; Mumcu, G. (2019, June), 3D Visualization-assistedElectromagnetic Theory Teaching Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--31940[16] Pettiford, C. I. (2017, June), Enhancing visualization of magnetic fields inElectromagnetic Fields Course Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2—28283[17] Voltmer, D., & Tierney, W., & Garner, B. (2001, June), Visual Electro Magnetics(Vem): A Visualization Tool To Enhance Learning In UndergraduateElectromagnetics Paper presented at 2001 Annual Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.10.18260/1-2—9998[18] Xu, Y., & Meehan, K., & Martin, C. V., & Overby, A. B., & Wei, X. (2011,June
education in 2040 as more accessible,inclusive, and equitable, highlighting the important role of community colleges in making thishappen [3]. An important need emerged, “to put less value on degree and more on competencies,experiences, and skills.” This need was supported by employers’ preference for “critical thinkerswho can apply learned information and skills to become specialists with on-the-job training” [3].In Broadening Participation in STEM: Effective Methods, Practices, and Programs,Wilson-Kennedy, et al., (2019) compiled fourteen case study programs and their high impactpractices (HIPs) that improved inclusion and success of underrepresented persons in STEM [4].Importantly, some of the HIPS are related to Experiential Learning, defined
: The Ups and Downs of Project-Based Learning of static equilibrium,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (Columbus, Ohio), ASEE Conferences, June 2017.[18] J. Kadlowec, M. Amadoro, and A. Osta, “A Statics and Dynamics Project Infusing Entrepreneurial Mindset,” in 2021 ASEE North Central Section Conference, (University of Toledo, Ohio), ASEE Conferences, March 2021.[19] E. Constans, K. Dyer, and S. Sangelkar, “A New Method for Teaching The Fourbar Linkage and its Application to Other Linkages,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, (Tampa, Florida), ASEE Conferences, June 2019.[20] J. Lahmann, B. Halsey, A. Danesh-Yazdi, S. Sangelkar, and E. Constans, “Comparison of Two Teaching Methods for
facilitate teamworkamong university students, enabling the development of their transferable and soft skills throughcontinuous practice while learning technical expertise.Within engineering education, collaborative efforts can augment learning beyond the requiredtextbooks and other materials, proving to be more efficacious than in-class instruction, particularlywhen focusing on higher-order cognitive processes (Bayram & Bütün, 2020). An examination byIsmail et al. (2019) evaluated the impact of teamwork within project-based learning, shedding lighton its influence on individual cognitive and affective performance to complete coursework. Anotherresearch conducted by Misaki et al. (2020) also aligned with the growing consensus advocating
%, respectively, for the Fall 2019 to Fall 2021 cohorts.A comparison of the demographics for the Fall 2022 cohort is provided in Table 3 along withcomparisons of the success in ENGR 122 and MATH 242 by the subsequent Fall quarter of thesophomore year. Although ACT scores have risen slightly since the 2014-2018 cohort, thefemale population was stable in 2019-2022 and rose slightly for 2022. The URM droppedslightly during the recovery from COVID but was slightly higher than previous years for Fall2022.Table 3. Demographics of comparison students. ENGR 122 and MATH 242 percentagesare students that passed by summer plus one academic quarter. Number ENGR 122 MATH 242 Female URM ACT Fall 2022 - Selected
. Krivickas and J. Krivickas, “Laboratory Instruction in Engineering Education,” GlobalJournal of Engineering Education, Volume 11, No. 2, June 2007.[7] D. A. H. Samuelsen and O. H. Graven, “Remote Laboratories in Engineering Education – anOverview of Implementation and Feasibility,” 14th International Multi-Conference forEngineering, Education, and Technology: Engineering Innovations for Global sustainability, SanJose, Costa Rica, July 2016.[8] A. Yousuf, A. Wong, and D. W. Edens, “Remote Circuit Design Labs with Analog Discovery,”2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, June 2013.[9] S. Abbasi, E. M. Kim, and T. F. Schubert, “Digilent Analog Discovery and Bench-topInstruments: A Comparison,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
relationships between these factorsand peer rating scores in the context of college course teamwork. We used Tandem to collectpeer rating data from 5,322 college students at a Midwest research university spanning the periodfrom 2019 to 2023. Our analysis reveals statistically significant associations between students’peer rating values and their personal factors. Female students, students with higher GPAs, orthose preferring working alone were more likely assigned higher peer ratings, while those ratingthemselves higher in extraversion and task control tended to receive lower ratings. In addition,the multiple-way interactions among personal characteristics suggest that academic performanceis more influential among these factors analyzed. These results
students use rules andstructured processes to come to the one “right” solution. While in many cases, this strategy isuseful and necessary, real life is complex, dynamic, and imprecise enough that it is unrealistic tothink that problems have only one solution. Therefore, students need to learn how to use truecreative thinking. Realizing this contemporary demand, the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) 2018-2019 criteria1 shifted the emphasis of engineering curriculum byidentifying creative problem-solving skill as a vital component for improving the future ofengineering and engineering education. Particularly, ABET 2000 Criteria1 requires visualization,cognitive model, communication, teamwork and creative problem solving.In
Affecting PhD Student Success. International journal of exercise science, 12(1), 34–45.[5] Cass, C., Kirn, A., Tsugawa, M. A., Perkins, H., Chestnut, J. N., Briggs, D. E., & Miller, B. (2017, June), Board # 18 : Improving Performance and Retention of Engineering Graduate Students through Motivation and Identity Formation Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--27798[6] Perkins, H., Tsugawa-Nieves, M., Bahnson, M., Satterfield, D., Parker, M., Kirn, A., & Cass, C. (2019). Motivation Profiles of engineering doctoral students and implications for persistence. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109
Pedagogy for Antiracist Social Studies Teaching,” Multicult. Perspect., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 87–94, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1080/15210960.2021.1914047.[30] V. Townsend and (Ruth) Urbanic, “Project Management Learning Takes Flight,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1015.1-24.1015.16. doi: 10.18260/1-2--22948.[31] S. Hodge, “Transformative Learning for Knowledge: From Meaning Perspectives to Threshold Concepts,” J. Transform. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 133–153, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1541344618770030.[32] K. Nicola-Richmond, G. Pépin, H. Larkin, and C. Taylor, “Threshold concepts in higher education: a synthesis of the literature relating to
," Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States of America, June 15-19, 2019.[5] O. Oje, O. Adesope, R. M. Wong, B. J. Van Wie, and P. Dutta, "Hands-on in Engineering Classrooms: A Comparison of Online versus Face-to-Face Delivery," Proceedings of American Educational Research Association Conference, Orlando, FL, April 9-12, 2021.[6] C. Watson, J. B. Gartner, B. J. VanWie, Dutta P., O. O. Adesope, and H. Curtis, "The Effects of Prior Knowledge on Learning with Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules," Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29, 2022.[7] O. J. Ajeigbe et al., "Gender-Related Effects on Learning with Hands-On Modules in
Practice of Undergraduate Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 62-70, 2019.[9] A. Wilson, "Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to measure undergraduate research participation," Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 9-15, 2012.[10] J. Mervis, "Student Research: What Is It Good For?," Science, vol. 293, no. 5535, pp. 1614-1615, 2001, doi: doi:10.1126/science.293.5535.1614.[11] P. R. Hernandez, A. Woodcock, M. Estrada, and P. W. Schultz, "Undergraduate research experiences broaden diversity in the scientific workforce," BioScience, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 204-211, 2018.[12] Y.-F. Jin, "Closing the Loop: A 10-year Follow-up Survey for Evaluation of an NSF REU Site," in ASEE annual
and professionals with physical disabilities and chronic and mental illness,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 112, no. 2, 2023.[54] D. C. Beardmore, “Navigating the academy in the absence of graduate disability accommodation policies,” presented at the CoNECD, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2022.[55] R. Figard, S. R. Brunhaver, and J. M. Bekki, “‘It is so exhausting to constantly have to explain to people’: Exploring the effects of faculty interactions on disabled students,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[56] E. Spingola and K. J. Reid, “Accessibility of ‘Introduction to Engineering’ Web Pages,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019, pp. 1–7.[57] E. M. Spingola
Engineering along with both undergraduate programs in BME. She served as associate dean for academic affairs in the College of Engineering for 7 years. In addition, Michele has served an ABET Evaluator since 2008, was a member of the Engineering Accreditation Commission from 2015-2020, and currently serves on the ABET Board of Delegates. In 2019, the Biomedical Engineering Division of ASEE recognized Michele with the Theo C. Pilkington Outstanding Educator Award. Michele earned her BS in Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Mechanics from The Johns Hopkins University and her MS and PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania.Dr. Roza Vaez Ghaemi, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Rosa and her
. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-impact-of-the-physics-statics-and- mechanics-sequence-on-student-retention-and-performance-in-mechanical-engineering[14] D. Reeping, D. B. Knight, J. R. Grohs, and S. W. Case, “Visualization and analysis of student enrollment patterns in foundational engineering courses,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 1A, 2019.[15] S. Pisano, H. Ma, B. Fulgham, G. Guadagni, D. D. Morris, and M. Abramenko, “Redesigning the Calculus Curriculum for Engineering Students,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/redesigning-the-calculus-curriculum-for-engineering- students[16
community engagement Engineers Without Borders Guatemala case study. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.26. Leidig, P. A. & Oakes, W. C. (2021). Engagement in practice: Project-based community engagement model preliminary case studies. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.27. ACCMARI (2019). Growth of communities through capacity building. Asociación de Comités Comunitarios Medioambiental Región (The Association of Community Natural Environment Committee Leaders Ixil Region).
engineering and ET in 2014 was 3.8% and 10.7% respectively. Thisfinding is not surprising to those familiar with ET programs. Table 1 shows the number of Blackstudents as a percentage of the total enrollment in ET and engineering (EN) at the top 10schools for ET enrollment in 2019 as reported by the American Society of EngineeringEducation (ASEE) [1]. For all of the institutions on the list that offer accredited bachelor’s degreeprograms in both engineering and ET, the proportion of Black students in ET is higher than theproportion of Black students in engineering, and for most the ET number is more than doublethat of engineering.The NAE report went on to recommend that agencies consider funding research aimed at betterunderstanding the reasons for
Inclusion into an Engineering Course,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 10, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.18260/3-1-1153-36034.[14] B. J. Allen et al., “Equity Toolkit,” Colorado Department of Higher Education, Denver, Colorado, USA, 2019. Accessed: Jul. 02, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://masterplan.highered.colorado.gov/equitytoolkit/equity-toolkit/[15] A. Collopy et al., “Exploring Nudging Approaches for Growing a Culture of Diversity and Inclusion with Engineering Faculty,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/42018[16] K. Goodman, H. L. Johnson, M. Darbeheshti, D. C. Mays, and T. Altman, “From Cohort to Classroom: Transitioning to
. Dwivedi, L. Jaccheri, J. Krogstie, and M. Mäntymäki, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 641–653. doi: 10.1007/978-3- 030-29374-1_52.[10] C. Hohls-du Preez and B. Marx, “Challenges Faced by Multi-Campus Institutions with Online Teaching during the COVID-19 Lockdown,” Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 419, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13040419.[11] C. Sielmann, C. Keulen, and A. Rutakomozibwa, “Proposed Curriculum for a Multi- Campus Educator Training Course,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Zone IV, Vancouver, BC, 2022.[12] T. Andrews and G. Klease, “Challenges of multisite video conferencing: The development of an
instructors. Furthermore, it discusses the challenges associated with working with this inherently unbalanced data. ● It enhances the existing models with new features related to specific course events, such as missing assignments, making late submissions, or failing individual assignments. ● It conducts numerous experiments, training a variety of machine learning models using the augmented data to evaluate their portability and the robustness of their predictions.Data AcquisitionThe data analyzed in this paper comprises 10 required lower-division CS courses taught over aspan of three years, from Spring 2019 to Summer 2022, catering to students pursuing theirassociate CS degrees within the same timeframe. Across these courses
Foundation grant (#2235227).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in the material are thoseof authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] United Nations. “Department for economic and social affairs”. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online.] Available: https://sdgs.un.org/goals[2] National Academies Press. “Environmental engineering for the 21st century: Addressing grand challenges”. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2024. [Online.] Available: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/resource/25121/interactive/uploads/2019/09/Introductio n.pdf[3] G. T. Daigger, S. Murthy, N. G. Love, and J. Sandino, “Transforming environmental engineering and science education
, no. 4, pp. 669–680, 1997, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.669.[3] S. Sorby, E. Nevin, A. Behan, E. Mageean, and S. Sheridan, “Spatial skills as predictors of success in first-year engineering,” in 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Oct. 2014, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044005.[4] Y. Maeda and S. Y. Yoon, “Scaling the Revised PSVT-R: Characteristics of the First-Year Engineering Students’ Spatial Ability,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1273.1-22.1273.19. Accessed: Dec. 22, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/scaling-the-revised-psvt-r-characteristics-of-the-first-year-engineering-students- spatial-ability[5] S. Dautle and S
made filling the planned RScohorts extremely challenging. Three recruiting years (2017-2019), instead of the originallyplanned two, were needed to enlist enough students for the study, in cadres of six, nine, and six,respectively. Within the design of the overall program, the researchers sought to include multiple climate-based features, common in smaller engineering departments and advocacy organizations [23]. Topromote intra-group socialization, students were invited to in-home celebratory dinners withfaculty members, social functions on and off-campus, and seminars with the primary researchers.Significant effort was invested in esteem-building for the RS, by providing a welcomingcommunity for them and demonstrating that faculty and
the factors influencing confidence levels amongHMG. With the results, implementing intervention strategies aimed at promoting diversity andinclusion within engineering education may be the answer to closing the gap in confidencedisparities between NHMG and HMG. Additionally, in future iterations of the survey, studentsmay be asked to explain their reasonings for such answers.References:[1] B. Przestrzelski and J. D. DesJardins, “The DeFINE Program: A Clinical Immersion for Biomedical Needs Identification,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2015, p. 26.1514.1-26.1514.16. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-define-program-a-clinical-immersion-for-biomedical- needs
, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. v–vii, 2022, doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022044277.[19] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20377.[20] C. Hampton and D. Reeping, “Positionality: The Stories of Self that Impact Others,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, ASEE Conferences, 2019. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33177.[21] J. Walther, M. A. Brewer, N. W. Sochacka, and S. E. Miller, “Empathy and engineering formation,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 11–33, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee
Design Process to First-Year Students with a Project Focused on Offshore Wind EnergyAbstractThis is a complete evidence-based practice paper. In 2019, a new semester-long course projectwas developed for our university’s first-year engineering program that aimed to introducestudents to the engineering design process (EDP) in an engaging and relevant way. Students inour small undergraduate-only engineering program earn Bachelors of Science degrees inEngineering, with a specialization in civil, computer, electrical, environmental, mechanical, or acustom area. Offshore wind energy was chosen as the project topic both for its relevance to theuniversity’s coastal location and because it touches upon many of the subareas of
://horizon- reserach.com/NSSME/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Report_of_the_2018_NSSME.pdf (accessed Nov. 1, 2020). 6. J Pleasants and J. K. Olson. “Refining an Instrument and Studying Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Scope of Engineering.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 9(2), 2019. 7. C. Cunningham, C. Lachapelle, A. Lindgren-Streicher. “Elementary teachers' understandings of engineering and technology.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2006. 8. R. Hammack, J. Utley, T. Ivey, and K. High. “Elementary Teachers’ Mental Images of Engineers at Work.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 10(2), 2020. 9. S.Y
Engineering Design Decisions: Exploring Change During a Capstone Course," International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1959-1989, 2023.[13] S. Howe and J. Goldberg, "Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies," in Design Education Today, Cham, Switzerland, Springer, 2019, pp. 115-148.[14] L. R. Brunell, "Effective Implementation of Industry Sponsored Senior Design in a Civil Engineering Program," in ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, 2005.[15] L. R. Brunell, "A Real-World Approach to Introducting Sustainability in Civil Engineering Capstone Design," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[16] L. R
Scale for computer literacy education,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1345–1360, 2019.[3] M. J. Scott and G. Ghinea, “Measuring enrichment: The assembly and validation of an instrument to assess student self-beliefs in CS1,” in Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education research, 2014.[4] I. Cetin and M. Y. Ozden, “Development of computer programming attitude scale for university students,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 667–672, 2015.[5] B. Dorn and A. Elliott Tew, “Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey,” Computer Science Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–36