Conference Session

Automation Subjects in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. With theconclusion of the project, each team needs to deliver a working product. Members also need toassess their peers’ work through peer review.Each progress reports are 12% of the project grade adding up to 60% of the overall project grade.Final report, presentation, and successful demonstration are worth 30%. Peer review is theremaining 10% of the grade. 10% extra credit is added to the grade if teams choose to use CADin the design process or utilize additional means not mentioned within the objective section ofthis assignment sheet. Page 22.558.4Student teams conduct relevant fixed-goal laboratories and homework assignments to

Conference Session

Incorporating Innovative Technologies into the Curriculum

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wayne P. Hung, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. Thetimely feedback also allowed instructors to adjust and find a more effective teaching method.Lantz 15 highlighted the benefit of Clickers when students have to generate an answer withoutbeing judged by peers, therefore, promoting memory though "generation effect." Keller et al 4survey more than 10,000 students in 94 lecture sessions. They suggested the maximum Clickerbenefit could be achieved if 3-4 questions were given per quiz in practically every lecture (90-100%). Both students and instructors agreed that it would be best to let students discuss during aquiz to foster interaction and improve learning. Kay and LeSage 3 summarized benefits andchallenges of using Clickers in Table 1 in which numerous advantages of how Clickers change apassive

Conference Session

Manufacturing Process Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Denny Choate, Cannon County High School; Kenan Hatipoglu, Tennessee Technological University; Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; Mohamed Abdelrahman, Texas A&M University, Kingsville

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

and create a presentation of the plan to peers and mentors by the end of first week.Weeks 2 – 6: Research Study  Conduct the research study according to plans developed in Week 1.  Meet once per week with the full group to review progress with peers.  Meet twice per week within subgroups working on related research questions.  Document changes in research plans as needed. Initiate and document plans for development of curriculum learning module in consultation with mentor and engineering research and development consultants. Page 22.1250.4Curriculum Learning Module Implementation:During the summer RET

Conference Session

State of Manufacturing Engineering Education

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Wosczyna-Birch, CT College of Technology and the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing; Wesley Francillon; Robert W. Simoneau, Keene State College

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

collaboration, communication, informed decision making, and design of investigationsperform higher in both educational as well as the workforce than peers who have not had a LBDexperience11. As a result, Koldner et al. advocates deliberate reflective practice of targeted skills,such as learning in the context of doing that includes monitoring one’s doing and learning andone’s experience of learning, coupled with frequent, timely, and interpretable feedback. (note:Deliberate, in this instance, means that the skills are practiced in a context that promoteslearning; reflective means that their practice is discussed and lessons drawn out from thatdiscussion12). Figure 2 below summarizes the Learning by Design model