Paper ID #6120Learning Strategies and Learning Traits Critical to Practicing Engineers af-ter CollegeMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University and the recipient of NSF awards for research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service
- ington. When he finds the time, he enjoys cooking, photography, bicycle repair, and cycling (instead of owning a car).Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri is in the Design Group of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford. Besides teaching undergraduate and graduate courses on structural analysis and design, she serves an administrative role as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. Her research focuses on the study of educational and career pathways of people interested in technical work (and how to make K-20 education more supportive of these pathways). Page 23.621.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 From Freshman Engineering Students to Practicing
enrolled in a first-yearengineering design course (3 sections) and 52 graduate engineering students enrolled in amaster’s level systems engineering course (2 sections) at Penn State University. Studentsvolunteered to participate based on a description of our research project and received nocompensation for their participation. Each student completed a concept map of a course-relatedtopic as a class exercise mid-way through each course; the topics were systems thinking(undergraduates) and creativity (graduates), respectively. All students were provided with briefinstructions about concept mapping and performed at least one “practice map” before completingthe maps of interest; they were given approximately 30 minutes to complete each mapping task
fact, the primary graduation requirements were twosignificant projects: Project #1: The Interdisciplinary Project. This project, usually completed in the junior year, asked the student to address a problem at the intersection of science and technology with societal need. Project #2: The Major Project. This project, usually completed in the senior year, is a design or research project in the student’s major area of study.Each project carries 9 credits, roughly one quarter of an academic year’s work. Each project hasa faculty advisor working closely with a small team of students (usually 2–4 but sometimes 1 ormore than 4). For the major project, the advisor is a faculty member in the appropriatediscipline. For the
, moresatisfied students with enhanced career potential. Beginning in AY 2009-10, the Collegebrought together faculty advisors from the eight departments to discuss best practices, establishnew academic policies, and to begin to draw all the departments towards convergence inadvising methods. It soon became clear that to reach convergence on new college-wide advisingpractices, a program with faculty support and recognition was needed. Consequently in AY2011-12, the College launched the Designated Faculty Advisors (DFA) program, for which theDean and the Provost split the funding needed to provide course released time for 16 facultyadvisors. In addition to expanding their advising repertoire, the presence of engineering facultyfrom every department lent
- building in instructional technology.Alana Unfried, North Carolina State University Alana Unfried is a Graduate Research Assistant at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University. She works on the Data Analytics team for the MISO Project (Maximizing the Impact of STEM Outreach through Data-Driven Decision Making), funded by the National Science Foundation. Alana’s responsibilities include the development of statistically sound evaluation instruments for teachers and students involved in these campus outreach programs. She also analyzes survey results and related data to understand the collective impact of these pre-college outreach programs. Alana is also a full-time Ph.D. student
requirements and how they may influence time to graduation. There is also a general lack of awareness about the process involved in transferring ECC to Iowa State. Policies/programs that use student credit hours earned (classification: freshman, sophomore, etc.) as a determining factor need to be revisited based on the ECC trend.Research QuestionsWhile there is a growing body of research of the impact of early college credit at theinstitutional-level or on student success as a whole, research specifically related to early collegecredit within a College of Engineering or for engineering students is lacking. By furtheranalyzing the data collected as a part of the Early Credit Task Force, this paper will answer threebroad research
Paper ID #7090 Recognition, several North Carolina Sustainable Building Design Competition Awards, Environmental Design + Construction Sustainable Design Award, American Society for Quality Competition Award, and a Faculty of the Year Award. He has developed undergraduate architectural curriculum and Masters of Architecture programs. He has also developed undergraduate curriculum in construction management using BIM technology. Currently he is working on developing GIS and BIM certification programs at the graduate level.Dr. Chafic BouSaba, NC A&T SU, CST Dept. Page 23.908.2 c
Professor Center for Engineering Education Research Undergraduate Studies Office College of Engineering Michigan State University Dr. Urban-Lurain is responsible for teaching, research and curriculum development, with emphasis on engineering education and, more broadly, STEM education. His research interests are in theories of cognition, how these theories inform the design of instruction, how we might best design instructional technology within those frameworks, and how the research and development of instructional technologies can inform our theories of cognition. He is also interested in preparing future STEM faculty for teaching, incorporating instructional technology as part of instructional design, and STEM
discussed, and opportunities for furtherstudy will be proposed.Literature on Student Attitudes towards EngineeringResearchers have used academic measures, demographic information, and survey instruments, totry to develop an understanding of how students decide to major in engineering and thepersistence of those students in engineering programs. Most commonly, statistical procedureswere used to relate high school performance, standardized test scores, and demographicinformation to retention in engineering, or engineering GPA. For example, one study appliedlogistic regression to a database of more than 80,000 students to assess the impact of high schoolGPA, SAT scores, gender, ethnicity and citizenship affected graduation rates.1 They concludedthat
all types of institutions, especiallyresearch universities, is critical in order to gain a better understanding of their impact and todevelop the most effective practices for various educational environments. Developing a broaderliterature-base on undergraduate research would be of particular importance to researchuniversities as the face the challenge of not having enough research opportunities to theincreasing number of interested undergraduate students13-15. Thus, the purpose of this study wasto examine the gains of two community college students who participated in an undergraduateresearch program at a research university.Description of Program From 2006 - 2012, a Midwest research university has delivered an REU. For 10-weeks inthe
conceptualized as18 “a design for instrumental action that reduces the uncertaintyin the cause-effect relationship involved in achieving a desired outcome” (p 13). Thisdescription of technology indicates that the paradigm of diffusion research focuses on thoseinnovations which have relatively well defined outcomes where one of the desired feature for theinnovation is to reduce the uncertainty in the cause-effect relationship. This is in contrast tosome of the innovative ideas and practices in contemporary education that call for open-endedstudent directed interactive learning20–23. Learning from this perspective is considered to be anon-linear process that has emergent outcomes without much focus on the cause-effectrelationships within the process
improving things.According to the interview participants, the main way in which the University was helping themdevelop their creativity was through the engineering design projects. For example: “I know Engineering Design was probably a really good class. I think I learned a lot from that class. Being creative – we had to do a lot of brainstorming. We learned different methods… which helps us to brainstorm ideas and then come up with even more ideas based on our first ideas. But anyways, we also learned different ways to narrow down ideas, choose the best one in the situation… I'd say just working on the design projects gives us practice at being creative and also working as a team and being creative with a
at Mississippi State University. She previously worked for the Geosystems Research Institute as a scientific visualization and virtual reality researcher, and for Mississippi State’s Electrical and Computer Engi- neering department as Outreach Coordinator. Her research interests focus on technology in engineering education, effective design of engineering courses and curricula, and scientific visualization.Mr. Dakota Farquhar-Caddell, School of Education Dakota Farquhar-Caddell is a Masters’s student in the Higher Education program at Virginia Tech and serving as a research assistant in the College of Engineering. His research interests include examining factors that impact learning experiences both in and out of
Practice Award. He was awarded the Achievement in Operations Research Medal from the Institute for Operation Research and Management Sciences (INFORMS) and has been named an Edelman Laureate for twice having been a finalist in the prestigious Edelman Competition for the best Operations Research application in the world. He has over 100 scholarly publications and has been Principal or Co-Principal Investigator for grants and contracts in excess of $10 million.Dr. Odis Hayden Griffin Jr., East Carolina University Hayden Griffin is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering at East Carolina Uni- versity and Professor Emeritus of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds BS and MS in
Paper ID #7714Key Aspects of Cyberlearning Resources with Compelling ResultsMrs. Jeremi S London, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jeremi S. London is a graduate student at Purdue University. She is pursing a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation. In 2008, she earned a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering from Purdue, and a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from Purdue in 2013. Her research interests include: the use of cyber- learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education; assessing the impact of cyberlearning; and exploring ways computer simulations can be used to
partial strategy or in addition totraditional curriculum in engineering courses17-20.Projects are universally the ‘modus operandi’ of engineering practice. Projects are typically acomponent of engineering design courses, which are usually separate from engineering scienceand are more likely though not all at the upper level. As examples of research on project work,Dym et al21 present project-based learning as the favored model for teaching design, while Franket al22 present a freshman year introductory engineering course based on project work. PBL andproject work share some similarities such as being multi-disciplinary, collaborative, and self-directed, but the two approaches differ slightly in their focus and method of implementation24. InPBL
they performed experimental research oncombustion of non-conventional bio-derived fuels for hybrid propellant rocket engines. Such aproject requires self-learning of new material on two-phased combustion and flows, chemicalthermodynamics, and analysis and research on current papers. As a result of this project,students are required to write a research report and submit and present the research paper atnational or international research conferences. Thus they get valuable skills and developcompetencies applicable in their future engineering practice and or graduate studies.Research Topics, or Open-Ended Design problems in Engineering DynamicsEngineering Dynamics is a sophomore level course at Central Connecticut State University(CCSU). The
Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 Best Paper Award for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Dr. Karen J McGaughey, Cal Poly State University Associate Professor Department of Statistics California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, CA Page 23.521.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Engineering Students’ Development as Lifelong LearnersAbstractIt is widely accepted that one goal of
. She also has interests in the diffusion of effective educational interventions and practices.Prof. Audrey Briggs Champagne, University at Albany, SUNY Please note I am Professor EmeritaDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is in- terested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and