Teaching Excellence, 2012. Prior to joining FSC, Dr. Villani had a 15 year computer consulting career in the Risk Management and Insurance Industry.Dr. Ilknur Aydin, Farmingdale State College, SUNY, New York Ilknur Aydin is an Associate Professor of Computer Systems at Farmingdale State College, SUNY, New York. Dr. Aydin’s research is in the general area of wireless and mobile networks with a focus on transport layer issues including multihoming, SCTP, congestion control, and network coding. Dr. Aydin has mentored undergraduate and high school students on research projects that involve the use of Arduino boxes and Raspberry Pi’s in the context of Internet of Things, and the use of public testbeds such as CloudLab and
presentations. Her research specializes in engineering education, focusing on remote laboratory evaluation. She is also passionate about exploring various technology applications to enhance engineering education.Dr. Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University Ibrahim H. Yeter, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor at the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. He is an affiliated faculty member of the NTU Centre for Research and Development in Learning (CRADLE) and the NTU Institute for Science and Technology for Humanity (NISTH). He serves as the Director of the World MOON Project and holds editorial roles as Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education and
. Piredda, F. Cordella, N.L. Tagliamonte, et al, “Nursing-Engineering Interdisciplinary Research: A Synthesis of Methodological Approach to Perform Healthcare- Technology Integration Projects,” MethodsX, vol. 12, no. 102525, 2024.[12] J. Bayuo, H. Abu-Odah, J.J. Su, and L. Aziato, “Technology: A Metaparadigm Concept of Nursing,” Nursing Inquiry, vol. 30, no. e12592, 2023.[13] A. Squires, F.S. Chavez, D.K.H. Messias, G.L. Narsavage, D.B. Oerther, et al, “Sustainable Development & The Year of the Nurse & Midwife – 2020,” Int. J. Nurs. Stud., vol. 94, pp. A3-A4, 2019.[14] D.B. Oerther, and C.A. Peters, “Educating Heads, Hands, and Hearts in the COVID-19 Classroom,” Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 37, pp. 303
. Each of thesefactors is illustrated with quotes from the participants.Collaborating: Some mentees described actively collaborating with their mentor, whetherco-authoring an article, co-advising a student, or working together on a project. These menteesappreciated a senior faculty member taking an interest in partnering with them rather thanadhering to conventional top-down hierarchies, as captured by Clark: “One thing that he was really helpful with is, he started including me on…writing proposals together and co-authoring papers together…I think the fact that he was a mentor and he was wanting to be a colleague and work together on stuff, it was very different than somebody that was like, “Well, I’m, you know, up here
Dallas Dr. Yvette E. Pearson is Vice President for Campus Resources and Support at The University of Texas at Dallas. A Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Pearson is recognized globally for nearly 30 years in higher education, particularly for her work to advance sustainability, access, and opportunity in STEM education and practice. Her university-based and consulting efforts have led to over $40M in funding for projects to support initiatives in STEM and changes to policies and practices of global engineering organizations. Pearson is a registered Professional Engineer, an ENVISION® Sustainability Professional, and a Commissioner on
the University of Michigan; and serves as a PI/Co-PI on multiple projects funded by the National Science Foundation. He currently serves in editorial capacity for the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, and Journal of International Engineering Education.Jeffrey Stransky, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Stransky is a post-doctoral research associate in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He obtained his PhD in Engineering Education and MS in Mechanical Engineering from ¬¬Rowan university. Dr. Stransky seeks to understand the engineering ideologies that promote potential
Aeronautical University at the Daytona Beach campus. She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech (VT). She received her bachelor’s and masters in Computer Science and Engineering. Her research is at the intersection of Engineering Education (EE) and Computing Education Research (CER) to advance personalized learning, specifically within the context of online learning and engagement, educational technologies, curriculum design which includes innovative and equitable pedagogical approaches, and support programs that boost the academic success of different groups of students. She teaches in active learning environments, such as project-based learning and flipped classrooms. She aims to bring EE and CER
with problems that necessitated the synthesis of multiple strategies. We planto incorporate additional course components, such as applied problems or projects, alongsideassessments of individual learning targets for future iterations of the course.Moreover, we found that the current structure of the course may inadvertently lead to a lack ofchallenge for high-performing students. By expanding the scope of course components to includemore diverse and challenging tasks and assessments, we are hoping to make sure that allstudents, regardless of their level of mastery, are sufficiently engaged and challenged throughoutthe course.Limitations and future workThe Calculus I course in this study was taught by three different instructors. Due to
types of workspaces available may vary between cohorts.Differences in workspace layouts can affect their suitability for group work and collaborativeprojects. An enjoyable place to work with others may encourage students to spend more timeworking together on a project compared to students with less enjoyable workspaces that simplywant to ‘get it done’ so they can go elsewhere. It is important for instructors to be aware of howthis could influence student interaction and collaboration. In courses featuring laboratorycomponents, discrepancies in equipment availability and functionality can lead to differentlearning outcomes and/or inequitable hands-on experiences. Equity across cohorts should be keptin mind when designing laboratory activities
Conference, in 30th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, vol. 7. Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, Aug. 2018, pp. DETC2018-86037. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86037.[22] M. Cassotti, A. Camarda, N. Poirel, O. Houdé, and M. Agogué, “Fixation effect in creative ideas generation: Opposite impacts of example in children and adults,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 19, pp. 146–152, Mar. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.008.[23] Y. Luo, “Design fixation and cooperative learning in elementary engineering design project: A case study,” Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 2015.[24] A. Schut, R. Klapwijk, M. Gielen, and M. de Vries, “Children’s Responses to Divergent and
them intheir interviews.Process safety can be a scary topic if we emphasize explosions and disasters. Emphasize insteadthat chemical engineering is about keeping people safe: we have a safety culture because wecare about the students, the operators, and the employees. Teach successes as well as disastersand emphasize learning from failures and leading and lagging indicators. The Center forChemical Process Safety is working on a project about successes - look for Risk-based ProcessSafety – Implementation Guide in mid-2025.Another way to move from disasters is to focus on the daily practice of safety. Have the studentsdo a hazard and risk analysis for walking into traffic without looking or for driving while on theirphones to bring process
by chemical engineering educators identified an approach toassess student understanding of moral reasoning through the development of the EngineeringProcess Safety Research Instrument (EPSRI); however, given that many chemical engineeringstudents have not completed a course in ethics or moral reasoning it has not been easy to implementthe tool. The goal of this project was to develop a learning module to teach students about differentapproaches to moral reasoning and ethical concepts associated with these approaches to betterprepare them for careers in which they can (and most likely will) encounter supervisors and co-workers who use different moral frameworks and exhibit varying stages of moral development.Indeed, one objective of the
Assignments, and 1 Project) in the 16-weekcourse. This data was obtained from the course’s learning management system, namely Canvas.The non-cognitive ordinal (numeric) data is 2-dimensional and includes repeated measures ofstudents’ emotional engagement. The non-cognitive data was collected through aprivacy-preserving smartphone-based application that triggered contextually appropriate,study-specific daily questions based on rules specified by researchers. Participants’de-anonymized answers were aggregated on secure, cloud-based servers for analysis. The threetypes of features were used to create the numeric sequences of the input data. Finally, we createdthree numeric datasets based on 8-week-long, 4-week-long, and 2-week-long input sequences
protect the ecological system. His primary research interests lie in machine learning and data visualization using AR/VR devices. Dr. Wu has actively contributed to several NSF and NIH funded projects, serving as both a Principal Investigator (PI) and Co-PI.Dr. Sergiu Dascalu, University of Nevada, RenoDr. Zhen Zhu, East Carolina University Zhen Zhu is an assistant professor at East Carolina University. From 2010 to 2013 he was a senior research engineer and a principal investigator with the Navigation Systems Division and the Advanced Concepts and Technologies Division in Northrop Grumman EDr. David Feil-Seifer David Feil-Seifer is an Associate Professor in Computer Science & Engineering at the University of
preparation,study habits, accountability, and realization of improvement opportunities. This viewpoint washeld by two-thirds (67%) of the respondents throughout the study (n=253) and is a key outcomeof this research. To our satisfaction, there was a shift in perspective during the final semester,compared to the previous two semesters of the project. Specifically, in the final semester, 52%of the respondents indicated they “enjoyed or liked” the weekly questions, compared to just 13%during the previous two semesters. The difference in these proportions was significant based ona z-test of proportions (p ~ 0.000) (Agresti & Finlay, 1997). Table 7: Week 15 Content Analysis of Reflections Week 15 (E): What are your
those things like stick in terms of like, what they are andwhy they were important.”As this excerpt illustrates, students often found concepts more memorable when the instructorused an engaging style of teaching (in this case, the use of humor) paired with real-worldexamples. In fact, the benefit of making connections between course content and real-worldapplications was echoed by other participants as well, such as in the following excerpt:“And then the whole class was more or less graded on the big project...And actually thinkingthrough a somewhat real-world example, even though it's, it probably wasn't a super greatsolution that many people came up with. But it definitely helped.”In sum, the use of engaging, practical, example-based material
understandingand encourage students to engage actively with course material. Furthermore, the substantial impact of analytical effort on analytical exam performancehighlights the significance of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing analytical skills amongengineering students. Educators could implement tailored instructional approaches, such asproblem-based learning, case studies, and hands-on projects, to develop students' analyticalabilities and improve their performance in analytical tasks. Additionally, the findings underscore the value of perceived effort as a predictor ofacademic success in engineering education. By acknowledging and measuring students'perceived effort levels, educators can gain insights into individual learning
educational environment.Prof. Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego Curt Schurgers is a Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project-based learning. He also co-directs a hands-on undergraduate research program called Engineers for Exploration, in which students apply their engineering knowledge to problems in exploration and conservation.Dr. Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego Dr.Huihui Qi is an Associate Teaching Professor in the department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, at the University of California San Diego.Hamad Alajeel, University of California, San Diego
Vectors Unit Vectors Dot Product Angle between vectors Projection onto a line Particle Equilibrium 3D Particle Equilibrium Moments Scalar Analysis using the Right Hand Rule Vector Analysis using Cross Product Moment about a line or axis Moment due to a Couple System Simplification A resultant force and couple-moment A resultant force at specified coordinates in a parallel force system Reduction to a Wrench Rigid Body Equilibrium 3D Rigid Body EquilibriumMethodologyIn both the control and experimental class, each of the
the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] D. F. Lohman, “Spatial Ability and G.” 1993.[2] K. S. McGrew, “CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research,” Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004.[3] H. B. Yilmaz, “On the Development and Measurement of Spatial Ability,” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–96, Mar. 2009.[4] C. Julià and J. Ò. Antolì, “Enhancing Spatial Ability and Mechanical Reasoning through a STEM Course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 957–983, Dec. 2018.[5] M. Stieff and D. Uttal, “How
Paper ID #41062Work In Progress: Enhancing Thermal and Fluids Laboratory Learningthrough the Integration of the Heat Exchanger Module (HEM)Benjamin Miles Phillips, Baylor University Ben Phillips is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University, working as a Research Assistant in the Baylor Energy And Renewable Systems (BEARS) Lab. His research interests are in Energy Storage and Renewable Systems, with projects focused in Concentrated Solar Thermal Energy Storage. He aspires to become a lecturer in the field of Chemical or Mechanical Engineering.Alexandre Yokochi, Baylor UniversityDr. Anne
Includes FYS Objective 4 o Includes FYS Objective 5 • Includes grading information: o Attendance o Participation o Written assignment o Out-of-class assignment o In-class assignment o Project o Presentation o Quiz or exam o Unique grading categories o Number of grading activitiesBesides open-ended questions on the lengths of a syllabus, unique grading categories, andnumber of grading activities, all other components were coded binary with 1 for the inclusion onthe specific item and 0 for its absence.Appendix B Table 2. Non-Student Stakeholder Survey Qualitative Responses Regarding FYS Success Q1. How do you define success in a First
. She explores how the integration of school safety strategies with disciplinary practices, often under zero-tolerance policies, blurs the lines between them, suggesting that both are byproducts of the school-to-prison pipeline.Dr. Roberta Rincon, Society of Women Engineers Roberta Rincon, Ph.D., is the Director of Research and Impact for the Society of Women Engineers. She is responsible for overseeing the research activities for the organization, including collaborative research projects with external researchers and dissemination of SWE research through academic conferences, the SWE Research website, and the annual SWE State of Women in Engineering magazine issue. She is the Principal Investigator for the NSF
sketching fundamentals inperspective to engineering students that was developed at Texas A&M University [6-11]. Thesystem has been deployed at three universities for 4 years in undergraduate and graduatemechanical engineering and design graphics courses. It has also been used by undergraduateinstructors outside of engineering. Students receive real-time feedback on their speed, precisionand smoothness and also an additional tip to help them improve. SketchTivity has repeatedlyimproved the sketching self-efficacy of students along with sketching skill development. Asurvey instrument that measures the self-efficacy of students was developed and validated as partof the project that helped us [12].A few years ago, an instructor who used
class format. Study participants stressed that achieving a high-quality learningexperience has prompted them to try something significantly new every year. Examples includetraveling to meet with remote students, curating exams for each location to accommodatedifferent exam schedules, incorporating or removing technology from the classroom such asZoom, hybridizing the course, implementing group projects and case studies, adding or removingteaching assistants, and attempting a flipped classroom.A problem consistently identified by the participants is boosting remote student engagement withthe course. One participant stressed, “… if you ask me, the most challenging thing is to keep thestudents engaged during the lecture.” Student engagement is
' critical thinking and problem-solving skills.In project-based activities, participants experimented with materials to examine their light-reflective properties. This material testing informed the design of daylighting systems for modelhouses, allowing students to directly apply the EDP. Through this hands-on approach, studentssynthesized their theoretical learning with tangible engineering tasks, and embodied the role ofengineers in solving contemporary challenges.Tools and InstrumentsQuantitative InstrumentsFor the quantitative analysis, we administered structured pre- and post-intervention surveys toevaluate changes in students' self-efficacy, STEM identity, and engineering knowledge. Thesesurveys, which featured a series of items on a 5-point
), and as a faculty member and junior consultant at FUTA (2013). His expertise spans deep foundations, pavement substructures, small dams, hydrocarbon contamination remediation, and landfill emission mitigation projects. Dr. Uduebor’s research focuses on sustainable civil infrastructure, ground improvement, and geohazards risk mitigation, leveraging his deep understanding of geomechanics and the application of water-repellent materials in geotechnical engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Targeted Self-Graded Problems in Engineering MechanicsAbstractEngineering mechanics is known to be a “bottleneck” course required in various engineeringdisciplines
advisor, peer mentor, participate in the Careers inScience at Iona (CSI) Program, conduct summer research with a research advisor, and enroll intailored courses for DESIRE cohorts [41]. 22 DESIRE Scholars and 20 students from a controlgroup were surveyed on their campus engagement. DESIRE Scholars were significantly morelikely to be engaged in work study, student organizations, research projects, and professionalconferences when compared to students with similar academic and financial backgrounds thatwere not in DESIRE. One study [35] explored components of the University of Arkansas’ Pathto Graduation, an S-STEM program that serves up to 36 students and is meant to increase thenumber of STEM students from low-income, rural backgrounds, during
, demonstrating her commitment to excellence and innovation. Her active involvement in research projects and organizing key events, such as the Annual Geomatics Conference at Fresno State, highlights her dedication to her field and community.Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker PE, California State University, Fresno Dr. Kimberly Stillmaker is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at CSU, Fresno in the area of structural engineering and the director of the Lyles College of Engineering Foundations for Success Program. She attained her PhD in Civil Engineering at UC Davis. Her research interests include structural steel welded connections and gender equity in engineering. She is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE Partnership
ofengineering PhD students, and what type of training mode is suitable for differentengineering PhD students?3. Research design3.1 Research tools and variable settingsTo gain a comprehensive understanding of the current training experience of Chinesedoctoral students, the China Doctoral Education Research Center launched by PekingUniversity, commissioned by the Ministry of Education's Department of DegreeAdministration and Graduate Education, has been conducting the NationalPostgraduate Training Quality Feedback Survey Project since 2016. This nationalsurvey focuses on recent doctoral graduates. The team developed the NationalDoctoral Graduates Survey Questionnaire as a survey tool, drawing from existingsurvey questionnaires. The questionnaire uses a