Paper ID #6565Bending Moments to Business Models: Integrating an Entrepreneurship CaseStudy as Part of Core Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Mark Schar, Stanford University MARK SCHAR works in the Center for Design Research - Designing Education Lab at Stanford Univer- sity. He is also a member of the Symbiotic Project of Affective Neuroscience Lab at Stanford University and a Lecturer in the School of Engineering. Dr. Schar’s area of research is ”pivot thinking” which is the intersection of design thinking and the neuroscience of choice where he has several research projects underway. He has a 30 year career in
Machine Design II ME 481 – Senior Capstone Design Design Project Documentation: Problem Definition, Progress report, Formal Design Reports Project Report (1 @ 35- 200 pages) Detailed description of design approach, results, and conclusions, with supporting documentation Teamwork 3-5 Students/Team Multiple industry interactions, small group
Paper ID #8072A Case Study on Advancing Learning in An Upper-Level Engineering CourseDr. Narayanan M. Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Dr. Narayanan Komerath is a professor of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology, and director of the Experimental Aerodynamics and Concepts Group and the Micro Renewable Energy Systems Laboratory. He has over 300 publications, over 120 of them peer-reviewed. He holds three U.S. patents, and has guided fifteen Ph.D.s, more than 50 M.S.s and more than 160 undergraduate research special problem projects. He is a former chair of the Aerospace Division
community oriented solutions that are the focus of the research we present below.Project-Based LearningProject-Based Learning (PBL) is an experiential mode of teaching that directly addresses thedevelopment of expertise through increased number of hours in-situ.25 There are several specificfeatures of PBL that have made it successful. Engineers are involved in capstone engineeringprojects where they experience the importance of issues relating to the sociality of a particularenvironment and learn the impact of contextual issues as they move through the project. PBLstudents are grouped with people from diverse backgrounds, allowing multiple perspectives on agiven subject through interactions among group members. Engineers learn to work
. Received several awards for the actuation in education including INTERTECH, ICECE and IGIP. Director of a project in Digital preservation of heritage and member of projects in Automation. Member of a program for enhancement of computer literacy at the University of Buenos AiresProf. Maria Feldgen, University of Buenos Aires Maria Feldgen is an associate professor and researcher in computer science at the University of Buenos Aires (School of Engineering). Her research interests include Engineering Education, Distributed Sys- tems, and Ubiquitous Computing. Her main research interests are around classroom assessment tech- niques for design capstone courses, heritage digital libraries and sensor networks. She was the
initiatives in southwest Virginia.Mr. Matthew Arnold Boynton PE, Virginia TechDr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia TechDr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Dr. Marie C. Paretti is an associate professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication and teamwork in engineering, design education, and engineering identity. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is co-PI. Her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, the effects of curriculum on design cognition, the effects of differing design pedagogies on
distinction of being called one of the top 3% of our futureleaders.As of September 2012 and having evaluated over 600 participants as to their interest andinvolvement in the program, we realized there was a significant difference in levels ofengagement. It had become relatively academic to identify the top 3% through a set ofcommon characteristics and extreme performance.Identifiable Credentials of the Top 3% of LTPs 1. Have exemplary work performance and assumption of unassigned leadership roles 2. Are fully engaged in an introspective and heartfelt approach to the LTP experience 3. Previously led much of their University Honors Programs Capstone Team project 4. Served as volunteer lead for Community Service / Mentor programs 5. Assumed
Paper ID #7130Muddiest Point Formative Feedback in Core Materials Classes with YouTube,Blackboard, Class Warm-ups and Word CloudsProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is a professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluating conceptual knowledge, miscon- ceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge
represent the content that is covered on the general part of thefundamentals of engineering exam and therefore, represent core content knowledge required ofmost engineering disciplines. We chose to structure the second level VCPs around course areasrather than cross-curricular pedagogical themes (e. g., project-based instruction, teaming andcooperative learning, teaching thorough design, service learning) because we believe that facultymembers would be more interested and committed to “their courses” and that communitieswould develop more naturally. We did not include the first-year course and the capstone coursebecause these typically utilize many of the research-based instructional approaches that we aretrying to get adopted in the other parts of
autonomous ground vehicle. II. INTRODUCTIONWith the development of readily available inertial measurement units (IMUs) board such as the ArduPilot® formobile applications, measurement of states such as position, heading, roll, pitch, and yaw is greatly simplified. As aresult, developing control students need only to focus on the design and implementation of the digital controlalgorithm that utilizes the sensor measurements to calculate the proper actuator commands. However from review offinal capstone reports and presentations over the years, students expressed continued difficulties when implementingeven simple PID based control algorithms on digital processor. This difficulty in C based
Paper ID #7101Teaching Architecture, Engineering and Construction Disciplines: Using Var-ious Pedagogical Styles to Unify the Learning ProcessJill Nelson P.E., California Polytechnic State University Jill Nelson is an Assistant Professor for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo, CA. Professor Nelson came to Cal Poly with over 25 years of structural design and project management experience. She is a registered Professional Engineer and Structural Engineer in the states of California and Washington. Jill Nelson received a B.S. degree in Civil
– 471 Machine Design II ME 481 – Senior Capstone Design Design Project Documentation: Problem Definition, Progress Formal Design Reports report, Project Report ( 1 @ 35- 200 pages) Detailed description of design approach, results, and conclusions, with supporting
components(including powertrain design.) Each student was required to complete the project, and fully justify all design decisions. Theproject served as a capstone experience, bridging many of the concepts of the course. One strongmessage that students drew from the experience was the reality of multiple designs – each withits own tradeoffs – that satisfied the challenge.Feedback and Assessment in the Machine Design Laboratory This section of the paper summarizes some of the feedback from students who conducted theexperiments in the Machine Design Laboratory. The “Design of Machine Elements” course hasbeen run only once with the new experiments. There are no results of a longitudinal assessmentstudy. In addition to direct questions to
the students they focus on and the types ofproblems they address. Many, if not most civil engineers are familiar with the Steel Bridge and Concrete Canoecompetitions. The first national level steel bridge competition was held in 1992 and continuesthrough today. It is sponsored by the American Institute of Steel Construction and the AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers and its mission is“to supplement the education of civil engineeringstudents with a comprehensive, student-driven project experience from conception and designthrough fabrication, erection, and testing, culminating in a steel structure that meets clientspecifications and optimizes performance and economy” (14). In this competition, the all bridgedimensions are set and the
training at the National Collegiate Inventors and In- novators Alliance (NCIIA). Babs is a serial entrepreneur and active in multiple entrepreneurial activities. She blogs about entrepreneurship on New Venturist. Babs taught entrepreneurship at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) for 15 years, where she maintains an adjunct position. Formerly, Babs was embedded entrepreneur for CMU’s Project Olympus and innovation advisor for CMU’s Institute for Social Innova- tion. For seven years at the University of Pittsburgh, Babs taught the Benchtop to Bedside new technology commercialization course. Babs is President of Carryer Consulting and co-founder of LaunchCyte, which has a portfolio of five companies. Babs has a Masters in
benefits accrue equally to students who have followed a full-time academic Page 23.576.11 program and those whose educational progress has been interrupted by jobs, family or transfers. The efficiency with which experimental competency can be applied later in unscripted applications such as capstone projects. The extent to which faculty and student-generated experiments can be openly distributed to act as a platform on which to build a customized practical learning experience. Can the appeal of Mobile Studio and Lab-in-a-box to students underrepresented in STEM education be scaled up? Does
knowledge in the areas regulatory affairs, and safety which are becomingmainstream capabilities for engineers. To meet the demands for a rapidly changing, technology-driven workforce, the industry and educational advisory bodies have recommended thatacademic instruction should include industry practice training2. Many programs and universitieshave accomplished industry practice training through co-operative education, industry fellowsprograms, guest lectures, capstone projects, courses co-taught with the industry, and field trips3,4. This poster describes an effort to translate some industry practices into classroomeducation. Experiential laboratory, design projects, classroom lectures or seminars can be used toinclude industry practice
Innovations in Software Engineering Education: An Experimental Study of Integrating Active Learning and Design-based LearningABSTRACTSignificant advancements have been made in engineering education in recent years. An importantoutcome of these advancements is the integration and extension of fundamental pedagogies as part ofengineering curricula, as well as the need for continued research into the effectiveness of thesepedagogies on students’ learning within engineering knowledge domains. In this paper, we focus on anengineering educational research study in the domain of software engineering. This study considers theimportant research question of the efficacy of traditional lecture-homework-project teaching approachescompared to peer-to
main components: a) thestudent’s computing-related major program; b) the entrepreneurship minor; and c) the culminatingentrepreneurship practicum. The requirements of the student’s major program, of course, varydepending on the particular major. For example, the CSE major consists of required and electivecourses in a range of topics from software design principles and practices to algorithms, fromcomputer systems and architectures to computer networking, from AI to computer graphics andvideo game design; and a culminating capstone project course which may, for example, consist ofdesigning and implementing a set of web services to meet the requirements of a real client.The entrepreneurship minor, offered in the business school, specialized for
entitled Improving Learning for Undergraduate Engineering Programs using Finite Element Learning Modules. This is a joint collaboration award with the University of Texas, in Austin. He has authored approxi- mately 50 papers with over 20 using finite element learning modules in undergraduate engineering. He was the PI for the initial four year, NSF CCI grant entitled The Finite Element Method Exercises for Use in Undergraduate Engineering Programs.Dr. Richard H. Crawford, University of Texas, Austin Dr. Richard H. Crawford is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin and is the Temple Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow No. 3. He is also Director of the Design Projects program in
period studentswere asked to decide between traditional (2 special purpose and capstone classes), hybrid (28technical classes and labs), and online classes (30 technical classes and labs) each denoted by adifferent section number. Many of these classes among the three modalities were being taughtby the same instructor, so it soon became apparent after a constant feeling of redundancy someof these classes can be converged. In 2011 we began combining the hybrid and online classes atthe same time and thus the converged classroom was born. Students now review the Schedule ofClasses from the school website and discover, for instance, course IET3424-850 offered nextsemester on Tuesdays at 1:00 pm with a section designation of -850 meaning this is a
school visits, theAmbassadors present in pairs on topics chosen by the hosting teachers. Typically two to fourpairs of Ambassadors present on a given day for the entire school day. This allows theAmbassadors to give classroom presentations to most students at the targeted grade level.Oftentimes Ambassadors are invited to present on “What is Engineering” and “My CollegeExperience” in an auditorium setting to allow a second touch point for all students in the school.Additionally, the group selects two to four schools each semester to partner with on long-termprojects, which are modeled after UConn’s Capstone Senior Design projects. Typically, theEngineering Ambassadors present a project kick off, maintain communications with teams atlocal schools
engineering (Software Engineering concentration), and has been accreditedsince 2002. At RMU the emphasis is on small class sizes (10:1 student to faculty ratio) andhands-on experiences through class assignments, course projects, internships (150 hoursmandatory), and an interdisciplinary capstone project (3 credits). Graduates at RMU receive twotypes of transcripts: academic and engagement. The academic transcript depicts student degreeprogress and grades obtained. The engagement transcript records, by description and hours,student activities outside of the classroom. The institution believes that students must be able tobalance academic and extra-circular activities. Software engineering students are members of theAssociation of Computing Machinery
analysis, and was an original member of the IBM Research speech recognition group that started in 1972. He was manager of the Speech Terminal project from 1976 until 1980. At IBM Dr. Silverman received several outstanding innovation awards and patent awards. In 1980, Dr. Silverman was appointed professor of Engineering at Brown University, and charged with the devel- opment of a program in computer engineering. His research interests currently include microphone-array research, array signal processing, speech processing and embedded systems. He has been the director of the Laboratory for Engineering Man/Machine Systems in the School of Engineering at Brown since its founding in 1981. From July 1991 to June 1998 he was
the main focus of this polytechnic institute?The institute that is home to Idol focuses primarily on preparing students for successful careers,and most often hires instructors who bring prior industry experience to their teaching positionsalong with their academic credentials. Industry involvement with instructors, course materials,and collaboration with student projects is common and encouraged, so students get firsthandexperience with workplace standards and practices.For students, assignments and extracurricular activities that have clear links to their futureworking life make their courses more meaningful to them and more practical for the workplace.For instructors, this system demands time in keeping up to date on current industry
theirsources of intellectual contributions to their design.It was theorized by the authors that presenting an exemplar prior to setting the students onto adesign project could alter, if not hinder, the number and type of creative solutions generated bythe students. Of particular interest is whether the presence of a prototype exemplar contaminatesthe design process for novice designers. That is, does the prototype exemplar cause novicedesigners to fixate on particular design features thereby limiting creativity or does it help them toimprove the performance of their designs?The concept of designers fixating on particular design features is not new to the study ofengineering design. Jansson and Smith1 were among the first who “clearly and
components in the engineering professionand includes a multi-disciplinary capstone design experience for which teams are eligible forstudent venture grants administered by the institution. Several multi-year grants havestrengthened the program through workshops, keynote speakers, faculty curriculum awards,student venture grants, and faculty incentives to work with industry sponsored student teams.Specifically, the College of Engineering received an invitation to participate as part of a larger Page 23.266.2initiative to develop the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN). The invitation alsoprovided funding to develop and integrate
the purpose of major advising is to assist the student intheir journey from high school graduate to competent entry-level technical professional. Theexemplar advisor engages in dialogue with the student, providing a perspective of the academicprogram as a process of socialization into the profession, rather than a series of disconnectedcourse requirements.In other words, the advisor’s job is to help the students understand what it means to be anengineer. Rather than relegating the professional issues to the capstone project or the internship,it is the goal of the advisor to facilitate the student’s learning about what is the role of anengineer in society, why is the entire curriculum necessary to produce the kind of engineer theinstitution is
, following the completion of each assignmentwill be able to read the summaries of the discussions created by the students in the various groupsand look for common misconceptions which can help tailor the future direction of the course or,possibly, the way the course is taught in future offerings.4. Prototype SystemWe are currently in the process of implementing a prototype version of the PICOLA system. Thisis the design/implementation project in the capstone design course in our Computer Science andEngineering (CSE) program. Thus the students who will work on the prototype are CSE majorswho are in the final semester of their programs. Most of these students have extensive experience inimplementing large scale software systems as part of their
drop resulted from the usual high attrition rate typical in Associate degree programs. 25Rising prices initially didn't affect upper division ET title availability at 4-year colleges either(weren’t many anyway), but the publishing philosophy resulting in fewer small market titles suredid! Annual enrollments were 3,000 to 6,000 in N. America at most for almost all upper divisionET courses – including proprietary school (DeVry) & Canadian technical college students. 26 Sowhen publishers stopped approving proposals projecting first year sales of fewer than 4-5,000copies – even though (i) technology title sales continued to hold up well in Years 2-5 (unlikemost disciplines), & (ii) short black & white titles were cheap to produce &