Technology programs. He is also member of AIChE and ASEE. Currently, he serves as director for ASEE’s Engineering Technology Council (ETC).Dr. Lisa Deane Morano, University of Houston Lisa Morano is a Professor of Biology and Microbiology at the University of Houston-Downtown (UHD). She is also the Director of the Center for Urban Agriculture and Sustainability (CUAS) at UHD. Her research has focused on the bacteria found inside plan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024A Student Experiential Learning Program – An Interdisciplinary Approach to Sustainability Vassilios Tzouanas1 and Lisa Morano2 1
accessible as aprimary focus to engineering students with tight degree plan requirements within their majors.The proposed specialization is an important long-term programmatic creation effort to advancesustainability education within engineering. The department chair has supported a multi-yeareffort to support and create student-centric community-engaged learning opportunities. Thisdepartment driven (top-down) effort is also supported at college level by the Associate Dean andDirector for Academic Programs in the College of Food, Agricultural and EnvironmentalSciences.The Engineering for One Planet Mini-Grant resources were to develop General Education courseofferings within the Sustainability theme as well as technical electives that promote
kind of major-related transferable skills did you learn during the independent study/undergraduate research? Please list them below: Q.11. Please explain how independent study/undergraduate research experience influences your academic and career plans. Also, you can make suggestions that could improve participant experience in the future course offerings. Figure 1: Survey questionnaire for the studyThe data collected through the surveys were analyzed to understand the students’ perceptionsand attitudes about the independent study. The Qualtrics survey was sent to about 22 studentswho took the independent study with the authors in the last few years, only 12 that is 55%responded. The
. The self-assessment form can be found in Appendix A. In general, very few students are aware of ABETor of its student outcomes [11]. By having the students participate in the self-assessment processand reflect on their experiences, each student is able to identify outcomes which have not beenachieved and develop a plan to achieve all ABET outcomes prior to graduation. This proactiveself-assessment prompts students to identify weak points in their education and has the potentialto shape better student outcomes, filling all the ABET student outcomes and preparing studentsto be well-rounded engineers.[12]. The two senior semesters of IBL allow the students to directtheir learning and create their own learning experiences to address these
Systemic Change inEngineering Education” [10]. A planned NAE Engineering of 2050 Report describes thedirection, the referenced ASEE Mindset Report sets the path, and The Blueprint for ChangeAward develops an actionable plan to get engineering where it needs to be.The author also had opportunity to spend time with invited researcher Dr. Amy Salazar,Associate Vice Provost of Student Success at Sam Houston State University (SHSU), in multiplevenues over several days in 2023 and 2024. Dr. Salazar conducted an in-depth study on LearningLoss influences on SHSU students, faculty and staff [3]. In addition to identifying overallimpacts to her institution – such as declining performance indicators like recruitment, retentionand persistence; loss of revenue
Network Analysis (ENA)One possible strategy for analyzing the connections between these frame elements is ENA, amethod that uses coded data to find temporal connections between ideas within an individual orcommunity. Each of these codes are represented as a node in the network, and edges betweennodes represent the strength of an individual or community’s connection between those twocodes. For example, epistemic network analysis has been used to investigate how engineeringidentity emerges as students participate in a medical device company simulation [12], howstudents develop an epistemic frame when completing an urban planning simulation [13], andhow engineering values and epistemology emerge as students participate in a four-weekengineering
director, or they may have been the product of such a program. In neither case,however, is it possible for new directors to understand and learn every aspect of planning andstrategy. Even if the previous director desires to impart all that they know, it is possible that thereis knowledge or meta-knowledge that they, themselves, are unaware they possess.Another challenge is the lack of widespread understanding of the state of the art in diversity,equity, inclusion, and belonging from a practitioner standpoint. The community exists in a stateof functional dichotomy between those designated as researchers and practitioners. In addition,there are many members of the academic community who are not aware of either the currentstate of practice OR
, and Canvasas the Learning Management System (LMS). Additionally, E. Session 3: Final Preparations and Strategyparticipants learn how to interact with their IoT devices,including initial setup, connectivity, and basic programming. The final session before the marathon event allows teamsThis session ensures teams are equipped with the necessary to refine their strategies and address any remaining technicaltools and understanding for effective collaboration and project or conceptual challenges. Participants review their progress,management. Figure 3 finalize their project plans, and ensure all components are fully
with the rubric encouraged educators to internalize itsconcepts, making inclusivity a central consideration in their pedagogical planning and execution.In addition, the rubric was adaptively used in action research projects, underscoring its versatilityand applicability across various educational initiatives. Although it was not initially specified asa requirement for these projects, educators intuitively incorporated the rubric into their researchmethodologies. This spontaneous adoption highlights the rubric’s utility in structuring inquiriesinto inclusive practices, enabling educators to conduct meaningful investigations that contributeto the broader discourse on equity in STEM education.Through both its immediate application during the
in decision-making representation in decision- decision-making making Shared Funding • Undercompensating the • Provide fair & equitable • Set up a sustainable funding community partners funding to community for system for the future • No plan for long-term duration of project • Community can generate operations & • Funding is centered around value after the project has maintenance
separate because it gives us time to focus on the project separately from the lecture stuff.”B. Challenges Stated in Students Feedback: Student feedback acknowledges the uniquechallenges of navigating cultural norms, highlighting the dynamic and enriching nature of theexperience. “The organization of the class could have been a bit better at times. During the trip we really never had much of an idea what was going on due to the itinerary constantly changing. This was not necessarily Dr. XXX's fault though, as we learned that changing plans last minute is culturally normal in the Middle East.”Suggestions for enhanced communication between the lecture and lab professors have surfaced asa valuable lesson from the initial implementation of this course
emphasized in the traditionalcurriculum. Student reflection and exit survey data examined student learning experiences alongwith the challenges of implementing skills they have learned. Students described the benefits oflearning an effective socially engaged design process to plan their projects, engaging withstakeholders to gather important information regarding their needs, learning recommendedpractices in idea generation, and creating prototypes before coding. On the other hand, studentsdescribed perceived challenges including lacking experience in socially engaged design skillsthat may impact their ability to implement skills from the workshops effectively, identifying andconnecting with stakeholders who could provide meaningful information, and
, 2024 Novel Approach Designing Interview Protocols with Generative Large Language Models to Study Mental Models and Engineering DesignAbstractThis paper describes the use of AI to support the initial development of an interview protocoldesigned to elicit engineering students’ mental models of socio-ecological-technological systems(SETs) and how these models influence their design decisions. The protocol was created for astudy that addresses the need to prepare engineering students to design sustainable solutionssuitable for a world afflicted by climate change. Three frameworks informed the creation of theprotocol: (1) mental models theory, (2) theory of planned behavior, and (3) social-ecological
: They must decide which goals to prioritize because they simply do nothave the working memory to accomplish everything at once. In an assessment context, writingnatural language and codes are potentially even more similar: both are done in response to aprompt that sets out expectations for the text to be produced, are evaluated according to specificcriteria and, if the required text is sufficiently complex, students are likely to create plans forproduction that they then execute. Drawing from research on keystroke log analysis of naturallanguage writing, we ask the research question: how do task complexity and characteristics relateto student programming process and performance? Fairness is a central concern of this researchas well. To what
Seaperch programaligned with the department's interests, and a plan for collaboration was put forth.The county’s involvement occurred in two parts. 1. Develop a challenge that would be relevant to solving current environmental problems that are occurring in the same area where the campers live. 2. Assess success and provide support during the completed project demonstration.A presentation consisting of information pertaining to the challenge was developed by PWC. Itincluded information about the important roles freshwater mussels have in their environments,several engaging videos, an outline of our goal, and the parameters of the challenge. Informationwas provided at an accessible level and was engaging enough to have campers excited
pursuing graduate education was discussed in the interviews (Figure 4). When asked if they planned on pursuing graduate level education, nine participants indicated yes, one participant indicated that they were unsure, and one participant indicated that they were not interested in pursuing graduate education. When asked if they planned on pursuing future research opportunities, all eleven participants indicated that they would be pursuing more research opportunities in the future (Figure 4). When asked if the altREU program provided an accurate representation of the research process, all seven participants indicated that they felt the altREU program accurately represented research (Figure 4). This question was added during the
Paper ID #43816Development of an Innovation Corps-Modelled Bioengineering Course to PromoteEntrepreneurial Engagement Among Undergraduate StudentsAmanda Walls, University of ArkansasThomas Hudnall McGehee, University of Arkansas Thomas ”Hud” McGehee is an undergraduate student in the Department of Biomedical Engineering. While Hud’s primary research focus is on nanocomposite biomaterials for orthopedic applications, engineering education prevails as another area of interest. Hud plans to pursue higher education by utilizing his engineering background in his future career in veterinary medicine via research and development in
wassubmitted and awarded to enable the ESP to support additional students at FCC and enable themto take longer than the planned completion time of two years to finish their pre-transfer courses.The supplemental funding impact also extended to support scholars at the local four-yearuniversity, California State University-Fresno (CSU-F), where the majority of scholars transferred.DemographicsFCC is two-year, Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) and an Asian American and Native AmericanPacific Islander-Serving Institution (AANAPISI) located in Fresno, California. The city of Fresnois one of the most racially and ethnically diverse areas in California. Of the more than 500,000residents of Fresno, many face challenges of concentrated poverty [1], with 30.0
resources – programfunding, lab and classroom space, equipment, software, etc. New programs must also buildawareness and connections with the local community, industry, and government to attractstudents, offer meaningful learning experiences, and build job placement pipelines. In addition,they must ensure they conform with and enhance the educational mission of the colleges they arepart of. While this can impose limiting curricular constraints, it can also be seen as anopportunity to develop a unique educational product. In 2013, Saint Vincent College (a smallcollege with a strong liberal arts and sciences focus) initiated a four-year bachelor's degree inengineering science after several years of planning. In the decade since that time, the
financial burden for transfer students, as they must pay additionaltuition and expenses.Because transfer students comprise approximately half of the CPP student population, thisproject, BRIDGE (Bridging Institutions to Decrease Gaps in Engineering Education, 2023-2026)funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), focuses on success for engineering transferstudents from three partnering institutions: Mt. San Antonio College (Mt. SAC), Citrus College,and Victor Valley College, by establishing mutually beneficial collaborations and applying threeelements: recruitment activities, retention activities, and faculty development activities.Planned Major Activities for the BRIDGE ProjectThe BRIDGE project plans three primary categories of activities.1
usability of the modules. However, the students were very engaged and exceled. Theycontributed insightful ideas in discussions that shaped module content, worked well in theirinterdisciplinary teams to iteratively redesign modules based on feedback, refined learningobjectives, and contributed not only to their groups but to the class. Throughout the process,students learned about each other’s own research which is beneficial in growing one’s networkand establishing future collaborations.While there were many positives in the course, there were also areas of improvement whichcould be incorporated by anyone planning to include this structure in a course. In spring 2022,students were initially confused about how to begin; so, in fall 2023, we added
teaching.They were still developing their teaching approach as of fall 2023 and adopted most of theprovided curriculum into the early weeks of their intervention section, implementing theprovided worksheets with minimal modifications for the topics that aligned with their courseoutcomes. Work with the models constituted a significant fraction of classroom time for the firstthird of the quarter, implementing four activities in the first three weeks. Instructor A made someadjustments later in the term in response to student feedback regarding the amount of class timedevoted to activities, ultimately implementing two activities (out of three originally planned)over the middle five weeks of the term.Instructor A taught with the models again in winter 2024
respective engineering disciplines, and their interests in sustainability topicsto address the challenges. The three chosen project topics were: • Growing & Greening: Enriching the City of London Using Rooftop Gardens • Transit & Living for a Kind and Sustainable London • Sustainable Development in London Using Local Climate ZonesThe sustainability plans were developed as recommendations to the City of London and werepresented to the Directors in the Environment and Infrastructure Division, and Acting Mayor ofthe City of London. The learning experience demonstrated an opportunity for knowledgesharing, engagement with stakeholders, mentorship by experts, collaboration in teamenvironments, transdisciplinary thinking and
came prepared to discuss the module content,regardless of whether they overtly responded to the questions in the forum, it seemed to be areasonable decision to eliminate the “mandatory” nature of the forum post activity. This wasreinforced by participants’ feedback that indicated they saw these written posts as “make work”tasks.To better serve the needs of the GTA participants, the Nature of Learning module (T1M2) inthe original professor PD program was divided into two parts. Part A focused on lessonintroduction and the first 5 minutes whereas Part B emphasized lesson planning and creatingeffective learning outcomes. It should be noted that the concept of a lesson plan and a lessonplan template were provided in the program orientation session
aspects of project management new since the last paper, including methods used toencourage system integration, which is inherently multidisciplinary, and methods used to quicklybring new students up to speed. We also expand to discuss how second graders were engaged,including a detailed learning plan. An appendix goes into technical detail about an interestingcollaboration between a high school student and university students.Pervasive stereotypes portray engineering work as completely objective and technical, despitemany engineers operating in social, creative, and innovative spaces [2, 3]. Publications havehighlighted the value of integrating art and humanities into engineering education [4], althoughbringing these perspectives together is not
the “Knowledge” and “Value” elements allows usto emphasize students’ ability to identify and define valuable competencies, which is afoundational step toward later engaging students in developing mastery within thosecompetencies.Course DescriptionsEngineering 110: Design your Engineering Experience (ENGR 110), an elective course forfirst-year engineering students, exposes students to the competencies within the context ofdefining engineering as a field, guides students through identifying opportunities available at theUniversity of Michigan, and aims to develop self-authorship [21], [22]. The competenciesprovide a framework for intentionally exploring learning opportunities available at the Universityof Michigan as students create a plan for
within and across school districts. PD sessions includedtime for teachers to develop lesson plans, explore resources, and reflect on their learning.We used a mixed methods research design to investigate the impact of the PD program onteacher self-efficacy and classroom pedagogy with a focus on cultural relevance and engineeringdesign. Quantitative pre/post data was collected using three survey instruments: TeachingEngineering Self-Efficacy Scale (TESS), Culturally Responsive Teaching Self-Efficacy Scale(CRTSE), and Culturally Congruent Instruction Survey (CCIS). Qualitative data includedvideotaped classroom observations, individual teacher interviews after each design task, andteacher focus groups and written reflections during the summer and
-COVID). A rubric was created, adapting existing rubrics anddefinitions reported by Gin et al. [6] and Stanny et al. [7]. Syllabus elements (i.e., grading policy,general absence policy, general makeup work policy, office hours, instructor contactinformation, important course dates, instructor encourages student contact, general campusresources, grading rubrics, emergency planning, and mental health resources, Table 1) wereevaluated using direct coding [8]. The presence or absence of each syllabus element wasrecorded for all syllabi (i.e., pre-COVID and post-COVID). In addition, the presence ofsubstantial changes between the early and late syllabi were recorded. The syllabi were codedindependently using two coders, and discrepancies were resolved
their research, educational goals, and career. 4. Explore–through outside stakeholders and their own community–how their research discoveries and knowledge might be implemented for societal impact. 5. Gather examples of citizen science and its impact. 6. Create a plan to make their educational and career objectives be more use-inspired and impactful. 7. Explain the pathways to impact within their own field of study and research area and how their discoveries could lead to societal impact. 8. Manage psychological barriers and conceptual misunderstandings about innovation that prevent individuals from seeing themselves as inventors, innovators, and entrepreneurs.Class sessions were 50-minutes in length and met
consider marginalized communities and underrepresented groupsin the resilient infrastructure development processes associated with hazard risks. Enhancedequality has the potential to boost community adaptability and lessen the unequal allocation oflosses and damages resulting from extreme events.The concept of resilience has gained significant attention focusing on effectively managingdisruptions, challenges, and shocks within systems, particularly in disaster risk management [4].It involves the ability to plan for, absorb, recover from, and adapt to adverse events [5].However, communities of color and other marginalized and socially vulnerable groups frequentlylack the resources and expertise necessary to participate in risk mitigation, planning