Paper ID #10501Engaging Computer Engineering Freshmen through a Voluntary Competi-tive Team Project with MentoringRoy W Melton, Department of Computer Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology Roy Melton is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Computer Engineering of the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, N.Y., where the graduating com- puter engineering classes of 2010 through 2013 voted him the ”most effective teacher” in the department and where he was a finalist for the 2012-2013 RIT Outstanding Teaching Award for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty. He received his
), an early-entrance-to-college program. He intends on pursuing a Ph.D in engineering.Dr. Sharon Liz Karackattu Sharon L. Karackattu earned a B.S. in Interdisciplinary Studies: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Florida in 2000 and completed a Ph.D. in Biology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006. She served as a postdoctoral associate in MIT’s Biological Engineering Division before spending two years as a Research Coordinator for Student Development at University of North Texas. She is currently a freelance educational researcher and consultant. She has taught college-level courses in the biosciences and maintains an interest in studying students pursuing the STEM fields.Dr
Paper ID #9246The Accidental EngineerDr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants Catherine E. Brawner is President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an
Paper ID #8743Review of a First-Year Engineering Design CourseDr. Lydia Prendergast, Rutgers, School of Engineering Assistant Dean for Academic Affairs and Engineering EducationProf. Eugenia Etkina, Rutgers University I am a professor of science education at the Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University. Page 24.1054.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Review of a First-Year Engineering Design CourseAbstractResearch shows that the first year
Paper ID #10223Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Stu-dentsMr. Noah Salzman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Noah Salzman is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. in engineering from Swarthmore College, his M.Ed. in secondary science education from University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and his M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. He has work experience as an engineer and taught science, technology, engineering, and mathematics at the high school level. His research focuses on the intersection of pre-college and
. Steadman is a past national president of Mortar Board.Dr. Gail D. Jefferson, University of South Alabama Dr. Gail D. Jefferson, University of South Alabama Dr. Jefferson earned a B.S. in Mathematics from Spel- man College in 1997, a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1997, an M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Ohio State University in 2003 and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from Florida A&M University in 2005. She served as a postdoctoral fellow at the National Institute of Aerospace, developing models and test methods to examine the behavior of advanced non-metallic, nanostructured material systems. Dr. Jefferson is currently an assistant professor at the University of
Paper ID #9805Collaborative cloud-based documents for real-time bi-directional feedback inlarge lecture activitiesProf. Brian M Frank P.Eng., Queen’s University Brian Frank is an associate professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering, where he has taught courses in electronics and wireless systems. He is the DuPont Canada Chair in Engineering Education Research and Development, and the Director of Program Development in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science where he works on engineering curriculum development, program assessment, and developing educational technology.Mr. Behnam Behinaein Hamgini, Department of
the use of expensive technology.17 In addition to its accessibility,this method of instruction assists the students in developing their communication skills, as wellas conducting a self–evaluation of their comprehension as they progress through the coursematerial. Page 24.57.4Course DescriptionThe hybrid flipped course described here is Freshman Engineering Clinic I, an introduction toengineering course taken by all freshman engineering students at Rowan University. There weretwelve sections of 20 – 25 students each in Fall 2013. Sections were interdisciplinary, withchemical, civil & environmental, electrical and computer, and
this qualitative assessment of a pilot program spanning 3 semesters, two (2) College ofEngineering faculty at Northeastern University explored and managed several experientialservice-learning projects in their first-year engineering courses between Fall 2012 – Fall 2013.As a result of 84 first-year engineering students working with 7 different community partners,215 middle school and high school students were exposed to engineering curriculum throughmeaningful service-learning projects involving STEM (science, technology, engineering &mathematics) education that they otherwise would not have received. The service-learningprojects were qualitatively very successful in delivering STEM curriculum to young students, asdetermined from faculty
Paper ID #8877Learning Outcomes of Introductory Engineering Courses: Student Percep-tionsProf. Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University Dr. Kaul is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western Carolina University. His re- search interests include Fracture Diagnostics, Structural Dynamics and Control, and Motorcycle Dynam- ics.Dr. Robert D. Adams, Western Carolina University Dr. Adams is the Interim Department Head of the Department of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University. He has 9 years of industrial experience as an electrical engineer working in the area of analysis and testing of
American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Enhancing the Educational Experience in Introductory Engineering CoursesIntroductionThis paper outlines the restructure of the content and delivery of an introductory engineeringseminar course for first-year undergraduate students using core service learning projectexperiences to shape early student learning of engineering design and practice. The First-YearSeminar in Engineering (FYSE) is a critical entry-level course for undergraduate engineeringmajors in accredited degree programs (accreditation by the Accreditation Board of Engineeringand Technology (ABET)) at institutions of higher education. The course is designed to orientnew students to the University and introduce engineering as a
Paper ID #9596Consistency in Assessment of Pre-Engineering SkillsDr. Shelley Lorimer P.Eng., Grant MacEwan University Dr. Shelley Lorimer, P.Eng. is Chair of the Bachelor of Science in Engineering Transfer Program (BSEN) at Grant MacEwan University in Edmonton, Alberta. She teaches undergraduate courses in statics and dynamics, as well as courses in engineering professionalism. She is currently participating in a research project with Alberta Innovates – Technology Futures in the oil sands and hydrocarbon recovery group doing reservoir simulation of enhanced oil recovery processes. She has a Ph.D. in numerical modeling
range of new technologies and systems.Dr. Mar´ıa Helguera, Rochester Institute of Technology Mar´ıa Helguera was born in Mexico city where she got a BS in Physics from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). She also holds an MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Rochester and a PhD in Imaging Science from the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) . Dr. Helguera is the principal investigator in the Biomedical and Materials Multimodal Imaging Laboratory in the Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science (CIS), RIT. Dr. Helguera is also very interested in implementing novel pedagogies in science and technology and has been involved with the freshman imaging project since its inception
Paper ID #9724Examining the Engineering Design Process of First-Year Engineering Stu-dents During a Hands-on, In-class Design Challenge.Ms. Jessica E S Swenson, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Jessica Swenson is a graduate student at Tufts University. She is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering with a research focus on engineering education. She received a M.S. from Tufts University in science, technology, engineering and math education and a B.S. from Northwestern University in mechan- ical engineering. Her current research involves examining the design process of undergraduate students
Microelectronics, conducting research and development in the realization of advanced semiconductor technologies. From 1992 to 2008 he was with Louisiana Tech University, where he was the Entergy/LP&L/NOPSI Professor of Electrical Engineering, in recognition of his teaching and research contributions in the microsystems and nanotechnology areas. From September 2000 to June 2008 he was the Director of the Institute for Micromanufacturing, where, from 1992, he had contributed to the growth and development of the Institute, including through planning and setting up of laboratory resources and facilities, development and implementation of major sponsored research efforts, and realization of academic courses and curricula, on the
Paper ID #8789Multidimensional Assessment of Creativity in an Introduction to EngineeringDesign CourseMrs. Silvia Husted, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Silvia Husted is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches design related courses. Her research interests include creative thinking, cognitive processes, and creating effective learning environments.Dr. JUDITH VIRGINIA GUTIERREZ PhD. in Science, Engineering, and Technology Education.Dr. Nelly Ramirez-Corona, Universidad de las Americas PueblaProf. Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las
curriculum which previouslyincluded no common engineering courses taken by all of the engineering students.During the 2012-2013 academic year, three first-year engineering courses designed to providestudents with a hands-on experience with engineering and with a link between engineering andthe required mathematics and science courses were introduced. The three courses consist of anintroduction to engineering course called Engineering Foundations and a two-course sequencecalled Engineering Models I and II, which introduces students to MATLAB® as a computing toolfor solving engineering problems. All three courses are required for all engineering andengineering technology majors, are 2 credit hours, and meet once a week for lecture (55 minutes)and once
universities have been introducing cornerstone design courses, using hands-on projects,looking for real-world challenges and problems to meet the many objectives named above.These reflections were deliberately gathered at the end of the first year, as students are decidingon majors, and have the projects most fresh in their minds as influencing their decision. Indeveloping their version of a cornerstone course at McMaster University, it was noted, “Theobjective of the Cornerstone is to instill in first-year engineers enjoyment from learning,motivation to continue learning, and genuine intellectual curiosity about the engineering in theworld around them.” 1 And, from the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, “The purpose ofcornerstone projects is to
and performance.1 The study results showed asignificant inverse correlation between faculty distance (approachability and accessibility) andother constructs measured such as self-efficacy, academic confidence, and critical thinking.The living situation (on-campus, commuter, etc.) has a significant impact on students’persistence.4 Many studies support the positive benefits of participation in a living-learningcommunity. Soldner et al.5 state that participation in a science, technology, engineering, or math(STEM) living-learning community “have the capacity to enhance the quality of students’ peerand faculty interactions and deepen their sense of social support” (p. 330). However, somestudies found only small positive relationships between
Paper ID #8699Capstone Project in a Freshman Solid Modeling CourseDr. John A. Mirth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology John Mirth has 23 years of experience teaching in a primarily undergraduate environment. This experience includes time at the University of Denver, the University of Wisconsin-Platteville, and his current position at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He has a BSME degree from Ohio University, and MSME and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Minnesota.Dr. John P Iselin, University of Wisconsin, Platteville John P Iselin is a professor of mechanical engineering at The University of Wisconsin
Paper ID #8710Use of the National Academy of Engineering’s Grand Challenges for Engi-neering as a semester-long project for an Introduction to Engineering courseDr. Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University Lindsay Corneal is an Assistant Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Windsor, a M.B.A. from Lawrence Technological University, and a Ph.D. from Michigan State University in Materials Science and Engineering
of future engineers by passing on all that he has learned from MSU and Corporate America.Mrs. Tonisha Brandy Lane, Michigan State University Tonisha B. Lane, M.A., is a PhD candidate in the Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education (HALE) program, and graduate research assistant for the Neighborhoods at Michigan State University. Her research focuses on underrepresented students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. She has over eight years of student affairs and higher education experience.Mr. Rickey Alfred Caldwell JrLisa R Henry, Michigan State University Page 24.737.2
Paper ID #9742Distinctive Academic Programs as a School Choice Factor: An ExploratoryStudyMr. Lee Kemp Rynearson, Purdue University Lee Rynearson is currently pursuing a PhD in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received a BS and MEng in Mechanical Engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology. He has previous experience as an instructor of engineering at the Kanazawa Institute of Technology, in Kanazawa, Japan. His current research interests focus on first-year engineering experiences
Paper ID #9381Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineer-ing CourseDr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State Univer- sity. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between
these courses,Engineering Models I and II, form a two-semester sequence of interdisciplinary courses in whichstudents apply fundamental theory from algebra, trigonometry, calculus and physics to relevantengineering applications chosen from a variety of disciplines. MATLAB® is introduced andprogressively developed as a programming tool to enable students to explore engineeringconcepts, to investigate solutions to problems too complex for hand solutions, to analyze andpresent data effectively, and to develop an appreciation of the power and limitations of computertools.The Engineering Models sequence was required for all incoming first-year engineering andengineering technology students in 2012-2013. There were multiples sections of these
Paper ID #8864Informal Peer-Peer Collaboration, Performance, and Retention for First SemesterEngineering StudentsNora Honken, University of Louisville Nora Honken holds degrees in industrial engineering from Virginia Tech and Arizona State University. She will receive a PHD in Education Leadership, Foundations and Human Development from the Uni- versity of Louisville in May 2014. She has held positions in engineering and management for Axxess Technologies, Varian, Amoco and Corning, and has taught in industry, at community college and at the graduate and undergraduate levels. Her research interests include
Black, T. C., “Using e-portfolios to support an undergraduate learning career: An experiment with academic advising,” Educause Quarterly, 2010, 33(4).12. Al-Atabi M., Mahdi, M. A. S., Younis, O., and Chung, E., “An integrated portfolio and advising system for undergraduate engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2011, 6(5), pp. 532- 541.13. Aguiar, E., Chawla, N.V., Brockman, J., Ambrose, G.A., Goodrich, V.E., “Engagement vs Performance: using electronic portfolios to predict first semester engineering student retention,” Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 2014, pp. 103-112
?Many leading sources seem to indicate that social responsibility is in fact an important goal for Page 24.1089.2both engineering and college graduates. Social responsibility was included among “essentiallearning outcomes” in College Learning for the New Global Century.5 The American Society ofCivil Engineers (ASCE) “sees civil engineers as being entrusted by society as leaders in creatinga sustainable world and enhancing the global quality of life. …the profession’s primary concern[is] protecting public safety, health, and welfare.”6 In the American Society of MechanicalEngineers (ASME) Vision for 2028 the guiding theme was “technology
Physics I courses.2 While calculus and physics are tools to be utilized by engineers to solveproblems, our students are often unable to see that the knowledge presented in the mathematicaland physics context can be transferred to solving engineering problems. Students also tend toview programming as an isolated component of engineering. They should understand instead thatprogramming is yet another tool to verify results and to solve more complex problems, reducingrisks of algebraic errors.3Design/MethodThree faculty members linked their classes to create a STEM (science, technology, engineering,and mathematics) small-learning-community (SLC). The same set of students is registered forthe three linked courses: Calculus I, Physics I, and
understandingAbstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires that Universitiesteach engineering students to function productively as part of a multidisciplinary team. However,reliable strategies for teaching teamwork are notably absent from the engineering educationliterature. Existing approaches emphasize cognitive complementarity ensuring representation ofappropriate knowledge experts and overcoming affective obstacles such as personality conflictsand problems in interpersonal communication. Comparatively less research has examinedconative approaches, in which students explore the relation between knowledge of instinctivebehavioral strengths and team productivity. This study reports the experiences of an instructionalteam at