, 2006.8. Ordonez, J.C., Vargas, J.V.C., Morega, A., Luongo, C.A., Shih, C “An International Component to Capstone Senior Design Projects,” 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 28, San Diego, CA, 20069. Ordonez, J.C., Vargas, J.V.C., Morega, A., Luongo, C.A., Shih, C.“International Capstone Senior Design Projects,” Proceedings of the Fifth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, May 2007, Tampico, Mexico10. Beer J. 1997 Communicating Across Cultures, http://www.culture-at-work.com/highlow.html11. Edward T. Hall. (2011, March 8). http://www.edwardthall.com/12. Hall, E.T. (1959). The Silent Language, New York: Doubleday13. Missana, S., “The
faculty members in an assessment process that is not onerous, weincrease the likelihood of having vigorous and productive discussions of curricular strengths andpotential areas of improvement, and subsequently developing and implementing curricularreforms, which are the desired end-results.Acknowledgements:The authors would like to acknowledge the important contributions of BME AssessmentCommittee members from 2006 to 2010: Walter Block, Pablo Irrarazaval, Wan-Ju Li, KristynMasters, William Murphy, Amit Nimunkar, Brenda Ogle, John Puccinelli, Paul Thompson,Mitch Tyler, John Webster, Justin Williams and Tom Yen.References:1. Website www.abet.org, accessed January 19, 2011.2. Enderle, J., Gassert, J., Blanchard, S., King, P., Beasley, P., Hale
. The interests shown bystudents and faculty to these two courses provide a preview for the forthcoming nanotechnologytrack. The nanotechnology track will provide a regional and national model for building aresearch-based curriculum derived from a strong campus infrastructure that supportsundergraduate research.References:1. Integrated Nanosystems Development Institute (INDI), IUPUI [Available: http://www.iupui.edu/~indi/index.php].2. Russell, S., et al., “Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5821, 2007, pp. 548-5493. Nagda, B.A., et al., “Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Student Retention,” Review of Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 1, 1998, pp. 55-724. Ishiyama, J
basisoften in another location where there may be issues getting particular courses. When a studentleaves early, the program completion rate suffers and there is lost income to the college. As thecurricula were developed, consideration was given to keeping required undergraduate coursesthroughout the last year of the program. The senior design project usually provides thisconstraint in that it may not be possible to offer that course(s) out of sequence. In the case of theElectrical – MBA program in Figure 1, it is typically not possible to complete all of the SeniorElectives (EE Sr Elec) prior to the 5th year.Advanced Placement – Completing both degrees in five years requires that students are ahead ofthe traditional curriculum. Students are best
educational providers, and the interested end users to the world of “free” andaccessible Open Source Technology (OST). In this article, we adopt the definition of “Open Source” as,“of or relating to or being computer software for which the source code is freely available.” (fromhttp://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=open-source). All presented software here can bedownloaded free of charge over the internet or requested from the developers free of charge. In somecase, there maybe a nominal fees associated with the setup and logistics. The costs of the servers andworkstations are not included in these fees, and they should be considered appropriately. Only a shortlist is provided here where it is not an all inclusive list. We only provide some
Investigation Notebooks used after Investigation Present/Absent Scale: – Present, 0 – Absent Driver Codes: T – teacher, S – student, B – balanced VIa. PICTORIAL GRAPHIC CODING Instructions: Identify scale, provide a brief description, and thumbnail sketch (if possible) of any pictorial graphics presented or created in the lesson. ID: Scale Description Thumbnail Sketch Choose one: Teacher
contemplative activities into the Page 22.1582.7course, a socio-cultural theory offered by Cole and Engstrom22 shall be used as the theoreticalframework for the study. Vygotsky conceived socio-cultural theory23 in the early 1920’s. Itemphasizes the central role of social relationships and culturally constructed artifacts inorganizing thinking. It attempts to theorize and provide methodological tools for investigatinghigher cognitive processes by which social, cultural and historical factors shape humanfunctioning. Cole and Engstrom’s model provides several dimensions along which one can studythe classroom as an activity system. They identify factors
Teaching Practicum providesa competitive advantage to the mechanical engineering doctoral degree at Georgia Tech. Theconsensus opinion appears to be in retaining the current topics in the course. Considerationshould be given for adding a session(s) on obtaining research funding and preparing grantproposals. Also, since many graduates do not enter academia, more coverage could be spent onadditional topics from industry and other career paths.Bibliography1. Wankat, P.C., Oreovicz, F.S., Teaching Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.2. Norris, Pamela M., Palmer, Sheila C., Effectiveness of the Woodruff School Doctoral Teaching Intern Program,Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 87, No. 3, 1998, pg. 223-2263. Lowman, Joseph, Mastering the
Technology ABET, On-Line, http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml, accessesJanuary 2011.6. Jack Zable, Guest Editorial 2007 National Capstone Design Conference, Advances in Engineering Education,Spring 2010, pp. 1.7. Carlee A. Bishop and Tommer R. Ender , Capstone Projects: Key to the Lifecycle Development of the SystemsEngineer, Proceedings, 2nd National Capstone Design Conference, Boulder, CO, June 2010, CD RAM.8. Shraddha Joshi, Joshua D. Summers, Investigating Information Loss in Collaborative Design: A Case Study withCapstone Design Project, Proceedings, 2nd National Capstone Design Conference, Boulder, CO, June 2010, CDRAM.9. Daniel A. McAdams and Julie S. Linsey [dDesign Education: A Globally Distributed Capstone EngineeringDesign Experience
. Minimize tunnel length by placing lines in the same tunnel. 5. Use a "Z" network (see Figure E2). 6. Avoid pipe velocities in excess of 8 ft/s. 7. The two AHUs in Concourse 4 are to be placed in parallel.Include the converged Kirchoff or Hardy-Cross solutions, and make sure your logic is explained.Accomplish a preliminary system design and provide: 1. Layout of the network; (a) actual physical layout (pipe numbers indicated) (b) “Z” arrangement for Kirchoff or Hardy-Cross usage (pipe and loop numbers indicated); Page 22.1650.12 Figure
Problem Based Learning Approach for Freshman Engineering,” 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 18 - 21, 2000, Kansas City, MO.[5] Daryl E. Chubin, Gary S. May, and Eleanor L. Babco (2005), “Diversifying the Engineering Workforce,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 73-86.[6] C. Dym, A. Agogino,O. Eris, D. Frey, and L. Leifer, (2005), “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Page 22.1183.7 Learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 103-120[7] Wayne Clough (2000), “The Future of Engineering Education,” Stay Informed! Magazine, http://gtalumni.org/Publications
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.8 Barker, Bradley S., J. Ansorge. “Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment” (2001) Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(3), 229-2439 Petre, Marion; B. Price. “Using Robotics to Motivate „Back Door‟ Learning” (2004) Education and Information Technologies 9:2, 147-158.10 Robinson, Mike. “Robotics-Driven Activities: Can They Improve Middle School Science Learning?” (2005) Bulletin of Science Technology & Society. 25:7311 Usselman, Marion; J. Davis, J. Rosen. (2008) Diversifying Participation in FIRST LEGO League. Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual
5Mb/s was set on the communication link,between the control room and the robot. The following figure shows the inside of the controlroom during the competition.Figure 3. Inside of the control room during a competition (MSU students John Ritter, ChrisChing, and Jennifer Hane).In addition to the technical rules, all teams competing had to turn in a systems engineering paper,and an outreach report. Optional items could also be turned in including a presentation about thedesign process and a video showing the design progression. Each of these elements of thecompetition earned points toward an overall team score that was combined with the results of themining competition. One award was given to the team that mined the most overall amount
projects (Engineers without Borders, etc.) Non-engineering related community service or volunteer work Student design project(s)/competitions(s) beyond class requirementsA 1: Not active; 2: Slightly active (attend occasionally); 3: moderately active (attend regularly); 4: Highly active(participate in most activities); 5: extremely (hold a leadership post)Table 4. Curriculum emphases scales for students, faculty, and program chairs. The Cronbach’salpha indicates the internal consistency reliability. Values can range from .00 to 1.00–psychometricians consider scales greater than .70 to be acceptable. Students - Broad and Systems Perspectives (alpha=.84) Overall, how much have the courses you’ve taken in your engineering
students”, this year’s group exhibited none of the skepticism and were eager toget started. More data will be collected at the end of this academic year and will be presented atthe conference. While some constraints do exist that must be considered, the benefits appear to Page 22.1090.6be worth the effort in creating as many reasonable opportunities for cross disciplinary projects aspossible.Bibliography 1. Fruchter, R. and Lewis, S. (2003). “Mentoring Models in Support of P5BL in Architecture/Engineering/Construction Global Teamwork”, The International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 663-671. 2. Orvis, S.M. (2009). Prestressing
the event.Communication is critical with the volunteer group; everyone should be clear on details such asarrival and departure time, what the volunteers should bring (water, gloves, food, etc.), what thevolunteer coordinators will provide (e.g. food or tools), what the task(s) for the day will be, andhow many volunteers are going to show. Almost as critical as the list of tasks is expectations, asthey can make or break a day. Having a crew show up really hoping to weed a site, and thenasking them pick up litter can put a damper on the day. It is important to give the volunteers aclear sense of what they will be doing, if they will be working with other groups, and any otherrelevant pieces of information.As part of having clear communication
institutions recognize onlyScholarship of Discovery, teaching-based institutions have started to recognize the other areas ofscholarship as defined by the Boyer’s Model.Scholarship at Gannon University is broadly recognized by three attributes: professional,communicated and peer-reviewed. Each of these attributes may be found at different levels, suchas University, regional, national or international (recognition, review, publication, etc.).Scholarship activity may be stronger in one of the three attributes; but, the body of a colleague'sscholarship should demonstrate all three to some degree.1. Professional — demonstrably pertinent to the discipline(s) of the individual faculty member.2. Communicated — evidence that the work has been made known
cadetreports are that the project experience thus far is realistic, relevant and exciting. Cadets arefrustrated by the communication challenges but optimistic that this will be the best capstoneexperience in the building.RICHARD W. FREEMAN has served as a lecturer in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’sElectrical Engineering Section since 2008. Prior to joining the faculty, he taught fulltime foreight years. He also worked in the Telecommunications Industry for eight years. He earned BSand PhD degrees in Computer Engineering from Iowa State University and a MBA fromSouthern Methodist University. He is pursuing his Professional Engineering License.RONALD S. ADREZIN serves as an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Sectionat USCGA, where he has
special summer internship opportunities, andproposals to the NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, VA and NASA Goddard Space Page 22.1367.7Flight Center have requested summer internship slots as well. A National Science Foundation S- STEM grant was awarded in January 2011. This award will support fifty-three scholarshipsacross the five T-CUP partner campuses over the next four academic years. The long-term planalso includes significant institutional support from NSU, including a dedicated staff person withoffice space to manage and oversee the program long term, faculty release for program advisors(based on achievement of specific enrollment
that will provide highly-skilled and prepared engineering technicians for the current and future workforce needs of the greater Chattanooga economic region.” Page 22.1200.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Developing an Effective Community College Transfer Pre- Engineering ProgramAbstractMany states are actively addressing strengthening the ties between the states’ 2-year and 4-yeardegree granting institutions. The stated purpose for this activity is to define articulationagreements for A. S. degrees that aid students in completing 4-year degrees
within eachcohort.The cohort each year is defined as the first-time, full-time freshmen officially enrolled for the fallsemester in the College of Engineering. A student is considered retained for a year if s/he is stillenrolled in the College of Engineering in subsequent fall semesters at the time of the census(typically 21 days into the fall semester). For example, the number of first-year students stillenrolled at the time of the census of the second year would measure first year retention, and thenumber of second year students still enrolled at the time of the census of the third year wouldmeasure second year retention.The data consisted of 10 cohorts entering the university between 2000 and 2009. The number ofmen in the entering class sized
bepremature. Finally, the experiences of our study participants might not reflect the experiences ofracially diverse students in other engineering programs across the country.References1. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.2. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2007, .NSF 07-315.3. WEPAN (2006). Engaging America’s intellectual talent: The status of women and minorities in engineering. www.wepan.org4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought
of Human Factorsand Ergonomics Society, Annual Meeting, 2007.12. Messner, J.I. et al., “Using Virtual Reality to Improve Construction Engineering Education”, Proceedings ofASEE Annual Conference, 2006.13. Bell, J.T. and Fogler, H.S., “Virtual Reality in Chemical Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the 1988ASEE North Central Section Meeting, Detroit, Michigan.14. Chaturvedi, S.K., Bawab, S., Akan, H., and Abdel-Salam, T.M., “Development of a Methodology to Visualizeand conduct a Physical Experiment as a Web-Based Virtual15. Chaturvedi, S.K. and Abdel-Salam, T., “A Web-Based Student Learning Tool for Thermodynamics ConceptsRelated to Multistaging in Compressors and Turbines”, Innovations 2008: World Innovations in EngineeringEducation and
Education.3. McAlpine, L. and Harris, R. (1999). “Lessons learned: Faculty developer and engineer working as faculty development colleagues.” International Journal for Academic Development, 4(1).4. Sheppard, S. Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. (2008). Educating engineers: Designs for the future of the field. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.5. Fisher, D., Fairweather, J., and Amey. M. (2003). “Systemic reform in undergraduate engineering education: The role of collective responsibility.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19.6. Gillespie, K.J. and Robertson, D.L. (Eds.) (2010). A guide to faculty development (2nd edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.7. Wankat, P. (2002). The effective, efficient professor
schedule, and if the student was the first person in theirfamily to attend university.ReferencesBlack student college graduation rates inch higher but a large racial gap persists. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, Winter 2007. Retrieved August 11, 2010 from http://www.jbhe.com/preview/winter07preview.htmlGuay, R.B. (1976). Purdue Spatial Visualization Test – Visualization of Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2009 (NSF 09-305). Arlington, VASorby S., Wysocki, A.F, & Baartmans. B. (2003). Introduction to 3D visualization: An active
farmers and interested people in each state byinfusing technical information and practical and state of the art technology and know-how topeople, companies, new businesses etc.In addition to the extension activities, institutions to disseminate advances in mechanics and theeffects of machines on society and the natural world were developed. These mechanics institutes Page 22.1042.3sought to not only inform the general public but to significantly influence technical educationbased upon scientific and philosophical principles.In the early 1800’s, George Birkbeck, a physician and professor of natural philosophy, drove thedevelopment of mechanics
for the Study of Technology. (2002). International TechnologyEducation Association.12. Sullivan, D., Zande, J., Butcher, S., Murphree, T., Ford, B. (2003). Using Marine Technology to Develop OceanLiteracy and Teach Workplace Competencies. Current: The Journal of Marine Education. Vol. 19, No. 3.13. Summary Evaluation of MATE: The Marine Advanced Technology Education Resource Center For the PeriodMay 1, 2004 – April 30, 2007, May 2007. 39 pp. Daniel Weiler Associates.14. Evaluation of MATE: The Marine Advanced Technology Education Resource Center For the Period May 1,2007 – April 30, 2008. June 2008. 38pp. Daniel Weiler Associates.15. MATE Center Annual Report to the National Science Foundation, January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.Submitted
-Brahmia, Suzanne, & Etkina, Eugenia (2004, spring). Recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations. How we can help: The Rutgers Story. APS/AAPT Joint NY State Section Meeting.[12] Carter, Deborah Faye. (2006, Summer). Key issues in the persistence of underrepresented minority students. New Directions for Institutional Research, Issue 130, 33-46.[13] Nestor-Baker and N. Kerka, S. “Recruitment and Retention of Underrepresented Students in STEM Fields”, the Ohio State University, Oct. 2009[14] Yelamarthi, Kumar, and Mawasha, P. Ruby. (2008, July-December). A pre-engineering program for the under-represented, low-income and/or first generation college students to pursue higher education. Journal of STEM Education, 9(3-4), 5-15
degree requirements. This includes both total credit hour requirement for degree as wellas a breakdown of the credit hours required in various major topic areas/categories, such asmathematics and basic sciences, general engineering topics, and general education. The datapresented herein also provides individual programs with a sound base from which comparisonsof their own program(s) may be made.IntroductionIt seems as though there is a near constant discussion about credit hour requirements, particularlywith reference to a so-called “credit hour squeeze.” As the cost of education continues to rise,state legislators, boards of trustees/regents, and other external constituencies push for furtherefficiencies, reduced costs, improved graduation
nd developmment design ccourses, and 3) makingprovision ns to includee practitionerrs into courses wheneverr possible.Recentlyy the CEE Deepartment modified m its curriculum c awway from a “track” systeem; however,plans hadd been madee to include a land develo opment desiggn track prioor to this chaange. The newcurriculu um is identical for all CE EE students and a is based to some deggree on the A American Soociety 1of Civil Engineering E ’s Body of Knowledge K