responsible for water, wastewater, and solid and hazardous waste policy issues. Ms. Layne has degrees in environmental and water resources engineering from Vanderbilt University and the University of North Carolina School of Public Health. She spent 17 years as a consulting engineer with several firms, and was formerly a principal at Harding Lawson Associates in Tallahassee, FL, where she managed the office and directed hazardous waste site investigation and cleanup projects. Ms. Layne is an active member of the American Society of Civil Engineers and a registered professional engineer. She served as president of the Society of Women Engineers in 1996-97 and is FY11 Chair of SWE’s Government Relations and Public Policy
Awards Dinner and and Icebreakers Medical Ethics: Game Night Engineering 6 – 9 PM Scavenger Hunt Movie and 6 – 9 PM Design Projects 7 – 9 PM Discussion 7 – 9 PM 7 – 9 PMMicroscopyThis activity introduced participants to various techniques of microscopy, including opticalmicroscopy, scanning electron
22.820.2review process also prepares students for procedures used in the consulting industry. MechanicalEngineering faculty at the University of Clemson recently reviewed their laboratory curriculumand concluded that identifying the strengths and weaknesses of peer’s reports helped students tobetter understand what to do and what not to do12.Peer reviews were implemented in a variety of ways in engineering curricula. In some cases,peer review was used for a single report or group project in which the reviewers were notintimately familiar with the topic5, 6, 9. The intent of this approach was to assure that students canidentify missing content, whereas if they already understand the topic well, they may fill in theomitted context on their own. Peer
separate thermodynamics and fluidmechanics texts removed the requirement for a supplemental text, the drawbacks to this approachwere significant.We traded two books for two books, required students to navigate non-sequentially through thesebooks for two semesters, and reinforced student perception that fluid mechanics andthermodynamics are vastly different fields of study. This last result struck at one of the coreprinciples which initially drove the integration of the two courses into one two-course sequence.These frustrations fueled the decision to develop a text tailored to the integrated two-coursesequence as taught at West Point. It was during this writing project that many of the integrationand consistency issues which had been easy to
J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K- 12 engineering outreach. He has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design. He has also co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for
Report: “Science Policies in the European Union - Promoting excellence throughmainstreaming gender equality”, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/g_wo_etan_en_200101.pdf(retrieved 08 March 2011)[8] Sagebiel, F. and Dahmen, J.: “Masculinities in organizational cultures in engineering education in Europe:results of the European Union project WomEng”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 1469-5898, Vol.,31, Issue 1, 2006, Pp. 5 – 14.[9] Miliszewska, I. and Moore, A.: “Encouraging Girls to Consider a Career in ICT: A Review of Strategies”,Journal of Information Technology Education, Year 2010, Vol. 9.[10] Gras-Velazquez, A., Joyce, A. and Debry, M.: “Women and ICT Why are girls still not attracted to ICTstudies and careers
aliens, racetracks for competitions, giant astronomical calendars, maps of theTihuanaco Empire, or to appease the gods. In addition to viewing them in spectacular fashionfrom Cessna aircraft, our focus was on creating mathematical representations of them as aconcatenation of different curve segments using MATLABTM,14 (Table 3), and when viewedfrom different vantage points using projective geometry based on rotation matrices (Table 4). Table 3 The enigmatic Nazca lines (and geoglyphs) The whale, hands, and astronaut Nazca geoglyphs viewed from Cessna airplane (Tyler Edstrom & Benton Garske). The whale geoglyph when viewed “straight The hands geoglyph created in The astronaut geoglyph created in on” and
, thermodynamics concepts, and bioprocess engineering. She is currently also an Associate Dean in the College of Engineering.Dr. Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University Katharyn E. K. Nottis is an associate professor in the Education department at Bucknell University. An Educational Psychologist, her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education, approached from the perspective of Human Constructivism. She has been involved in collabo- rative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, seismology, and chemical engineer- ing. Page 22.1510.1
Carlson Jones, University of WashingtonJoy K CrawfordTamara Floyd Smith, Tuskegee UniversityDon Peter, MS,PE, Seattle Pacific University Don has taught electrical engineering at Seattle Pacific University since 1987, specializing in analog and power electronics, Before that he worked as a design/evaluation/diagnostics engineer at Tektronx, Inc. for eleven years. He has been envovled in various consulting projects, including two summers as a NASA Summer Faculty Fellow at the Jet Propulsion Laborary in Pasadena, Ca. He has a BS in Physics from Seattle Pacfic University and an MSEE from the University of Washington. Don is an IEEE senior member and member of the ASEE.Elaine P. Scott, Seattle Pacific University
engineering problems. This construct includes the interpretation of figures,diagrams, and word descriptions that represent engineering- or physics-based principles. There aretwo different skills that are included in this construct: 1. Three-view two-dimensional projection drawing to a three-dimensional perspective drawing. 2. Relating different visual and mathematical representations of unseen quantities such as Page 22.1352.6 velocity, force, pressure, or temperature.Spatial Reasoning Items: Construct S1An example of Construct S1 is shown below in Figure 3. This figure was used with permissionfrom a Mental Rotation Test developed
target their laboratory experiences to take advantage of thenewest technologies and expose students to the tools and methods employed by practicingengineers, while emphasizing fundamental concepts and principles.Today, university-based educational programs invest heavily in many new tools andtechnologies, often only using them in more advanced or project-based courses. Faculty and staffcontribute large amounts of time preparing new course materials that students need to learn thesenew tools. Because new tools are often far too expensive and complex for use outside of thelaboratory, the vast majority of programs provide only limited access to these technologies in theform of two or three hour weekly lab sessions, constraining the amount of time
EM concepts, using the student-owned LiaB kit.The cliché – seeing is believing – is one of the fundamental principles that underpin the project;visible light-emitting diodes and low-power vertical cavity surface emitting lasers are keycomponents in a number of the experiments that have been developed since his proposal. Theelectronics breadboard serves as a miniature optical table and plastic optical components can bemounted on the solderless breadboard surface and aligned to optoelectronic and electro-opticaldevices with simple optomechanical fixtures positioned in the 0.1” spaced holes on thebreadboard. The students perform experiments that demonstrate basic concepts in EM and seethe application of these concepts using eye-safe
. Follow-on exams andinterviews will determine whether these updates were successful.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science FoundationResearch and Evaluation on Education in Science and Engineering (REESE)Program under grant DRL–0816207. Opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the NSF. Studies involving human subjects wereconducted with KSU Human Studies Board oversight under protocol #4691.References[1] Warren, Steve, "Optimizing Student Learning and Retention of Time- and Frequency-Domain Concepts Through Numerical Computation Projects," 2005 Annual Conference and Exposition
-150 as well as competing trucks from othermanufacturers. Page 22.1604.2As I viewed one of these DVDs I realized that mixed in with the hard-sell-advertising werenumerous examples of how the engineers at Ford had solved their design problems by theparticular materials that they chose. I created a worksheet of questions for the students thatrequired them to watch the videos and then fill in answers on the sheet. I used this worksheetsuccessfully in the Industrial Materials course that I was teaching.How the Video Spots were UtilizedDuring all but the last year that I used this class project I obtained an individual copy of the DVDfrom local
correct solution to each of thequestions and indicating where marks could be gained and lost. A document camera wasused to project details onto a screen. Typically the marking would take about half theallocated period (about 25 minutes). After marking, scripts would be returned to theirowners, who were asked to check them quickly, before they were collected by the TA. It wasthen the job of the TA to take the scripts away and ensure that each student had participatedcorrectly by providing an adequate script and marking correctly someone else‟s. Thosecompleting the requirements were given the 1% mark. Scripts were returned at the nextweek‟s tutorial, giving an incentive for students to attend that as well. In 2009 a total of 5peer-marked sessions
educators in the process of teaching/learning, the rescue of the intellectual and reflexive of her/his teaching work in a way that it isnot only the deliver of knowledge but mainly the producing of knowledge.The main challenge for the institutions is to form the global engineer, which actions must lead toprovide more opportunities for students to: go abroad for studies and internships; be involved inglobal teams, working in projects, and designs.What is necessary in fact is the global engineering educator to inspire the formation of the globalengineer.References[01] World Development Indicators, 2001.[02] Deba Dutta, Professor, Mechanical Engineering Director, InterPro, College of Engineering; http://www.interpro.engin.umich.edu/[03] Compete to
indicative of the independent nature of these indicators and confirms theprevious analyses based on Kendall's tau. Notice that this 90º relationship existed not only forthe control semesters where each two-member team submitted lab reports but also for the sologroup where each individual student performed the laboratory exercises and submitted their ownlab report. Page 22.544.9Figure 5: Biplot for first control semester Figure 6: Biplot for the second controlrepresenting the data points (x) and variables semester. The data scales are represented by(vectors) projected onto the first two principal the left-hand and bottom axes and the right
and a project engineer. Page 22.704.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Factors Influencing High School Students to Pursue an Engineering BaccalaureateIntroductionIn the twenty-first century, students have myriad curricula that may be pursued in high schools.Curricula at specialized high schools have been developed for very specific areas of study whencompared to the curricula at most comprehensive high schools. At comprehensive high schools,a general program of study is offered either in a college-preparatory curriculum orgeneral/vocational
programsmake appropriate links and project meaningful pathways for students from the advancement ofcultural orientation to the development of global competency.This study examines the extent of current engineering students’ awareness and potentialacceptance of cultural similarities and differences. We conducted survey assessment using theMiville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale short form (MGUDS-S) to measure and compareorientation toward diversity among four groups of engineering student populations, includingthose entering three different types of global engineering programs and a baseline population offirst-year engineering students. We proposed and tested a set of research hypotheses for multiplegroup comparisons of MGUDS-S results, including
demonstration is a powerful teaching strategy forengineering students. This style of teaching was incorporated into an engineering materialsselection course. Students realize that changing material properties play an important role inunderstanding why materials are selected for different design specifications. Engineeringstudents take courses in mechanics of material, machine design, finite element analysis andcapstone senior projects. These courses require students to call out and specify the best and leastexpensive material according to some type of chemical, physical or mechanical loadingconditions. Students should understand the way a material behaves in service depends upon itsalloy composition, crystalline structure, manufacturing process and
, Boulder: Westview Press, 1997.[12] Chubin, D.E., and E. Babco, ""Walking the Talk" in Retention-to-Graduation: Institutional Production of Minority Engineers - A NACME Analysis," 2003.[13] Hughes, Q.S., and R.L. Shehab, "WHAT THEY SAY MATTERS: PARENTAL IMPACT ON PRE-COLLEGE ACADEMIC IDENTITY OF SUCCESSFUL AFRICAN AMERICAN ENGINEERING STUDENTS," Proceedings of the 2010 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Louisville, KY, 2010.[14] Jackson, L.A., P.D. Gardner, and L.A. Sullivan, "Engineering persistence: Past, present, and future factors and gender differences," Higher Education Vol. 26, 1993, pp. 227-246.[15] Morning, C., and J. Fleming, "Project Preserve: A Program to
, Perspectives of IO Psychology, and Group and Organization Management, integrates organizational and social psychological theories in conceptualizing social stigma and the work-life interface. This research addresses three primary themes: 1) current manifestations of discrimination and barriers to work-life bal- ance in organizations, 2) consequences of such challenges for its targets and their workplaces, and 3) individual and organizational strategies for reducing discrimination and increasing support for families. In addition to her academic positions, Dr. King has consulted on applied projects related to climate ini- tiatives, selection systems, and diversity training programs, and has worked as a trial consultant. She is
themselves (Table 3) we see there are significant differences in only two cases. It may benoted that in every case but one when this comparison is made, the groups perceive that there aremore differences than seem to actually exist. The one exception is students. They perceivefewer differences than seem to actually exist. Perhaps this is due to their lack of experience.Why do these perceived differences exist? The data obtained from this project cannot answerthis question, but it is important to understand these preconceptions may exist among groups andindividuals so that problems in the design process may be avoided.These data may also be analyzed in another way that could be useful. The weights assigned toeach group by themselves can be compared
experimental and quasi-experimental research. Most of her work involves examination of the social and cognitive indicators predictive of educational success, along with the measurement of educa- tional outcomes. She is currently serving as Co-PI for several funded projects examining the impact of various engineering education models on student persistence, intentions, attitudes, etc.Sheryl A. Sorby, Michigan Technological University Sheryl A. Sorby is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics and Director of Engi- neering Education and Research. She is the former Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Engineering at Michigan Technological University and previously served as a rotator to the
as prepared. I can say that I didn’t know that much. I was one of those kids who was on the fence about science classes. After this camp, I was really inspired. I did my senior project on nanotechnology.Following the camp, participants were contacted six months later to provide feedback on thecamp's impact on their view of science. Camp participants (n=4) completed the follow-upsurvey. Of these, all either Agreed or Strongly Agreed that they could see the value of thesummer camp as it relates to STEM education. When asked if they would participate in the Page 22.225.9Bioengineering summer camp if asked again, all
: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy. Retrieved Jan. 8, 2010 from http://www.opportunityequation.org/5. American Association of Physics Teachers. (2002). AAPT statement on physics first. Retrieved January 12, 2011 from http://www.aapt.org/policy/physicsfirst.cfm.6. National Research Council. (2001). Physics in a new era. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.7. Machold, D. K. (1992). Is physics worth teaching?Science & Education, 1, 301-311.8. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. & Novak, J. D. (1994) Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (ed.) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning: A project of the national science teachers association (New
awardees,for a final total of 58 participants. After completing orientation activities during May 2010, theparticipants traveled to China for 10-12 weeks during the summer to work on frontierengineering research projects in university, industry, and government labs in China. Eachreceived a stipend (US$4,000 for graduate students and US$3,000 for undergraduate students) tohelp support their time spent doing research. All grantees also received allowances for expensesrelated to the required orientation program, travel to and from China, lodging/meals while inChina, and a re-entry meeting. The total award amount was estimated at approximately $7,500(undergraduate students) or $8,500 (graduate students) in reimbursable expenses, and $1,400
received a doctoral degree in Educational Psychology from the University of Texas at Austin, in 1998. She served as an Assistant Professor at the University of Alabama from 1998 to 2002, when she moved to Arizona State University. In 2008 she was promoted by ASU to Associate Professor. Dr. Husman has been a guest editor of Educational Psychology Review, has served on editorial board for top educational research journals, and currently sits on the editorial board of Learning and Instruction. In 2006 she was awarded the U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER grant award and received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers. She has conducted and advised on educational research projects and grants
of instruction will include introduction of material, use of technology in the classroom,cooperative learning, peer sharing and modeling. As always, there will be an open studentdialogue in every class session. Note: There are two Supplemental Instruction (SI) sessions.They are scheduled for Monday & Wednesday 8:50 AM to 9:50 AM.GRADING:There will be four exams, daily lab assignments, and a comprehensive final examination. Therewill be make-up exams administered for each hourly exam with permission of the instructor.Every student is required to take the final exam. The grade for the course will be computed asfollows: Exam 60% Projects 10
AC 2011-2308: PUTTING MATHEMATICS IN CONTEXT: AN INTEGRA-TIVE APPROACH USING MATLABMicah Stickel, University of Toronto Micah Stickel is a lecturer in Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Toronto. He first came to the department when he started as an undergraduate student in 1993. Since that time, he has completed the B.A.Sc. (1997), M.A.Sc. (1999), and Ph.D. degrees (2006). He has been involved in a number of research projects, including the use of spiral antennas for Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems, the design of high-fidelity directional couplers for digital circuits, and the application of micromachining techniques in the fabrication of bandpass filters for broadband