AC 2011-1416: RETENTION: QUANTIFYING THE APPLES AND OR-ANGESThomas F. Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University. In this capacity, he is responsible for all activities related to student services (academic ad- ministration, advising, career planning, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting activities have focused on the safety and reliability of hydraulic structures, and he
instructor, she teaches courses in engineering ethics, communications, and professionalism as well as courses in the Women’s & Gender Studies program. She has extensive academic and career advising experience and experience with planning and implementation of summer programs for high school students and mentoring programs for first-year students from underrepresented groups. Page 22.1445.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Effect of Contextual Support in the First Year on Self- Efficacy in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsAbstractThis study
real application of knowledge occurs. Initial assessment ofapplication has only been done informally by way of students voluntarily sharing anecdotal Page 22.1379.12accounts. As the course matures, we plan to provide more thorough and valid assessment of thisparticular course objective. 7. Future Work and ConclusionComputer security education is key to combating the risks and vulnerabilities intrinsic to theInformation Age. Each day, students are inundated with alerts and pop-ups informing themabout patch updates, antivirus signatures, firewalls
community at any given time. In this paper, we also provide adetailed description of the algorithms, workflows, and the technical architecture we use to makesense of publications, conference proceedings, funding information, and a range of otherknowledge products. We plan on announcing its open availability to the EER community.1. IntroductionIn today’s globally competitive economy, success is increasingly driven by knowledge andintellectual capital. Academic communities that have developed a corpus of knowledge artifactsover decades or sometimes centuries of research are uniquely positioned to capitalize on theirexpansive knowledge bases. Yet, this process is fraught with difficulties. To be innovative, anorganization [or community] has to be
necessitates frequentand costly inspection to monitor deterioration, and thus has wide-ranging consequences. The inclusion of an energy harvesting project into the Capstone Design course met no Page 22.565.15notable challenges to implementation and was well received by other faculty. The specificlearning objectives of the course include working through a typical engineering design process,including background research, concept generation and selection, embodiment, formulation andaccomplishment of an analysis plan, prototype construction, and formulation andaccomplishment of a test plan. Along the way, students are to present their work to
images, OpenVZcan deploy several virtual machine containers within each VM images that shares a kernel withthe KVM VM image. For the parallel data systems class in which students design, build, and testa parallel file system, we are planning to have students build parallel file systems within OpenVZcontainers. The major constraint in this approach is the I/O performance bottleneck for the I/Oserver components of parallel file systems running in virtual machines that must share physicaldisks on the services on which they operate. The approach we are considering to overcome thisconstraint is to schedule final performance runs for students running on physical servers. Basedon our assessment of the cloud computing and virtualization technologies, we
students and can adjust course content. Further, there will be evidenceto examine the extent to which students are prepared in physics mechanics to begin a coreengineering science course. Finally, the paper will also present changes that some facultymembers made in the course plans to apply what they learned about the extent of their students’preparation in physics near the beginning of the course.IntroductionEngineering faculty members have long assumed that student knowledge and skill with respectto physics is a major part of the foundation for their progress in studying many engineeringdisciplines, including mechanical engineering. ABET Engineering Criteria require that at leasttwenty-five percent of the credits for an engineering program be
electronic communication, weshow clips from Frontline‟s documentary Digital Nation.13 This video explores the concept ofmultitasking and other issues associated with our digital-heavy culture. This discussion is used asa starting point to have the students think about the concept of focusing on a topic. At this point, we have spent approximately an hour-and-a-half on material leading up to the catapult. Instead of delving straight into calculations, we have the students build a catapult from plans and parts that we provide. The catapult is largely constructed from foam core; therefore, we spend 5 to 10 minutes discussing techniques for working with the
Specialization ResponsesEnvironmental 167 Civil Infrastructure Systems 53Structures 154 Engineering Management 40Geotechnical Engineering 137 Materials Science 36Water Resources 139 Ocean Engineering 21Transportation 120 City Planning/Urban Development 12Civil Engineering (General) 99 Municipal/Public Works 12Hydraulics/Fluid Mechanics 94 Surveying/Geomatics
student services (academic ad- ministration, advising, career planning, women and diversity programs, etc.) and curricular issues. He is principal investigator on several NSF grants related to retention of engineering students. As a faculty member in civil engineering, he co-teaches a large introductory course in civil engineering. His research and consulting activities have focused on the safety and reliability of hydraulic structures, and he has participated as an expert in three different capacities regarding reviews of levee performance in Hurri- cane Katrina. He is a three-time recipient of his college’s Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, a recipient of the Chi Epsilon Regional Teaching Award, and a recipient
and quality. In addition,with ever increasing demands on integration and concurrency in the product development cycleand in many cases globalization of the effort, CAD/CAM systems cannot be considered stand-alone systems. They are in fact key data authoring and manipulation tools that prepare data thatis central to most other product development activities such as analysis, optimization, processplanning, resource and production planning, supply chain management, marketing andadvertising, and quality control. As such their use must be considered a critical function for anycompany that wishes to be competitive in creating products that will be successful in the globaleconomy.The above motivates the need for highly trained CAD/CAM technologists
• Spiritual importance • Risk reduction • Precautionary principle • Balanced solutions • Interdependence (eco and human) • Effective problem definition • Honesty of practice, alignment of principle • Be worth expenditure of limited time, and action resources Business Perspectives and Values • Economic viability • Effective planning, management, and implementation • Defined goals and objectives • Appreciation of limitations • Constant improvement • Management responsibility • Reframe, monetize pollution responsibility • Triple bottom line
the NSF funded grant (#0532536) for the Nanoscale Informal Science Network.Brian Phillip Jensen, University of St. Thomas Brian Jensen is a student at The University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, MN. He is studying mechani- cal engineering with a physics minor. Brian plans to graduate in December of 2011. His interests are sustainability, optics, and engineering education. Page 22.464.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Development and Assessment of an Engineering Course for In-Service and Pre-Service K-12 TeachersAbstractThe engineering education
content. Further, there will be evidenceto examine the extent to which students are prepared in mathematics to begin a core engineeringscience course. Finally, the paper will also present changes that some faculty members made inthe course plans to apply what they learned about the extent of their students’ mathematicspreparation near the beginning of the course.IntroductionMathematics and science are vital parts of an engineering curriculum as evident by therequirements of ABET1. ABET Engineering Criteria require that at least twenty-five percent ofthe credits for an engineering program be taken in mathematics and science courses. At least onestudy2 has shown that success in the first mathematics course is useful in predicting persistencein an
settings. His technical expertise spans applied quantitative methods, strate- gic planning, technology evaluation, and organizational assessment. Prior to joining the Systems and Information Engineering faculty at UVa, Dr. Smith was as a Senior Scientist at Science Applications In- ternational Corporation (SAIC) where, during his twenty-plus years tenure, he led numerous studies and analysis in a variety of application domains, including transportation operations, transportation security, national security, manufacturing, and health care. Prior to his employment at SAIC, Dr. Smith was a member of the Industrial Engineering faculties at the University of Missouri and Oregon State University. Dr. Smith earned his
techniqueswill have to be created or existing techniques adapted to fill that void.Finally, it will be necessary to test the clarity and effectiveness of this classification schemeand its application in practical settings. We have supplied a recommended process for usingthe new classification scheme in Section 4, but further vetting inside and outside the designclassroom will be required. Plans for testing the efficacy of the scheme and its application inboth academic and corporate settings are under development.References[1] Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: HarperCollins.[2] Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., Berstell, G., and D. Nitterhouse (2007). Finding the right job for your product, MIT Sloan
of these hires were justified by the strongengineering student enrollment numbers, produced by the existence of ABET-accredited degreesin the four major disciplines. Benedictine College has entered a memorandum of understandingwith UND, has established articulation agreements with each of the four UND engineeringdepartments, and has completed three semesters of offering both on-site engineering and DEDPcourses to BC students. Moreover, dual-degree programs have been published in the BC CourseCatalog for each of the four major engineering disciplines. After its first year of the agreementwith DEDP, the Fall 2010 BC engineering program enrollment consisted of ~20 sophomores andjuniors and ~25 freshmen.Five-Year, Dual-Degree ProgramThe plan for
. Threesections of the course contained a total of 36 students. The University is co-educational, so mostclasses are a combination of a few males and predominantly females ranging from freshmen toseniors. Most of the students are non-native English speakers from diverse countries, and all ofthem are, or plan to become, design majors. Course Activities. Over the past several years, the teaching strategies and assignmentrequirements for MATH 131 have evolved to accommodate students‟ generally non-Americancultures, their English-as-second-language (ESL) needs, and their individual learning andinformation-processing preferences. After administering and evaluating learning style preferenceand brain hemispheric preference tests, the professor uses
graduate and undergraduate engineering students. Job and long-termcareer opportunities for recent graduates involved with the energy program are also discussed.Lastly, a discussion is included regarding what changes and additions that are planned for theenergy program at Lawrence Tech to keep the program vibrant and adapting to the ongoingknowledge and understanding needs of today’s engineering graduates.1) BackgroundIn the early spring of 2003 Lawrence Technological University (also known as Lawrence Tech)submitted a proposal to NextEnergy (a nonprofit corporation created by the State of Michiganwith the mission to support and promote alternative energy within the State of Michigan) andwas awarded one of five $100,000 grants in early summer 2003
curricula have not stressed theimportance of improving student creativity skills.The design process has become a fundamental aspect required to attain a desirable output interms of quality and functionality when developing a product. According to Ulrich2, “A productdevelopment process is the sequence of steps or activities that an enterprise employs to conceive,design, and commercialize a product.” Same principle applies to the design process which isused to build a product by generating ideas and concepts according to customer specifications.The design process described in the book Engineering Design3 is covered in four main phasesbeing the planning and task clarification, conceptual design, embodiment design and detaildesign. During the
reported at the 2010 ASEE National Conference [4]. Those interested in the details of thefinal plan can look at the 2010 summary paper, which describes the curriculum as we are nowdelivering it. For the course Infrastructure Engineering, there were two key evolutions between2008 and 2010. First, the course was given considerably greater definition, including theaddition of a course description and course objectives and power generation and distribution aswell as network modeling were added to the course content. Second, it was decided thatInfrastructure Engineering would become the second course in our 3-course engineeringsequence, which is taught to non-engineers, mostly humanities majors. This second decision wassignificant in that it basically
how do design a course from the ground upwith a goal not only of creating a high quality learning experience for the students, but to do sowith an eye towards the goal of meaningful assessment. As it turns out, the class is reasonablywell planned out in terms of leaning objectives and outcomes that feed into and support those Page 22.192.14objectives. Our challenge into the future is to more carefully document and asses this process.Fortunately a number of institutional resources exist and to which we have access to address thisimportant goal. In essences what is a serious shortcoming currently is easy to address.Another series of lessons
cognitive principle of automaticity, by which well-learned processes takeless of the individual’s limited cognitive capacity, thus leaving more capacity for other tasks,such as learning new concepts or problem-solving.[4,5] Lastly, our system offers rapid feedbackand an optimal level of difficulty (not too easy nor too hard), characteristics which canpotentially produce the state of optimal cognitive functioning that psychologists refer to as“flow”.[6]We are continuing to enhance these modules. We have reworked the questions in the op ampmodule to make the questions more focused on single steps in the solution process. We aredeveloping additional modules on Kirchhoff’s Voltage and Current Laws for dc circuits andworking on plans for modules in ac
completed a post-test atthe end of the semester. This provided a baseline for comparison with the proposed hybridoffering. The plan was to repeat the process with the 2009 offering of Senior Design I.However, the portions of the lectures were to be presented on-line using Blackboard.Introductory course material, team oral presentations and guest speakers would continue to useclass time. At the end of the semester, a post-test of the hybrid model would again beadministered. A comparison between the growth from the 2008/2009 group and the 2009/2010group could show the effectiveness of a hybrid class that could replace much of the lectureportion of senior design. Even though there was a difference in the number of lecture topics inthe two semesters
Table/Index No Application Cluster Everything management Partitioning MySQL Cluster7 Shared Nothing Parallel plan User defined Yes partitioningAs shown in Table 2, MySQL cluster is the only Parallel and Distributed DBMS that supportFedora Core Operating System. Therefore, we installed MySQL cluster 7.0.13 on Fedora Core 12Linux. In addition, since MySQL Cluster employs shared nothing architecture, each node owns itsmemory and storage area for the instance. MySQL cluster has three different nodes: (1)management nodes: manage the entire distributed database in the cluster, (2) SQL nodes:coordinate SQL query requests, and (3
a planned frequently returns time reads most of no eye contact. Page 22.831.12 conversation. to notes. report. Encourages Encourages Avoids or audience audience Reluctantly interacts discourages active interaction. Calls interaction. with audience. audience on classmates by
tocollaboration between academic and student affairs can be attributed to background and training;a habit of isolation; differences in language, culture, and theoretical bases; poor communication;organizational structures, goals, and priorities; and a lack of mutual understanding.19,20 Truecollaboration requires understanding the culture, language, and organizational characteristics aswell as philosophical and programmatic approaches. It will also involve identifying the roles offaculty and student affairs staff in student development and the opportunities for interactionbetween the two units,21 and joint planning, implementation, and accountability, and institutionalcommitment.22 The purpose of collaborative partnerships between academic and student
characteristics of an effective leader 90.0% 92.3% 91.6%Conduct a thorough job search 80.0% 75.8% 82.6%Conduct a professional job interview 85.6% 81.3% 89.7%Develop a plan for PD, life-long learning, grad.school and licensure 87.5% 82.4% 85.8%Example 2: To address the retention of our female student population, we organized three all- Page 22.858.4female events specifically tailored for female engineering and technology students. We invitefemale engineering executives to present on topics found important among female students in
how they will proceed and eliciting ideas on what the company might feel is the directionthat they want the process to follow. Gantt charts will explain to the sponsor how they plan toproceed and deadlines that will be met to complete the project.With the focus of the semester’s work ahead clearly in the minds of the team members, they cannow forge ahead to start the design process. The designs they choose to investigate will bediscussed, detailed, rejected, and confirmed. Communication will go on continuously among theteam members. When they have formulated the best designs for their project, they will take thosedesigns back to the industrial sponsor and again present their findings. They will make cleararguments for the designs they have
participate in the curriculumdevelopment process. The team met several times on campus, and the participation by industryprofessionals made the curriculum relevant to the industry. Also, the industry partnersappreciated the direct response by the institution on meeting their need. The company Presidentalso facilitated several plant visits for faculty members. After each plant visit, the curriculum gotadjusted and became more relevant to industry. Faculty members saw the industry need and jobopportunities for their students, and the industry professionals saw the commitment from facultymembers. The program description and the plan of study are available at the Purdue UniversityCalumet’s Department of Engineering Technology website.3 While the