Paper ID #10610The Continuing Shock of the New: Some Thoughts on why Law, Regulation,and Codes are Not Enough to Guide Emerging TechnologiesDr. James Craig Hanks, Texas State University, San Marcos Dr. Hanks is Professor of Philosophy, an Affiliate Professor of Materials Science, Engineering, and Com- mercialization, and a member of the Steering Committee for the Interdisciplinary Program in Sustainabil- ity Studies at Texas State University. His book ”Technology and Values” (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010) is in revision for a second edition, and his new book ”Technological Musings” is forthcoming, with ”Tech- nology and
Psychology Department at the Illinois Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology in 2006 from North Carolina State University. His primary areas of research are in performance management and training and develop- ment, including multilevel influences on learning and performance in team/group settings. Dr. Ellington is currently a co-principal investigator on an NSF/TUES grant examining individual ethical reasoning and team ethical climate in interdisciplinary undergraduate design teams. Page 24.537.1 c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #8413Predatory Online Technical Journals: A Question of EthicsDr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud has been an active member of ASEE since 1986. She has served as Pacific Northwest section chair, newsletter editor, Zone IV chair, and is currently the immediate past chair of the Engineering Ethics Division. She was her campus’s ASEE representative for 17 years and organized a conference there for 10 years. She is a regular annual conference presenter, moderator, and reviewer and serves as communications editor for the Journal of Engineering Technology, as well as a manuscript
Paper ID #10060The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision-making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Quali-tative MethodsQin Zhu, Purdue University Qin Zhu is a PhD student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His main re- search interests include global/comparative/international engineering education, engineering education policy, and engineering ethics. He received his BS degree in material sciences and engineering and first PhD degree in philosophy of science and technology (engineering ethics) both from Dalian University of Technology
University of Idaho, the Land-Grant College for the State of Idaho, and worked as an engineer in design offices and at construction sites.Dr. Ashley Ater Kranov, Washington State UniversityDr. Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow Dr. Beyerlein is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho where he serves as the coordinator for an inter-disciplinary capstone design sequence that draws students from across the College of Engineering. Over the last ten years, he has been part of several NSF grants that have developed assessment instruments focused on professional skills and piloted these with capstone design students.Prof. Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jay McCormack
., Engineering Ethics, 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.2. Lathem, S., M. Neumann, and N. Hayden. 2011. The Socially Responsible Engineer: Assessing Student Attitudesof Roles and Responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3):p. 444-474.3. Redish, E., Smith, K., Looking Beyond Content; Skill Development for Engineers. Journal of EngineeringEducation. 97(3):p. 295-307.4. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. 1997.ABET Code of Ethics ofEngineers.http://wadsworth.cengage.com/philosophy_d/templates/student_resources/0534605796_harris/cases/Codes/abet.htm (accessed January 3, 2014).5. Gilbane Gold. 1989. 24 min. Lubbock, TX: National Institute for Engineering Ethics, Texas Tech University.(DVD)6. Sweeney, R. 2013
Paper ID #8857Developing Engineering Ethics through Expert Witness Role PlaysDr. Bradley J. Brummel, The University of Tulsa Bradley Brummel is an Assistant Professor of Psychology at The University of Tulsa. His research inter- ests include using role plays and other simulations to teach responsible conduct of research. He conducts interdisciplinary research with Mechanical Engineering, Neuroscience, and Computer Science. His work has appeared in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, Personnel Psychology, Human Rela- tions, and Journal of ManagementDr. Jeremy S. Daily P.E., The University of Tulsa
deep learning activities on moralgrowth28. The scores were measured before they started college and after they had completed ayear of study. Their findings were that students who had taken more Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) or health sciences courses posted lower end of yearethical growth. This might be caused by a lack of emphasis on ethical considerations in STEMand health sciences courses. The study concluded that students’ ethical growth was highest whenthey participated in activities that expose them to multiple viewpoints and different perspectivesof ethical issues.Trice measured engineering students’ pre- and post-ethics course ethical levels and found thatethics education, especially one that is geared for
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Ethical Concerns of Unmanned and Autonomous Systems in Engineering ProgramsAbstract:Unmanned systems are entering educational curricula (both K–12 and post-secondary) becausethey capture student interest, provide multidisciplinary engineering opportunities, anddemonstrate many tangible science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)concepts. In collegiate engineering programs, unmanned systems are used both within thecurriculum (e.g. capstone design projects) and as part of co-curricular/extra-curricular activities(e.g. the Associate for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI)’s student designcompetitions). Graduate programs dedicated
hydrometeorology. Dr. Nykanen has 13 years of academic experience and is a registered P.E. in Minnesota.Dr. Marilyn C Hart, Minnesota State University- Mankato Dr. Hart received her doctorate in Cellular and Molecular biology from St. Louis University School of Medicine. She was a postdoctoral fellow at Washington University School of Medicine before join- ing the faculty at Minnesota State Univesity- Mankato in 2001. Dr. Hart is currently a Professor of Biology, the Director of the Undergraduate Research Center, and co-director for the National Science Foundation-funded Interdisciplinary Mentored Academic Experience for Science, Technology, Engineer- ing and Mathematics (STEM) Success.Prof. Winston Sealy, Minnesota State
Paper ID #10155Ethnography in Engineering Ethics Education: A Pedagogy for Transforma-tional ListeningDr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech Yanna Lambrinidou is a medical ethnographer and adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Sci- ence and Technology Studies (STS) at Virginia Tech. For the past 7 years, she has conducted research on the historic 2001-2004 Washington, DC lead-in-drinking-water contamination. This work exposed wrongdoing and unethical behavior on the part of local and federal government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engineering
of the Technology and Society (T & S) Division and as the ASME district B leader. He also serves as the treasurer and secretary for the ASEE Engineering Ethics Dvision.Ms. Nadia Sunny, Grand Valley State University Nadia Sunny is pursuing a Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering at Grand Valley State University, Michigan. She received her Bachelor’s in Chemical Engineering from Bangladesh University of En- gineering and Technology in 2004 and Master’s in Business Administration from Institute of Business Administration, Dhaka University in 2008. She has a diverse work experience in mechanical fabrication company, urea process plant, telecommunication equipment vendor and bank. She received excellence awards
and appreciation of one’s self in the world and of world issues), and • Global civic engagement (active engagement with local, regional, national and global community issues).2Instruction in engineering ethics contains elements of all three dimensions in globalcitizenship. Ladd3 subdivided engineering ethics into microethics and macroethics.Microethics considers individuals and internal relations of the engineering profession.Macroethics pays more attention to larger societal problems and values the collective socialresponsibility of the profession in making decisions about technology relevant to the good ofsociety.4 Most of the current teaching in engineering ethics has focused on microethics.5 Asa result, this educational focus
Paper ID #8396Textual Appropriation and Attribution in Engineering Theses and Disserta-tions: An Exploratory StudyMr. Edward J. Eckel, Western Michigan University Edward Eckel received a B.S. degree in biology from Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and a Master’s in Library and Information Science from Drexel University, Philadelphia. Currently he is an engineering and applied sciences librarian at Western Michigan University Libraries. His work has appeared in Science and Engineering Ethics, College & Undergraduate Libraries, Issues in Science and Technology Librar- ianship, Internet Reference Services Quarterly, and
conducting studies were with Attilio Poto; Dr. Matthew Mailman; Dr. Scott Nelson. ”Taking weekly lessons at Symphony Hall in Boston, where the greatest of musicians throughout time have stood, was awe-inspiring and magical.”Dr. Margaret Loraine Lowder, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Mir M. Atiqullah, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Rajnish Singh, Southern Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Craig A Chin, Southern Polytechnic State University Craig A. Chin received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Florida International University in 2006. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the electrical and computer engineering technology at Southern Polytechnic State University. His research
need to help people because I’m very passionate about a couple social issues, and really passionate about improving the world as a whole whether through civil rights or hunger or any of the social issues we talked about. My main instrument through which I think I will probably be doing that is through war, at least of some kind. I mean that’s going to be my job.SR Type 2 – These students wanted to better society at large with engineering. They wanted tobe involved with technological improvements that would alleviate certain social andenvironmental problems they believed to be important. These students saw a direct path throughengineering to affect these types of changes. Miranda: “Like even our professors are talking about, how they