Conference Session

Intercollegiate and Cross-disciplinary Collaboration

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Burks Fasse PhD, Georgia Institute of Technology; James William Schwoebel, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ethan James Craig, Georgia Institute of Technology; Anish Joseph, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ajit Vakharia, Georgia Institute of Technology; Steve M. Potter PhD, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kim Dooley, Texas A&M University; James DUPE Linder, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

determine the lasting effects of participation on this program. Anticipated data includeoverall educational utility of the program as well as project sustainability (evidenced by grantapplications) and impact in the Georgia Tech community. We are already beginning to see how the first implementation of LINCR seems to bemaking an impact on collaborative efforts at Georgia Tech. For example, a Center for HumanAchievement of Movement and Performance (CHAMP) has been proposed as aninterdisciplinary research center for movement disorders. This was originally a proposed LINCRproject self-assembled into a PI initiative to start a new collaborative research center designed tocultivate a community of interdisciplinary research. Additionally, the

Conference Session

Capstone Projects, Design Projects, and Teamwork

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tomas Enrique Estrada, Elizabethtown College

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

member with a valuable opportunity for professional growth.-Finally, incorporating topics of interest which may not be in the curriculum could provide thestudents with a more tangible sense of how the theory learned in the classroom carries over tosolving problems in practical applications.In addition to the above opportunities, there were a number of unique characteristics to a smalldepartment and a liberal arts college which we considered to be advantages. Amongst them werethe following:-Lack of graduate projects for instructors to mentor: Because the instructors did not also directgraduate research, all project-oriented time is devoted to undergraduate students

Conference Session

Integrating Art, Humanities, and Engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy W. Simpson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Marcus Shaffer, Penn State Architecture; Elisha Clark Halpin, Penn State University, School of Theatre, Dance Program; Amy Dupain Vashaw, Center for the Performing Arts @ Penn State; Dorothy H. Evensen, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

bothsurprised and delighted by the impact of the event and their project.Finally, one thing that all of the students suffered from on this capstone project was a lack offoresight. The design project was structured so that faculty research and pre-project prep wouldguide/facilitate the work, not dictate the final results. This working method allowed for a greatdegree of student input (far greater than any other capstone deign project), but it also meant thatstudents were operating with reserved confidence and expectations. In the end, there was a gooddegree of original/inventive design, but stereotypes of engineers and artists prevailed. Theengineering students craved structure and focus, and the architecture and dance students sawstructure and focus as

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Learning, Evaluation, and Assessment

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew E. McFarland, University of Virginia; Reid Bailey, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

University to assessthe impact of the Collaborative Engineering Program on its cohort of students.1.1 Research QuestionsThe long-term goal of this research is to improve understanding of how students become proficient atinterdisciplinary design for the purpose of creating better curricula to develop graduates with those skills.To facilitate this goal, the primary research method used was to observe engineering students from boththe Collaborative Engineering Program and not in the program working on interdisciplinary design teamson an engineering design activity. It uses a mixed-methods approach to address two main objectives,interdisciplinary collaboration and engineering design, by addressing two high level research questions.Research Question 1

Conference Session

Robotics, Mechatronics, and Control Systems - Multidisciplinary Perspectives

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chad Eric Davis P.E., University of Oklahoma; Pakize S. Pulat, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

approachof the course did not translate well because it was more difficult to effectively use hands-ondemonstrations. While researching other pedagogical approaches1,2,13,14 to circuits for non-majors courses, two common themes emerged. First, incorporating hands-on experimentallearning opportunities is a best practice for this type of course. Second, it is desirable to makethe courses with electrical subject matter as practical and relevant as possible. Since theinfrastructure for a lab-based course was not available, a method to bring a hands-on elementinto the large lecture hall was desired. After discussing the situation with another professor whoimplemented a robotics project into a freshman orientation course5 and seeing

Conference Session

Robotics, Mechatronics, and Control Systems - Multidisciplinary Perspectives

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael A. Gennert, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Taskin Padir, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

, designedtop-down, incorporates a number of best practices, including spiral curriculum, a unified set ofcore courses, multiple pathways, inclusion of social issues and entrepreneurship, an emphasis onprojects-based learning, and capstone design projects. This paper provides a brief synopsis,comparison with other approaches, and multi-year retrospective on the program. The curriculumhas evolved rapidly from the original to its current state, including changes in requirements,courses, hardware, software, labs, and projects. The guiding philosophy remains unchanged,however, providing continuity of purpose to the program. The program has been highlysuccessful in meeting its desired outcomes, including: quantity and quality of enrolled students,ABET EAC

Conference Session

Micro-Technology and Nanotechnology

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hisham Hegab P.E., Louisiana Tech University; James D Palmer, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

engineering degrees. The Biomedical Engineering degreewas created in 1970 and was among the first few in the Nation. In 1999, the science andengineering colleges were combined to become the College of Engineering and Science. Thisreorganization and the administrative changes led to a new vision for the college to be the best atintegrating engineering and science in both education and research1,2. With this new vision,nanotechnology was determined to be a strategic area of focus. Funding was obtained to build aresearch center, the Institute for Micromanufacturing in 1999. Several faculty were hired withexpertise in nanotechnology, and graduate courses were added to the roster until a fullMicro/Nano concentration was established in the Ph.D

Conference Session

Curriculum Development and Multidisciplinary Instruction

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Darshita N. Shah, Teaching and Learning Laboratory at MIT; Jennifer E French, Teaching and Learning Laboratory at MIT; Janet Rankin, The Teaching & Learning Lab - MIT; Lori Breslow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

thermodynamics.The videos were created at the request of SUTD’s senior administration to help supplement theeducational resources of a young university. The design parameters were largely left to the MITTeaching and Learning Lab to define. In order to best support learning, the goals of the videoswere three-fold: 1) to reinforce pivotal concepts and multidisciplinary themes, 2) to provideopportunities for students to actively engage with content, and 3) to provide real-world examplesfrom everyday life, or from research, of the utility of these concepts. The videos were designedfor a variety of usage scenarios: in class, in recitation sections, for students to review whenstudying, and during faculty training workshops (to provide faculty with ideas for ways

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Learning, Evaluation, and Assessment

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lawrence E. Whitman, Wichita State University; Cindi Mason, Wichita State University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

Engineering Education. 94(1), 41 – 55.4. ABET Board of Directors (2011). 2012 – 2013 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Baltimore, MD.5. Butcher, D. R. (2006). Redefining engineering for the year 2020, ThomasNet.Com Industrial Market Trends.6. Turns, J., C. J. Atman, et al. (2005). "Research on Engineering Student Knowing: Trends and Opportunities." Journal of Engineering Education: 27-41.7. Dym, C., A. Agogino, et al. (2006). "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning." IEEE Engineering Management Review 34(1): 65-92.8. Whitman, L., Toro-Ramos, Chaparro, B., Hinckle, V. Z., Davidson, C. and C. Wilkinson. (2009). "A practical global design competition," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Learning, Evaluation, and Assessment

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Narayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

. Experience of changing theculture in courses and undergraduate research is touched upon, and some metrics are presented togauge the fact that the approach is effective.In conclusion, the list provided at the beginning of the paper is repeated:a. Graduates must know and be able to use what they are supposed to have learned. The idea that the bachelor’s degree is just intended to provide a flavor and trigger interest in engineering, with actual competence coming through lifelong learning, runs into serious trouble in an environment where global corporations can recruit smart, competent graduates from all over the world who can start making an impact immediately.b. There is a large opportunity for improvement in depth of learning. The