Biology Scholars Program of the American Society of Microbiology. Prior to becoming focused on en- gineering education, his research interests included hemodynamics and the study of how vascular cells respond to fluid forces and its implications in vascular pathologies.Dr. Charles S. Tritt, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Tritt has been the director of the Biomedical Engineering program at the Milwaukee School of En- gineering (MSOE) since 2009. He has been teaching at MSOE since 1990. His Ph.D. is in Chemical Engineering from the Ohio State University as is his B.S. degree. He holds an M.S. in Biomedical Engi- neering, also from Ohio State. His research interests include biomedical applications of mass, heat and
is generated in the QAorepeating sequence block in the model, which provides flow as a predetermined function of time.This function takes a user-defined heart rate and stroke volume to calculate a time waveform ofblood flow out of the heart. This blood from the heart flows into an “Add” block that subtractsoff the flow of blood leaving the artery into the systemic circulation. The output of the “Add”block is the net flow of blood into the systemic artery. This is then fed into an integration block,indicated by “1/s.” Integration of the flow gives the volume of blood in the artery, indicated byV. This volume of blood results in stretching the walls of the artery to create pressure. Theconversion of volume to pressure is done through the
, S., Kuh, G. D. & Gayles, J. G. Engaging Undergraduate Students in Research Activities: Are Research Universities Doing a Better Job? Innovative Higher Education 32, 167-177, doi:10.1007/s10755-007-9043- y (2007).2 Kinkead, J. Learning Through Inquiry: An Overview of Undergraduate Research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2003, 5-18, doi:10.1002/tl.85 (2003).3 University, B. C. o. E. U. i. t. R. Reinventing undergraduate education: a blueprint for America’s research Page 23.626.11 universities., (State University of New York, Stony Brook, 1998).4 Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L
attainment of the program’s learning outcomes and thesenior design projects.Bibliography1. Altuger-Genc, G. and Chassapis, C. Fostering Lifelong Learning in a Capstone Design Environment: An Implementation assessment. 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 20112. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Thomson, Ph, Harrison, K. Assessment Framework for Capstone Design Courses. Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 20063. Bloom, B.S. and Krathwohl, D.R. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.” Handbook 1. Cognitive Domain. New York., Addison-Wesley, 19844. Cooley, W.L. Individual Students Assessment in Team-Based Capstone Design Projects. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in
Page 23.1400.31 U.S. Department of Education, International and Foreign Language Education Service,http://www2.ed.gov/programs/fipsenortham/index.html2 http://www.nareti.com/host institution(s), forwarding applications for which they recommend travel awards. The hostinstitution determines final acceptance. Accepted students then work with international officestaff and NARETI faculty at the host institution regarding travel logistics, curriculum options,and specific research/internship opportunities.Program assessment: An evaluation plan and specific assessment tools were identified so as toassess the program objectives (Table 2). These assessment tools include: (1) a healthcareawareness survey, (2) two case study reports, (3) a global
between the two paper styles. quite daunting and took a ton of effort outside of class. However, it was definitely a worthwhile experience - something I would for sure do again.”Literature cited1. Linda Dynan, T. C. The Impact of Writing Assignments on Student Learning: Should Writing Assignments Be Structured or Unstructured? Computers in Higher Education Economics Review 8, 64–86 (2009).2. Guilford, W. H. Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Adv.Physiol Educ. 25, 167–175 (2001).3. Guilford, W. H. Experimental case studies to engage higher cognitive skills. Advan. Physiol. Edu. 33, 358–359 (2009).4. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H. & Krathwohl, D. R. A taxonomy of educational
, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. 2012: Baltimore, MD2. BMES. Biomedical Engineering Society Code of Ethics. 2012 [cited 2012 October 23]; Available from: http://www.bmes.org/aws/BMES/pt/sp/ethics.3. Kohn, L., J. Corrigan, and M. Donaldson, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, I.o.M. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Editor. 2000, National Academy Press: Washington, DC.4. NIOSH. Prevention through Design. 2012 [cited October 24]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/5. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition ed. 2003: Free Press6. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Pedagogies of engagement: classroom-based practices. Journal of
to TTL levels for devicecontrol. For engineering programs that lack resources for extensive neural interface research,this game offer a less expensive, but no less educational, laboratory experience forundergraduates. The possibility for adaptation of these toys to control various devices for neuralinterface demonstrations is limited only by the imagination of an engineer.References (note to reviewers - references need formatted to ASEE standards)1 Reyes, Janet F. and Tosunoglu, Sabri, “An Overview of Brain-Computer Interface Technology Applications in Robotics” Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics. May 2011.2 Velliste, Meel; Perel, Sagi; Spalding, M. Chance; Whitford, Andrew S.; Schwartz, Andrew B. “Cortical control of
show good signal acquisition technique, goodacquired signals, an understanding of the underlying digital signal processing, and a reasonableresult. Of the 37 design teams to date, all but one was successful.Summary The ABPM Project is a freshman mini-project which is succeeding in realizing the objectivesidentified in this paper. Preliminary outcome assessment indicates that objectives are beingachieved, and suggests areas for improvement in both the assessment process and the projectitself.References [1 ] Caverly, R., Fulmar, H., Santhanam, S., Singh, P., O’Brien, J, Jones, G., Char, E., Mercede, F., Weinstein, R., and Yost, J., Project-Based Freshman Engineering Experience: The Core Course, ASEE Annual Meeting, 2010. [2 ] L
. 157-174, 2010.3.Cunado D., Nash M.J., Nixon S. M., Carter N. J., "Gait Extraction and Description by Evidence- Gathering," inProceedings of the Second International Conference on Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication,1999, pp. 43-48.4.Moeslund T.,Granum E., "A Survey of Computer Vision-Based Human Motion Capture," Computer Vision andImage Understanding, vol. 81, pp. 231-268, 2001.5.Habibi M., Ulseth R., “Time allocation Scaffolding in Project-Based Learning” Proceedings 2012 ASEE AnnualConference, AC 2012-4180.6.Ewart D., et al, “Entrepreneurship in the Iron Range Engineering (IRE) Model,” Proceedings 2012ASEE Annual Conference, AC 2011-974.7.Kilpatrick E., Stage E., “Self-motivated Learning for Professionalism in an
onfreshmen and sophomore bioengineering students in the future.Bibliography1. Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D.D., and Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering design, thinking, teaching,and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, (86) p. 17-28.2. Howe, S., and Wilbarger, J. (2006). 2005 National Survey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses. ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition Session 2525.3. United States Department of Labor-Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook.http://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/4. Partnership for 21st century skills. 2011. http://www.p21.org/5. Taylor, S. (1999). Better learning through better thinking: Developing students’ metacognitive abilities. Journalof College Reading and
cm Green di 0.19 cm 160 Settling Velocity [cm/s] 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80