Paper ID #11011Orienting Engineering Ethics in terms of China: Curricula Shortcomingsand Case Studies on ChinaDr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, The University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute, ShanghaiJiao Tong University Rockwell F. Clancy is a lecturer at the University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong Joint Institute, Shang- hai Jiao Tong University. His research and teaching interests include applied ethics, political philosophy, and science, technology, and society studies. Rockwell completed his PhD at Purdue University, West Lafayette, MA at the Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium, and BA at Fordham
, and engineering,(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data,(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams,(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems,(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,(g) an ability to communicate effectively,(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global & societal context,(i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, lifelong
curiosity anddesire for continuous learning and an appreciation of globalization, ethical responsibility anddiversity.The challenge that many educators have faced is how to teach students many of the professionalskills. The traditional classroom setting may not easily lend itself to effective training ofoutcomes such as life-long learning, ethical and professional responsibility, or understanding theglobal context of engineering solutions. Therefore, it becomes necessary to look beyond theclassroom for the means to adequately prepare future graduates. Students develop theirknowledge and skill over time, and it is the cumulative result of the curricular path they follow(i.e. the courses they take), the pedagogies employed by their instructors, and
trying tofacilitate innovation in their employees, but students are not learning how to be creative in arapidly changing world 1. For solving this problem it is necessary to project the integrativeeducational system (cluster) for training creatively thinking students.For this objective an innovative educational model, new methodology and technology, newthinking, and higher level of consciousness become necessary. Models of contemporaryengineering education and activity must be based on general models which take intoconsideration the unity of the world in its complex connections, and ecological, ethical,aesthetical principles. In the process of developing the model an attention was focused on thefundamentalization of education, which is based
diversity and the role of leadership.Bhattacharyya1 proposes that civil engineers deal with the public and relate to people as apolitical body thus the use of the term civil. Bhattacharyya1 states that civil engineers havedeveloped the greatest cities in the world and that they must be aware of the different cultures.Bhattacharyya1 also emphasizes the role of ethics as a means to promote public welfare.The issue of ethics is of a great importance to engineers and constructors and it is even a biggerof a challenge to those who wish to be involved in international projects. This is becauseethically acceptable behavior can mean different things in different cultures. Furthermore, evenwhen people agree that a certain behavior may be construed as
Outcomes3 (The rating scale is 1=poor, 3=acceptable, to 5=excellent) Desired Accreditation Outcome On-Campus Off-Campus Multidisciplinary team and topic 2.91 4.14 Evidence of ability to engage in life-long 2.99 4.14 learning Understand impact of engineering on society 2.45 3.33 Knowledge of contemporary issues 3.06 3.68 Understanding of professional and ethical 2.17 2.79 responsibility Figure 1 illustrates that overall project quality for global projects significantly exceeds that for on-campus
Storytelling as an Effective Mean for Stimulating Students' Passion in Engineering ClassesAbstractStorytelling was employed as a powerful tool in stimulating students' interest in the classroom ofa sophomore level course in engineering design. Over two years, students’ assessment of themethodology was obtained through a survey that incorporated students that have and not havetaken the course. The outcome of students’ satisfaction and support of telling stories by theinstructor was overwhelming among both groups of students. The impact was not targetedtowards just creating passion in the classroom, but the active participation and reflection on thestories was sought to lead to ethical values pedagogy. To gain multi-cultural
—11 Famous Bb Week 12 Envelopes & Ethics CO2 and TP—12 Finance Bb due Week 13 The Present 13 SoE Assessment Bb due Week 14 No class 14 Light Bb due Week 15* The Future Reflective Paper Two* due— and Bb tbaFigure 1. Fall 2013 syllabus extract for ENGR 160. Weeks and/or topics discussed in this article are denoted with an asterisk.CommunityEngineering students are part of both their immediate community, i.e., peers and campuspersonnel, and the wider community of practitioners. Literature reveals that connectionto peers is a strong indicator of student persistence and retention7. Linkage to a localgroup, i.e., a benefit of a small school experience, is
ethical and responsible research.3.2 MethodsNanoJapan participants in Summers 2012 and 2013 and RQI REU students in Summer 2013completed pre- and post-program assessments using the Georgia Institute of TechnologyInternational Internship (GITII) survey, a valid and reliable instrument developed to assess students’general knowledge, abilities, and skills related to technical internships. The instrument wasdeveloped by the Georgia Tech Office of Assessment and uses an externally validated General Self-Efficacy Scale to assess an individual’s ability to cope with stressful life events.30 We selected thisinstrument as one of the assessment tools for NanoJapan because it is specific to technicalinternships and allows comparison with a referent group of
grouped into eleven subcategories see Table 1. below: Sorted Reported concept learned responses percent Cultural differences 33 52% German manufacturing methods 30 47% Technology and innovation 20 31% Living and working - Transportation 18 28% Time management - work ethic 14 22% Relationships and communication 14 22% Table 1. Sorted responses to open-ended question on concepts
31% to a B+ (89%). In the mid-semester evaluations for the Spring 2014course, 98% of students noted that working in a group has contributed to their understanding ofthe course material. Engineers in the workforce are constantly working with others on variousprojects. Another student explains that working in a group motivates students to stay on top oftheir work load as well as encourages them to produce higher quality work. This student states,“Working in a group allows me to work harder to guarantee that I do not let my partners down.”This accountability not only improves the students’ work ethic but also improves the way theyinteract with their peers. By exposing teamwork early in student engineering development theygain a sense of
consideration to “economic, environmental, social,political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability” aspects. Today’sengineer must possess more than just what has been traditionally considered technical skills andmust do more than just problem solving. He/she must be able to use creative thinking andinnovative design principles, while grasping importance of changing technologies. Moreover,working within multidisciplinary teams of other industry professionals and communicatingeffectively across all disciplines is of paramount importance 2.Involvement and, for some, leadership roles in “real world” projects that “balance technicalsolutions with social, cultural, environmental, economic, and sustainability concerns, in
management was a huge success, with exceptionally high-levelspeakers including Ministers from Egypt and Iraq, and the Advisor to the King of Jordan, topmanagement from Arab Contractors League and other prominent individuals. It is easy to seehow a student is impacted when he/she hears directly from the person making policies that affectan entire country or organizations so large that they affect an entire region of the world. Inexposing Bradley students to these experiences, the author has enriched their cultural andprofessional knowledge and directly addressed at least three program outcomes (understandingof professional and ethical responsibility, broad education in a global context, and contemporaryissues) listed in ABET’s Criterion 3.3.3 Impact
agreement from perspectives such as ethics, sustainable development, work environment, economy and usefulness. It is also a learning objective that the students should be able to evaluate and analyze their own abilities and competencies regarding working in an intercultural and distributed project, as well as develop strategies that lead to lifelong learning. The focus on competencies suitable for a global engineer is thus more explicit than in the Runestone course. Page 20.24.5