2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 320 Robotic Systems and Material Handling 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 340 Applied Dynamics 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00ENGD080 Writing Lab 2010-2011 Not Transferred 1.00ENGD090 Writing Workshop 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00PHI 194 Global Ethical Viewpoints 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00AELP000 Non-Credit/American English Lang 2010-2011 Not Transferred 0.00CHE 120 General Chemistry I 2010-2011 D Transferred 3.00CHE 120L General Chemistry I Lab
design courses. He has conducted research, with peer-reviewed publications, in biomedical engineering in the areas of biomechanics, bioelectricity, and biomedical imaging, since 1992. Other research interests include renewable energy, optical fiber communications, and project-based multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary education. Page 22.912.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Integrating Online Learning in Interdisciplinary Electromechanical and Electromechanical/Biomedical Design Courses AbstractThe following paper
course focuses on planning, development, andimplementation of an engineering design project, which includes formal report writing, projectdocumentation, group presentations, and project demonstrations. The goal of these courses is todemonstrate the ability to manage a major project involving the design and implementation ofproducts with a mixture of electrical and mechanical elements as a member of a productdevelopment team. In these project-based courses, the students are expected to effectivelymanage their time and team efforts to produce a finished product in three ten-week quarters. Notextbook is required. Weekly progress reports, design notebooks, formal reports, and oralpresentations constitute integral components of this course sequence
to relate these disparities among African American students and criticalthinking. The shortage of African Americans earning college degrees affects the nation as a whole.Reported achievement gaps by Fleming, Garcia & Morning (1995); Fleming & Morning (1998);McDonald & Powell (1998); Lee (1986); Garibaldi (1997); and Jibrell (1990), havedemonstrated that White students scored 30 percent higher than Black students taking theNational Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) science and reading and writing scores 11,12, 13, 14, 15 . Exposing students to critical thinking pedagogies in the K-12 education systems andhigher education institutions can narrow the academic achievement gap for African
mentors and the overall scope of theorganization. Existing models of mentorship do not adequately describe the specific relationshipbetween the college and high schools students: (1) Due to the proximity in both age andexperience, the college students cannot be considered more experienced (traditional model ofmentorship) and (2) Due to the fact that both student populations are in different educationalsystems, the college students cannot be considered peer mentors. To help understand thisalternative mentoring relationship, this study was guided by two research questions:1) Whatmotivates PFP participants to become mentors to high school students? 2) What do theseundergraduate students learn by mentoring high school students? A survey of
ABET-TAC Accreditation in 2006. We spent much time inthe preceding years deciding on what direct measures of assessment we should do in whichcourses in the curriculum. After our process was set up, we wanted to do what Moskalrecommends, which is after an initial assessment process is set up, “greater attention can be paidto concerns of validity, trustworthiness, triangulation, and the completeness of the plan”6.In Borrego’s review of engineering research including such topics as assessment, it was foundthat the reliability and validity of the tests and homework assignments developed by programsare usually not established7. This is certainly the case for our EET program. We write all ourown tests, quizzes, etc., with no peer review, pre-test
the U.S. Senate committee of the Judiciary on security issues associated with peer-to-peer networking. Page 22.1379.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teaching Computer Security Literacy to Students from Non- Computing DisciplinesAbstractGone are the days when cyber security education was only a concern for computer and Internetexperts. In today’s world of pervasive computing, everyone is a target. The volume,sophistication, and
offers frequent networkingopportunities among the teachers (peer support) and a regularly scheduled direct link touniversity program managers (programmatic support). Most instances of HSE function asafterschool programs, and teacher-coaches are paid for their coaching and mentorship just asthose who direct afterschool athletics. Students on HSE teams work on projects that are selected Page 22.539.2by the coach and team and that have local significance for the students and their community.These projects can continue from one academic year to the next. In the course of their HSEexperience, the students write business plans, solve real-world
selection process? Does the prestige of the NAE, and of its members, lend grand-ness (orgrandiosity?) to the Challenges?At least some of the Grand Challenges relate very closely to the work of individual Committeemembers. For example, the emphasis on personalized medicine in Engineer Better Medicinesreflects Craig Venter’s interest in innovation in this area, exemplified by his controversialpublication of his own genome.22 Managing the Nitrogen Cycle is a passion of Rob Socolow,whose work is cited in the write-up.23 He is also deeply involved with Carbon Sequestration,another one of the Challenges, where he is cited again.24 This raises a question about framing –why the heavy emphasis on personalized medicine in Engineer Better Medicines? Why
learning, teachers should continually check for understanding and provide studentswith thoughtful, timely, and precise feedback. Students need to know how well they are doingand are typically open to suggestions for improvement. Generally, the clearer and morespecific an instructor can be with feedback, the better the results for students. Students alsobenefit from peer reactions and should be encouraged to take responsibility for their ownlearning (i.e., taught to self-evaluate). Providing accurate feedback and helping students totake charge of learning can stimulate healthy minds.Improving Pedagogy with Differentiated InstructionA key concept in differentiated instruction is applying a proactive approach to the learning andteaching model. As
peers at other institutions involved in the Mobile Studio project to redesign variouslaboratory and design experiments so that they can be completed by the students using theMobile Studio IOBoardTM. The key issue that we had to address was the fact that the MobileStudio IOBoardTM is limited to very low voltages (plus or minus 4 Volts) because it draws itspower from the USB port of the laptop it is connected to. This implied that laboratoryexperiments that required a “Power Supply” or “Function Generator” with more than 5 volts hadto be redesigned in such a way that the overall concept of the experiments could still beunderstood by the students. The instructors involved in the Mobile Studio project at the variousinstitutions worked together very
, machine vision, and adaptive and nonlinear control, especially applied to UAVs. During his stay at WVU Dr. Campa has published more than 30 peer-reviewed articles in international journals, about 60 research papers for international conferences, and a couple of book chapters. He has joined the MathWorks in 2009, where he currently works as a Technical Evangelist for the US west coast area. Page 22.619.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Enhancing Mechatronics Education using Model-Based Techniques and Mathworks ToolsAbstract- This paper
important [16]. Evidently as Davies (8 p 94) deducedheadmasters believed universities promoted some kind of social intercourse that was notpresent in the CATs.Whatever else it is, a liberal education is not a specialization. Technology is aspecialization so whatever differentiates a university student of technology from atechnological student in a technical college it is something other than the study oftechnology. Whatever it is, it contributes to the student‟s development as a gentlemanirrespective of what he studies. “It seeks” as Davies writes, “to confer on its recipients afreedom of mind which those who do not possess this advantage will not exhibit.” Thusthe technical college student is in a certain kind of bondage because his studies do
lieu of a final exam. Common interview questionsinclude formative assessment and professional development questions such as: What are you going to do to continue your own learning about teaching and learning? In retrospect, if you needed to miss a session which one would it have been? Topics of the course have varied modestly between offerings. However, they link closely toskills sets faculty are recognized to need for teaching25,26. Most of the following topics havebeen consistently included: Historic Perspectives in Teaching Engineering and University Teaching Learning Styles* Course and Syllabus Design Defining and Creating Learning Objectives Teaching Design and Laboratories Effective Lecturing* Writing in
for undergraduates)in the academic year before the capstone project. This is to obtain buy-in from the appropriatefaculty mentors and allow them to socialize it with their students. This way the team can largelybe in place and know what to expect before the end of the spring semester. This would reducethe 2-4 week “ramp-up” time resulting from different schedules and team assignment practices indifferent engineering programs.It took longer than expected for the students to leave the comfort of their own discipline andinteract in an interdisciplinary way with their peers to develop a thorough understanding of thechallenge at hand and develop conceptual solution alternatives at the system level. We have alsohad challenges in aligning the
of their experiences withand reactions to engineering coursework. In particular, differences between experiences ofpersisters and non-persisters in their first two years of study are compared to identify factors thatmay strongly influence non-persisters to switch out of engineering.Prior research on the same data set has found that at the onset of their first year, non-persistersare already less intent on finishing an undergraduate major, and they experience a sharp decreasein intrinsic psychological motivation to continue studying engineering after their first year. Thecurrent work shows that non-persisters do not take significantly less engineering courseworkthan their peers during their first year, and students who ultimately choose non
statics.21 The organization of knowledge is constructed at the time of learning and can beinfluenced by instruction8 and study behaviors.13 In fact, studies comparing the knowledgeorganization of successful and struggling students in postsecondary classrooms shows that moresuccessful students’ express an organizational structure that more closely resembles that ofexperts than do their less successful peers (e.g., Refs. 22, 23). These differences have beenassociated with performance on classroom assessments24 and problem solving measures.2 Taken together, this body of research suggests that one way in which an instructor couldimprove students’ problem solving is by helping students to develop a well-organized knowledgebase and showing
the federally recognized categories of impairment (hearing, visual, and mobility), surveys allowedparticipants to write-in other disabilities; these are denoted by an asterisk.Using a five-point Likert scale (―strongly disagree‖ to ―strongly agree‖), high school studentparticipants responded to statements about STEM courses, such as ―It seems like Science,Technology, Math and Engineering classes are geared more for boys than girls.‖ High schoolteachers helped develop appropriate language for the student surveys. These questions shed lighton students‘ perceptions of courses versus fields by gender, race, and (dis)ability.Likert scales, while limited in various ways, are useful because ―they build in a degree ofsensitivity and differentiation
learning,etiquette, writing, ethics, etc. Each semester students are given multiple opportunities tohave feedback provided on their written work and speaking skills. They also practicegiving effective feedback to other students. Each week a different practicing engineerfrom industry comes for lunch and “story hour” where she or he shares importantmessages and experiences from their careers.At the end of the semester there are several culminating events: • Practice Final Design Review: where students get faculty and peer feedback in a non-graded opportunity to give their design project presentation. After being given the opportunity to use the feedback for improvement the students present their final design work and summary of
pursued differently as individual faculty try to advance theiracademic careers11. Recent research conducted with a sample of science and engineering facultyat top U.S. research universities12 shows that research university faculty‟s allocation of time toteaching, research, grant writing, and service differs before and after they have been tenured andpromoted to full professor. For example, tenure-track assistant professors in research universitiestend to spend more time in research and grant writing than tenured faculty. Once tenured andpromoted to associate professors, faculty tend to spend more time in teaching and service andless time in research and grant writing than the amounts that they spent in those categories aspre-tenure faculty. After
ofengineering. However, there is increasing evidence that middle school is the level at which girlsbegin to disengage and lose interest in STEM fields. Day4 writes: “As early as fourth grade,girls begin to turn off and tune out in science classes and drift away. By the time they enter highschool, even if their interest revives, it’s often too late. They don’t have the foundation to pursueadvanced courses.” Countryman et al.5 write about the enrollment disparity in computer scienceclasses as learners enter high school; girls enroll in fewer computer science classes than do boys. Page 22.1092.2The authors reference the influence of a culture in which
22.1363.6respectively, and some 347, 25, and 17 peer-reviewed articles using Web of Science® [retrievedAugust 16, 2010].It should be noted that memory of past accidents and their lessons learned are not only encodedin education, but they are often “institutionalized”, in building codes for example orOccupational Health and Safety regulations. As a result, instilling the memory of past accidentsand their lessons learned in engineering students can be seen as serving the function of diversityin redundancy (where memory resides and who recalls and exercises it) to help to avoid a repeatof similar accidents. Teaching engineering students about accident causation and system safetycan serve to complement and reinforce institutionalized safety requirements, and it
presentation. Animportant strategy to enforce rehearsing involved pairing students to peer-evaluate theirpresentations prior to final delivery. This was in addition to a short animated video ‘Get Preparedto Present Well’ produced specifically for the course, along with a check list, to emphasize thekey techniques. A pre- and post-survey was conducted to benchmark presentation skills anddetermine how regimented rehearsing affected their delivery. When rehearsed, the studentsclearly saw an improvement in their performances and as a result developed a strongappreciation for the importance of practicing. However, the study also identified that when theassignment is demanding and time is limited, practice is first to be sacrificed.IntroductionABET
criteria. We elected not to have all teams develop the same app, but to let the teamscollaboratively define their own apps. In doing so the teams spent the initial part of the projectwriting their own user stories. One member of the team was appointed Product Owner to resolveproposed feature conflicts. This activity allowed everyone to participate in the writing andestimation of user stories. We included the initial development of user stories and Android bootcamp as Iteration Zero activities, with the exit criteria from Iteration Zero being that there wouldbe sufficient work defined to support the start of Sprint 1. Page 22.1712.5The instructor
prepare students to not only work effectively with other disciplines, but actually thrive in this role. • Ongoing group process facilitation including peer-coaching during laboratory sessions.The developed biomedical instrumentation laboratory, including laboratory procedures andmanuals will be made available to community colleges partnering with Drexel University andalso to middle and high schools participating in activities organized by the Drexel’s faculty.Specifically, the hands-on laboratory- and project-based courses described below will be offeredto the students of Burlington County College (BCC), Delaware County Community College(DCCC), Montgomery County Community College (MCCC), Community College ofPhiladelphia (CCP), and
disciplines are not obviously aligned. The common engineeringteaching paradigm divides complex problems into many pieces which students are then taught tosolve independently, all the while anticipating that eventually, they will “be able to develop asolution by combining them…Eventually...the effort involved in learning about the small piecesis so overwhelming that we can longer synthesize the original problem–the parts become moreimportant than the whole.”1 Further, the engineering curricular focus on solving “one problem ata time,” assuming a singular answer or solution, stands in direct contrast to “the history ofmodern technology and society in all its vital messy complexity.”2 As Charles Vest, formerPresident of MIT writes, “There are two
understanding as well as additional educational outcomes. Theframework adopted for the activities presented in this study drew heavily on the Workshop Physicsmodel, the defining elements of which (Laws et al., 1999) are shown in Table 1. Table 1: Elements of Inquiry-Based Activity Modules (Laws et al 1999) (a) Use peer instruction and collaborative work (b) Use activity-based guided-inquiry curricular materials (c) Use a learning cycle beginning with predictions (d) Emphasize conceptual understanding (e) Let the physical world be the authority (f) Evaluate student understanding (g) Make appropriate use of technology
learning outcomesevaluated via student feedback questionnaires, peer reviews, supervisor comments and employersurveys. The student feedback questionnaire was administered pre- and post- in a design projectclass. Sustainability learning outcomes were assessed based on the relative importance studentsassigned sustainability between the pre- and post-questionnaires to the other factors involved inproject implementation. The peer reviews included sustainability as a measurement of projectachievement – reinforcing students’ belief in sustainability issues18.The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) has developed a university level course forsustainability education with a goal of integrating environmental, social, and economicsustainable
number of factors that determine a student’s problem solving success and final homework scores in these courses. For example, the homework scores also reflect knowledge of the subject, mathematical accuracy, and help from peers. Other factors from the study environment to the attitude of the teacher impact problem solving success, but they were not considered. The focus here is on a single factor (persistence, quantified by time) and its relationship to problem solving success. Clearly, more data is needed to make any definitive conclusions, but the data presented here suggest, at most, a weak correlation between persistence and problem solving success. 2. The overestimation/over-reporting of the time
production comes down, LH2 becomes an evermore attractive option. As planned there, the concept exploration results from last year havebecome the starting point for this year’s course assignments. The gaps in learning seen last yearare being addressed this year.The new paper for 2011 extends prior work through a second cycle of iteration, bringing in theexperiences of developing a paper for professional peer review, presenting to visiting technicalexperts from industry, and hopefully, presenting to the airline industry in 2011. It also discussesthe experience from a current experiment to close the iterative cycle of improvement: refiningthe undergraduate high speed aerodynamics course, incorporating the lessons and capabilitieslearned from the