. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering
Mathematics at Wartburg College. Research interests include data analysis methods, artificial intelligence and machine learning, point-set topology, and the consequences of the axiom of choice and the axiom of determinacy.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University Kurt Becker is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. His research includes engineering design thinking, systems engineering, engineering education professional development, technical training, and adult learning cognition. He is currently working on a USAID funded project in Egypt, ”Center of Excellence in Water”, and Department of Education funded GEARUP projects in the area of STEM education related to engineering
) common inquiry protocols [11]. The team employed the NICframework to guide and structure our CoP to accelerate progress [12] on improving laboratorycourses by sharing information and collaboratively addressing issues that arise. We have foundthat the CoP has been helpful for both new and experienced faculty to have a network of support.The current CoP is organized by a group of eight specialized faculty. Our backgrounds aresummarized in Table 1. In addition to organizing CoP events, the members of the organizingteam also collaborate on research projects across our lab and design courses. We have recruited32 additional members into the CoP; the available demographics are summarized in Table 2.During the CoP events, instructors from across the
had trouble incorporating GL andstandards effectively into their senior capstone projects benefited greatly from a particularpedagogical intervention in their library instruction session [6]. A common theme from thesearticles is that students find it tricky to identify and access GL, and they are eager to learn theseskills. Librarians need to be equipped to help our patrons and therefore need to be well-versed inhow to find and access these resources as well.In 2001, at a moment when the internet was drastically revolutionizing how people produced anddisseminated GL materials, Thompson provided a set of key strategies for finding a number ofdifferent formats of commonly used GL, such as technical reports, standards, militaryspecifications and
Paper ID #43552Harnessing the Strengths of Neurodiverse Students in Graduate STEM Fields:The Central Role of Advisor-Advisee CommunicationMs. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) ”Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity
(see Fig. 1a) and total enrollments (see Fig. 1b).Excluding the academic year (AY) 2020-2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic, AY 2022-2023highlights our largest enrollment with approximately 15,000 students from over 50 courses takingexams each semester in the CBTF. During Fall 2023, the CBTF also administered a recordnumber of exams, recording over 90,000 reservations. The ability to support the growing numberof students and courses utilizing the CBTF is made possible through operating three dedicatedtesting facilities that offer testing sessions ten hours each day, seven days a week. We project thatthe utilization of our labs will continue to grow as we bring a fourth testing facility online inSpring 2024 in partnership with the College of
[11, 12] introduced knowledge surveys (KS) to develop self-assessment skills instudents. Rather than requiring students to provide answers to learning prompts, KS requirestudents to rate their ability to perform the specified skill tied to a learning objective. Pre-courseor pre-unit of instruction KS allow faculty to discern prior knowledge students may bring to thecourse while serving as a cognitive “heads up” for students of learning objectives and material tocome [10]. KS completed in close proximity to an assessment event (e.g., exam, design project,or writing assignment) allow faculty to compare students’ self-assessments of learning with theirown assessments of student learning (i.e., the grade on the assignment). Such comparisons
rising.Unfortunately, it can take many years for professionals unfamiliar with technical standards tobecome fully proficient when relying on industry to provide such education [2]. Therefore,technical standards education must be deployed in the United States with higher quality andfrequency than in the past. To ensure this happens a deeper understanding of the currentchallenges facing technical standards education is necessary.MethodsThis paper is the second in a project aimed at providing technical standards education toundergraduate engineers. It analyzes the free response data collected from the survey publishedin [7]. Appropriate human subjects' approval was obtained through the [IRB-23-07511-XM].SurveyA Google Forms survey was disseminated: (1) to gauge
Professor of Mathematics at Wartburg College. Research interests include data analysis methods, artificial intelligence and machine learning, point-set topology, and the consequences of the axiom of choice and the axiom of determinacy.Prof. Kurt Henry Becker, Utah State University Kurt Becker is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. His research includes engineering design thinking, systems engineering, engineering education professional development, technical training, and adult learning cognition. He is currently working on a USAID funded project in Egypt, ”Center of Excellence in Water”, and Department of Education funded GEARUP projects in the area of STEM education related
over the world face. Knowledge,including sources for materials and techniques, are passed down orally. Additionally, theIndigenous Peoples even though they are oral cultures, they also have what Western Europeanculture calls “trade secrets” or proprietary information. This proprietary knowledge is onlyshared with those designated within the Tribe to know the information. Part of the challengefacing all storage and retrieval sources is to have a way to index proprietary information withpublic terms to make it discoverable and available to those allowed to know.Currently, with efforts to revive ancient knowledge, it is helpful to find what we know has beenwritten about the specific engineering projects of the past. Most of this literature is
the data and information, finding the most relevant information andeven identifying trends that would not be obvious to the human eye. This would allow users to stayup to date on new academic findings, keep familiar with new technologies, and stay more currentwith new publications in their field of interest all much faster and more efficiently than searchingand doing all this manually. [10] [41] Group Projects Hands-On 100% Virtual Self-Monitoring Figure 2: Different aspects of the student experiments with digital twin learning.During the pandemic education took a pivotal turn towards online learning, and even now theonline portion has stuck around as a popular option for learning
, and non-traditional students(veterans and returning learners) with over a year gap in the last math course they have taken.This bridge program provides individualized math plans, rigorous math review, and hands-on,project-based learning (PBLs). Program participants showed improvement in math performanceand math persistence as compared to the baseline data and showed a promising starting point foraddressing the obstacles facing these at-risk student populations.Baseline student populationThe baseline student population includes any students at Lipscomb University with an intendedmajor of Computer Science (CS), or Civil (CE), Electrical and Computer (ECE), Mechanical(ME), or Software Engineering (SE) beginning with cohorts starting at the
dozens of graduate and undergraduate students in research and K-12 outreach activities and is the Director of the Excellence in Computing and Information Technology Education (ExCITE) program. She is a fellow of the Center for the Advancement of STEM Leadership Program (CASL) and the Opportunities for Under-Represented Scholars (OURS) post-graduate institutional leadership certificate program and an alumna of the Frontiers of Engineering Education program (FOEE) of the National Academy of Engineering. She has been serving on the Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) Capital Area Regional Network steering committee since 2016Dr. Briana Lowe Wellman, University of the District of Columbia Dr. Briana Lowe Wellman is an
Paper ID #42224Leveraging a token economy system to motivate concept practice in a fluiddynamics classroom.Mr. Sanha Kim, University of Virginia Sanha Kim is a 4th-year chemical engineering Ph.D. student in the Ford Group at University of Virginia. His current research project revolves around modeling the mobility and growth of pathogenic bacteria in porous media. His educational scholarship interests are focused around instructional strategies that enhance the quality and quantity of student engagement with class material.Steven R Caliari, University of VirginiaDr. Roseanne M Ford, University of Virginia Roseanne M. Ford
Learning ActivitiesThe overall goal of the learning activities was to improve undergraduate engineering students'understanding of the following vector concepts in a 3D space:1. Cartesian components of vectors2. Unit vectors3. Directional angles4. Vector addition and subtraction using the triangle law5. Cross product using the right-hand rule6. Dot product to determine the angle between two vectors7. Dot product to compute the projection of a force onto a lineThe authors created paper-based learning activities in the form of guided inquiry [19] to addresseach of the concepts. The activities were integrated into the app by designing the app andactivities in parallel. Both were designed without context (i.e. not specific to any STEM course).This
know. By building on these skills eitherthrough mentorships, internships, in the classroom, or any other methods available to me in thefuture, I will be able to transform these classroom-learned concepts into real-world skills. Forinstance, if I am to help design or work on robots in the future, I will already have a certain skillset that may provide me with competent preparation or readiness. Not only will this prove moreefficient, as I already have a grasp on either the basics or the majority of the process ofcompleting the project, but this may also allow me to choose between different technicalapproaches to completing challenging tasks. With the knowledge I already have along with theknowledge I intend to build upon, I will be able to
the classroom. Thepush to integrate microelectronics in pre-college education spaces has come about due to therising desire and focus of bringing microchip manufacturing back to the United States. As part ofthe CHIPS Act, the U.S. federal government set aside a significant amount of money for researchon developing trusted and assured microelectronics, as well as providing an infrastructure formajor microelectronics workforce development projects [1]. This was driven by a shortage inmicrochip manufacturing ability within the U.S. and the desire to build the capacity for chipdevelopment and manufacturing across the country. Due to this growing pressure to integratemicroelectronics content and contexts in the classroom, teachers are now being
single conceptin a one-time course. It is embedded in engineers' professional life and is reflected in multipleaspects of engineers' social roles. Moreover, equity and social justice engineering curricula mayfoment a culture that welcomes differences, as Rossmann et al. (2020) reported. The authorsidentified that their program, designed to develop engineering socio-technical skills, had moregender and ethnic diversity in the student population than other engineering programs in thesame institution. The third intervention category was external, which encompasses papers that describe theimplementation of workshops, external project grants, and external professional development tohelp students, faculty, or staff apply equitable design
undergraduateengineering students. By immersing players in the role of a Mars settlement engineer, the gamecontextualizes ethical dilemmas within a realistic engineering project. Players are not merelypresented with abstract right or wrong choices; instead, they must employ personal reasoning andcontext-dependent justifications in their decision-making process. Each game segment concludeswith a pivotal decision, influencing the storyline and leading to various potential endings. Marsis novel in its approach to teaching engineering ethics. Unlike traditional methods for teachingethics such as exposing students to ethical standards, using case studies, and discussion activities[6], which often present decontextualized scenarios, Mars offers a rich, interconnected
, paying particular attention to the time perspective they situated their responses.Methodology and MethodsThis study used mixed methods to answer our research question. A mixed methods research studyintegrates qualitative and quantitative approaches to obtain breadth and depth [25]. We collectedquantitative and qualitative data from engineering students at one Hispanic-Serving Institution(HSI) in the Southwest, who were enrolled in Statics, Strength of Materials, and EmbeddedSystems courses. The three courses were selected as part of a larger project to decrease the highDFW rate, or rate at which students fail or withdraw from a course, by restructuring the curriculuminto mastery-based grading [26]. However, the data presented in this paper is
of studies exploring factors of effective teaching,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 36, 2013, pp. 143-152.[9] B. Trammell, & R. Aldrich, “Undergraduate Students’ Perspectives of Essential Instructor Qualities,” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 16. 2016.[10] https://pypi.org/project/PuLP/
Paper ID #42823Apoyando y Modificando el Curr´ıculo: Supporting our Next Generation LatinxSTEM StudentsMayrismir Cordero, MPA, Palo Alto College Mayrismir Cordero obtained her Master’s Degree in Public Administration from St. Mary’s University in San Antonio. She knows and understands that student success is a collaborative effort. Her project management and organizational skills have led her to design programs that lead and serve a large community of multidimensional learners. After 17 years in education, her love for students, her connection with faculty and her shared identity as a Latina with the Hispanic/Latino
with a simplified,custom peer review survey generated in Qualtrics that uses a Likert scale and measures thedegree to which students agree or disagree with statements related to each team member’sperformance and professional skills demonstration. This paper describes both the new peerreview tool as well as results from a study conducted in the 2022/2023 academic year to evaluatestudent perceptions of PEPSA against the prior CATME baseline using two identical studyquestionnaires.IntroductionSimilar to its other peer institutions, Penn State requires its undergraduate engineering studentsto complete a capstone design project in their senior year. While the duration, topic area, andlevel of inter-departmental collaboration of the capstone design
was correlated negatively with intercultural growth.Awareness of professional growth Of the 42 students in the 2022-2023 cohort, 11 not only took courses in their secondlanguage and in their engineering discipline during the Fall semester of their study abroad butalso availed themselves of the opportunity to complete credit bearing research projects in atechnical institute at their various partner universities; 7 more chose a research project in auniversity or private institute instead of an internship in a company for the second half of theiryear abroad. Doing research in a team was new for some. JD, for example, a student with a solidacademic record of As, Bs, occasional Cs and a 104.85 IDI score prior to his abroad sojournrelated
interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering.Dr. Alyson G. Eggleston, Penn State University Alyson Eggleston is an Associate Professor in the Penn State Hershey College of Medicine and Director of Evaluation for the Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. Her research and teaching background focuses on program assessment, STEM technical communication, industry-informed curricula, and educational outcomes veteran and active duty students.Dr. Catherine Mobley, Clemson University Catherine Mobley, Ph.D., is a Professor of Sociology at Clemson University. She has over 30 years experience in project and program evaluation and has worked for a variety of consulting firms
, and the assignment learning outcomes. WATTS research was funded by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) collaborative grant (award #s 2013467, 2013496, & 2013541). The results ofthis research demonstrated statistically significant improvements in student technical writing [1]. Theseimprovements can be attributed to the WATTS-trained tutors who provide appropriate feedback to thestudents during their tutoring sessions. This team’s research has explored changes between pre-tutoring and post-tutoring assignments anddemonstrates that, while the writing improves, it is still a challenge to engage students in revising theirwork. During the WATTS research project, students took writing assignment
Project (2018). 5. Cheryan, S., Master, A. & Meltzoff, A. N. Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Front. Psychol. 6, (2015). 6. Boucher, K. L. & Murphy, M. C. Why so few? The role of social identity and situational cues in understanding the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. in Self and social identity in educational contexts 93–111 7. Malone, K. R. & Barabino, G. Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Sci. Educ. 93, 485–510 (2009). 8. Sparks, D. M. Navigating STEM-worlds: Applying a lens of intersectionality to the career identity
contrast, in-person interventions prioritize face-to-facecommunication, traditional lectures with facilitated group discussions, and hands-on activitiessuch as case studies or projects. Both approaches, typically independently studied for theirunique strengths and limitations, will be jointly implemented into an undergraduate biomedicalengineering tissue mechanics course in this research to promote critical reflexivity through theadded socialization. To determine the effectiveness of the applied interventions, assessments willinclude observations made of discussions on the virtual collaborative learning platform Perusall,in-person case studies, and student artifacts (surveys). Moreover, we anticipate that in-personand digital pedagogical
STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects that focuses on engineering education, teacher networks and STEM learning environments. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis, mixed methods, and advanced quantitative methods. Dr. Alemdar is passionate advocate for equitable and inclusive STEM education. She actively engages with educators, students, and communities to promote the importance of STEM disciplines and education research in preparing the next generation for the challenges of the future. She
Audrey Boklage, PhD University of Texas at AustinIntroductionWhat is a makerspace?Academic makerspaces are prevalent in institutions across the world; specifically inundergraduate engineering programs. Makerspaces are informal, opt-in STEM (science,technology, engineering, mathematics) spaces and are increasingly recognized for their potentialto increase student access to and engagement with STEM (e.g., Martin, 2015, Roldan et al.,2018, Wilkczynski et al, 2019). Over the past two decades, research has highlighted the benefitsof makerspaces, including engineering specific skills, such as prototyping, supporting studentdesign projects, entrepreneurship, and innovation, (Forest et al., 2014; Wilczynski et al., 2016