Asee peer logo
Displaying all 2 results
Conference Session
Using graphics in the rest of the engineering courses
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andy S Zhang, New York City College of Technology of CUNY; GAFFAR BARAKAT GAILANI, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
components [1-5].In fall 2012, a team of faculty members consisting an instructor who taught the capstone Page 23.810.2course: Machine Design that has a senior design project, and two instructors, one full-timeand one part-time, both were teaching t h e engineering graphics c o u r s e c a l l e dA d v a n c e d S o l i d M o d e l i n g started to work on a collaborative project to address theissues mentioned above. Based on the findings that many students who were enrolled in theMachine Design class did not have enough knowledge and skills in creating gears and sheetmetal components, a special design project that requires students to
Conference Session
CAD Assessments, Trends and Applications
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Srikanth B Pidugu, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Mamdouh M. Bakr, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Swaminadham Midturi, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; George P Tebbetts, University of Arkansas, Little Rock
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
needs. Our DA and IDA methods assess student (learning) outcomes satisfying the Page 23.230.3MET specific criteria are in coincidence with ETAC Criteria. It’s also to be noted however, thatthere is a considerable overlap between ETAC and MET specific criteria. Two methods –Direct and Indirect Assessment methods are used to assess the studentoutcomes of METs. The DA method uses semester exams, quizzes, projects, lab reports,independent study papers, and capstone design projects, and the IDA method uses end of thesemester self-assessment by students. As pointed out earlier, we need only the raw scores and thetest papers for this model but not