, , M. Richey, K. McPherson, X. Fouger, and C. Simard, “Graduate and undergraduate design projects utilizing a virtual product life-cycle management (VPLM),” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2008.15. W. M. Butler, J. P. Terpenny, R. M. Goff, R. S. Pant, and H. M. Steinhaur, “Improving the aerospace capstone design experience through simulation based learning,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2012.16. R. Goff and J. Terpenny, “Engineering design education - core competencies,” in 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting (ASM). Nashville, TN: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, January 2012.17. U. Haupt, “Case
achieved during the GAM. The incoming and outgoing hyperbolic asymptotes aredisplayed radiating from the planet and reinforce the ease of interpretation by the student. Figure 1: Gravity Assist Maneuver Example2Figure 1, above, shows a sample GAM plot using planet centered coordinates. In the program, allgravity assists are assumed to be powered, and if an unpowered gravity assist is better, theoptimization reduces the ΔV magnitude to a negligible value.2 In the figure, the incoming andoutgoing hyperbolic trajectories are shown in black and blue, respectively, with a red poweredΔV direction vector. In this example case, the ΔV direction vector is displayed, but its magnitudeis negligibly small (< 1 m/s). Further
about entire near-space mission On-the-spot design of ballooning mission to explore Venus (done in 1980’s by USSR!) Submit “Rev. C” of Team Project Doc. – includes Flight Data Analysis, Lessons Learned Public exhibit of payloads, flight photos/video, data analysis, team project documentation Course evaluations, wrap-up discussion of opportunities – “Where do we go from here?”Student Payloads – Hardware and ExperimentsHere are the contents of a handout giving an overview of the main payload-build assignment:A. Required basic components • Payload box, built from materials provided (it must be light (no more than 2 lb before rigging), strong (survive potentially-rough flight and landing), and thermally insulating
administrators in questionbothered to read these comments, had them read to them, understood or cared if they did either.Table 3: Comments from Interested StudentsCommentOne of the purposes of the course was to be able to design a military defense system. Thisproject was due on one of the last days of the semester and in order to do it we had to apply allthe knowledge learnt during the course. It is not true that we had no textbook. It was not veryused during the classes. But (the prof) gave us the syllabus the first day of class, and there wereall the topics of the course were related with the corresponding chapters of the book.He is not afraid to give the grades that one deserves. He has given me 40’s and has given me120’s, and every time I deserved
www.spaceportindiana.com2 www.seds.org3 List, R.J., Smithsonian Meteorological Tables, vol. 114, 1951.4 Federal Standard 1037C, Telecom Glossary 2000, 7 Aug 1996.5 http://www.airnav.com/airport/KBAK Page 23.665.96 Yagi, H, and Uda, S., Japanese Patent No. 69115, 1926.
Aerospace Engineering Training 1992-2002, conducted by Abacus Associates, 2003.[3] J. Bauman. NASA chief justifies cuts during session at USU. Deseret Morning News, August 15, 2006. Cited from online version: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,645193239,00.html?pg=2[4] M.D. Griffin, “How Do We Fix Systems Engineering”, 61st International Astronaut Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2010.[5] H. Petroski, “To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design”, St. martin’s Press, New York, 1985.[6] H. Petroski, “Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error Judgment in Engineering”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.[7] D. Lanning, W. Lestari, S. Waterhouse, “A Laboratory-Based Course in Aerospace
1157070. The first author greatly appreciates the Texas A&M University AerospaceREU Program and mentors for their support and the activities provided in making this researchexperience an opportunity for continuous learning.Bibliography 1. Barbarino, S., Bilgen, O., Ajaj, R. M., Friswell, M. I., and Inman, D. J. 2011. “A Review of Morphing Aircraft,” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 22: 823–877. 2. Bertacchini, O.W. 2009. “Characterization and modeling of transformation induced fatigue of shape memory alloy actuators,” Doctor of Philosophy dissertation, Texas A&M University. 3. Bierögel, C., Grellmann, W., Fahnert, T., and Lach R. 2006. “Material parameters for the evaluation of PA
(greencircles) and 5 graduate student mentors (turquoise circles) are shown for demonstration. Eachproject has a graduate student mentor with only the most experienced students supervising morethan one project. The graduate students meet with their undergraduate team(s) a couple of timesa week (ideally) and are available for consultation at other times. These graduate students arevolunteers who are involved in some aspect of project engineering in their own research. Theyare chosen largely on their understanding that, to receive the benefit of undergraduates workingon their project, they will be required to invest much more time at the beginning than simplyundertaking the specific tasks themselves. Such mentoring abilities require considerablecoaching
, and Test Projects to Teach Engineering, Elger, D.F.; Beyerlein, S.W.; Budwig, R.S.,Frontiers in Education 30th Annual Conference, 2000, Volume 2, Issue , 2000 Page(s):F3C/9 - F3C13 Page 23.1304.710. Virtual Flight Tests: An Effective Pedagogical Tool, M. Javed Khan and Bruce Heath, ASEE AnnualConference, 11 -13 June, San Antonio, TX, 201211. The Development and Implementation of a Flight Simulation Based Environment for Teaching Math & Science,M. Javed Khan, Marcia Rossi, Chadia Aji, Bruce Heath, Proceedings of the SITE Conference, 5 – 9 March, 2012,Austin, TX12. Teaching of Math and Physics Using a Flight Simulator, M. Javed
, 2000. 3. Cimbala, J. M.; Pauley, L. L.; Zappe, S. E.; Hsieh, M. Experiential learning in a fluid flow class via take-home experiments. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2006. 4. Hertzberg, J.; Leppek, B. R.; Gray, K. E. Art for the Sake of Improving Attitudes Toward Engineering. ASEE Annual Conference, 2012. 5. Jouaneh, M.; Palm, W. System Dynamics and Control Take Home Experiments. ASEE Annual Conference, 2010. 6. Cengel, Y. A.; Cimbala, J. M. Fluid Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications; McGraw Hill: Boston, 2010. 7. Stephan, E. A.; Bowman, D. R.; Park, W. J.; Sill, B. L.; Ohland, M. W. Thinking like an engineer: An active learning approach; Pearson: New Jersey, 2011. 8. Tennekes, H. The Simple Science of Flight; MIT Press