Asee peer logo
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 39 in total
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Todd Mosher
Session 2302 Systematic Course Design at The Aerospace Institute Todd Mosher The Aerospace Corporation ABSTRACTA new course design methodology has been created to aid instructors at The Aerospace Institute,the education and training division of The Aerospace Corporation. This methodology’s heritageis an approach described in "The New Professor's Handbook" by Dr. Cliff Davidson and Dr. 1Susan Ambrose that
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
V. Coppola; K. Powell; D. Hyland; B. Cosgrove; A. Waas; A. Messiter; Joe G. Eisley
Session 3268University of Michigan’s Aerospace Engineering Curriculum 2000 ’ K. Powell, V. Coppola, J. Eisley, D. Hyland, A. Messiter, A. Waas and B. Cosgrove Abstract This paper summarizes a two-part curriculum reform that is well underway in the University of Michigan Aerospace Engineering Department. The first part of the reform was developed by a college-wide task force, and addressed the overall structure of the thirteen Bachelor’s of Science in Engineering (BSE) programs across the College, and the courses
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
T. Hannigan; James E. Simon; K. Koenig; G. Cruse; K. Poh
Session 2259 Flowfield Mapping and Cooling Fan Flowrate Measurement Systems Development by Aerospace Engineering Laboratory Students T. Hannigan, J. Simmons, K. Koenig, G. Cruse, K. Poh Mississippi State University/USDA, Agricultural Research ServiceGraduate and undergraduate students actively participated in a successful research project for aUnited States Department of Agriculture laboratory to monitor ventilation air flow in largepoultry houses. Aerospace engineering laboratory students, graduate assistants, and facultyassisted in determining the flow rate through a stock cooling fan enclosure, evaluated
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
John Valasek
Session 2502 A Safe, Responsible, and Accountable Approach to Teaching Airplane Design John Valasek Western Michigan UniversityPapers relating to the teaching of capstone aircraft design courses typically focus on eitherpedagogy1 (suggested topics and tools) or on how aircraft design should be incorporated into theoverall aerospace engineering curriculum 2-4. This paper proposes that the topics of flight safetyand professional responsibility and accountability be given increased emphasis in existingaircraft design courses. The
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Walter S. Lund; Trudy L. Schwartz; Lee D. Peterson; Lawrence E. Carlson
IntegratedTeaching and Learning Laboratory. He received his B.S. degree in mechanical engineering at the Universityof Wisconsin at Madison, and his M.S. and D.Eng. (1971) in mechanical engineering from the University ofCalifornia at Berkeley.LEE D. PETERSON is Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering Sciences and Technical Director of theIntegrated Teaching and Learning Laboratory. He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. (1987) in Aeronauticsand Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.WALTER S. LUND is Senior Design Engineer in the Aerospace Engineering Sciences department. Hereceived his B.S. degree from Worcester Polytechnic Institute and his M.S. (1971) from the University ofConnecticut, both in electrical engineering.TRUDY L
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Charles N. Eastlake; Alfred L. Stanley
Session 2502 Establishing a Computer-Aided Manufacturing System to Extend the Capability of Traditional Aircraft and Spacecraft Design Courses Charles N. Eastlake, Alfred L. Stanley Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityThe Aerospace Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’sDaytona Beach, FL, campus has just completed the initial implementation of a ComputerAided Manufacturing (CAM) system within its long established capstone aircraft andspacecraft design course sequences. This paper details the development process whichwe went through in order to establish that capability.1. Why do we need it
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
V.J. Deleveaux; C.O. Ruud
” workshop sponsored by the Penn State University, forthe National Coalition for Manufacturing Leadership, the consensus opinion of the industryparticipants seconded that two of the major skills in which engineering graduates were weak areinterpersonal and communication [NCML,1996]Consequently, the Penn State Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (I & ME) departmenthas designed a Capstone course to address these weakness. The Capstone course began in theSpring of 1994 as a joint effort between Industrial and Aerospace Engineering to design andmanufacture a full size sail plane. By the fall of 1995 the course had expanded to 10 projects; allof which were inter-disciplinary. Examples of projects include: design and fabrication of semi-automated
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Thomas W. Graver; Leon F. McGinnis; David W. Rosen
used by leading edge companies in a variety ofindustries, including automotive, aerospace, telecommunication, industrial machinery, andmedical devices.Companies that are potential adopters of RPM and students who may need to work with RPMshare a need for information and education that enables and advances RPM deployment. RPM isone of the fastest growing areas of manufacturing technology today. RPM holds the promise ofsaving both time and money in bringing new products to market. Other key technologies,including data handling, global networking, CAD, CAM, CAE, CNC machining, investmentcasting, RTV molding and virtual prototyping, all come together around RPM. But only a fewcompanies are reaping the full benefits of the RPM and its associated
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
David A. Lopez
Business Administration from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. He has workedfor professionally: Rockwell International, Hughes Aerospace, and the Boeing Commercial AirplaneCompany. He is a registered professional engineer in California. Page 2.335.5
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Young Je Yoo; Tae Yu Kim; Ki-Jun Lee; Byung Gee Lee
. Machines and our life -aerospace engineering -mechanical engineering -shipment and ocean engineering6. Architecture and construction -architecture -civil engineering7.Energy -overview of energy -fossil energy -atomic energy -electric energy -energy in 21th century The text was finally prepared after many revisions during the writing, we had a chance todiscuss on engineering and technology with the high school students. This discussiongave us the ideas on how to teach engineering and technology to non-engineering majorstudents.Lectures First course was open for Fall Semester, 1994. 90 students were enrolled from liberalarts, social science, natural science, agriculture technology, teachers
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Jerry W. Samples
their home institution. Applicants were selectedbased on the materials submitted along with an over arching goal of recruiting a faculty groupdiverse in engineering disciplines, type of educational institution, gender, and race.The program was designed primarily for junior faculty and as such 14 out of the 24 participantshad less than 2 years of teaching experience, 8 had 3-4 years, 1 had 5 years, and 1 had 9 years. Ofthe 24 participants, 11 were women and 2 were members of typically underrepresented groups.There were 8 civil, 3 mechanical and aerospace, 3 industrial, and 4 general engineering faculty inattendance as well as single representation from electrical, metallurgical, plastics, geological,naval architecture, and chemical engineering
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Duane Brown; Dennis Krumwiede; Jerome P. Lavelle
, RockwellInternational, Ball Aerospace and Vaisila OY. He is Ph.D. candidate in the Industrial and Manufacturing SystemsEngineering Department at Kansas State University. Mr. Krumwiede teaches in the Management Department at KSUin the areas of POM and TQM. His research interests are with the international community of businesses in the areasof engineering management and operations management. Page 2.66.5DUANE BROWN is a PhD candidate in the Statistics department at Kansas State University.
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Charles U. Okonkwo
engineering technology at a time whenincreasing governmental regulations dictate that businesses must adopt environmentallyresponsible practices. Employers require engineering and technology professionals who areknowledgeable in the applications of environmentally safe design and manufacturing processes.Authors such as McCright and Bergmiller(1), Wells(2), believe there is a need for manufacturingengineers trained in product quality, environmental protection and conservation. Wells (3)shares the opinion that environmentally safe manufacturing is cost effective in the long run. Wehave designed the following six courses to prepare students to work in industries including, butnot limited to semiconductor, aerospace, automotive air-bag, environmental
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
N. Yu; Peter K. Liaw
Session 1245 Ceramic Matrix Composites: Combined Materials and Mechanics Curricula P. K. Liaw1 and N. Yu21Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville,Tennessee 37996-2200, and 2Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering andEngineering Science, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-2030INTRODUCTION The research in ceramic-matrix composites is of industrial and national importance. Forexample, continuous fiber reinforced ceramic composites (CFCCs) have been successfullyfabricated by chemical vapor infiltration techniques at the Oak Ridge National
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Ratan Kumar; Phillip R. Foster; George W. Watt
. Concurrent practices overcome thesedifficulties.At the ASEE 1996 College Industry Education Conference1 the Aerospace Industry identifiedthree disturbing shortcomings common among new engineering hires which are summarizedbelow: (1) New hires require excessively long apprenticeships (3-5 years) before becoming productive. (2) Few engineering graduates know how to work in groups or how to manufacture anything. Even fewer understand the process of large-scale, complex system integration that is so common in industry. (3) Often the students with the highest GPAs are those that are least prepared to work cooperatively in teams to engineer and integrate complex systems
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Edward Pines
of Industrial Engineering at New Mexico StateUniversity where he teaches and conducts research in quality, large-scale systems, and ergonomics. He has over tenyears industry experience as an industrial engineer, systems analyst, and project manager in the aerospace andcomputer manufacturing industries. He earned his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State University in1994.AcknowledgmentsThe support of the Advanced Research Projects Agency, the National Science Foundation, and the Department ofEnergy through Technology Reinvestment Project 04AL98816 is gratefully acknowledged.I would like to thank Diane Lise Hendrix, Brian K. Lambert, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments onan earlier version of this paper
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Jerry W. Samples; Robert Martinazzi
”, ASEE Prism, Vol. 5, Number 1, Washington, D.C., September1995.ROBERT MARTINAZZI is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University ofPittsburgh at Johnstown. B.S. Aerospace Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, M.S. MechanicalEngineering from Carnegie Mellon University. Registered professional engineer. Interest include engineeringeconomics, management and leadership development. Worked as project engineer for Armstrong World Industries,does engineering management consulting work and presents seminars on personal and corporate effectiveness andleadership.JERRY W. SAMPLES is Professor of Engineering and Director of Engineering Technology at the University ofPittsburgh at Johnstown. He holds a BS ChE from
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Sohi Rastegar; Gerard L. Coté
is activity in biomedicaloptics and their feedback requested. The results of student surveys and evaluations willbe assessed by the Advisory Board. The Advisory Board will meet prior to Fall '97 toreview the course notes, the results of student surveys and evaluations, and give theirguidance before embarking on the second years' teaching effort. Page 2.74.6BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATIONSOHI RASTEGARDr. Rastegar received the BS degree in 1980, the MS degree in 1982 in aerospace engineering, and thePh.D. degree in 1987 in biomedical engineering from the U of Texas, Austin. He is currently an AssociateProfessor with the Bioengineering Program at Texas A&M
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Willie E. (Skip) Rochefort; William F. Reiter; Milo D. Koretsky
Centennial Conference, J. Engineering Education, p. 26 (January, 1994).5) Hollister,W. M., E. F. Crawley, and A. R. Amir, "Unified Engineering: A Twenty Year Experiment in Sophomore Aerospace Education at MIT," J. Eng. Educ., p.13 (January, 1995)6) McMasters, J.H. and J.D. Lange, "Enhancing Engineering and Manufacturing Education: Industry Needs, Industry Roles," ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Anaheim, CA, June 25-28, 1995 Session 25027) Todd, R.H., C.D. Sorensen, and S.P. Magleby,"Designing a Senior Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers," J. Engineering Education, p.92-100 (April, 1993)BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATIONMILO D. KORETSKY Assistant Professor of Chemical EngineeringOregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-2702 email
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Patrick L. Walter
this program was graduated in 1996. This paper describes howinstrumentation or measurements system design is providing a general engineering focus forthe two semester Capstone sequence. Specifically, the first senior class’s design, prototyping,testing, and environmental qualification of telemetry compatible flight hardware to measurerocket engine performance and loads delivered to a flight payload are described. This flighthardware was comprised of a piezoelectric accelerometer, charge amplifier, strain gagepressure transducer, and dc amplifier/power supply all manufactured within TCU. A Requestfor Proposal (RFP) containing fifty-six (56) aerospace specifications was presented to andsatisfied by the students. A written proposal response and
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Ronald Matusiak; David Andruczyk; D. Steven Barker; Stephanie Goldberg; Ilya Grinberg
systems engineering.D. STEVEN BARKER graduated from University of Wyoming with an MS in Physics and a Ph. D. in ElectricalEngineering. His has 10 years of experience in the aerospace industry and 11 years in academia. Currently he is anassistant professor of Engineering Technology at the State University of New York College at Buffalo. His interestsare in industrial controls and automation. He is a member of IEEE.STEPHANIE GOLDBERG graduated from the University of Buffalo with MS and Ph.D in Electrical and ComputerEngineering. She has 10 years of industrial experience in the area of defense electronics and 6 years of teachingundergraduate courses in electronics and digital circuits. Currently she is a faculty member at the State University ofNew
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Richard Gilbert; Andrew M. Hoff
process unit operations as visual icons, associating sequences of these icons with material electrical properties, and finally developing a set of detailed but general process behavioral models which could be commonly used in microdevice fabrication. INTRODUCTION A universal character of high technology business is the magnitude of the initialinvestment in process facilities and personnel. Aerospace and biomedical instrumentationare two examples of technology based industries that require major capital investment andan extensive interdisciplinary workforce. Microelectronic manufacturing is poised to makea major impact upon the world market over the next ten years. The integrated
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Andrew Grossfield
during the day, designingcircuitry for aerospace/avionics companies. As a Graduate Associate, pursuing a doctoral degreeat the University of Arizona, he found himself in the odd position of both teaching calculuscourses and taking courses in applied mathematics. Being caught in the middle made him acutelyaware of the differences in mathematics, as viewed by the mathematician, as needed and used bythe engineer and as presented to the student. He is licensed in New York as a ProfessionalEngineer and is a member of ASEE, IEEE, and SIAM. His e-mail address isai207@freenet.buffalo.edu Page 2.493.5
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Roland Jenison; Rebecca Sidler Kellogg
Session 2438 Utilizing Reverse Engineering to Explore the Design Process Rebecca Sidler Kellogg, Roland Jenison Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Iowa State University AbstractFaculty at Iowa State University (ISU) have used the process of reverse engineering for the pastfive years to introduce lower division students to product design principles. This paper discussesthe use of reverse engineering as a hands-on activity in the Engineering Design Graphics (ENGR170) course. This activity was initiated with
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Robert George; Allen Soyster; John Lamancusa
semesters, 65 projects have been completed. Over 300students have been involved from Mechanical, Industrial, Electrical, Aerospace, and ChemicalEngineering departments.In this paper, the reader will be provided with viewpoints on industry-based projects from threedifferent perspectives: an industry person who supplies projects and wants to hire qualifiedengineers, a professor who teaches the course, and the department head who supervises theprocess. Page 2.233.2 2II. Industry Perspective:A. OverviewWhy does industry want to participate in the education of
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Hussein Anis
topics of fluid mechanics-field theory, possibly usable by other fields(elasticity, electromagnetics, hydraulics,...). The developed product is usable by individual Page 2.143.7students for education/training support and by instructors as teaching/lecture support aid.Detailed objectives are : to select topics that can be widely used by other departments. For example the set of topicsfalling within the framework of the field theory currently in use are: Fluid and Aero Mechanicscourses at the Departments of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanical Power Engineering,Electromagnetic courses at the Electrical & Electronics Engineering Departments
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Kenneth Belanus; John Hartin
Technology program at the University ofPittsburgh at Johnstown. Prior to obtaining his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Oregon State University, healso taught in the MET program at Oregon Institute of Technology. He received his M.S. degree in MechanicalEngineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from theUniversity of Cincinnati. His industrial experience includes analysis and test in the aerospace industry, and hisrecent efforts have focused on developing experimental capabilities in the engineering technology laboratory.Kenneth Belanus is an associate professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department at OklahomaState University where he teaches courses in mechanics, design, and
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Jawaharlal Mariappan
cross-platform skills and knowledge.These courses are heavily laboratory and project oriented. However, there are no establishedprocedures or standards for a mechatronics laboratory, which is essential for the success ofmechatronics courses. This paper presents various issues associated with development of amechatronic laboratory, the experiments and projects that have been designed and the GMIexperience.INTRODUCTION Mechatronics is a term that represents the synergistic integration of Mechanical, controlengineering and electronics, and intelligent computer control of products. Examples ofmechatronic products can be found in all sectors of engineering including automotive, machinetool, and aerospace industries, consumer electronics and
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Il-Hong Jung; Hosoon Ku; D. L. Evans
years. He is currently Ph.D. candidate in Electrical Engineering at Arizona State University. His interests are inComputer Communication, Network Management, and Multimedia Communication Systems.DON L. EVANS is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education and a Professor ofEngineering in the Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Department at Arizona State University. He completed hisBS (’62) at the University of Cincinnati, and Ph.D. (’67) at Northwestern University in Mechanical Engineering.Since then he has taught a wide variety of courses in Engineering at Arizona State University. He is an activemember of ASEE, and has served as Division Chair, Program Chair, and Executive Committee Member in theFreshmen Program
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Stephanie L. Blaisdell; Mary Anderson-Rowland
school outreach program and conveying the message that women are welcome and wantedin engineering at ASU.WISE-Up, to the choices for women in engineering and technology, has been a recruiting staplefor the WISE Program since it's inception in 1993. Over 200 high school girls and teachers haveparticipated in WISE-Up, 35% of which have been minorities. In the past, WISE-Up hasconsisted of three days of hands-on engineering labs, similar to the TEAMS format describedabove. Two sessions of WISE-Up, accommodating up to 50 girls in each, are offered eachsummer. The WISE-Up labs are modified or new each year to accommodate repeat-participants.In the past, labs have included Aerospace Engineering, Bioengineering, Computer Science,Construction Management