distinct transformation categories. The studycorrelated these categories with the TROPOS subscales and examines demographic factors.Findings indicate higher TROPOS scores for first-generation students and female studentscompared to their peers.I. IntroductionThe perceptions and belief system of first year engineering students affects their self-efficacy,confidence, sense of belonging, satisfaction and other such constructs which are essential forshaping successful student experiences and outcomes. For example, Hutchison-Green [1] foundthat first year engineering students’ perception of their course success depended on their speed ofsolving problems and the amount of time taken to learn new material in comparison to theirpeers. Further, student
experienceIntroductionMany first-year engineering students at African universities are coming from high schools thatrely heavily on rote memorization practices. This can be exacerbated by the challenge ofinsufficient resources to engage students in more experiential approaches. The dominance ofstudents being directed to read and memorize for tests and examinations has been documentedas a common practice in contexts like South Africa [1], but it extends broadly across thecontinent. The authors see this as potentially leading to negatively affected self-perceptionsabout students’ ability to execute as innovators. If this is the case, the ramifications aresignificant, as technical skills and innovation are needed for the development and advancementof technology in
-generation college students, including those who areprimarily “students whose parents do not have any post-secondary education experience” [1] or“students whose parents have not received a bachelor’s degree” [2]. Although first-generationstudents make up about a third of the U.S. college population [3], they are less likely to beacademically prepared for college, have a prior understanding of the college experience, or knowabout college educational expectations from their parents [4]. To help first-generation studentspersist and graduate from college, institutional retention efforts and support services, includingFederal TRIO programs (Upward Bound, Talent Search, Student Support Services), have beenimplemented and used by many colleges. Despite
new ways to support first-year students and enhance retention. According tothe Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U), High-Impact Practices (HIPs)offer significant educational benefits, especially for historically underserved groups, bycultivating substantive relationships, promoting engagement across diverse perspectives,facilitating the application of acquired knowledge, and fostering reflective processes aimed atpersonal development [1]. Students involved in HIPs are more likely to experience positiveoutcomes like academic achievement, persistence, and attainment of goals that prepare a studentto live a rewarding life [2]. It is recommended to integrate HIPs into curriculum in alignmentwith course objectives and
increased integration of teamwork in engineering design education, there areless information on what, how, and when to successfully intervene in team activities to yieldbetter team performance. Psychological safety, which is a team construct established throughdeep interactions and conversations that facilitate how team members perceive their treatmentfrom team members, could possibly elevate the performance of engineering design teams [1].This initiative is a Work in Progress under the GIFTS category. The hypothesis is that a positiveteam experience with an emphasis on psychological safety can enhance a student's academicsense of belonging. Solidifying this tool is the first step to a multi-step research study.Project ApproachThe “Team Safety
Engineering at The Ohio State University. She is involved in the Department of Engineering Education as an Undergraduate Research Associate. Her research interests include sense of belonging in engineering.Sydney Cooper, The Ohio State University 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 GIFTS: Connecting DEI, STEM, and Character Strengths for First Year EngineersIntroduction and OverviewThe VIA Institute on Character identifies character strengths as are the parts of your personalitythat impact how you think, feel, and behave [1]. Many of these individual character strengths canbe found in engineering and STEM more broadly in which a survey was developed
belonging was not indicated as a significant predictor of second-year retention.Our study also noted a lack of significant difference between white students andunderrepresented minority students in terms of second-year retention. Our study underscores theneed for early academic interventions with respect to math placement and calls for further studyto examine the strength of motivating factors related to persistence.Introduction and BackgroundUniversities, particularly land-grant or other public institutions, are increasingly coming underpressure to demonstrate the value of an undergraduate education to society [1]. The escalatingcost of student loan debt and the perceived increased cost of an undergraduate degree haveintensified pressure on
early in their college careers, they have the time to strategically tailor their experiencesover the next 8+ semesters.During Semester 1, students learn from an industry representative who provides them withemployer insight into what makes a good job candidate for hire. Starting with “is engineeringright for me,” the students are given several metrics by which they can self-assess if engineeringis a good fit. Students then analyze a sample resume to determine what makes a strong resume,which leads into an analysis of how to tailor the next several years toward building a strongresume. Outside of class students create a resume and a 4-year+ plan (based on SMART goals),which are assessed by instructors. Finally, students participate in Mock
the University of South Carolina. Prior to becoming Faculty Director, he served for eight years as the faculty advisor for the USC Engineering and Computing Living and Learning Community. He has taught a variety of high-school and first-year introductory and professional development courses over the last two decades. Dr. Gatzke also leads a two-week Maymester study abroad trip to Germany covering energy topics. 15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE): Boston, Massachusetts Jul 28 WIP: Surprises Found in Student Stress and Academic Support Survey Rawle D. Sookwah1, Bob Petrulis2, and Edward P. Gatzke1* 1
are navigating whatit means to be in a university environment - to live and work more independently, whichchallenges growth in areas such as socialization, study habits, and time management. It is nosurprise that successful first year experience (FYE) programs also include a mixture of co-curricular activities ranging from academic support to community building, and personaldevelopment initiatives to facilitate students’ professional and personal growth [1].The purpose of this Work in Progress study is to validate a survey that will be used to investigatethe effects of social and navigational capital of first-year engineering students on three importantaspects of the entrepreneurial mindset (EM). This is done for two reasons: 1) construct
First-Year SeminarsIntroductionBeing a woman in engineering is associated with numerous visible and invisible challengesincluding a chilly climate, lack of support, and the absence of role models [1, 2]. Thesechallenges persist through every stage of a woman’s engineering career, starting from theireducational experiences, and extending well into their professional life, whether in industry or inacademia. In the most recent national survey by American Society of Engineering Education [3],women make up 25.5% of the enrollment and 24.1% of the degrees awarded in engineeringprograms. A chilly climate [4] is often thought to be contributing to the lack of engineeringidentity within women in engineering, resulting in lower persistence, interest, and
necessary as it ensuresstudents understand these principals early on. Recent pedagogical innovations also stress uponthis. Researchers like Cech [1] and Foor & Walden [2] have noted the disconnect betweentechnical training and social responsibility. The education system they propose may bridge thisdisparity. Cech [1] sees a culture of disengagement where technical skills are valued more thansocietal concerns, while Foor and Walden [2] cite resistance to diversity efforts, highlighting thenecessity for early and proactive DEIB involvement in education. These findings encourageestablishing a curriculum that is technically adept and ethically and socially aware. These ideas'practical applications, as reported by [3], [4], [5], [6], reflect our