of Central Florida Professor Hyoung Jin Cho is the Associate Chair of the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida. He coordinates two undergraduate programs – B. S. Mechanical ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #43410Engineering and B. S. Aerospace Engineering. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal andproceeding papers. He has 12 and 6 patents granted in the U.S. and Korea, respectively, in the areas ofsensors, microfluidic devices, and micro/nanofabrication. His current research focus is on miniaturizedenvironmental sensors and sample
writing, hands-on work, programming, and more. This allowed eachof us to take on roles aligned with our capabilities and learn from each other's expertise. Ibenefited greatly from collaborating with peers who could fill my gaps and enhance mystrengths”. Another student captured the essence of interdisciplinary learning: "I really enjoyhaving research in a team... I can also see more different research fields closely becausedifferent students may have a different research focus." These comments illustrate the richnessof learning and innovation that arises from a mixture of diverse viewpoints and experiences.Positive mentorship dynamics: The role of mentors in shaping the team experience was aunique aspect. Reflecting on the impact of mentorship, a
communication and rhetoric at Texas Tech University. He is author of Design Thinking in Technical Communication (2021 Routledge) and co-author of UX Writing (2024 Routledge), Writing to Learn in Teams (2023 Parlor Press), Designing Technical and Professional Communication (2021 Routledge), and Collaborative Writing Playbook (2021 Parlor Press). He has also edited the collection Keywords in Design Thinking (2022 University Press of Colorado).Md Rashedul Hasan, Texas Tech University I am working on my MS in Systems and Engineering Management at Texas Tech University. I am from Bangladesh, a South Asian country known for its abundant green landscapes. After completing my master’s program, I intend to pursue a Ph.D. in
for paper submissions to allow participants to reidentify their maps face down, preventing peer or researcher observation. Pseudonyms remained the same throughout the experience, allowing individual growth to be compared at different times. Participants were not constrained on time and were allowed to turn in concept maps when completed. Students placed paper concept maps in a closed folder or submitted them anonymously online. alfway through the 10-week experience, participants received a photocopy of their first conceptHmap on paper or were asked to reassess the digital version. Paper concept maps were laid out face down, with only the pseudonym visible. Participants were allowed to build upon the
it is criticalthat faculty work on improving their online teaching techniques, they must also optimize thebenefits of in-person learning when human-to-human interactions take place. One of the largestbenefits of in-person learning is the opportunity of social interaction. One study found thatallowing students to interact with each other in a flipped gamified environment provided betterlearning outcomes when compared with online or traditional education [12]. The impact of thispandemic is expected to affect social skills of those who were students during that time [4]. In-person learning provides opportunities for students to socialize with their peers and buildrelationships. It is important that, rather than taking these features for granted
positively affect motivation [1]. At the root of the model is that behaviorscongruent with one’s identities are preferred and motivating, whereas behaviors incongruent arenot preferred and viewed as unimportant and meaningless. Moreover, what children and youngadults perceive as congruent for them is heavily influenced by what they see and experience. Assuch, role models (teachers, mentors, peers) who reinforce and share in a given identity make itfeel congruent. It can then be more readily adopted as a part of their identity – who they are.This is why having caring, dedicated and multiple mentors, for example, is at the heart of boththe CISTAR and NSBE SEEK parts of the REM program and is so critical for changing thedemographics of fields such as
the workforce. An analysis of student reflections from exit interviews of graduatingstudents from 2018 and 2019 cohorts and journal entry data collected from students from therecent 2023 cohort is presented in this work. The themes emerging from this analysis show thatboth graduating students and current students seek to strengthen the RAMP community beyondthe summer program. Their recommendations point to the need for continuing support in bothpersonal achievement and for advocating the needs of their peers. With over a hundred RAMPparticipants now established across the engineering majors and the workforce, theserecommendations will be integrated in the participatory action research framework that anchorsthe design of RAMP. We will address
experience at each institution.Surveys were administered to the NCC Scholars before and after the Summer ResearchExperience. One set of survey questions asked Scholars to think about starting college in the fallsemester and report how well-supported they felt with respect to engaging in activities importantfor success in STEM in college (Figure 2). While the first cohort at NCC was small (N=5), gainswere seen in how well-supported Scholars felt in writing lab reports, raising their hand in class,using tutoring, using academic advising, working with peers to study, working on groupassignments, talking with teachers and using college/career readiness opportunities (Figure 2).Scholars were also asked about a series of support services offered on campus
UniversityTable 3Exemplar online professional development professional articles Resume Cover Mock Elevator Follow-up Job offer development letter help interviews pitch with negotiation Topic Area and review and and prospective review interview employers preparation How to How To Write an Proven Tips How To Negotiate
Framework Development with Successive Capstone Projects1. IntroductionThe undergraduate program at the Portland State University Department of Electrical andComputer Engineering (PSU ECE) includes a three-quarter capstone design sequence typicallytaken during the student's senior year. For the last three years, and a fourth currently ongoing attime of writing, a capstone project has been sponsored by the author's Wireless EnvironmentalSensing Technology (WEST) Lab. The purpose of these sponsored capstones are as follows: 1. In the short term, design a wireless sensor to solve a specific problem. 2. In the long term, converge at a more general-purpose hardware and software solution set with which to design future wireless
walk. During this activity, students walk around the classroom and read their classmates’project results. For each assignment, they leave a comment – either an affirmation or asuggestion for improvement – on a sticky note. After this gallery walk concludes, students thentake turns presenting their homework results to the class. The instructional period shouldconclude with enough time left for students to write a brief reflection on how they mightincorporate feedback from their peers to improve their presentations. These reflections will beturned in as the final exit ticket of this mini-unit.ConclusionThe “Cool It!” mini-unit described above has been conceptualized following theories ofculturally-responsive and sustaining pedagogies, community
. Interestingly, “Projects”elicited mixed responses, featuring both the most and least favored aspects. Other best-likeaspects emerged around the Engineering Design Process, and Flexibility and Creativity, whilethe least-liked themes included Assignment and Writing, and Timeframe.Table 2. Top Three Best and Least liked Aspects of the Courses. Best Liked Aspects Count Freq (%) Least Liked Aspects Count Freq (%) Projects 207 70 Assignment and Writing 108 36 Engineering Design Process 156 39 Projects 73 24 Flexibility and Creativity 100 25 Timeframe 22 7Concerning Projects, students highlighted
had experiences in the “real world” upon which to draw – whether work or interest related –were very engaged in class discussions, more confident in speaking out, eager to share with theirpeers and often did well in this course. Such students were particularly valuable in groupdiscussions assignments and were often paired with more traditional students who also had giftsto share that were helpful in return. Enhanced faculty and student peer interactions brought moreexperienced or practical-minded students into Discrete Linear Systems first and often produced afeeling of confidence and motivation to succeed that was then helpful in Continuous LinearSystems and other follow-on courses.To help provide just-in-time mathematics, the Analog Circuit
of the sustainability culture present at RHIT as indicated by anycampus sustainability commitments. By analyzing the current state of sustainability education atRHIT and its relevance in meeting the institution's strategic goals, we can pave the way for abrighter and more sustainable future. Upon review of the school’s course catalog, courses werecategorized as fitting into four tiers related to the level of sustainability coverage and thepotential for incorporating sustainability content. Survey data was collected from currentstudents and faculty to assess perceptions of sustainability coverage in courses. Finally, wereviewed sustainability-related degree programs and course offerings at peer institutions toassess how these institutions
andlearning. The use of students as observers for college teaching brings a unique and valuableperspective to the evaluation process. This observation approach offers benefits for the studentobservers, instructors, and the overall teaching enhancement mission of institutions. One of themain benefits of student observer programs is that they provide instructors with an opportunity toreceive constructive and formative feedback on their teaching from a different perspective thantheir peers or their students. By observing, recording, and possibly discussing these aspects withthe instructors, student observers can provide authentic insights into the effectiveness of teachingmethods and offer real-time, firsthand constructive feedback for improving
work was compared with thecomputer submitted answers.This paper examines what types of mistakes (conceptual and non-conceptual) students were ableto correct when feedback was provided. The answer is dependent on the type and difficulty ofthe problem. The analysis also examines whether students taking the computer-based testperformed at the same level as their peers who took the paper-based exams. Additionally, studentfeedback is provided and discussed.IntroductionAutomated grading has been around since Michael Sokolski invented scantron grading machinesin 1972. Over time, computers have evolved from grading multiple choice exams to acceptingnumerical and written solutions. New systems like PrairieLearn can grade a wide variety ofsolutions
faculty so we can't use them." and "getting feedback from students on whatworks well".Go it Alone. Definition: The instructor either creates their own IM, modifies existing IM to suittheir course needs, and/or indicates they select existing IM using their own judgment andknowledge.Seven instructors mentioned creating or selecting IM alone, without the involvement of others, inresponses to questions 5, 6, & 7. Examples include "I write and distribute some materialsmyself" and "Materials developed by colleagues and myself".Peers & Colleagues. Definition: When an instructor mentioned persons or groups of personsthat influence their IM selection decisions, such as faculty, instructors, or institutional employeesboth within and outside of the
are less under their control. Though it is notintended for the education environment, a simple act of assigning grades may already put gradersin a powerful position. By democratization, we (as instructors) basically release our “gradingpower” in the courses and engage students in the grading processes. Examples include contractgrading, self-grading, and peer evaluations.In our view, these categories of alternative grading can address the negative features oftraditional grading discussed earlier. First, both lower grade granularity and democratization ofgrading can make grading less judgemental as students are not compared by hair-splittingdifferences, and they can have more control in grading. Second, standardized and iterativeformative
compared to that of the topic-quiz reflection. These results might beexplained by the fact that students were requested to write a 1-page reflection for both the topicquiz and DYOP. It is reasonable that for some levels to increase, others must decrease. Sinceproblems designed by students on the DYOP were of similar complexity as those they completedon quizzes, a decrease in percent coverage at the Understand and Apply levels indicates lessemphasis placed on engagement at these levels during reflection rather than less engagement atthem. Indeed, it would be difficult for students to engage at the Analyze level without first havingengaged fully in the Understand and Apply levels. The decrease in N/A (-20.6%), however, can beattributed to a decrease
capacity to contribute to global sustainabilityissues like climate change. These experiences equip them well for the professional phase of theircareers, allowing them to collaborate effectively in an increasingly interconnected world.The integration of international virtual exchange (IVE) programs in engineering education hasgained significant attention in recent years. As part of this trend, the assessment of studentoutcomes through IVE has become a crucial area of research and evaluation. Recent studies,such as one conducted by East Carolina University, have demonstrated the potential of IVE toenhance student learning and academic performance [21]. The definition of IVE as “technology-mediated international experiences that are peer-driven
preparation programs in both industryand academia. This exploratory study's purpose was to scope existing peer-reviewed and publishedarticles describing the focus and target audience of engineering workforce training programs forgraduate students in industry and academia. The study aimed to explore what existing workforcetrainings exist for graduate engineering students and then, to see what skills they are teachingstudents. The objective was to, using the information from the scoping review, to begin to outlineworkplace reading skills and criteria for a future development of a theory of workplace readinessfor Ph.D. engineering graduate students. This exploratory study used the Virginia WorkplaceReadiness skills framework to classify the skills
Flexibility IP SCAFFOLDING Zone of Learner Assistance Learner Assistance Towards Independence OF Proximal Instructor Active Learning Peer Learning PLP Project or Exam INSTRUCTION Development Weeks 1-4 Weeks 1-4 Week 5 Student: Faculty ASSESSMENT OF • Non-technical core competency • Formative & summative feedback on model PERFORMANCE AND • Improved understanding of • Feedback on student interactions
Paper ID #44485Board 174: Fostering Inclusivity and Engagement while Learning by Doing:A New Paradigm in Engineering Education Based on Student-Designed, Student-TaughtCoursesMr. Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz Eliot Wachtel is a fourth year Robotics Engineering Student, Student Instructor, Undergraduate Researcher, and Club leader at UC Santa Cruz. He has been involved in teaching and mentoring undergraduate peers in engineering concepts for three years, acting as the formal lead instructor for two undergraduate courses. When not teaching, or learning, he is doing research in the Braingeneers
developing feedback literacy. The framework also draws from Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick's [20] principles of good feedback practice, emphasizing the role of peer and self-assessment in feedback processes. In the context of Scrum, this dimension reflects the framework's collaborative nature, where feedback sources are not limited to the traditional instructor-student dynamic but include peers and self-reflection [22]. 2. Feedback Timing: Timeliness in feedback is highlighted by Hattie and Timperley's [19] model of effective feedback, which emphasizes the importance of immediate feedback in learning processes. This aspect is mirrored in the Scrum methodology, where regular sprint reviews and retrospectives [23] provide
the programare represented in the dataset, with members from a mean of 12 teams (min=5; max=17)participating in each of the meetings, alongside the REDPAR leadership, and guest attendees.Seven out of the 31 meetings (23%) featured guest presenters.At the time of writing, two more cohorts have been funded by the RED program, for a total of 30teams. We expect the underlying structure of the community meetings and the types ofinteractions analyzed here to be similar in more recent CoT meetings.For the analysis, we transcribed and qualitatively analyzed the meetings using Dedoosequalitative data analysis software. Our codebook includes the variety of topics covered at eachmeeting (e.g., sustainability of change, building strategic partnerships
density of concrete. 6. Describe the effect of pozzolans on the compressive strength of concrete. 7. Understand that different pozzolans have different effects on the properties of concrete. 8. Understand that the properties of concrete can vary based on the quantity of pozzolan added.Methodology The objective of the mini-project was to investigate how a supplementary cementitiousmaterial (SCM) affects the properties of fresh and hardened concrete. The students collaboratedwith their peers to generate different ideas, and based on classroom knowledge, they identifiedseveral potential SCMs. However, due to material availability in the lab, the groups were advisedto use fly ash and silica fume for their mini
● Her interests include reading, music, and computers. ● Challenges in the classroom involve a "quiet refusal" and verbal repetition. Kiernan 21 Career Readiness Track ● She completes tasks when given clear instructions and modeling. ● Performs significantly below her peers in reading, writing, and math. Matt 18 Diploma Track ● He excels in classroom activities, blogging, and creating
happy witha ‘C’ (a passing grade) while another wants an ‘A’. The one desiring the ‘A’ often then mustcarry the team and resents the fact that the other members obtained a high mark without puttingin the work. On the other extreme, each member of the team must materially participate in allaspects of the project (e.g. a team can’t decide one person will write the report, another will dothe calculations, etc.). The instructor’s challenge in this paradigm is to then determine how eachperson performed individually, independent of how well the team performed. Most instructorsattempt something in between these two extremes.As anyone who has taught a class with team projects knows, such courses are typically moredifficult to teach than more
Thoughts: Increased interest Actions: Seeking relevant or focused information Kuhlthau task: Complete information searchPresentation Feelings: Relief/satisfaction or disappointment Group task: Write or present Thoughts: Clearer or focusedFigure 1 – Levels of the Information Search Process along with activities and tasks indicative ofeach level. [28]The six stages in the ISP, summarized in Figure 1, are: • initiation, when the researcher is looking for background information and feels uncertain or apprehensive about the research
beintegrated with the technical modules to help students excel in the workplace. Theinstruction and practice of the soft skills was designed as several discrete modulescontributing to three distinct themes. Each module contained explanations, examples,exercises and instructions for teachers to use the module. The activities and learningopportunities were tied directly with the technical content to make them repeatable indifferent classes and to help reinforce the skills. In total, nine team/teamwork modulesincluding teamwork, problem solving, decision making, leadership (with the sub-contents ofteam organization, influence and motivation, conflict management, peer and team evaluationas well as reporting and presentation) were prepared, in addition to