. Krishnamurthi, M. Enhancing Student-Teacher Interaction in Internet-Based Courses. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 5. Paterson, K. Student Perceptions of Internet-Based Learning Tools in Environmental Engineering Page 22.642.9 Education. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 295-304, July 1999.6. Starrett, S. A Beginner’s Approach to Teaching with the Internet. Proceedings of the 1996 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.7. Wallace, D., Mutooni, P. A Comparative Evaluation of World Wide Web-Based and Classroom
the 1990’s undergraduate science programs, physics programs in particular, began to developactive learning techniques to supplement or replace traditional lecture methods. Two of the moreeffective methods developed were just-in-time-teaching (JiTT)1 and peer instruction2. Theseactive learning techniques have proven to be effective methods and have steadily been deployedin undergraduate classrooms over the past 15 years. While not limited to use in the physicalsciences, these techniques have seen much wider use in science classrooms than in engineeringclassrooms. The results of a national survey of faculty using peer instruction show 94% of usersfrom the natural sciences and only 3% from engineering3. While there is some publishedscholarly
appropriatebackground for the project, and that, after learning more details about the project, the studentsare still interested.Once a project is staffed with the necessary student(s), the project officially begins. This isinitiated by a kick-off meeting at the company. The MEDITEC program pays for the students totravel to the company to meet their technical leads, learn all relevant information about theproject, obtain necessary parts or equipment, and see the facilities.FinancesThe donation from each company is used to support the MEDITEC projects. The moneyallocated per project is nominally $5,000. Any funds that are not used remain in the MEDITECfund. This covers student stipends, site visits and travel, project materials, laboratory usagecosts, and
considered. Future assessments shouldinclude how effective the program is in recruiting students to Cal Poly and what other possiblelong term impacts there may be. Page 22.658.14References1 Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Futurehttp://books.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html2 K.C. Chen, D. Belter, T. Fredeen, S. Magnusson, and Heather Smith, “Inspiring a diverse population of highschool students to choose engineering as a career path,” ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2009.3 www.engineeryourlife.org/4 Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering
mayinclude: Why do you think it is? Do you think this substance is a solid or a liquid? How do youknow? What makes a solid a solid? What makes a solid a solid at the atomic level? Before youleave this part of demo tell them that the container contains iron filings and ask if they think theiron filings are magnetic. Page 22.671.3Next have student(s) place a magnet on top of container #1, turn container over, and then set thecontainer in the upright position. Ask students what happens to the iron filings. Follow-up 2questions may include: Why are the
their modeling expertise. Page 22.688.6AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Education Program(EEC) Grant No. 0648316. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.Bibliography1. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Foundations of a models and modeling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving
American Colleges.; 1984.9. Hanson SL. Lost talent: Women in the sciences. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1997.10. National Council for Research on Women. Balancing the equation: Where are women and girls in science, engineering, and technology? New York, NY: National Council for Research on Women; 2001.11. Seymour E, Hewitt NC. Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997.12. Berryman S. Who will do science? Minority and female attainment of science and mathematics degrees: Trends and causes. . New York: Rockefeller Foundation; 1983.13. Pieronek C, McWilliams LH, Silliman SE, Uhran JJ, Gunty M, C. G. Monolith or mosaic: Using demographics and detailed
, Title and Dates, Extent (size), Creator (issuing body), Scope Content (collection description), Subject(s), Access, Language of Materials The metadata used to describe each item (report) consists of Author, Report Title, Date and Report Number information.Adapting Archivists’ Tools to Engineers’ NeedsThe Archivists’ Toolkit is an open source relational database for archival data managementdeveloped collaboratively by Five Colleges, Inc., New York University Libraries, and the UCSDLibraries with funding from Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Its main function is to support thedescription of archival resources. The system is highly customizable and extremely user friendly,making it very easy to learn and use
Expecting Related k, s to the team with team track Quality and a. Oct. Nov. Oct. Nov. Oct. Nov. Oct. Nov. Oct. Nov. Team 1A 3.8 4 3.2 8 3.5 4 3.2 8 3.8 4 3.2 8 4.0 4 3.2 8 3.5 4 3.8 Team 1B 3.8 3.8 3.0 2.8 3.5 3.8 4.2 3.8 4.0 3.5 Team 1C 4.0 4.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.2 4.0 Team 1D 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.8 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.5 Team 2 A 4.7 4.3 4.7 4.7 4.3 5.0 4.3 4.7
AC 2011-977: BENEFITS OF SMALL COLLEGE-INDUSTRY PARTNER-SHIPS FOR TRAINING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTBruce V. Mutter, Bluefield State College Bruce V. Mutter is the founder and CEO of the Center for Applied Research & Technology, Inc. (CART) and teaches project management and engineering economics at Bluefield State College as an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Technology.Roy Pruett, Bluefield State College Roy E. Pruett is a Registered Professional Engineer and a Professor and Department Head of the Electrical Engineering and Technology Department at Bluefield State College. He is the owner of Pruett Engineering and serves as consultant to several local businesses. Roy received his B. S. degree in
visualization of materials concepts through demonstrations and experiential learning through hands on exercises. Page 22.301.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Building an Engaged, Collaborative, and Inspired Teaching CultureIn the early 1990’s, the University of Alberta was already using teaching awards, peerconsultation, and student course evaluations to motivate better teaching. While the culture waspositive, it was not informed or intentional. Over the last twenty years, the faculty has growndramatically, many new instructors have been hired, class sizes have increased, and the
34(435-439).6. Kephart K., Villa E., Gates A., and Roach S. (2007). The affinity research group model: Creating and maintaining dynamic, productive and inclusive research groups. Computer Science Department. The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas.7. Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998a). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett- Koehler Publishers. 2nd Edition.8. Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1998b). Another Look at Evaluating Training Programs. American Society for Training & Development.9. Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 24(139-142).10. Morrison, Kathryn L. and Carol Sue Marshall. (2003) “Universities and Public Schools: Are We
Cobb paradox – why projects fail. The Standish Group, “Unfinished voyages”, 1996. 4. S Robbins, “Understand what motivates your boss”, Harvard Business School Working Knowledge, May 13th 2006. 5. “Skills needed to get hired” Video from NSF-sponsored project, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A42Tab_bu6A Page 22.342.10
management,quality management, software ergonomics, and systems engineering.[2]As of 2004, the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics counts 760,840 software engineers holding jobsin the U.S.; for comparison, in the U.S. there are some 1.4 million practitioners employed in allother engineering disciplines combined.[3] The term software engineer is used very liberally inthe corporate world. Very few of the practicing software engineers actually hold engineeringdegrees from accredited universities. There are estimated to be about 1.5 million practitioners inthe E.U., Asia, and elsewhere. SE pioneers include Barry Boehm, Fred Brooks, C. A. R. Hoare,and David Parnas
Education, 2010.3. Travis, Jeffrey and Jim Kring, LabVIEW for Everyone, 3rd Edition, Pearson Education, 2007.4. Nise, Norman S., Control Systems Engineering, 5th Edition, Wiley, 2007.5. Web Site http://www.digikey.com.6. Web Site http://www.ni.com.7. Web Site http://www.ab.com. Page 22.383.15
future engineers willalso think more green energy efficient in the original designs they perform since they will nowhave the tools to evaluate options and present the long term savings of a greener energy designthat might have a slightly more initial cost. It is hoped that more programs will find room intheir programs for a similar course to the one presented in this paper.Bibliography1. Capehart, B. L., Turner, W. C. & Kennedy, W.J., (2008). Guide to Energy Management Sixth Edition, Fairmont Press , ISBN 978-1-4200-8489-4.2. Doty,S. & Turner, W. C. (2009). Energy Management Handbook Seventh Edition, Fairmont Press, ISBN 978-1- 4200-8870-0.3. U.S. Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook 2010, DOE/EIA
also invented analternative to tables, where the logarithm values were carved on ivory sticks which are nowcalled Napier's Bones. A modern set of Napier's BonesNapier's invention led directly to the slide rule, first built in England in 1632 and still in use inthe 1960's by the NASA engineers of the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs which landedmen on the moon. A 1960s slide ruleSlide rules added logarithms to perform multiplication and contained up to 22 different scales Page 22.395.6that were used for various mathematical functions like square root, sine, cosine
and Hearing a Freshman Engineering Student Think. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.3. Grigg, S., Bowman, D. and Benson, L. (2011). Technology Adoption Behaviors in a First Year Engineering Classroom. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.4. Jonassen, D.H. and Tessmer, M. (1997). An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation, and research. Training Research Journal 2:11-46.5. Wong, R.M.F., Lawson, M.J. and Keeves, J. (2002). The effects of self-explanation training on students’ problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learning and Instruction 12: 233–262.6. Olszewski, B., Macey and Lindsrom (2006). The practical work of coding: An ethnomethodological inquiry. Human Studies 29:363-380
-depth contour. Six gates (shaped L as inverted "U"s) were placed around the pond on that contour, and a vehicle that passed through each gate (as determined by a diver tracking the AUV) was considered to have succeeded. Page 22.440.8Figure 2. The second arena used, at the Coronado Springs Resort, Orlando, Florida. The arm ofthis man-made lake that we used is a rough oval,200 feet by 300 feet. The bottom is mud and silt,and the depth is no greater than 11 feet. The armused for the competition is
Robotics: Applying Modern AI Techniques, Proceedings of Page 22.452.8International Conference on Autonomous Minirobots for Research and Edutainment (AMIRE), 2001. [9] Lund, H.H., Modern Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction, Proceedings of the IEEE Volume 92,Issue 11, Nov. 2004 Page(s): 1821 – 1838. Page 22.452.9
://www.coexploration.org/howsthewater/html/overviewwater.html 6. Zeilik, Michael. University of New Mexico Department of Physics & Astronomy, Institute for Astrophysics. Retrieved on January 6, 2011 from http://flag.wceruw.org/tools/conmap/solar.php 7. Borrego, M., Newswander, C. B., McNair, L.D., McGinnis, S., & Paretti, M.C. (year). Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge. Advances in Engineering Education, Winter 2009 Volume 1 Issue 3.AppendixFigure 3. Concept Map quiz on the Solar SystemFigure 4. Concept-in-Context Map on Diffusion of Solids.Figure 5. Concept-in-Context Map Quiz on Single Phase AlloysConcept-in-Context Map on Material Failures
another as post-test, have been developed. In addition twodesign projects were given to students in the second half of the semester. Overall, thepreliminary findings of formative and summative evaluations support the claim that the newlydeveloped course was effective in helping students develop conceptual understanding andinterest in quantum mechanics. We have also identified areas for further improvement of hands-on and virtual lab experiments. The course materials as well as evaluation instruments form asolid foundation for further development and expanded offering in other institutions of thiscourse for engineering students.AcknowledgementThis research was supported by NSF Grant No. DUE-0837670.Bibliography1 D. A. Zollman, N. S. Rebello, and
engineering offered by theUWP CEE department (construction, environmental, geotechnical, transportation, and structur-al). As part of this introduction, each sub-discipline area would assign students to assess a por-tion of the local infrastructure.All faculty in the CEE department participated in developing the materials for the modules, withone module created for each sub-discipline area. Faculty worked in their area(s) of expertise.The result is a set of materials that is targeted directly at sophomore students. Each sub-discipline area was instructed to devote one lesson of their module to introducing their sub-discipline and three lessons to explaining one (or more) facet of the sub-discipline. For eachmodule, students had to gain knowledge and
. Ford, J. D., & Riley, L. A. (2003). Integrating communication and engineering education: A look at curricula,courses, and support systems,” Journal of Engineering Education, 92, 325-328.3. Russell, J. S., & Stouffer, W. B. (2005). Survey of national civil engineering curriculum. Journal of ProfessionalIssues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131, 118-128.4. Sack, R., Bras, R. L., Daniel, D. E., & Hendrickson, C. (1999). Reinventing civil engineering education.ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, session 13d3.5. Jensen, J. N. (2003). A case study approach to engineering courses. ASEE Conference Proceedings, session 2653.6. Schlosser, P., Parke, M., & Merrill, J. (2008). Decision-making in the design
runs.References1. Felder,R.M, and R.W. Rousseau, “Elementary Principles of Chemical processes”, Wiley, NJ, 2005, 3rd Edition.2. Seider, W., J.D. Seader, D.R. Lewin, and S. Widagdo, “Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis,Analysis, and Evaluation”, Wiley, NJ, 2009, 3rd Edition.3. Cheng, H.C. and Luyben, W.L., “Heat-Integrated Distillation Columns for Ternary Separations”, I&EC Process Page 22.30.10Design and Development, 24, 707, (1985).
% 2nd year 22% 3rd year 59% 4th year 19% 5th year+ 0% Figure 11: Year in Plan of StudyIt is almost evenly split between whether or not the first undergraduate Engineering Economycourse has any prerequisite course(s), with 53% of respondents stating that their course doeshave prerequisites and 47% saying it does not. Additionally, nearly a third of the EE instructors(32%) state that their department offers other courses in the Engineering Economy field.Survey Results for Student Perception
Hardware and Software, retrieved from http://sine.ni.com/cs/app/doc/p/id/cs-11855 on 1/18/2011. 5. Part III – I-V Characterization of Photovoltaic Cells Using PXI, retrieved from http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/7231 on 1/18/2011. 6. NI USB-6008,12-Bit, 10 kS/s Low-Cost Multifunction DAQ, retrieved from http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/201986 on 1/18/2011. 7. Bishop, H. Robert. LabVIEW Student Edition. Volume 8. Prentice Hall. 2007. Page 22.59.13
Guideline in Development, http://apeg.bc.ca/prodev/pdreq.html, sourced January 3, 2011; 5. Kuan, S., Success by Design, Innovation – Journal of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC, p.36 – 38, November 2010, Vancouver, BC; 6. ASCE, ASCE Policy Statement 465: Academic Prerequisites for Licensure and Professional Practice, Task Committee on the First Professional Degree, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston Virginia; 7. Canadian Consulting Engineer, U.S. Moving to Require Master’s Degree for Engineers, URL: www.canadianconsultingengineer.com/issues/archives.aspx, Feb. 25, 2008; 8. Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia
that used interview as asingle or complementary method. Table 1. Example of Interviews in Engineering Education Research Paper title Year Method(s) involvedWhy Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, 2010 semi-structured interview and 6 informal conversationLongitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational ValuesStudents’ Conceptions of Tutor and Automated Feedback in 2010 in-depth interview (semi-structured 7 interview)Professional Writing
: • Project-1: the students were given digital logic functions such as f =xx +x x,1 2 2 3 and were asked to implement them by using the standard 7400 series chips. Figure 1 depicts a typical practical implementation of the logic function f . The students were asked to prepare the truth table of the circuits, and to implement them on breadboards and verify the expected functional operations. An Light Emitting Diode (LED)s were connected to the output of the logic circuits so that Logic 0 and Logic 1 output could be identified easily, i.e., when the light was on, Logic 1 is understood while logic 0 is interpreted when the light was off. x1