of progressive pedagogical thinking, use of modern educational technologies, combining the best national traditions and international experience in training engineers; - improvement of the content of engineering education, attaining its humanization and professionalization, forming a high-level informational culture of the engineering education system, increasing the academic mobility of students to improve the quality of engineering education; - improvement of the system of retraining and professional development of the engineering education institutions faculty and engineering corps of the country, etc. [1].To achieve these objectives the AEER uses various mechanisms, namely, non
. Page 19.2.33.1 Detailed Schemes in the Research There are different and more numerous types of questions and answers betweenlearners and teaching staff in the distance learning environment. Fig.1 shows anexample of questions and answers (denoted Q/As) from learners (denoted S1 to S4) andteaching staff (denoted T), respectively. For instance, there may be a volley of answersfor Q3 if it is assumed to be of the highest priority at a certain time during the process oflectures/seminars. It is more effective to timely enhance dynamics between learners andteaching staff by making the usage of shared space mobile Q/A integration. It is alsopossible for any S to get an answer for each question uploaded if it can be found andmatched in the knowledge
program, student need to take course related programminganalyzed statistically. language. These courses are offered to student with further objectives: (1) Student must acquire fundamentalsThe proposed pedagogy incorporated hands on practice of programming languages (2) Student should have abilityin laboratories tailored with short theory sessions to learn software tools related to their discipline.(3)replacing conventional way of conducting theory sessions Student should have adequate skills of analyzingin classroom and practical sessions in laboratory requirement and developing engineering
environments, whichrequires global competency and ongoing, lifelong learning to better understandingengineering cultures around the world [1], [2]. Accreditation bodies and universitiesrecognize that the preparation of lifelong globally competent engineers begins during theundergraduate degree [3]. However, incorporating international experiences into a packedundergraduate curriculum in a meaningful but affordable manner is difficult for courseadministrators and instructors. Furthermore, little is known about the effectiveness ofexisting efforts. This paper addresses the need to better understand how course instructorscan effectively internationalize their learning materials in an engineering classroom.The course used as a qualitative case study in
isachieved by the synthesis of inverted, interactive, and international learning in networkedclassrooms on distributed campuses, while learning technologies are used strategically to enablethe new pedagogy to enrich the learning experiences and outcomes of all domestic andinternational students on local and remote campuses at multiple universities. Such a different, ifnot unique, pedagogy is developed based on three basic premises: (1) contextual understanding isbest achieved via direct engagements (as opposed to linear lecturing), hence the "inverted"learning, (2) what students learn depends on with whom they learn (instead of from whom theylearn), hence the "interactive" learning, and (3) diversity increases learning opportunity foreveryone, hence
leading to increasing strategic value of the application ofdesign in businesses (see Figure 1), the ‘Design Ladder’ model (DDC (2003)) highlights the value of design forcompetitiveness. Typically, companies’ design maturity, exhibited by their attitude towards design, is reflectedin how they integrate design thinking as part of their innovation process. In the first step of the ladder, design is anegligible part of their business. When design is applied as ‘style’, it is typically seen as an appearance attribute,relating to the final physical form of the product, which may be the responsibility of a designer or someone elsewithin the company. In the third step, design is not the result, but a method, which is integrated into the
engineering majors complete a studyabroad experience; engineering represents three percent of all US study abroad students whilecomputer science is at 1.5 percent.1 Notwithstanding the significant resources often needed topromote study abroad, there are several other factors that affect the ability of institutions topromote globalization outcomes for students. For example, several universities are revampingtheir core curriculum to include an emphasis on globalization while others are creatinginterdisciplinary courses with an international “thread” linking subject content from disciplinesas diverse as fine arts, social sciences, natural sciences, and economics.2
interdisciplinary activities and assess theentire program.The project will allow a number of results to be achieved: (1) the development of a combinedResearch-Academic undergraduate student exchange program, and (2) the interaction betweenboth institutions' faculty in academic and research domains. Project results will pave futureavenues of collaboration at the graduate level, and increase cultural awareness of studentsstudying abroad to the U.S. and Colombia. Page 19.9.2 BackgroundHigher education institutions are moving toward the internationalization of their campuses. Inthe U.S., universities are recognizing the
Institute was set onproviding humanitarian services for the destination through a leadership learning experience forthe undergraduate Michigan Tech students. As the Institute grew throughout the next few years,it was clear that additional project locations were necessary.Over the next years, the Pavlis Institute broadened its reach to countries such as Argentina, India,and, its most recent addition, Malta. The addition of each leadership practicum location“demonstrates the maturity and success of the Pavlis Institute.” 1 Each location brought aboutpolitical, authority, and educational challenges, all of which were embraced by the studentstraveling there. The learning outcomes of the Pavlis Institute were changed by the experiences inthe developed
period once they become employed.[9] Page 19.11.2 1 Strict requirements for students, faculty and educational programs; The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation is working towards standardization of basic requirements for education in Russia by providing Federal State Education Standards concerning educational programs, quality of education, faculty requirements, students’ evaluation methods and criteria, etc. All universities are obliged to get state accreditation and are advised to receive public
Ministry of Educationand Science of the Russian Federation were implemented during the last years in CTPD andFPD: 1) professional development programs at home universities (72 hours, the participantsbalancing work and study); 2) professional development programs at other universities (72hours, the participants leaving their home university for around 2 weeks); 3) professionaldevelopment programs at home universities (over 500 hours, the participants balancing work andstudy).All the three types of programs are run at Kazan National Research Technological University(KNRTU). Moreover, several all-Russian events have been hosted by KNRTU in the last years,including:- Meeting of Coordination Council on additional professional education of the
Engineering Education Association), and in the past served as First Vice President of IFEES (International Federation of Engineering Societies) Page 19.13.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Engineering for the Americas: Progress on the Action Plans of the Ministers of Science and Technology of the Organization of American StatesThe Organization of American States’ First Meeting of Ministers and HighAuthorities of Science and Technology, held in Lima, Peru in November of 2004,resulted in the Declaration of Lima [1], which pronounced that science,engineering
Regression, Experimental Design, Program Evaluation, and Survey Methods. Page 19.14.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Engineering Leadership Development Programs: Universities Respond to Critical Needs in the US and InternationallyIntroduction In a world where technological innovation continues to accelerate, engineers need tocontinuously evolve and improve, just like the new technology they are developing. The need forengineers to be effective leaders and
Caribbean.These are examined, and a summary of the state of engineering program accreditation in theregion will be presented.IntroductionEngineering program accreditation is the key to a global knowledge economy. Internationallyrecognized Engineering accreditation establishes programmatic and institutional optimizationthat provides quality assurance, internationally recognized standards, and a process ofcontinuous improvement. This would bring internationalization to academia, which would inturn build capacity, foster development, enable mobility and move the countries to globalcompetitiveness.The International Engineering Accreditation Alliance (IEA) [1] groups the agencies that havebecome signatories of the six international mutual recognition
Educational PartnershipIntroduction:Over the last three decades, the internet has accelerated interconnectedness. From thisinterconnectedness, the appearance of the “micro-multinational” or small to medium-sizedcompany that operates internationally has become a major contender. Given the highlyinternational level of economic activity now seen1, engineering graduates will likely be calledupon to navigate effectively in the global economy.In response to economic needs, post-secondary institutions have begun to address ways thatglobal competency can be integrated into engineering programs. Five educational methods thatcan be used to help develop global competency are listed below: 1. International enrolment refers to the traditional student
Faculty Development and International Collaborations Using Vertical Education Enhancement Model Stephen U. Egarievwe1,2 and Ralph B. James2 1 College of Engineering, Technology and Physical Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Normal, AL 35762, USA2 Nonproliferation and National Security Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USAAbstractThis paper presents the international collaboration and experiences of an effective facultydevelopment initiative based on a vertical education enhancement (VEE) model. The VEEfaculty development program was designed to effectively improve performance and moralthrough
Engineering Education’s (ASEE), Going theDistance report, 53.6% Hispanics, 61.4% Native Americans, 61.7% African Americans and 49%Female students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in this major.1 This translatesto an engineering workforce that comprise of about 6% Hispanics, 0.3% Native American, 4%African Americans and 13% females according to the latest National Science Foundation’sreport.2 With such high attrition rates among minorities and underrepresented groups, changingthe current engineering workforce’s diversity portfolio is of grave national importance andrequires a plethora of high impact approaches. In the aforementioned ASEE report, over 60strategies and best practices were proposed. High impact practices included first-year
American universitiesbrings a variety of benefits to those institutions including developing international ties, securingfinancial resources, adding diversity to the intellectual pool of students and fulfilling a shortageof engineering talent in the US [1]. However, competition for recruiting these students hasincreased in the past few years with Australia, the UK and Germany attracting a large number oftalented students [1]. Several approaches have been reported to ensure the number of internationalstudents on campuses does not decline [2], including collaborations, increased efforts inrecruitment, and commitment to new funding for marketing and program promotion [3]. These aregood strategies, however, according to Srivastava et al (2010) “there
, andGeotecnica Ambiental. They served as important ambassadors for the tour, able to show off theirsignificantly increased linguistic and cultural proficiency in Spanish/ in the Chilean way of life.As role models they could relate best to the younger SIEPers, advocate for Chile as a site oftechnology and culture and the site of choice for the younger students’ up-coming year abroad.SIEPers can choose between study abroad options in Spain, Mexico and Chile, and it is adifficult undertaking to steer them away from the always preferred Spain and open their mind-sets towards Latin America.xiiiAcademics: The Chile J-term students earned 1-4 URI Credits: 3 credits for CVE 323: Sustainable Solutions for Developing Communities – Using Paul Pollack’s 2008 book
. This involves shared education that happens across several university settings. Authorsin16 present ideal features for BOL to have a effective collaborative learning is to: (1) providetechnical and resources support, (2) get familiar with each system, (3) launch effective andsustained communication, (4) build mutual trust, and (5) get organized in all aspects of thecollaboration. In this type of collaboration using BOL can have various types of communications(a) Discussions with other instructors teaching classes in the program at two institutes involvedin the collaboration. (b) Lecturing or chatting with students in the class, may be from differentinstitutes. Communication in a BOL typically takes three forms: (i) communicating with
global environment. This evaluation process consists of monitoringthe development of the learning experience. Also, students need to evaluate the experience as a Page 19.22.5function of theory in combination with feelings by participating in a reflection session. Finally,feedback should be provided to the student to complement their reflection.To accomplish this goal, the following specific objectives have been defined: 1. Increase the incorporation of global-centric, real-life, meaningful research and professional development activities in the classroom. 2. Increase the preparation of STEM students to enter an interdisciplinary
with do-it-yourself (DIY) kits they could use at home alongside a neuroscience MOOC.2. Research questionsIn order to better understand the experiences of students who were sent at-home laboratory kitsto use alongside this MOOC, we ask four primary research questions:1. How can we characterize the ways in which students around the world use onlineresources with the at-home lab kits? What online behaviors can we identify for the students inthe treatment group when they are likely to be using the kits at home? For example, how muchtime do they spend online watching lab videos that demonstrate kit experiments?2. How is their use of the kits reflected in their online individual and collaborativebehaviors? What patterns of behaviors (e.g
for such educational programs and they are not subject toaccreditation anymore. Without any regulatory requirements or norms, due to such approach,many employers did their best to minimize their expenditures related to educating or retrainingtheir personnel. However, the problem of interaction with the labor market that has not beensolved by now to the necessary extent or with the necessary effect becomes more and morecritical. [1]The system of continuing professional education (hereinafter – “CPE”) was formed within theinstitutions of engineering education due to their own initiatives only: Late in 1990s – early in2000s educating economists and managers was considered to be of highest priority and mostdemanded in Russia. There were certain
, technical objects andprocessing procedures [1]. Therefore interest and taste for engineering are among successfactors in his professional activity. Mechanical aptitude, power of engineering observation,mechanical intelligence and spatial perception are professionally important qualities. However engineering activity is of creative nature. Real engineer should actindependently, creatively and with initiative in every field. Often engineers become teammanagers, therefore administrative abilities are also of great importance. Sense of responsibility is also necessary for professional engineers as wise utilizationof funds, equipment and manpower often depends on his work, abilities and self-discipline. At the university future
practices inengineering education in different EU-countries).Project ApproachIllustration of the SALEIE project’s main themes is shown in figure 1.Figure 1. SALEIE Project Workpackages and Main ThemesThe methodology that this project is following is to audit current practice, design new models, integratethe models into trial institutions, monitor and evaluate the trials and analyse, report and disseminatethe findings.As a first step questionnaire surveys have been developed, launched and the results have been analyzedfor an audit of the current situation and current practices in interest areas of this project. The surveyshave been designed to audit:• The skills required of graduates able to help industry to respond to the current global
“engineering elite” without boundariesand cross-country barriers. Different cultural background of engineers in a global world may,however, form unpredictable barriers to their cooperation within a transnational company or auniversity. On the other hand, cultural differences as a set of various “points of view” andapproaches can make a fruitful contribution to the development of engineering community [1].Professional growth of engineers is closely linked to the global challenges mankind faces today.In the XXI century, the mankind is facing a number of new challenges; their solution willdetermine the future progress and even survival. The “global agenda" today includes thefollowing issues: corruption, poverty, environmental pollution, human rights
situation exists for womenin underrepresented groups across all ranks in computer and information science. This meansthat the numbers of women professors in engineering from underrepresented groups are so smallin the U.S. (less than 1%), that most of them can be readily identified [1]. Increasing therepresentation of women and diversifying the field of engineering has become a nationalimperative, which is closely aligned to the United States’s ability to maintain its globalcompetitive edge [2], [3]. Initiatives that facilitate women’s access to mentoring relationshipsand research networks have proven successful in providing women engineers with the academiccapital necessary for career advancement [4]. Research demonstrates the direct
-leveltechnical equipment and adaptability with an innovative development vector. Large-scaleinnovation of the industry is largely determined by ensuring its production of highly skilledstaff, training quality of that should be responded with fast-changing demands of thedeveloping manufactures. In modern conditions, the main goal of the petrochemical industry enterprises is toimprove the quality of products, ensuring theirs competitiveness and as a result, theachievement of profit, which is the source of funds for the further development of enterprises[1]. During the transition from one stage of company development to another, there is anaccumulation of organizational problems. These problems may be the result of making wrongmanagement
develop solutions for real-worldissues. Despite involvement of some graduate students in international research, there remainsubsets of graduate students from underrepresented minority (URM) groups who have neitherbeen encouraged nor invited to participate in international projects. The Council of GraduateSchools’ 2013 publication, “Graduate Education for Global Career Pathways,” included papersthat encouraged graduate students to participate in global conferences as means to engage, andserves as the premise for our strategy to broaden participation of URM graduate students ininternational projects.1 The Graduate School at UMBC and the National Science Foundation’sPROMISE: Maryland’s Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP