aligns with the loading test and falls within therange of reported laboratory tests as documented in the work of Yang et al12. Using theseparameters, the stability analysis indicates that the first mode of lateral buckling is produced with630 pounds, as shown in Figure 11-b. The lateral buckling from the laboratory test occurs with290 pounds, however the buckling shape is like the theory. The disparity between the predictedand observed loads is attributed to misalignment of the upper chord and other imperfectionsinherent in the construction process. 100 pounds a. Deflections under 100 s applied at center Mode 1: 630 pounds Mode 2: 680 pounds Mode 3: 710 pounds Mode 4: 890 pounds
. Zavala, and J. F. Calderón, “Student response to instructional practices (StRIP) survey in engineering classrooms: Validating a Spanish version,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2020.[5] M. L. Kovarik, J. K. Robinson, and T. J. Wenzel, “Why Use Active Learning? In Active Learning in the Analytical Chemistry Curriculum,” American Chemical Society, 2022, pp. 1–12.[6] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin, “Measuring actual learning versus the feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p. 116(39), 2019.[7] H. J. Cho, K. Zhao, C. R. Lee, D. Runshe, and C. Krousgrill, “Active learning
range of student involvement in chemicalengineering.References[1] Landherr, Lucas. “Integrating Comics into Engineering Education to Promote Student Interest, Confidence, and Understanding.” Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education), 10 Sept. 2020, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32983. Accessed 28 Jan. 2024.[2] S. Madnani, “Why Chemical Engineering?,” Viterbi Voices, Apr. 27, 2020. https://viterbivoices.usc.edu/sheetal/chemical-engineering-why-i-chose-it-and-why-i- stayed/ (accessed Feb. 05, 2024).[3] “2021 Graduate Enrollment in Science, Engineering, and Health Fields at All-Time High as Postdocs Continue to Decline | NSF - National Science Foundation
mistakes areessential for improving conceptual understanding, which was an additional upgrade to theinterventions. When the professors display a growth mindset, it can facilitate positivepsychological and learning outcomes for students [9]. For our surveys, we changed the “male” and “female” terms to “man” and “woman” respectivelyas they are more appropriate options for the gender choice.References[1] C.S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology Of Success. Penguin Random House, 2006.[2] N. Zerin, S. Ratanalert, “ Work in Progress: Promotion of Growth Mindset in IntroductoryMass and Energy Balance Course in Chemical Engineering,” ASEE Conferences, 2023.[3] “Developing a Growth Mindset with Carol Dweck,” Stanford Alumni, October 2014.Available: https
, S. (2018). The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 938-961.Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., Roetzer, K., Bottaro, G., & Peschl, M. F. (2018). When relational and epistemological uncertainty act as driving forces in collaborative knowledge creation processes among university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 21-40Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995) Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4:1, 39-103, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2Jordan, M. E., & McDaniel, R. R. (2014). Managing Uncertainty During Collaborative Problem Solving in Elementary School Teams
acceptance and adoption among engineering students.References[1] S. Dawson, L. Heathcote, and G. Poole, "Harnessing ICT potential: The adoption and analysis of ICT systems for enhancing the student learning experience," International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 116-128, 2010.[2] K. Cook-Chennault and I. Villanueva, "Exploring perspectives and experiences of diverse learners' acceptance of online educational engineering games as learning tools in the classroom," ed: IEEE, 2020, pp. 1-9.[3] H. Taherdoost, "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Procedia manufacturing, vol. 22, pp. 960-967, 2018.[4] A. Granić, "Educational Technology Adoption: A
this will also result in increased student engagement and motivation topursue their studies. Students in the follow-on course found it a useful way to introducemicrocontrollers and microcontroller programming. We plan to expand the programmingcomponent further and to explore ways to integrate it more with the follow-on courses.References[1] J. O. Campbell, J. R. Bourne, P. J. Mosterman, and A. J. Brodersen, “The Effectiveness ofLearning Simulations for Electronic Laboratories,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91,no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2002, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00675.x.[2] M. D. Koretsky, D. Amatore, C. Barnes, and S. Kimura, “Enhancement of Student Learningin Experimental Design Using a Virtual Laboratory,” IEEE Transactions on
Skills,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1565–1569, Aug. 2006. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9270-6[4] J. Jiang and L. K. Fryer, “The Effect of Virtual Reality Learning on Students & Motivation: A Scoping Review,” AERA 2023, pp. 1–14, Oct. 2023. doi:10.3102/ip.23.2005486[5] C. Graeske and S. A. Sjöberg, “VR-Technology in Teaching: Opportunities and Challenges,” International Education Studies, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 76, 2021. doi:10.5539/ies.v14n8p76[6] S. Grassini, K. Laumann, and M. Rasmussen Skogstad, “The Use of Virtual Reality Alone Does Not Promote Training Performance (But Sense of Presence Does),” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, Jul. 2020. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01743[7] Mordor Intelligence, “VR
confident I can understand my field’s subject matter in class. 0.83 0.00 -0.02 0.01 I can do well on exams in my field. 0.79 -0.02 -0.04 0.02 I understand concepts I have studied in my field. 0.77 0.06 0.04 0.00 Others ask me for help in my field. 0.57 -0.03 0.07 0.00Factor 2: Interest (α=.91) I am interested in learning more about my field. -0.04 0.90 -0.01 0.01 I enjoy learning my field. 0.06 0.87 0.00 0.00 I find fulfillment in doing work in my field. 0.05 0.80 0.03 -0.02Factor 3: Recognition as a science person (α=.93) My parent(s) or guardian
. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.maps.mla.org/Resources/Policy- Statements/ADE-Guidelines-for-Class-Size-and-Workload-for-College-and-University-Instructors- of-English-A-Statement-of-Policy[2] A. C. Estes et al., “The ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop: Assessing 20 Years of Instructional Development,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1758–1786, 2019.[3] C. Riley, S. L. Beaudry, and A. Bettencourt-McCarthy, “An Institutional Excellence in Teaching Workshop Adapted from the ExCEEd Model,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[4] A. Morse, “Application of the ExCEEd Teaching Model to Improve Graduate Teaching in Environmental Engineering Courses,” in 2009 Annual Conference &
,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005.[7] M. K. Seery, “Establishing the laboratory as the place to learn how to do chemistry,” J Chem Educ, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1511–1514, 2020.[8] T. Kotulski and S. Murray, “The National Engineering Laboratory Survey,” 2010.[9] T. D. Taganahan, “Changing Students’ Epistemological Beliefs and Understanding of Basic Concepts on Electric Circuits,” Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.7828/jmds.v4i1.631.[10] S. Zwart, “Engineering Epistemology: Between Theory and Practice,” Engineering Studies, vol. 14, no. 2. Routledge, pp. 79–86, 2022. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2022.2124025.[11] R. Havdala and G. Ashkenazi, “Coordination of
Available for prescribed number of office hours only; discourages interaction except in class or for emergency 2 Available for prescribed number of office hours; provides phone and email but discourages contact 3 Available for more than prescribed number of office hours; offers phone, email, fax, home phone; encourages interaction 4 Available for multiple office hours, multiple means of access including phone(s), email, fax; holds open hours in locations other than office (e.g. library or union); encourages interaction Learning
, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—30917[6] Xiao, Z., Zuo, S., Zhao, J., Fu, W., Goldstein, M. H., Philpott, M. L., Laystrom-Woodard, J.,Pool, M., Wolters, A., & Woodard, B. S. (2019, June), Understanding Interrelated GrowthMind-set and Academic Participation & Performance Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—33479[7] Anita L. Campbell, Inês Direito & Mashudu Mokhithi (2021), “Developing growth mindsetsin engineering students: a systematic literature review of interventions”, European Journal ofEngineering Education, 46:4, 503-527, DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835[8] Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). “To WhatExtent and Under
learning alongside their children.If a family is interested is developing a project in more detail like they would for a science fair,they can sign up to run a booth at STEAM Night.Limitations to the study include the small sample size of STEAM Night participants whoresponded to the survey. Also, no study was done to determine actual effectiveness of STEAMNight on learning or promoting interest in science, technology, engineering, art, or math. Despiteits limitations, this study provides an example of how to successfully hold a STEAM Night at anelementary school, engaging parents, teachers, and community members, while also showingevidence of the challenges that come with change, such as overall family preferences.References[1] F. Grinnell, S
. Hunter, "Exploring the dynamics of organizational learning: identifyingthe decision chains science and math faculty use to plan and teach undergraduate courses,"International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2014.[5] A. Kezar and E. Holcombe, "Support for high-impact practices: A new tool foradministrators," Liberal Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. n1, 2017.[6] S. Laursen et al., "Levers for change: An assessment of progress on changing STEMinstruction," in D. Smith (Ed.), 2019.[7] A. Olmstead, A. Beach, and C. Henderson, "Supporting improvements to undergraduateSTEM instruction: An emerging model for understanding instructional change teams,"International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 6, pp. 1-15, 2019.[8] S. E. Shadle et al
= INT 1, but 1 [ft/s] does not equal 1 [m/s]Conclusion It appears that PackML provides a clear method for developing control systems formany, if not all manufacturing environments. Standardization is appealing in a world that ismoving towards larger, totally connected systems; PackML simplifies otherwise com.Appendix B – Lab #2 Lab #2IntroductionThe PackML Trainer allows the user to observe the PackML states as they are manipulated. Thetrainer was developed to provide hands-on experience with PackML without the bulk of anactual machine. It shows all 17 states and the transitions between them through animation [4].The trainer has multiple modes to simulate various levels of control
such as fugacity and kinetics, onetechnique to make the theoretical challenges more approachable is to present the concepts morevisually, given the general preference of students in STEM for visual learning. As such, thisresearch study focuses on the creation, compilation, and analysis of chemical engineering comicsgeared towards K-12 students. Comics have become increasingly more prevalent as visual learningtools, with a long history of their educational potential dating back to the 1940’s, so they could beused to help guide more students into chemical engineering without the stigma of the field beingtoo complex.A series of comics was created displaying how chemical engineering is found in everyday commonapplications, including chocolate and
senior design projects: Students win–clients win!” The Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007) 1209–1216. 6. Cliff Mirman, “Pathways for Integrating Industry into an Engineering Technology Program”, Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration, San Antonio, TX. 7. Kornecki, A.J., Khajenoori, S., Gluch, D., Kameli, N., 2003. “On a partnership between software industry and academia.” Proc. of the 16th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Madrid, Spain, pp. 60–69. 8. Otieno, A. and Mirman, C., 2003, “Engineering Technology Capstone Experience: An Industry Based Partnership,” Proc. CIEC 2003 Conference, January 28 – 31, Tucson, Arizona, Session Number
science educators andadministrators, especially those interested in learning strategies to broaden participation in CS(Computer Science) by innovating CS1. So, for our following observations, we will set a camerain a classroom section and focus on students and UTAs' interaction at one or two tables.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the Center for Inclusive Computing atNortheastern University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe Center for Inclusive Computing.References[1] “Women and Information Technology by the Numbers,” NCWIT - National Center for Women & Information Technology (2020
feedback loop isanticipated to where as students progress in their respective research, the STEM Ed seminarcourse will provide a venue for them to continually give back to the program by allowing themto provide insights to new students.References [1] R. Sowell, T. Zhang, N. Bell, and K. Redd, Council of Graduate Schools, Washington, DC, rep., 2008 [2] Proceedings of the National Conference on Graduate Student Leadership (St. Louis, MO.: Washington University), 2003, 44-47. [3] Nettles, Michael T., and Catherine M. Millett. Three Magic Letters: getting to the Ph.D. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 2006. [4] A. Fentiman and S. Fisher, “Building Graduate Student Communities,” 2009 Annual
& Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2-33525[2]. Sala, A. L., & Echempati, R. (2011, June), Performance Assessment of Undergraduate Vibrations Course Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2—18866[3]. Sridhara, B. S., & White, D. H. (2012, June), Developing Experiments for the Vibration Course with Minimal Expenditure Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—21188[4]. Turso, J., & Johnson, D., & Sweeney, S. (2003, June), Development of A Mechanical Vibrations Course for Engineering Technologists Paper presented at 2003 Annual Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. 10.18260/1-2—12653[5
mechanical engineering professor andchair of a “Joint Committee on Ethics of American Engineering Societies” put forth a proposalfor a common code of professional ethics that included (in the sexist language of the era) thefollowing precept: He will interest himself in the public welfare, in behalf of which he will be ready to apply his special knowledge, skill, and training for the use and benefit of mankind [2].Another participant in the Joint Committee stated in an accompanying paper that “[a]s theprogress of the world, the comforts of man, and his ability to produce are so very largely due tothe work of the engineer, his work is of the very greatest importance; he therefore naturallyinterests himself also in the public welfare [3
programs play in theparticipants’ success as it prepares them for further educational and professional pursuits [7]. References[1] B. Dewsbury and C. J. Brame, “Inclusive Teaching,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 2, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021.[2] C. Harrison and K. D. Tanner, “Language Matters: Considering Microaggressions in Science,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 17, no. 1, p. fe4, Mar. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-01-0011.[3] S. Reardon, “The Widening Income Achievement Gap,” The Widening Income Achievement Gap,” vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 10–16, 2013, Available: https://stonecenter.gc.cuny.edu/files/2022/09/Conwell-2.pdf
impact the users’ dignity, empowerment and sense of security,” Des. Sci., vol.5, p. e21, 2019, doi: 10.1017/dsj.2019.18.[2] S. Sprecher and B. Fehr, “Compassionate love for close others and humanity,” J. Soc.Pers. Relatsh., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 629–651, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0265407505056439.[3] P. Gilbert et al., “The development of compassionate engagement and action scales forself and others,” J. Compassionate Health Care, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4, Dec. 2017, doi:10.1186/s40639-017-0033-3.[4] A. Jonsson and G. Svingby, “The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity andeducational consequences,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–144, Jan. 2007, doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.[5] R. C. Campbell, “How can engineering
: developing entrepreneurialthinking in STEM (Entre-STEM)." Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets ThroughSTEM Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 165-194, 2023[11] T. Siller, T., & G. Johnson, G. Curriculum, Pedagogy, And Assessment In EngineeringEducation Reform. In 2004 Annual Conference (pp. 9-366), 2004 (June).[12] I. K. Amalina, S. Suherman, T. Vidákovich, L. Puspita, & N. Supriadi. The Comparison ofHungarian and Indonesian Curriculum: A Case Study of ISCED 2 Mathematics and ScienceCurriculum. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 112-122, 2023.[13] Y. Supriani, F. Meliani, A. Supriyadi, S. Supiana, & Q.Y. Zaqiah. The Process ofCurriculum Innovation: Dimensions, Models, Stages, and Affecting Factors. Nazhruna
) reveal a slightly positive attitude toward ChatGPT overall, although again,the range of results indicates that opinions varied widely. Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) testsindicated non-normal distributions, but these tests are known to detect very small deviationswhen applied to a large dataset. The K-S statistics values were low (.079, .064, .097, and .117respectively for the individual components), and the histograms (shown in Figure 1) as well asthe skewness and kurtosis values appear close to normal.Figure 1Distribution of students’ attitudes towards ChatGPT. 80 80 70 70 60
(pp. 269-274). IEEE. 4. Michaeli, T., & Romeike, R. (2021, April). Developing a real world escape room for assessing preexisting debugging experience of k12 students. In 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 521-529). 5. Estrada, T., & Atwood, S. A. (2012, June). Factors that affect student frustration level in introductory laboratory experiences. In 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 25- 629). 6. Van De Bogart, K. L., Dounas-Frazer, D. R., Lewandowski, H. J., & Stetzer, M. R. (2017). Investigating the role of socially mediated metacognition during collaborative troubleshooting of electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2
active learning," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 14, no. 1, p. ar5, 2018.[7] B. B. Morrison, L. E. Margulieux, B. J. Ericson, and M. Guzdial, "Subgoals help students solve Parsons problems," Learning and Instruction, vol. 34, pp. 63-71, 2015.[8] T. Naps, G. Rößling, V. Almstrum, W. Dann, R. Fleischer, C. Hundhausen, A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, M. McNally, S. Rodger, & J. Á. Velázquez-Iturbide, "Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education," SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 131-152, 2002.[9] H. G. Sigarchian, S. Logghe, R. Verborgh, W. de Neve, F. Salliau, and E. Mannens, "Hybrid e-TextBooks as comprehensive interactive learning environments," Interactive Learning Environments
,” International Data Corporation, 2023.[2] Y. Tadjdeh, “Semiconductor shortage shines light on weak supply chain,” National Defense, vol. 105, no. 811, June 2021.[3] United States Government, “CHIPS and Science Act”, 2022.[4] United States Department of Defense, “Microelectronics Vision”, 2022.[5] Semiconductor Industry Association and Oxford Economics, “Chipping Away: Assessing and Addressing the Labor Market Gap Facing the U.S. Semiconductor Industry”, 2023.[6] S. Pennisi, “Pandemic, Shortages, and Electronic Engineering,” in IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 41–49, thirdquarter 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCAS.2022.3189891.[7] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, & G. Hackett, “Social cognitive career theory,” Career Choice and
. 1010–1022, Springer, 2023. [2] M. Cook, Z. Lischer-Katz, N. Hall, J. Hardesty, J. Johnson, R. McDonald, and T. Carlisle, “Challenges and strategies for educational virtual reality: Results of an expert-led forum on 3d/vr technologies across academic institutions,” Information Technology and Libraries, vol. 38, p. 25–48, Dec. 2019. [3] S. Marshall, “Augmented reality’s application in education and training,” in Springer Handbook of Augmented Reality (A. Y. C. Nee and S. K. Ong, eds.), ch. 13, pp. 335–353, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. [4] M. Safi and J. Chung, “Augmented reality uses and applications in aerospace and aviation,” in Springer Hand- book of Augmented Reality (A. Y. C. Nee and S. K. Ong, eds