 383 386 300 279 272 200 132 100 92 0 2015 2016
presented at the The Kern Entrepreneurship Education334 Network Paper presented at 2008 Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,335 2008.336 5. M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, Z. G., B. C.E., T. K. Miller, The Effect of an Entrepreneurship337 Program on GPA and Retention Journal of Engineering Education October, 293-301 (2004).338 6. ABET. (2021), vol. 2023.339 7. V. M. Dimitra Kokotsaki dimitra.kokotsaki@durham.ac.uk , and Andy Wiggins, Project-based340 learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools 19, 267-277 (2016).341 8. J. Uziak, A project-based learning approach in an engineering curriculum. Global Journal of342 Engineering Education 18, 119-123
members. B. Dr. H S: Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Iran:My journey in academia, originating from Iran and transitioning to the U.S., encapsulates both theunique challenges and growth opportunities faced by international faculty in American highereducation. Born and raised in Iran, where I completed my undergraduate and master's degrees inengineering, my initial academic experience was firmly rooted in the Iranian education system.This background set the stage for a significant cultural and educational shift when I arrived in theU.S. for my PhD at the University of Wyoming. The complexity of my transition was compoundedby having a South Korean advisor, who was himself an international scholar. This situation limitedmy
Ethics in the IT Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51-61, 1999.[6] M. S. Tooley and E. E. Umphress, "Work in progress - the ethics of diversity: Addressing diversity issues in undergraduate engineering ethics education," in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oct 18-21, 2009, pp. 1-3.[7] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. Knight, C. Swan, and N. Canney, "Intersections between Engineering Ethics and Diversity Issues in Engineering Education," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 144, no. 2, 2018.[8] J. L. Hess, A. Whitehead, B. K. Jesiek, A. Katz, and D. Riley, "WIP: Intersections Between Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI
, social factors) could draw attention tothis important topic. This is particularly relevant for required courses such as thermodynamics,materials, and manufacturing. Institutions might alternatively offer a number of elective courseswith a strong sustainability focus, such as renewable energy and/or sustainable development.These courses could form a concentration within mechanical engineering. Making sustainabilitycommitments readily apparent on the ME program website could help attract prospectivestudents, including women and underrepresented minorities. Encountering genuinesustainability-related content in their courses could help motivate and retain these students.References[1] S. Vinodh, K. Jayakrishna, and K.E.K. Vimal, “Sustainability in
]. Table 1: Measured wind resource in terms of Weibull parameters [17]. Weibull Distributions Month k c (m/s) VmW (m/s) January 1.64 5.64 5.04 February 1.6 6.78 6.08 March 1.82 6.73 6 April 1.41 4.83 4.39 May 1.7 5.7 5.1 June 1.95 6.35 5.66 July 2.02 7.66 6.78 August 1.87
story-of-diy-hobbyists-military-funding/[3] A. C. Barton, E. Tan, and D. Greenberg, “The Makerspace Movement: Sites of Possibilities for Equitable Opportunities to Engage Underrepresented Youth in STEM,” Teachers College Record, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 1–44, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/016146811711900608.[4] J. Diaz, M. Tomàs, and S. Lefebvre, “Are public makerspaces a means to empowering citizens? The case of Ateneus de Fabricació in Barcelona,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 59, p. 101551, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101551.[5] I. Villanueva Alarcón, R. J. Downey, L. Nadelson, J. Bouwma-Gearhart, and Y. Choi, “Light Blue Walls and Tan Flooring: A Culture of Belonging in Engineering Making Spaces (or Not?),” Education
centered on needs finding.AcknowledgementThe authors acknowledge and appreciate financial support from the Kern Family Foundationunder grant: Duke-2020- Creating Value: Identifying and Specifying Student Design Projects.References[1] S. Howe, J. Goldberg, “Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices,Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies.” In Design Education Today, D. Schaefer, G.Coates, C. Eckert, C., Editors. Springer, Cham. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17134-6_6[2] S. Zenios, J. Makower, P. Yock. Biodesign: The Process of Innovating MedicalTechnologies, 1st edition. Cambridge University Press, 2009.[3] L. Ghirotto, L. De Panfilis, S. Di Leo, “Health professionals learning qualitative research intheir workplace: a
Education Director until his retirement in 2018. He was RPI ECSE Department Head from 2001 to 2008 and served on the board of the ECE Department Heads Association (ECEDHA) from 2003 to 2008. He is a Life Fellow of the IEEE.Dr. Mohamed F. Chouikha, Prairie View A&M University Dr. Mohamed Chouikha is a professor and chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Howard University. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Coloradoˆa C”Boulder. Dr. Chouikhaˆa C™s research inteProf. Miguel Velez-Reyes, University of Texas at El Paso Dr. Miguel Velez-Reyes is the George W. Edwards/El Paso Electric Distinguished Professor in Engineering and Chair of the Electrical
] T. Estrada and S. Atwood, “Factors that Affect Student Frustration Level in Introductory Laboratory Experiences,” en, in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceed- ings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, pp. 25.629.1–25.629.7. DOI: 10. 18260/1-2--21386. [8] E. Burkholder, A. M. Price, M. Flynn, and C. E. Wieman, “Assessing problem-solving in sci- ence and engineering programs,” in 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceed- ings, Provo, UT: American Association of Physics Teachers, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1119/ perc.2019.pr.Burkholder. [9] S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, B. Hanks, L. Murphy, B. Simon, and C. Zander, “Debugging From the Student Perspective,” en, IEEE Transactions on
. Abet criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Balti- more, MD: Author, 2004. [2] Maura Borrego, Jennifer Karlin, Lisa D McNair, and Kacey Beddoes. Team effectiveness theory from indus- trial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4):472–512, 2013. [3] Rosanna Martin, Bryan Maytham, Jennifer Case, and Duncan Fraser. Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European journal of engineering education, 30(2):167–180, 2005. [4] Phillip C Wankat and Frank S Oreovicz. Teaching prospective engineering faculty how to teach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(5):925
by the Purdue University Innovation Hub and thePurdue University Libraries & School of Information Studies.Acknowledgements: Our special thanks to Aly Edmondson, instructional designer with thePurdue University Libraries, who contributed many hours of time to editing and enhancing ourvideo content. We would also like the thank our stakeholder consultants who provided valuablefeedback on our content development.References[1] A. J. Head, M. V. Hoeck, J. Eschler, and S. Fullerton, “What information competencies matter in today’s workplace?,” Library and Information Research, vol. 37, no. 114, pp. 74– 104, May 2013, doi: 10.29173/lirg557.[2] M. Phillips, M. Fosmire, L. Turner, K. Petersheim, and J. Lu, “Comparing the information
’ college teaching self-efficacy," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. ar14, 2018/03/01 2018, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-02- 0039.[3] E. E. Shortlidge and S. L. Eddy, "The trade-off between graduate student research and teaching: A myth?," PLOS ONE, vol. 13, no. 6, p. e0199576, 2018, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199576.[4] N. Davidson and C. H. Major, "Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning," Journal on excellence in college teaching, vol. 25, 2014.
-based learning. Table 2 Grade breakdown Project 1 30% Report 40% Project 2 40% Final Presentation 30% Project breakdown Weekly presentations 20% Reflection(s) 30% Lab work 10%ABET Score Tracking 2.1 7.3 100 2.3
: American Society of Civil Engineers.6. National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.7. Stachowiak, A. and Digiesi, S. and Mummolo, G. and Fertsch, M. and Ortega-Mier, M., 2020, Knowledge gap and innovative models for higher education in industrial engineering and management, 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference.8. Warsame, A. F., 2017. The Gap Between Engineering Education and Postgraduate Preparedness. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations9. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Cox, M. F., Borrego, M., Beddoes, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Changingengineering education: Views of U.S. faculty, chairs, and deans
address the challenges posed by the ever-changing landscape of the construction and design sectors.References:[1] ABET. (2021). “At a Glance.” Retrieved Sept. 19, 2023. [2] Engineers Canada, “Accredited Programs,” Engineers Canada, [online]. Available:https://engineerscanada.ca/accreditation/accredited-programs. [Accessed: November 25, 2023][3] Estes and Estrada. (2007). “Architectural Engineering Programs: Finding Common Ground.”Paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition. Honolulu, Hawaii. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--1966[4] Phillips, J. (2018). “Current Trends in Architectural Engineering Education.” Paper presentedat 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City, Utah. DOI: 10.18260/1-2--30246[5] Walbridge, S., and Al
using CATME team tools," Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 5-19, 2014.[4] D. Khurana, A. Koli, K. Khatter, and S. Singh, "Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges," Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 3713-3744, 2023/01/01 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4.[5] N. S. Khan, A. Abid, and K. Abid, "A novel natural language processing (NLP)–based machine translation model for English to Pakistan sign language translation," Cognitive Computation, vol. 12, pp. 748-765, 2020.[6] N. K. Manaswi and N. K. Manaswi, "Understanding and working with Keras," Deep learning with applications using Python: Chatbots and face, object, and speech
interviews with each participant is provided below.Participant 1 (P1): P1, a fifth-year architectural engineering graduate student, initially intendedto pursue a master's degree and enter industry but decided to stay for a Ph.D. due to his passionfor research. He learned about the seminar through his wife and enrolled to gain valuableknowledge and feedback without dedicating excessive time. P1's expectations included learningabout the interview process, preparing application materials, and exploring non-academicopportunities. The seminar broadened his understanding of career options, provided insights intocrafting application documents, and facilitated peer review. He believes the seminar surpassedhis expectations to some extent, although he
Mississippi State University. Dr. Garshasby is an architect, researcher, and educator who currently teaches collaborative studio(s) and environmental building systems within the College of Architecture, Art and Design at Mississippi State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessing LEED Credit Weighting: A Dual Perspective on Sustainable Construction and Educational Implications Mohsen Goodarzi1, Mohsen Garshasby21 Assisstant Professor, Department of Construction Management and Interior Design, Ball State University 2 Assistant Professor, Building Construction Science, Mississippi State UniversityAbstract:This research
Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, stormwater, and wastewater system projects. He is also the Faculty Director of the Student Innovation Idea Labs at Cal Poly Pomona, which oversees the campus startup programming and maker spaces.Mr. Seth Claberon Sullivan, Texas A&M University Seth Sullivan is the Director of the Zachry Leadership Program in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the university, he worked in consulting in the private sector and as an analyst in the U.S. Government. Heˆa C™s earned ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Benchmarking a foundation for improving psychological safety in
conduct project work. To broaden theapplicability of the exercises they are based on the Python programming language. The initialdeployment environment for the advanced IoT toolkit and accompanying exercises will be incapstone senior design courses. Surveys are planned to collect information to be used inassessing the efficacy of the IoT toolkits and exercises.Acknowledgement and DisclaimerThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation through GrantNo. 2044255. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] N. E. Cagiltay, E. Aydin, C. C. Aydin, A. Kara and M
education, pp. 341-245, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, March 10-13, 2010.[7] L. Porter, C. Bailey-Lee and B. Simon, “Halving Fail Rates using Peer Instruction: A Study of Four Computer Science Courses,” Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pp. 177- 182, Denver, Colorado, USA, March 6–9, 2013.[8] L. Porter, D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, and B. Simon, “A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing,” Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. Pp. 358-363, New York, NY, USA, 358–363, Memphis, TN, USA, March 02-05, 2016.[9] P. Deshpande, C. B. Lee, and I. Ahmed, “Evaluation of Peer Instruction
across diverse educational contexts. Pursuing suchinnovations in grading practices promises to advance educational equity and ensure studentsuccess more accurately reflects ability and effort.References 1. T. M. Addy et al., What Inclusive Instructors Do: Principles and Practices for Excellence in College Teaching. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2021. 2. J. M. Malouff, A. J. Emmerton, and N. S. Schutte, "The risk of a halo bias as a reason to keep students anonymous during grading," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 233-237, 2013. 3. L. R. Southgate, "Rethinking Anonymous Grading," Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.proxy-bc.researchport.umd.edu/10.1007/s10677-023-10415-y 4
: Sustainable Infrastructure Framework Guidance Manual.” Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, Washington DC, USA, p. 192, 2018.[10] T. Tanner, A. Bahadur, C. Simonet, and H. Betts, “Resilience scan | 2014,” 2016.[11] B. G. Celik, M. E. Ozbek, S. Attaran, and M. Jalili, “Comparison of Environmental Responsibility of Construction Management Students Based on Exposure to Sustainability in Curricula and on Campus,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 96–110, 2014, doi: 10.1080/15578771.2013.826752.[12] A. Tinker and R. Burt, “‘Greening’ the construction curriculum,” Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 26–33, 2003.[13] ACCE, “Standards and criteria for accreditation of postsecondary
consideration of the open book examination," Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 11, no. 4-1, pp. 597-602, 1951.[3] A. Gharib, W. Phillips, and N. Mathew, "Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety," Online Submission, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 469-478, 2012.[4] Y. Song and D. Thuente, "A quantitative case study in engineering of the efficacy of quality cheat-sheets," in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[5] W. Chang and R. S. Shieh, "Exploration of the value of using a formula sheet for physics examinations," European Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 6, p. 1411, 2013.[6] I.-H. Hsiao and C. López, "Lessons
faculty development programs where knowledge, skills, experience, and professional interestsof faculty play an important role.AcknowledgementsThis project has been made possible by the “Charles E. (Chick) and Joan F. Rolling ProgramFund in Engineering and Ethics: A Global Perspective” under the College of Engineering and theCollege of the Liberal Arts of the Penn State University. References[1] J. P. Kretzmann and J. L. McKnight, Building Communities from the inside Out: A Path toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets. Chicago: The Asset-Based Community Development Institute, 1993.[2] S. M. Biscotte and N. Mouchrek, "Bringing an Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD