Tools: MS Word, Email, WWWJuniorYear ME 302 – Fluid Mechanics ME 371 – Machine Design I Laboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 pages each) Short Technical Reporting Brief narrative of procedure, measured data, Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4- deduced and analyzed data, plotted results with 6 pp. Individual); Technical discussion and conclusions. Analysis, Economic Analysis, Recommendation for Action Tools: EES.Powerpoint ME 391
AC 2011-1023: INNOVATIVE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN NANOENGI-NEERINGAjit D. Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Ajit D. Kelkar is a Professor and Chairman of Nanoengineering department at Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering at North Carolina A&T State University. He also serves as an As- sociate Director for the Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures and is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro. For the past twenty five years he has been working in the area of performance evaluation and modeling of poly- meric composites and ceramic matrix composites. He has worked with several federal laboratories in the
implementation of teaching/learning at the college level; e.g. be knowledgeable of key organizations supporting engineering instruction like ASEE and ABET, general publications in education, and instructional resources; e.g. Ohio State Center for Advancement of Teaching (formerly Office for Faculty and TA Development).Obj. 2 - Students will be aware of the curriculum issues related to engineering education specifically; e.g. accreditation requirements, laboratory development and design instruction.Obj. 3 - Students will be able to recognize the options for types of instructional approaches to engineering materials and have understanding of their appropriate application.Obj. 4 - Students will be able to implement
having the student as first author on the journal paper. If the student writes some, but the faculty member is responsible for the majority of writing and editing, include the student as a corresponding author. Attend industry, professional organization, and other meetings that may help identify potential research topics and partners – Many professional engineers working in the industry have great research ideas and interest but limited time to write proposals and conduct research. Consider working with these engineers as consultants on these potential research projects. Work to acquire the needed laboratory materials and equipment to be successful in your research area
training was part of the TAs employment contract for all new TAs and isoffered during the first months of the fall and winter term.Program Development and Core ModulesThe program was developed iteratively with several meetings between faculty members,academic growth professionals, and graduate students. The diverse group from variousdisciplines helped identify core areas specific to APSC that needed to be addressed. These corecompetencies have come to include: 1. Understanding of the TA instructor relationship. 2. Understanding of the TA student relationship. 3. Fair, efficient and effective marking strategies. 4. Effective Laboratory\Tutorial development, presentations and time management skills. 5. Professional expectations and
Option 2 Homework 10% Homework 10% Laboratory 30% Laboratory 30% Exams (5) 60% Exams (4) 30% Final Exam 30%students to copy displayed figures or procedures. For difficult concepts or higher levels ofcognition—analysis, evaluation, or design—gaps are left on the handout (hence the name) toallow open investigation rather than “spoon-feeding” of information. 9From the workshop’s comparison of the diverse learning styles, the author implemented anadditional assessment option for global learners. Understanding that “global” learners absorbinformation more randomly 7 and need the
, economic andpolitical influences; product design; manufacturing; sustainability; application of current eco-friendly product design models; various research topics; studio and laboratory experiences;project and presentation. Page 22.945.4Course Objectives.Learners will understand the diverse nature and importance of sustainability concepts.Learners will develop the ability to think critically.Learners will analyze technical, technological, and design problems within social andenvironmental contexts.Learners will make economically, environmentally, and socially sound decisions.Learners will apply the technological knowledge, skills, attitudes, and
challenge and encourage learning in today’s effective teaching programs.“Differentiated instruction, often referred to as universal design, is a teaching and learningstyle that is the result of neuroscience research on how the human brain processes and retainsnew information”. 1Introduction“Acknowledging that students learn at different speeds and that they differ in their ability tothink abstractly or understand complex ideas is like acknowledging that students at any givenage aren’t all the same height: It is not a statement of worth, but of reality”.2 In adifferentiated classroom and laboratory, the teacher proactively plans and carries out variedapproaches to content, process, and product in anticipation and response to student differencesin
to highlight successes within the department. Chairs are to rethink performance rewards18. c. The College-wide Spring Forum focused on teaching effectiveness. d. The College of Engineering Professor of the Year Award will highlight the integration of teaching and research.The COEN will also continue to work on making positive changes in the personnel and placecategories, which require long-term plans and a considerable amount of funding. Progress hasbeen made since the administration of this survey in acquiring new funding for generalengineering instructor, professional advisor, and GA positions. Renovations are underway toenhance existing research and teaching laboratories, and space requests and plans
scientific and professional meetings, including several invited papers. To date Dr. Schonberg has received over 35 contract and grants from a variety of federal, state, local, and private funding agencies, including the U.S. DoT, NASA, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Army Research Office, Sandia National Laboratories, the U.S. Army Missile Command and the Engineering Foundation. In 1995 Dr. Schonberg received the AIAA’s Lawrence Sperry Award for his work on the design of spacecraft protection systems. In 1998, Dr. Schon- berg was promoted to the membership rank of Associate Fellow in the AIAA and in 2000 was selected to receive the Charles Beecher Prize for one of his recent papers on orbital debris