GC 2012-5660: INAE ACTIVITIES FOR PROMOTING INTERNATIONALCOLLABORATION IN S&T AND INNOVATIONMs. Baldev Raj, Indian Society for Nondestructive Testing (GEEP) Page 17.28.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Nurturing Students for Next Generation Challenges Baldev RajPresident, Indian National Academy of Engineering, President, International Institute of welding, President- Research,PSG Institutions, Peelamedu, Coimbatore-641004 E-mail: baldev.dr@gmail.comNext generation challenges are to improve sustainability and equity.The
en- gineering college teachers and industry professionals, nationally and internationally. He is also in charge of the newly formed Teaching Learning Centre, arguably the first such centre among the institutes of higher technical education in the country. The Centre has organized programs which enhance the teach- ing learning process among the faculty and students of the Institute, like the Faculty Development and Teaching Assistant Training Programs. He is also Professor in Charge of the IIT Madras Heritage Centre and founder-convener of the IIT Madras Energy Forum.Prof. Pramod S. Mehta, Indian Institute of Technology Madras Professor Pramod S. Mehta is presently a senior professor in the Department of Mechanical
1 Page 17.29.2 CONTENTS OF PRESENTATION1. The Evolution of International Academic Collaboration in India2. Some Existing Academic Dialogues Between India and China3. International Collaborations with Asian Countries4. Some Successful Indian Bilateral Cooperation Initiatives – IIT Madras5. IIT Bombay -- Role of the Office of the Dean for International Relations 2 Page 17.29.36. The Nature and Scope of Collaboration7. “Global Partnerships: Drivers and Relationships” (Points from Prof C D Mote Jr ‟s Presentation)8. Curriculum , Pedagogy and Laboratory
skills of en- gineering graduates. Under Nagarjuna ’s leadership, Mission10X has so far reached out to over 19,000 faculty members in innovative methodologies from 1000+ engineering schools spread across India and has recently launched its second phase targeted by 2013 to reach out to 25,000 more faculty members, develop 250 academic leaders and deploy 2500 unified learning kits to bridge technology gap between industry and academia. Under Nagarjuna’s leadership Mission10X established many partnerships Most technical Universities in India have affiliated to Mission10X, International partners like Dale Carnegie, University of Cambridge, Harvard Business Publishing, Development Dimensions International. Nagarjuna holds
GC 2012-5643: DESIGN EDUCATIONS FOR STUDENTS AT MECHANI-CAL ENGINEERINGHaeseong J. Jee, Hongik University Haeseong J. Jee, Professor, Hongik University B. S. in Mechanical Engineering, Seoul Nat’l University in Korea Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering, MIT NIST in Gaithersburg, Maryland Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hongik University in Korea Page 17.14.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012DESIGN EDUCATIONS FOR STUDENTS AT MECHANICALENGINEERINGHaeseong J. Jee, Professor, Hongik UniversityB. S. in Mechanical Engineering, Seoul Nat‟l University in Korea Ph. D. in
PG Research Experimental Computer based- Nature of institution Research University Teaching institution Subject Areas Science and Arts and Commerce Technology Specialization Generalist Specialist Prosperity of Rich Poor Stakeholders Access to information Information haves Information have nots - Page 17.7.18EVOLUTION OF UNIVERSITY RESEARCH ANDINDUSTRIAL CONSULTANCY IN INDIA During the Early Years (70’s) ―Publish or Perish‖ Later Years (80’s) ―Publish and Consult; or Perish
presidentiste@gmail.com Abstract Technology has been changing very rapidly during the last few decades. Thisrapidity of change brings tremendous pressure on the educational system to identifywhat is basic and must be taught & learnt, and what needs to be imparted through selflearning or continuing education programs. The challenge for India is to build technicalskills into the mindboggling mass of working age professionals. It is clear therefore thatthe prospect of economic prosperity for India is critically predicated on the strengths ofIndia‟s technical education. Milton Freedman, a Nobel Prize winning economist observedthat, “the great untapped resource of technical and scientific knowledge available
of SEEM, Fellow of IETE. Revised ” A Text-Book of Electrical Technology-Transmission, Distribution and Utilisation”: Volume III by B.L.Theraja for M/s. S.Chand and Publication, New Delhi. Page 17.41.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 ROLE OF UNIVERSITIES IN INTERNATIONALCOLLABORATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION – FACULTY DEVELOPMENT Prof. Mohan Khedkar, Vice-Chancellor, Sant Gadge
GC 2012-5639: EFFECT OF WOMEN IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT OF FEMALE ENGINEERING STUDENTSDong Ik Kim, Kunsun UniversityProf. Myongsook Susan Oh, Hongik University Myongsook Oh is a professor of Chemical Engineering Department at Hongik University in Seoul. She obtained a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from the University of California at Berkeley, and Sc. D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Before joining Hongik University, Dr. Oh was associated with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) and Texaco, Inc in the U. S. Starting from her Sc. D. thesis on softening coal pyrolysis, she worked on the conversion of fossil fuels for over 30 years. She has continued working on the
role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner and A. L. Stevens (eds.), Mental models (pp. 75-98), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.4. Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, H. A., & Simon D. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317-345.5. Simon, H. A., & Simon, D. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In R. S. Siegler (ed.), Children’s thinking: What develops (pp. 325-348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.6. Gray, G. L., Costanzo, F., & Plesha, M. E. (2005). Problem solving in statics and dynamics: A proposal for a structured approach. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
. These can provide ideas of best practices that can belearned from these different institutions in different cultural contexts for other engineeringeducators across the world.AcknowledgementsS. M. Lord would like to thank all those at USD and SEU who made her sabbatical time at SEUin Spring 2012 possible. Page 17.9.11References[1] Unique features of USD’s Engineering Programs available at http://www.sandiego.edu/engineering/ Last Accessed 14 May 2012.[2] McKenzie, L. J., M. S. Trevisan, D. C. Davis, and S. W. Beyerlein, “Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study,” Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake
. Page 17.30.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION IN CURRICULUM AND LABORATORY DEVELOPMENT Dr. K. P. Isaac Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, India kpisaac@yahoo.comAbstract The aim of any country‟s higher education system is sustainable developmentand achieving higher growth rates. India aims to increase the higher educationenrolment rate from about 12 percent at present to 30 percent over a decade. Technicaleducation at all levels in India is witnessing a consistent growth by establishing newinstitutions, addition of courses and increase in seats
ElectronicsII. The longer semester in China did permit inclusion of some topics from Electronics II in thiscourse specifically feedback, active filters, and frequency response of transistors. Electronics Icovers diodes, OpAmps, transistors, transistor amplifiers, and multiple transistor circuitsincuding amplifiers, current sources, and differential amplifiers.The grading was done using the U.S. instructor‟s method of including homework (15%), twomidterm exams (20% each), a final exam (35%), and the laboratory (10%). In this university, thefinal exam supposed to be at least 60% of the final grade, there is only one midterm, andhomework counts for little. In the U.S., this laboratory is a part of the course and is usuallytaught by the same instructor. In
, Berkeley, CA. Wankat, P. C. and Oreovicz, F. S. (1993). Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc.References Burghardt, M. D. (1999). Introduction to Page 17.32.5
place at LSU followed by guidedfield trips to the campus research facilities. The instructional model described for the sustainablestructures challenge is applied to the bioreactor design challenge to meet the designed bioreactorsystems requirements of: 1) Characterize the organism(s) is/are used in the solution; 2) Explainthe rationale behind selecting this particular organism; 3) Describe the growth requirements ofthe organism(s) used in your solution; 4) Identify and explain those parts of the system providingthe necessary growth requirements; 5) Detail the characteristics of your technological system--the parts and how they work; 6) Provide an explanation of any/all mechanisms (sensors, etc,)used to monitor your system; and 7) Provide a
), 768- 772. 5. King, I. (1915). An inquiry into certain aspects of the study habits of university students. School and Society, 2(49), 824-828. 6. Bailey, M., Floersheim, R. B., & Ressler, S. J. (2002). Course assessment plan: A tool for integrated curriculum management. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(4), 425-434. 7. Hayes, R., Kotovsky, K., Kozbelt, A., & Weissman, A. (1999). Where does students’ time go? Center for Innovation in Learning at Carnegie Mellon, Research Brief, 1(2), 1-4. 8. Ressler, S. J., & Lenox, T. A. (1996). The time survey: A course development tool that works! Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition
and renowned professor in Academic circles in the coun- try and abroad. His academic record wise he has obtained B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) degree from Osmania University, Hyderabad, M.Tech from IIT Madras, and Ph.D from IIT, Delhi. Commencing his academic career in Research and Development as the Senior Scientific Officer in ARDE (DRDO), Pune from 1976-78, then moving onto the Post of Development Engineer of M/s Hyderabad Industries, Hyderabad from 1978-1980. His first stint in academic career began from 1980-86 when he took up the Faculty assignment in the year 1980 in Mechanical Engineering Department, Osmania University. Scaling up the academic ladder, Dr. Reddy got promoted as Professor in 1991. From 1991
methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases’, J. Enging. Educ., 95 (2006), 123-138.[3] Albanese, M. A., and Mitchell, S., ‘Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Page 17.15.10 its Outcomes and Implementation Issues’, Academic Medicine, Vol. 68, 1993, pp. 52– 81.[4] Malicky, D. M., Kohl, J. G., and Huang, J. M., ‘Integrating a machine shop class into the mechanical engineering curriculum: experiential and inductive learning’, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, vol 38 num 2, 2010, 135-146[5] Azevedo da Silveira, M., and Scavarda-do-Carmo, L.C., ‘Sequential and
. and named to describe the larger construct they refer to from In addition, these engineers are an international group. the student’s point of view. We compare and contrast theThey have traveled and/or studied abroad, and they are structures and characteristics of the engineering educationconnected to an international student group. As we use a system from the student perspective(s).qualitative approach in our work, we will not attempt togeneralize findings here but instead to generate hypotheses to The themes consolidated from the five cases in our sampletest in future follow-up work (see Future Work). are noted in the two results sections that follow. The first